@KeirGiles @citizenlab 6/ Takeaway for us: some sophisticated threat actors are feeling pressure & innovating.
Trying to move away from smash & grab phishing for passwords (& maybe your 2nd factor code)... and going for something more subtle, slower perhaps less detectable.
8/ There were so many clever bits to this attack, it's easy to imagine a lot of people falling for it.
Everything was clean. The doc looked real. The language was right. Email addresses at the State Dept. seemed to be CC'd.. I could go on.
They even had Keir enter "ms.state. gov" into the ASP name...
(this doesn't do anything but further the deception that he's adding an external app to his Gmail, that name field accepts any text you want to put in there)
NEW: fresh trouble for mercenary spyware companies like NSO Group.
@Apple launching substantial bounties on the zero-click exploits that feed the supply chain behind products like Pegasus & Paragon's Graphite.
With bonuses, exploit developers can hit $5 million payouts. 1/
2/ Apple is introducing Target Flags which speeds the process of getting exploits found & submitters rewarded.
This faster tempo is also a strike against the mercenary spyware ecosystem.
And the expanded categories also hit more widely against commercial surveillance vendors.
3/ If I contemplating investing in spyware companies I'd want to carefully evaluate whether their exploit pipeline can match what @apple just threw down.
NEW: @WhatsApp caught & fixed a sophisticated zero click attack...
Now they've published an advisory about it.
Say attackers combined the exploit with an @Apple vulnerability to hack a specific group of targets (i.e. this wasn't pointed at everybody)
Quick thoughts 1/
Wait, you say, haven't I heard of @WhatsApp zero-click exploits before?
You have.
A big user base makes a platform big target for exploit development.
Think about it from the attacker's perspective: an exploit against a popular messenger gives you potential access to a lot of devices.
You probably want maximum mileage from that painstakingly developed, weaponized, and tested exploit code you created/ purchased (or got bundled into your Pegasus subscription).
3/ The regular tempo of large platforms catching sophisticated exploits is a good sign.
They're paying attention & devoting resources to this growing category of highly targeted, sophisticated attacks.
But it's also a reminder of the magnitude of the threat out there...
WHOA: megapublisher @axelspringer is asking a German court to ban an ad-blocker.
Their claim that should make everyone nervous:
The HTML/ CSS code of websites are protected computer programs.
And influencing they are displayed (e.g by removing ads) violates copyright.
1/
2/ Preventing ad-blocking would be a huge blow to German cybersecurity and privacy.
There are critical security & privacy reasons to influence how a websites code gets displayed.
Like stripping out dangerous code & malvertising.
Or blocking unwanted trackers.
This is why most governments do it on their systems.
3/Defining HTML/CSS as a protected computer program will quickly lead to absurdities touching every corner of the internet.
Just think of the potential infringements:
-Screen readers for the blind
-'Dark mode' bowser extensions
-Displaying snippets of code in a university class
-Inspecting & modifying code in your own browser
-Website translators