Students For Liberty Profile picture
Jun 20 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Everything bad you've heard about nuclear energy is a myth.

Nuclear is safer than wind. Cleaner than solar. More reliable than both.

Yet environmentalists hate it more than coal🧵.Image
If you believe we're facing climate doom, nuclear energy is literally our best shot to avoid it.

But decades of fear-mongering have turned the safest energy source into the most hated.

Time to bust some myths:
Myth #1: Nuclear Waste

"Nuclear waste will poison us for thousands of years!"

Reality: The waste from a reactor supplying YOUR electricity for an entire year? About the size of a brick. [1]

Only 5 grams of that is high-level waste—the weight of a sheet of paper. [1]Image
All civilian nuclear waste produced in the U.S. since 1950 would fit on a football field at 30 feet deep. [2]

Coal waste to power the same amount? That football field gets filled 2.5 times EVERY DAY. [2]

But somehow nuclear is the "dirty" energy?Image
Oh, and 97% of nuclear "waste" could be reused as fuel in certain reactors.

France, Japan, Germany, Belgium, and Russia already do this with plutonium recycling.

We're literally throwing away perfectly good fuel because of fear.
Myth #2: Nuclear Plants Are Fragile

Even at Fukushima—hit by a massive tsunami that killed 20,000 people—zero deaths from radiation. [3]

The plant was 40 years old and STILL contained the damage.Image
Modern nuclear plants in France are built to withstand earthquakes twice as strong as the 1000-year event calculated for each site. [5]

Also, a commercial reactor literally cannot explode like a nuclear bomb. Fuel enrichment is only 5%, bombs need much higher levels.
Myth #3: Nuclear Kills People

In 70 years, across 667 nuclear plants worldwide, only 3 major accidents occurred.

Combined death toll: 32 people. [6]

Nuclear's death rate: 90 per 1000TWh—THE LOWEST of any energy sector. [6]Image
Meanwhile: → Hydropower dams fail and kill thousands → Coal causes respiratory diseases → Wind turbines kill more people per TWh than nuclear

But nuclear gets the scary reputation. The propaganda worked.
Want to stop falling for energy propaganda and learn to think independently about policy?

Learn how to spot weak arguments and question popular narratives that don’t match the data.

Get the free "How Not to Be an NPC" course:
👉go.studentsforliberty.org/npc-sowell/Image
Check our sources:

[1] World Nuclear Association. "What Is Nuclear Waste and What Do We Do with It?" World Nuclear Association, world-nuclear.org/nuclear-essent…….

[2] Carbon Credits. "Nuclear Education: The World’s Shrinking Waste Line." Carbon Credits, carboncredits.com/nuclear-educat…….

[3] World Nuclear Association. "Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors." World Nuclear Association, world-nuclear.org/information-li…….

[4] International Atomic Energy Agency. "The Resilience and Safety of Nuclear Power in the Face of Extreme Events." IAEA Bulletin, iaea.org/bulletin/the-r…….

[5] World Nuclear Association. "Nuclear Power Plants and Earthquakes." World Nuclear Association, world-nuclear.org/information-li…….

[6] "What’s the Death Toll of Nuclear vs Other Energy Sources?" engineering.com/whats-the-deat…….

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Students For Liberty

Students For Liberty Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfliberty

Dec 12
In 1968, historian Robert Conquest published research showing Stalin killed millions.

Western intellectuals called him a propagandist. A Cold War hack. A CIA plant.

Then the USSR collapsed. The archives opened.

And every number he predicted was proven correct; or too conservative. 🧵Image
The 1960s had a serious Soviet problem.

While Conquest documented mass murder in Ukraine and the Gulag, Harvard professors praised Stalin's industrialization. British intellectuals visited Moscow and declared the future had arrived.

Anyone questioning this got dismissed as a reactionary.Image
One British historian refused to look away.

Robert Conquest spent the 1960s piecing together evidence from refugee testimonies, leaked documents, and demographic data that didn't add up.

His 1968 book "The Great Terror" documented Stalin's purges with precision. Image
Read 14 tweets
Dec 11
China tried capitalism as an experiment in four cities.

It worked so well they're still pretending to be communist.

But this "accident" keeps happening everywhere. And almost nobody talks about why. 🧵 Image
You've been told capitalism needs heavy regulation to work. That developing countries need government intervention to industrialize.

But across the world, governments created small zones with one key feature: dramatically fewer regulations, lower taxes, and actual property rights.Image
These "Special Economic Zones" did what wasn't supposed to be possible.

They attracted massive investment. Created millions of jobs. Turbocharged economic growth.

Not through aid. Not through subsidies. Through capitalism.

And the pattern repeats on every continent. Image
Read 10 tweets
Nov 28
Three ideas everyone told you would help you are actually destroying your generation.

A social psychologist at NYU spent years studying why Gen Z has record anxiety and depression.

What he found will make you question everything about how you were raised. 🧵 Image
Jonathan Haidt analyzed campus culture, mental health data, and generational shifts.

His conclusion? Three "great untruths" are being taught to young Americans as wisdom.

But they're the opposite of wisdom. They're psychological poison. Image
Untruth #1: "What doesn't kill you makes you weaker"

You were taught to avoid discomfort at all costs. Trigger warnings. Safe spaces. Microaggression reporting.

The promise: protection from harm.

The reality: you never built resilience. And now ordinary challenges feel unbearable.Image
Read 11 tweets
Nov 24
Javier Milei calls himself a "Borgesian Liberal."

The man who inspired Argentina's new president? Jorge Luis Borges, the greatest writer in Spanish since Cervantes.

And the Nobel committee blacklisted him for 20+ years because he believed individuals matter more than collectives. 🧵Image
While Pablo Neruda (communist) won the Nobel in 1971 and Gabriel García Márquez (Fidel Castro's personal friend) won in 1982, Borges was denied for two decades.

His crime? Defending individual liberty with philosophical depth that rivals Friedrich Hayek. Image
Like Hayek, Borges understood human fallibility.

He was skeptical about free will, yet insisted: "If they tell me that at this moment I cannot act freely, I will despair."

We must act as free individuals precisely because we cannot know all that determines us. Image
Read 23 tweets
Nov 20
Argentina's 1853 Constitution declared property "inviolable." It guaranteed rivers open to all ships, banned protectionism, copied America's federal system, and even improved on it.

For 80 years, this worked perfectly.

Then one Supreme Court decision destroyed everything. 🧵 Image
Here's the part nobody teaches: Argentina didn't stumble into prosperity.

After decades of civil war, the founders in 1853 made a deliberate choice. They looked at the United States and asked: Why reinvent the wheel?

They copied the Constitution almost word for word, but improved it by learning from America's mistakes.Image
When General Rosas had closed Argentina's rivers to punish provinces that defied him, it strangled the economy. So the 1853 Constitution made it explicit: Rivers stay open. No exceptions.

They were building a machine for wealth creation, and the results came fast. Image
Read 18 tweets
Nov 18
Jean-Paul Sartre invented a verbal trick that killed millions.

He took the word "violence" and redefined it.

The existing social order? That was violence. Institutions? Violence. Property? Violence.

Once everything is violence, killing to overthrow it becomes self-defense. Here's how one philosopher's language game produced genocide. 🧵Image
Sartre was the most celebrated intellectual of the 20th century.

Existentialism. Freedom. Authenticity.

Every philosophy department teaches his work as liberation thought.

But they skip over what happened when his ideas left the seminar room and entered the killing fields. Image
Sartre's innovation was linguistic genius turned deadly.

He borrowed from German philosophy the concept of "institutionalized violence."

If society itself is violence, then revolutionary counter-violence isn't aggression. It's justice. It's self-defense. It's purification.

The system is the real murderer. You're just responding.Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(