Israel’s “Operation Rising Lion” hit Iran’s nuclear sites (Natanz, Fordow), missile bases, and IRGC leadership, killing Hossein Salami and Mohammad Bagheri.
Iran’s firing back with 39+ ballistic missiles on Tel Aviv and Haifa.
Casualties: 224+ in Iran, 24 in Israel. 💥
3/11: What about the military balance?
Israel 🇮🇱: 170,000 active troops, 340 aircraft (F-35s, F-16s), Iron Dome at ~90% interception rate.
Destroyed 120 Iranian missile launchers, holds air supremacy.
Short War (1–3 months, 65%):
Israel’s air dominance and Iran’s losses (e.g., Natanz centrifuges destroyed) favour a ceasefire.
Iran’s 40% inflation and unrest push for talks via Oman, Qatar.
Medium War (3–6 months, 25%):
Iran sustains low-intensity strikes or hits Hormuz (20% global oil).
Long War (6+ months, 10%):
Needs U.S./Gulf escalation, unlikely with Iran’s isolation.
What’s your bet?
7/11
Why is the short war likely?
Unlike Iran’s proxy wars (2006 Lebanon, 1 month), Hezbollah and Hamas are depleted.
IRGC’s missile barrages are fading, and 70% of Iranians oppose the regime, limiting escalation.
Israel wants a nuclear win, not occupation.
So now the Q is: Is a quick end realistic?
8/11
But let's also look at possible escalation risks:
Iran’s Moves:
Could target U.S. bases (Iraq, Qatar), use Houthis, or choke Hormuz.
But U.S. retaliation would crush Iran’s economy.
U.S. Stance:
Trump demands Iran’s “surrender,” sent 2,500+ troops to deter, but avoids strikes.
Regional Players:
Gulf states aided Israel’s defense, risking Iran’s wrath.
What could tip the scales?
9/11
Now, a deep dive into military aspects reveals.
Israel has an edge: Mossad’s pre-planted drones and ATGMs gutted Iran’s defenses pre-strike. 197+ sorties since June 12 show precision.
Iran's weaknesses are revealing itself: Aging air force, no proxy buffer, and hit nuclear sites (Fordow vulnerable) limit conventional power.
Cyberattacks and terrorism are fallback options.
What’s Iran’s next play?
10/11 How about possible diplomatic paths?
Iran hints at talks via Oman, Qatar, but wants a “final response” first.
Trump’s nuclear negotiation push aligns with Israel’s goals if Iran’s weak enough.
[1/7] 🚨 Recently published in Nature Communications (May 2025)!
Proud to share the findings as a senior collaborator & contributing author in this major GBD 2019 study.
We examined the global burden of acute vs chronic care needs across 204 countries & 379 sequelae.
Let's dig into key insights from this study!
[2/7] Key finding: Chronic care conditions account for 68% of global DALYs (Disability-adjusted life years measure burden), while only 27% are due to acute care.
The burden intensifies with age and affects nearly every health system on Earth.
📈 Chronic ≠ niche. It’s the majority.
[3/7] Inequality alert:
In low-SDI nations, acute care still dominates.
In high-SDI countries, chronic care needs represent up to 94% of YLDs.
This SDI gradient reveals deep inequities in system readiness.
🧵1/
What should a sovereign nation do when its innocent civilians—targeted for their religion—are slaughtered by cross-border terrorists backed by a hostile neighbor?
On April 22, 2025, 26 civilians (25 Hindus & 1 Nepali citizen) were brutally massacred in Pahalgam, Kashmir by Pakistani-backed terrorists.
They were targeted for their religion, gunned down after being identified as Hindus. India vowed retribution—and that moment came.
This wasn’t random. It was religious cleansing.
2/ India launched #OperationSINDOOR on May 6.
✅ 9 terrorist sites obliterated
✅ Targets: Kotli, Muzaffarabad, Bahawalpur
✅ Method: Precision missile strikes & drones
✅ Targets were non-military terror hubs used by Jaish-e-Mohammed & Lashkar-e-Taiba; not civilians, not army posts.
3/ Why the name “SINDOOR”?
It’s not just a codename.
Sindoor, the sacred vermilion worn by Hindu women, symbolises protection, life, and dharma.
India chose a name steeped in civilisational ethos, a reminder that this strike was about righteous retribution, not vengeance.