President Trump just announced that the United States has attacked the nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow. As discussed in today's column, Trump has history on his side in taking this action without congressional approval... thehill.com/opinion/white-…
...Since Iran has threatened to attack the United States in response to such an operation, it could trigger a series of cascading decisions. For example, under Article Five of the NATO treaty, an attack on one member is an attack on all...
...That is just one of the issues that could arise in a more prolonged conflict if Iran carries out its threat of retaliating against U.S. assets.
...Since Iran has suggested that it might strike American assets anywhere in the world, such retaliation could trigger treaty and defense cooperation agreements with allies. That could quickly globalize the conflict unless Iran (and its surrogates) limit their response.
...Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif., are calling for Congress to act. Rep. Massie called the attack unconstitutional. As shown historically, such congressional efforts are unlikely to succeed in the short term. Some Democrats, including Sen. Fetterman, D-N.J., have already stated support for the attack.
...We have our first Democratic calls for impeachment. The problem, as discussed in today's column, is that Trump is using the same authority that prior presidents have used, including President Obama in attacking Libya. thehill.com/opinion/white-…
...These members would have to argue that it is a high crime and misdemeanor under Section 4 of Article Two of the United States Constitution. However, prior presidents have used the same authority in launching major attacks on foreign nations.
...In addition to Obama's attack on Libya, Clinton launched cruise missile attacks under Operation Infinite Reach on two continents on August 20, 1998. He ordered attacks in locations in Khartoum, Sudan and Khost Province, Afghanistan.
...Sen. Bernie Sanders just declared the attacks to be unconstitutional...
...Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has now joined Rep. Sean Casten in calling for impeachment...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today's decision upholding the Tennessee law restricting gender transition care for minors has enormous implications for a variety of transgender cases. Chief Justice Roberts declared "The Equal Protection Clause does not resolve these disagreements."...
...The Court rejected the use of intermediate scrutiny that was just used by a judge in Boston to bar the Trump administration from requiring either male or female designations on passports...
...There is still room here for future challenges. The Court found that there was no discrimination on the basis of transgender status and noted that "absent a showing that SB1’s prohibitions are pretexts designed to effect invidious discrimination against transgender individuals, the law does not classify on the basis of transgender status."...
Sen. Alex Padilla just disrupted the press conference with Secretary Noem. It was an extraordinary act by a sitting senator, but Gov. Newsom just supported Padilla in this disruptive act...
...The scene captured the race to the bottom by Democratic politicians in fueling the rage as violent protests unfolded around the country. Padilla started to yell at Noem and became a virtual troll or crank at a press conference...
...The incident appeared entirely performative to appeal to those coming to the city to protest the parade celebrating the 250th anniversary of the United States Army.
Here we go on today's opinions from the Supreme Court...
...We have the first opinion today and it is another unanimous decision. Justice Jackson authored the opinion in Rivers v. Guerrero on the handling of successive habeas petitions. ...supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf…
...We have the second opinion. It is written by Justice Barrett. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch is another unanimous or near-unanimous opinion. In this case, only Justice Gorsuch dissents. supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf…
Abrego Garcia is reportedly on his way back to the United States. Some of us argued from the outset that this was the best course. The basis for his removal is overwhelming and, once this process is completed, he is likely to find himself on another flight back to El Salvador...
...However, this may be a case of being careful what you ask for. Abrego Garcia will be brought back to face criminal charges in allegedly trafficking narcotics, guns, and people...
...A grand jury has issued the charges against Abrego Garcia. It offers the Administration a way to end the dispute over his removal while reframing this case as now a criminal prosecution.
We have our first opinion today. It is unanimous and authored by Justice Jackson in the reverse discrimination case of Ames v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Services. ...supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf…
...Significant ruling that a member of a majority group does not have the added burden of showing "background circumstances." Remand for further consideration...
..."We hold that this additional “background circumstances” requirement is not consistent with Title VII’s text or our case law construing the statute."