Not only would Kamala have bombed Iran, everyone currently insisting she wouldn’t have would be using Beyoncé gifs to celebrate it
She lost to Trump because she refused to break with Biden’s “anything Israel wants to kill Palestinians they get” approach. She said no to conditioning weapons sales, called Iran the most dangerous threat, kicked Arabs out of her rallies, yet ppl kept insisting she was different
You mean to tell me the Liz Cheney hugging “most lethal military” bragging, Top Cop candidate wouldn’t take marching orders from Bibi like her predecessor after Iran bombed Israel’s military sites for a week straight (after Israel bombed them first)? what reality do you live in?
The claim that Dems would be de-escalators if in charge would hold substance if current top Dems actually came out and opposed the strikes, instead of basing their entire opposition on protocol. Killing brown people is bipartisan policy—you’re lying if you don’t acknowledge that.
https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/1936622354693534105
If this is how ostensibly “liberal” countries are reacting, how would a Democratic administration be any different. They wouldn’t. These girlboss revisionists have nothing—they just want another excuse to condescend and blame the left for their own leaders siding with fascists.
https://twitter.com/sharonnadeem/status/1936766601375989912
Liberals: MY 𝓰𝓲𝓻𝓵𝓫𝓸𝓼𝓼 president would NEVER have escalated the Israel/Iran conflict to protect Israel
Liberals when you literally asked them last year to do just that:
Liberals when you literally asked them last year to do just that:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
