NEW: Erez Reuveni, the DOJ lawyer fired for his honesty in the Kilmar Abrego Garcia case, tells Congress that Emil Bove suggested the DOJ respond to any court orders blocking the CECOT deportations with "fuck you."
He also says DOJ lawyer Drew Ensign lied to Judge Boasberg.
Reuveni accuses Drew Ensign, the DOJ lawyer appearing for the Trump admin in the Alien Enemies Act case, of lying to Judge Boasberg on March 15 when he said he didn't know planes were taking off.
He says Ensign was at a meeting the day before when the flight were planned!
Reuveni says that on March 15 he was emailing DHS updates telling them that Judge Boasberg was ordering DHS to halt the flights.
His supervisor, August Flentje, noted Bove's "fuck you" line and joked Reuveni might be fired for telling DHS not to violate the order.
Reuveni notes that he repeatedly told DHS throughout the night of March 15 that they had to follow court orders. Even Drew Ensign agreed Judge Boasberg's order required them to turn the planes around.
Emil Bove intervened and ordered DHS to ignore that interpretation.
Reuveni's whistelblower account also says that senior DOJ leadership directly ordered DHS not to comply with Judge Boasberg's order to report as to what happened with the flights.
Relevant to yesterday, Reuveni also accuses senior DOJ leadership of defying the D.V.D. court order, with the DOJ refusing to distribute nationwide guidance on its impact despite the order quite clearly applying nationwide.
Yesterday SCOTUS blessed other defiance in that case.
Reuveni says he was ordered to file a brief at the 1st Circuit seeking an emergency stay of the D.V.D. injunction.
The brief argued that the order was nationwide, yet Reuveni knew that inside DHS the Trump admin was saying it only applied to the named plaintiffs — so he refused.
After Reuveni again raised serious concerns that DHS was treating the D.V.D. injunction as if it hadn't happened and didn't apply nationwide (despite telling a court it agreed), Drew Ensign personally told him to stop sending emails raising concerns about noncompliance.
On March 31, when the Trump admin deported more people to El Salvador using military flights, Reuveni knew that those flights violated the D.V.D. court order.
He says the DOD's General Counsel didn't know about the court order and was "upset" that DHS hadn't told him about it.
Reuveni, again investigating what appeared to be a clear violation of a court order, reached out to the DOD and the State Department.
The DOD's General Counsel says Joseph Mazzara had organized the flights — but Mazzara told Reuveni he didn't know anything about them.
After Reuveni raised his serious concerns about the admin having violated a court order, Yaakov Roth, a senior DOJ attorney put there by Trump, ordered him to stop asking questions and stop writing things in email.
The implication was that the admin wanted to hide from FOIA.
Turning to the Kilmar Abrego Garcia case, which got Reuveni fired, he says that he repeatedly raised serious concerns about the facts and the law — and that DOJ leadership again ordered him to stop asking questions and stop trying to uncover the truth of the matter.
Finally, Mr. Reuveni says that he was ultimately fired because he refused to sign a legal brief making an argument that was directly contrary to law and unsupported by any evidence put forward in the case — that Abrego Garcia's deportation was legal because he was a "terrorist."
Mr. Reuveni's whistleblower letter is a shocking documentation of the Trump administration's contempt for the rule of law and for the federal judiciary.
Unfortunately, yesterday the Supreme Court arguably blessed this defiant attitude from the admin. static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/d…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨The Supreme Court today gives Trump a license to engage in racial profiling, with Justice Kavanaugh writing in concurrence to expressly endorse ICE and Border Patrol targeting any Latinos they observe in Los Angeles speaking Spanish and then demanding their papers.
Justice Sotomayor is utterly scathing: "We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low wage job. Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent."
Sotomayor: "The [Gov't], and now the concurrence, has all but declared that all Latinos, US citizens or not, who work low wage jobs are fair game to be seized at any time, taken away from work, and held until they provide proof of their legal status to the agents’ satisfaction."
🚨NEW: Reversing *generations* of practice, the Board of Immigration Appeals gives ICE exactly what it demanded, ruling that any undocumented immigrant who entered illegally is categorically ineligible to ask a judge for bond — expanding mandatory detention by millions of people.
The new decision comes after the Trump admin announced in July that it would take the legal position that a 1996 law barred release on bond anyone who crossed illegally — despite no admin having EVER made that claim before. Now the BIA greenlights that completely novel argument.
The Board of Immigration Appeals has upheld grants of bond to people in this situation THOUSANDS of times in the past. NO ONE previously put forward the argument that they greenlit today — one that they claim is just a straightforward application of the law, not even ambiguous.
Trump is now moving to strip protections and deport the same people that he himself granted deportation protections to in his last week in office in 2021.
Trump’s order said protecting noncriminal Venezuelans from being sent back to Maduro was a matter of U.S. national interest.
Trump's DED order for Venezuela applied to anyone here before January 20, 2021. Only weeks later, Secretary Mayorkas granted Temporary Protected Status to Venezuelans here before March 9, 2021. So effectively speaking, this is the same group of people that Trump protected.
🚨NEW: Declarations filed in the lawsuit against the rushed attempt to deport 600 Guatemalan children reveals the chaotic way the Trump admin carried out the operation.
Children were taken out of bed after midnight to be rushed onto planes. One girl "was so scared she vomited."
Other declarations directly refute the Trump admin's claims that the children's parents requested their return to Guatemala.
One dad in Guatemala says he got "a strange call" two weeks ago saying that his daughter was about to be deported — despite never having asked for that.
One 17-year-old describes what happened to him on Sunday night. He says he was woken up at 2:00 in the morning and told to get his things. He was scared, so he prayed to God and hoped he'd be protected.
Throughout the fateful morning, no one told him what was happening.
NEW: The Trump admin plans to double the number of immigration judges, ordering hundreds of military lawyers to serve as immigration judges, despite flimsy legal authority to do so.
Notably, immigration law is infamously complex, and judges normally require months of training.
Many former JAGs serve as immigration judges today, having gone through a competitive hiring process. JAGs are often good lawyers, so I am not of the belief that they will all become rubber stampers. But the command pressure to deny will undoubtedly be *enormous.*
Indeed; the Trump admin has actually fired dozens of judges already and moved to purge many of the Biden appointees.
While I don’t believe military judges will be ordered to deny, they will undoubtedly be pressured to do so. And their inexperience will cause serious issues.
NEW: McCarthyism returns to immigration law, as @USCIS announces that it will begin screening applicants for immigration benefits for "Anti-America ideologies or activities." The term has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump admin.
The full policy memo is here. The Trump administration says that it will use its discretion to deny immigration benefits to anyone it deems to have supported a group with "anti-American ideologies" or engaged in "ant-American activities." uscis.gov/sites/default/…
The new policy on "anti-Americanism" and discretionary benefits comes just days after the Trump admin tightened standards for naturalization, ordering a more searching analysis of whether applicants for citizenship have met the required "good moral character" standard.