Ayn Rand predicted in the 1960s everything happening now.
Campus extremists. Environmental policies advocating human poverty. Race as a criterion for everything. Hatred of success.
This isn't a description of 2025. It's what she warned about 60 years ago. 🧵
In The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution (1971), Rand collected essays from the 1960s describing a disturbing trend:
Students solving political disputes through brute force instead of logic, reason, and persuasion.
Sound familiar?
Rand saw students demanding and disrupting college activities until their demands were met.
Today's campus environment mirrors exactly what she described almost 60 years ago.
The playbook hasn't changed. Only the scale.
At the time, she noted the student movement was unpopular—but they weren't there for immediate victory.
They were there to test limits.
As she put it: "The uncontested absurdities of today are the accepted slogans of tomorrow."
"[Uncontested absurdities] come to be accepted by degrees, by precedent, by implication, by erosion, by default, by dint of constant pressure on one side and constant retreat on the other—until they are suddenly declared to be the country's official ideology."
Rand's key insight: While everyone worried about the results of campus chaos, few addressed the root cause.
"Every possible question was raised and considered, except: What are the students taught to think?"
That's still the question no one wants to answer.
What students are taught to think matters immensely.
When you teach people that:
→ Success is evil
→ Human prosperity is environmental destruction
→ Race determines everything
→ Force trumps reason
You get exactly what we have now.
Rand's warning: "When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet."
She called for arming ourselves with reason and morality—not physical fights.
Don't shy away from calling out authoritarian ideologies like socialism or fascism.
Rand was right: ideas move history — and students are often the first battleground.
If you want to be the one leading the defense of liberty on your campus — not just reacting to the chaos — the Local Coordinator Program is for you.
Join a global network of students from over 100 countries learning to challenge collectivism with clarity, courage, and action.
Socialists promise "equality" will solve everything.
But equal misery is still misery.
Still, they've convinced millions that being equally poor is better than being unequally prosperous.
How did we fall for this? 🧵
Let's look at what "equality" really means in practice.
France and Myanmar have identical income inequality levels according to the World Bank.
But: France = wealthy, developed Myanmar = 40% live below the poverty line
Clearly, "equal" doesn't always mean "better."
Two societies: Society A: Everyone (except rulers) lives in dire poverty → Low inequality Society B: Most people live well, some are extremely wealthy → High inequality
Which would you choose?
If you're honest, you'd pick Society B every time.
Here's why dogmatic libertarians are becoming liberty's worst enemy 🧵
These days, it's like a race to see who can be the most "libertarian/classical liberal."
Grounded in dogmatism, they act like there's only one way to justify liberty, one way to support it, or one way to advance it.
They're more like Marxists than liberty-lovers.
Picture this: Few ideologies have evolved as much as the one that champions liberty.
From free trade to abolishing slavery, freedom of speech, women's rights, constitutions, rule of law—all the things we take for granted today were once radical liberal ideas.
We're heirs to this tradition, but not the stuck-up kind.