David Hauser Profile picture
@dh
Jun 25 18 tweets 6 min read Read on X
This happened in China.

A robot was hanging limp from a crane.

Then—suddenly—it came alive.
Smashed a monitor, and attacked a man.

12M watched the footage.
They called it the first robot uprising.

Still, that same model was sold to the public.🧵 Image
The footage is chilling:

Inside a factory in China, a humanoid robot hangs motionless from a crane while two workers talk nearby.

Then—suddenly—it snaps to life.
Its limbs whip around violently. A computer monitor goes flying.

And these men?
They run for their lives.
The robot appeared to be a Unitree H1—a 6-foot humanoid with powerful motors and AI.

It weighs 104 pounds, with enormous human strength.
And it wasn’t a prototype, it was already on the market.

And the more alarming part: Image
It was being sold to everyday consumers… for $90,000.

But this machine had the strength to seriously injure or kill a person if something went wrong.

That’s a massive safety risk.

What makes it so dangerous?
The Unitree H1 is built with:

A metal or carbon-fiber frame

Electric motors powering every joint

Cameras and sensors for vision

AI software that controls how it moves, walks, balances. Image
But the moment that software glitches or gets confused—it’s like giving a toddler superhuman strength.

That crane it was hanging from? That’s a common setup during robot testing.

Developers use overhead rigs to let robots “learn” to walk without falling.
But this time… it wasn’t just learning.

It spun into chaos—arms flailing, dragging gear, smashing objects.

What if it hadn’t been restrained?

This wasn’t an isolated case either.
In February 2025, another Unitree humanoid—wearing a flashy outfit—was performing at a public festival in Tianjin.

Mid-show, it charged toward the crowd.
Spectators screamed. Security rushed in.

Thankfully, no one was hurt.
But this is twice now—and it’s not just in China.

At Tesla’s Austin Gigafactory, a factory robot attacked a human engineer.

It didn’t just malfunction. It pinned the man down and dug into his back and arm, leaving him bleeding heavily on the floor.
The robot kept moving. Kept pressing.

The man left a trail of blood before help arrived.

It was gruesome. And it was real.

So what’s going wrong?

Most likely:
– Software bugs
– Sensor errors
– Misinterpreted commands
– Bad safety logic.
But here’s the deeper truth:

We’ve given powerful, mobile machines the ability to make real-world decisions—without making sure they fully understand what they’re doing.

With AI chatbots, a mistake is annoying.
With humanoid robots? It’s potentially deadly. Image
When AI controls a machine with moving joints, strong limbs, and no emotional awareness—you don’t get harmless errors.

You get accidents, injuries, and panic.

The scariest part?
This kind of technology is already in people’s homes. Image
Anyone could buy one of these robots, take it out of the box, and let it roam around.

No regulatory oversight. No mandatory safety inspections.

Nothing stopping that robot from turning a glitch into a tragedy.

So—how do we stop this?
Here’s what should already be in place:

Physical restraints during all testing.
Emergency kill-switches.
Motion restrictions in software.
Real-time system monitoring.
Compliance with global safety standards (like ISO 10218). Image
Right now, some companies skip or cut corners on these.

That’s unacceptable.

The bottom line?

We’re no longer building just code.
We’re building moving machines with agency—machines that share physical space with people.

And that changes everything. Image
Because when these systems fail, it’s no longer a “tech bug.”

It’s a human safety crisis.

So no, this wasn’t a robot uprising, but it was a warning.

Robots are already out there.

They’re strong, autonomous, and fallible. Image
We are wildly underprepared for what happens when they go wrong.

The future isn’t just about what we can build.

It’s about what we’re ready to control. Image
Learn what they don’t teach in business school.

Follow @dh for real-world strategies, lessons, and stories that drive success.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Hauser

David Hauser Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dh

Jun 18
In 2018, Celsius was a $280M energy drink brand on the verge of collapse.

Delisted from Nasdaq. Dropped by Costco. Almost dead.

Today? It’s worth $13.4 BILLION.

Here's how a no-name brand became Red Bull’s worst nightmare:🧵 Image
First, some background:

Celsius tried to take on Red Bull and Monster with a similar “high energy” vibe.

It flopped. Too crowded. Too confusing. No edge.

By 2018, no one believed in the brand. Except John Fieldly.
When Fieldly became CEO, he didn’t try to out-Red-Bull Red Bull.

He flipped the script:

“Let’s build an energy drink for people who care about what they put in their bodies.”

Not for clubbing or gaming. For health-conscious hustlers. Image
Read 12 tweets
Jun 16
A startup sells for millions.

But when the deal is closed, founders walk away with almost nothing.

Not because the company failed—but because of a clause buried in the investor deal.

This is how founders get wiped out in “successful” exits:
🧵 Image
Remember Good Technology.

They were valued at $1.1 billion, then acquired by BlackBerry in 2015 for $425M.

But here's where things went south...
Over $350 million went to investors.

Founders and early employees went home with nearly nothing.
This happens more than people think.

You see the headline sale.
You imagine yachts and champagne.
But you don’t see the liquidation stack.

All because of a clause that's meant to over-insure Investors;
Participating Preferred Stock Image
Read 12 tweets
Jun 9
Your sales calls are too long.

Not because you talk too much… But because you don’t know what to listen for.

Great founders listen for exactly 3 Signals — then close or move on.

Here’s how to steal that skill:🧵 Image
When I started selling, I thought long calls meant progress.

I wanted to build rapport. Understand every pain point. Go deep.

But 40-minute discovery calls turned into 60.
And the close rate is still inconsistent.

I realized something hard: information ≠ insight
What separates top closers from average founders isn’t charm.

It’s pattern recognition.

They know what signals matter — and which ones don’t.

They don’t go wide. They go deep, fast, on the things that move deals forward.

And they do it in minutes, not hours. Image
Read 11 tweets
Jun 4
I’m obsessed with comebacks like this.

Before 2012, Boston Scientific was a mess...
Flat stock. $4B in losses. Crushed morale.

Until Michael Mahoney took over.

• Doubled revenue
• Added $50B+ value
• Grew stock 1,900%

This is how he did it: 🧵 Image
Mahoney actually wanted to be a doctor.

But a C+ in organic chemistry killed that dream.

So he pivoted—got an MBA, then started selling nuclear cardiology cameras.

That blend of science + commercial instinct shaped everything he later built.
He joined Boston Scientific in 2011—right after a $27B merger disaster.

The company had just lost billions. Revenue stalled. Morale was wrecked.

The work culture was fearful— too afraid to lose AND too afraid to try something new.

Everyone played it safe. Image
Read 14 tweets
May 24
I used to invest in flashy startups that made headlines.

Until I saw a funeral home quietly make more profit than a VC-funded app.

Here's the simple reason boring businesses like these always win:
(Bookmark this—You'll thank me later) Image
Warren Buffett didn’t invest in Tesla, Google, or Facebook.
He missed them all—and he admits it.

Yet he's worth over $130 billion.

How?
He made his fortune by betting on the boring stuff.

Same way Shaq and Codie Sanchez got rich.
These 3 made millions (and billions) from businesses no one brags about:
• Car washes
• Trailer parks
• Funeral homes
• Laundromats
• Franchises

No hype. No headlines.
Just businesses that print cash... every single day. Image
Read 14 tweets
May 16
I've studied thousands of businesses over 15 years, and the pattern is clear:

Ferrari businesses attract attention.
Toyota businesses create millionaires.

The wealth paradox nobody talks about: 👇 Image
Everyone today is chasing the the next revolutionary app or cutting edge tech - thinking it's their ticket to dream money.

These are the "Ferrari businesses" of the world.
They are sleek, sexy, inspiring

They attract all the attention.

High Valuation, Headlines & even Investor FOMO.

They do everything but make money.

And there's a BIG reason behind it...
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(