China didn't wait for the market to kill hard drives. It executed them. Here's how NAND flash took over everything from laptops to datacenters while the West kept clinging to spinners.
HDDs are dead in China—everywhere that matters.
This wasn’t just market drift. It was deliberate policy, executed with precision. A short thread on how and why NAND killed the hard drive in China:
(1/9)
Forget what’s happening in the West. In China, spinning disks are already legacy. Laptops, desktops, tablets, and even entry-tier machines are now SSD by default. No debate. No nostalgia. Just purge.
(2/9)
Why? Because NAND is strategic. HDDs were never China's game. No domestic champion. No IP base. No reason to subsidize a sunset industry when you can bankroll YMTC and control the future.
(3/9)
Consumer PC makers—Lenovo, Huawei, Tongfang—all flipped. Government contracts mandated SSDs. Schools, tax bureaus, telecoms. From Beijing to the provinces, HDDs were slowly pushed to the margins.
(4/9)
And it’s not just the endpoint. National clouds—Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu—are migrating tier by tier. Cold data still sits on massive HDD arrays, but that’s inertia. No one’s scaling up on spinners anymore.
(5/9)
Surveillance? Yes, still HDD-heavy. China’s CCTV grid is unmatched in scale and cost-sensitivity. But even there, hybrid SSD-HDD setups are taking hold. Flash-first, archive later.
(6/9)
Don’t expect a Chinese Seagate. They skipped that chapter. It’s NAND or bust. Domestic fabs, domestic firmware, domestic controllers. Vertical ambition—HDDs were horizontal deadweight.
(7/9)
The message from Zhongnanhai to Zhongguancun was clear: build what's next, not what’s fading. That’s how flash won. Not by consumer demand but by state foresight.
(8/9)
Bottom line: HDDs aren’t just dying in China. They’ve been defeated. On price, on policy, on principle. Spinners still turn. But no one’s betting the future on them anymore.
(9/9)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Another day, another Harvard economist “discovering” the bleeding obvious.
'Americans Are Not Prepared' Says Harvard Economist About China's De-Dollarization - 'Interest Rates Are Going To Be Higher For A Very, Very Long Time' share.google/JkumYmMuFqktN7…
The U.S. Federal Reserve is not a government agency. It’s a cartel of private banks granted money-printing authority. Unaccountable to voters. Unanswerable to Congress.
This isn’t capitalism. It’s legalized monetary capture.
(2/16)
In 1944, the Bretton Woods Accord made the U.S. dollar the world’s reserve currency because it was pegged to gold.
America controlled half the world’s gold supply and most of its industrial output. The dollar was a proxy for real things.
Friedman taught that the only social responsibility of business is to increase profits. From that seed grew a system that stripped America to its studs and sold the drywall to China. (2/17)
In this worldview, workers are costs. Communities are irrelevant. The nation-state is an afterthought. Only shareholders matter. If that means dismantling your own country for better margins, so be it. (3/17)
ASML’s days as an untouchable monopoly are numbered. China’s EUV breakthrough is real, and Western media is pretending it doesn’t exist. Here's what they're hiding.
For years, ASML has been propped up as an untouchable monopoly. The only firm capable of making EUV machines. The crown jewel of the West’s semiconductor stack. (1/9)
But this myth only survives because no one in Western media wants to acknowledge the truth. China has developed its own EUV tech. It uses LDP. And yes, it's real. (2/9)
Exhibit Q.2
Bloomberg says China’s industrial profits are sinking due to US tariffs and deflation. Once again, Western media mistakes a war footing for collapse. (1/10)
China’s factories aren’t losing money because they’re inefficient. They’re losing money on purpose. This is margin warfare. Bloomberg won’t say that. (2/10)
A third of China’s industrial firms are running at a loss. But they’re not folding. They’re backed by local state support. The mission isn’t quarterly profit. It’s industrial control. (3/10)
China wants to be the global AI superpower by 2030.
Unlike the West, it's not waiting on OpenAI or Nvidia to hand it over. China is using full-spectrum industrial policy to dominate the entire stack. From fabs to foundation models.
RAND just mapped it out. Thread 🧵
(1/9)
Forget the Silicon Valley myth. China’s strategy is not emergent or chaotic. It’s orchestrated.
National funds, provincial grants, compute vouchers, startup parks. Every layer of the AI stack is mapped, funded, and controlled. (2/9)