Thread by @Humanspective

Megathread for MAHA. One of the most important threads I’ll share 🧵

The ACIP are convening again tomorrow for several important votes and recommendations. But at the top of the MAHA (and probably world) list is the mRNA covid vaccines.

I believe there is a "Blind spot" that has gone unnoticed. Something "Hiding in plain sight". And I think this could totally dismantle the push for Global mRNA adoption and move things toward a moratorium on covid mRNA injections. Or at least help.

In this thread, I’m going to explain how MAHA and the pro vaccine side can both win. And the someone that might be the key to unlocking all this.

Outcasted in Australia and told to leave his esteemed career as a professor in an Adelaide University in South Australia, because he wouldn’t submit to the mRNA injections. He was one of the very first to speak out against the dangers of mRNA technology.

At the very start, as the mRNA mandate madness was sweeping Australia and the Globe, Professor Nikolai Petrovski said: "[I am] extremely uncomfortable" about the roll out of this mRNA technology, which is being mandated worldwide.

Let me introduce you to Professor Nikolai Petrovski.

1. Professor Nikolai Petrovski began his mission very early, by trying to warn everyone that actually, the vaccines the government was rolling out and mandating, was "a technology that was developed for gene therapy [a] completely novel experimental technology that's never been used in humans before".

This was very early on and he was attacked from all angles, for pointing out the absolute long term unknowns of mass vaccination with a novel mRNA gene therapy

2. Professor Nikolai Petrovski was one of the first scientists to prove that COVID-19 was a bioweapon that likely originated from a lab. And his research was used by Rand Paul and others in their move to prove the GOF research in their investigations against Anthony Fauci in the U.S.

3. Nikolai Petrovski covers in detail here with Senator Alex Antic, about how the virus most likely was a man made virus. When they tried to match which animal the virus was most adapted for: "Human's came out on top"

4. He became aware early on that something was not right. He exposed how much of the blame and failures for not containing the Pandemic was due to the World Health Organization's lack of competency in managing Global Health, saying the WHO "guaranteed we were going to have a Pandemic"

5. For speaking out, he was told by the university where he taught and conducted research that he was no longer welcome because he refused the TGA and Government mandated mRNA injection.

6. In an unexpected twist, he decided to be the first person to take his own COVID vaccine, which he personally developed, believing he should suffer any adverse events. The crazy thing is, the TGA would not accept his own vaccine as "proof" of vaccination....it has to be the mRNA genetic injection, otherwise "no jab, no job"

7. As covered in mainstream media, Nikolai Petrovski was sacked after refusing mRNA, "because he's had his own"

8. To think that Australia would not support one of the very few scientists in Australia that has already been vetted by the NIH and has seen significant funding from the U.S.

9. Someone with this level of experience

10. But then when you understand that CSL has a sort of monopoly on medical products in the Australian market it begins to make more sense. They were never going to help this leading Australian scientist bring out an Australian made product

11. With all the above happening....He basically said "Scr*w you guys". He wasn't risking taking the vaccine and he was getting no support. And then he got louder and louder. He appeared on podcasts, warning people about mRNA technology. The adverse events. And he said loud and clearly "I would not take this vaccine".

12. He shared alarming stories about a corrupted, totalitarian system, including cases where people could not get vaccine exemptions (due to mandates) even after dying and being resuscitated due to mRNA injections.

13. He became an expert witness in vaccine mandates cases all over Australia and even New Zealand, fighting the governments authoritarian policies and highlighting the vaccines inability to stop transmission

14. And while that was all happening, his very own vaccine, not mRNA, a protein based vaccine, which the Australian government would not support him in providing to the Australian people, was approved in another country, after one of the most supported and successful crowdfunds in Australian history. Everyone outside the government and Big Pharma, the hard working people that he inspired, supported him

15. Interestingly, his vaccine technology uses plant-based adjuvants instead of artificial or metal-based ones to create immunogenicity. I found this an interesting aspect, because the toxic nature of adjuvants, aluminium, mercury, fetal debris mentioned by RFK Jr etc, has been heavily criticised in the medical field.

16. And even more interesting. His product is one of the VERY few that I have noticed that did a true placebo (saline control) controlled trial in his human clinical trials.

But to be clear, he has always understood that the ideology of vaccines preventing transmission has always been false and that they probably never will stop transmission.

It seems his perspective is freedom of choice, with an emphasis on safety over the ideological claims that they can ever prevent transmission. It's only protection of self.

17. Here he talks about the approval of his protein based vaccine and the "realities" about transmission blocking.

Professor Nikolai Petrovski: "We shouldn't be pretending they stop infection or transmission. They never did, they never will"

18. And as he calls out here, the whole idea that the mRNA vaccine were ever going to stop transmission and that we began to see the negative immune effects of "class switching" to IgG4, was an "Insane Experiment"

Nikolai Petrovski: "We don't know anything about this new technology [and] this is an experiment [and] that's scary"

19. Professor Petrovski's focus shifted to being an outspoken critic of the government's authoritarian assault on rights. As he said here with Senator Alex Antic about "The Pandemic of the Unvaccinated: "It was a disgraceful campaign [that] had no scientific basis [and is] a form of racism"

20. An outspoken critic for truth and transparency

"They are refusing to do autopsy"  Professor Nikolai Petrovski & Senator Alex Antic

"Everyone who's dying after having a vaccine should have an autopsy, that should be the default, they're refusing to do autopsy, why are they scared to do autopsies....if you don't do the autopsy you never know [and] in the old days [autopsies] were done on everyone"

21. And now here's where I tell you how MAHA, potentially the world can win, with both sides getting what they want.

From my side, I think Professor Nikolai Petrovski has been well and truly vetted and has a lot of support, due to clear to his warnings of mRNA, fight for justice against mandates, warning of the side effects and his stance has never changed. He has always had the same message.

It's really simple. The pro vaccine side is afraid of letting go of the mRNA technology because they associate it to having the protection of covid vaccines.....it's a threat to them.

The MAHA side, even though many want the entire vaccine industry overhauled, including the traditional vaccines, with proper placebo controlled trials, I would say most are primarily focused on ending the mRNA technology first....then moving on the other items.

So here would be an idea:

Scale up and implement a protein based platform like Professor Nikolai Petrovski's for covid. To be clear, I'm in no way associated to this....I'm only doing this because I'm grateful for how much he has stood up in the freedom movement. Courage is contagious.

AND: His covid protein based product already ticks Robert F Kennedy's box of having done a true placebo (saline) controlled trial. Is is already tested under his new rules as the acting Secretary of HHS.

AND: The adjuvant profile seems much more different then the typical ones that use aluminium etc...I'm not an expert on that though, so maybe others can add on that. And I know many including myself are so suspicious of ALL VACCINES nowadays.

But to me, this seems like a super interesting way to navigate a very divisive topic. Especially if they are going to continue to cling onto mRNA just because they need them for covid.

Doing this gives the pro vaccine side a covid vaccine, and gives the regulators something to give them, with room to finally get a moratorium on the mRNA infrastructure for full evaluation...stopping the shots.

In that way, both sides win.

And imagine, if all this was thrown into the ACIP meeting due to take place tomorrow. Is it possible that could trigger a new shift in thinking and a new direction that positively impacts the movement looking to stop the mRNA shots?

Just a VERY long thread to a very simple idea.