Josh Barzon Profile picture
Jun 26 20 tweets 16 min read Read on X
🧵 IFB 2.0: Exploring Its Modern Groups and Subcultures

This post is an addendum to my previous thread on the history of the IFB, looking beyond the legacy stream (and mainstream connotation) to explore the many distinct circles that make up the fragmented IFB world today. 🧵👇🏼 Image
🧵 Introduction and Disclaimer

Yesterday, my thread on the history of the Independent Fundamental Baptist (IFB) movement absolutely blew up! … and I’m deeply grateful for the thoughtful discussions it sparked.

One theme I consistently heard (both from former IFB members and those still in it) is that the article was fair, accurate, and balanced in how it addressed the broader culture and trajectory of the movement.

That means a lot to me.

That said, many also noted (rightly) that the IFB world isn’t monolithic. There are many circles, camps, and subcultures within the IFB label. some harsher than others, some more refined, and some actively reforming.

My original thread primarily focused on the mainstream connotation of “IFB” which is what most people think of when they hear the term. That includes the revivalist, authoritarian, King James Only stream most closely shaped by Jack Hyles, The Sword of the Lord, and their institutional legacy. This is still the most dominant and influential expression of the movement today.

But in fairness to the diversity within the IFB world, I’ve put together this short addendum highlighting other groups that exist within or adjacent to the IFB. Each with their own tone, emphasis, and theological posture.

Below is a concise overview of several of these distinct IFB-aligned branches. I hope you enjoy this, and let me know in the comments at the end if you are part of (or were part of ) any of these IFB circles. 👇🏼Image
🧵 1. Hyles/Sword of the Lord Legacy

Rooted in revivalism, King James Onlyism, and loyalty to strongman leadership. This camp includes Hyles-Anderson College, First Baptist Church of Hammond (IN), Jack Trieber (Golden State Baptist College), and Jeff Fugate (Commonwealth Baptist College) and other smaller institutions.

The Sword of the Lord newspaper under Curtis Hutson and Shelton Smith helped define the preaching style, doctrine, and ministry philosophy for decades. Loyalty to high standards and pastoral authority remains central, even as some distance themselves from past scandals.

Preaching is typically topical, emotional, and tied to personal application, with an emphasis on soul-winning, bus ministries, and hard-line separation from worldly culture.

The legacy of Jack Hyles continues to shape this stream’s views on church growth, pastoral power, and family roles. It remains the most visible and controversial face of the IFB to outsiders.Image
🧵 2. Camp Meeting Crowd

Loud, fiery, and emotionally charged, this group leans heavily into Southern revivalism. Preaching is intense, often theatrical, with heavy emphasis on shouting, altar calls, and demonstrative worship that can be quite entertaining! .

Leaders like Tony Hutson, John Hamblin, and Cody Zorn are popular in this circuit, which still hosts weeklong camp meetings throughout the Appalachian and Southern U.S. regions.

These events often include marathon services, multiple sermons, and emotionally stirring music. The culture emphasizes spiritual fervor, traditionalism, and resistance to modern trends.

While often dismissed by more academic fundamentalists, this crowd sees itself as carrying the torch of old-time religion through bold preaching and raw sincerity. They are less institutionally connected but deeply rooted in a shared culture of experiential Christianity.Image
🧵 3. Bob Jones University (BJU) Circle

BJU represents a unique branch of fundamentalism with a more academic, culturally refined, and institutionally polished than most IFB circles.

Founded in 1927 by evangelist Bob Jones Sr., the university became a leading voice in 20th-century American fundamentalism, emphasizing Christian worldview, apologetics, and classical education. It helped train generations of pastors, missionaries, teachers, and musicians.

While not explicitly IFB, many alumni went on to serve in IFB or IFB-adjacent churches and institutions, making its influence deeply felt within the movement. The school is especially known for its strong fine arts program, intellectual rigor, and Reformed-leaning fundamentalist theology.

Though it has faced public scrutiny in past decades over issues related to racial policies and administrative culture, BJU has made notable changes in recent years, distinguishing itself from the more revivalist, authoritarian tone of legacy IFB institutions.Image
🧵 4. Pensacola Christian College (PCC) Circle

Accredited and conservative, Pensacola Christian College holds firmly to King James Onlyism but presents its convictions with a more subdued and polished tone compared to legacy IFB circles.

Founded in 1974 by Arlin and Beka Horton, PCC grew rapidly due to its academic standards and the popularity of its affiliated Abeka curriculum, now used in thousands of Christian schools across the country.

The college enforces dress codes, music standards, and behavioral expectations, but it does so with a softer institutional style. They are less revivalist and more administrative. Chapel services focus on practical holiness and Christian living.

Notable alumni like Kurt Skelly, Dave Young, Ben Everson, and others have become influential voices for a more balanced version of fundamentalism, committed to separation but without the drama and scandal of other IFB offshoots.

PCC emphasizes professionalism, discipline, and ministry training, and while it remains conservative, it is often viewed as a “safer” and more stable alternative to Hyles-Anderson or similar institutions.Image
🧵 5. Heartland Baptist Bible College

Established in 1966 as Pacific Coast Baptist Bible College, Heartland moved from California to Oklahoma City in 1998 due to financial issues and a desire to strengthen its church-based support. It was renamed Heartland Baptist Bible College and reorganized under independent fundamentalist Baptist churches rather than a single sponsoring denomination.

Led for years by Sam Davison and now by Jason Gaddis, it is tightly affiliated with Southwest Baptist Church and has become a trusted source of training for many IFB churches.

The college hold very strongly to KJV-only convictions, Landmark ecclesiology (emphasizing a historical continuity of Baptist churches), and conservative standards in dress, music, and worship - but is much more “southern gospel” leaning in their music style than other more musically conservative peers such as Baptist College of Ministry run by the Van Gelderans (covered later).

Their preaching is often more responsible than other IFB circles as they aim to teach “expositional” preaching to their students which is commendable. However topical and eisegetical preaching still exists within this camp through various hobby horse topics, revival meetings, and chapel messages.

Heartland’s atmosphere is perceived as more structured and disciplined than chaotic, and it has avoided many of the extreme excesses of the Hyles model.

Heartland alumni often serve in churches that still emphasize revivalism and conservative standards but with a calmer, more pastoral spirit. It maintains strong ties to older IFB fellowships and newer pastors seeking stability.Image
🧵 6. Bible Baptist Fellowship International (BBFI) / Now Mission University

One of the oldest and most influential networks in Baptist fundamentalism, BBFI was established in 1950 by pastors like Noel Smith and G. Beauchamp Vick.

For decades, it was a powerhouse of missionary support, church planting, and pastoral training, headquartered in Springfield, Missouri.

Though less visible in recent years, it still operates the Baptist Bible College (BBC) in Springfield (now called Mission University under the leadership of Mark Milioni) and hosts regular national meetings. The fellowship has historically focused on missions, evangelism, and church autonomy.

BBFI churches vary widely in culture (some more progressive, others more traditional) but generally retain conservative values without the cultural militancy of the Sword crowd.

Preaching style ranges from expository to topical, and many BBFI pastors allow for more diversity in application of standards and philosophy. Though its peak influence may have passed, BBFI still represents a major stream in the history of 20th-century Baptist fundamentalism.Image
🧵 7. GARBC (General Association of Regular Baptist Churches)

The GARBC has always stood slightly apart from the cultural and revivalist ethos of the IFB world, but still has many similarities.

Founded in 1932 as a break from the liberal Northern Baptist Convention, it prioritized doctrinal clarity, church autonomy, and theological education.

GARBC churches are typically not King James Only, nor are they revivalistic in style. Instead, they emphasize expository preaching, ecclesiastical separation, and historic Baptist confessions.

Seminaries like Faith Baptist Bible College (IA) and Clarks Summit University (PA) have long been associated with the GARBC and promote strong academic training.

While many in the IFB world see GARBC churches as too “respectable” or intellectual, this fellowship has maintained a steady voice for doctrinal integrity without embracing the authoritarianism or showmanship found elsewhere.

Many GARBC churches today do not identify as IFB, but their history overlaps significantly with fundamentalist battles of the 20th century. It remains a vital if quieter, part of the conservative Baptist landscape.Image
🧵8. West Coast Baptist College / Lancaster Baptist Church

Founded in 1995 by Paul Chappell, a former student and admirer of Jack Hyles, West Coast Baptist College (WCBC) in Lancaster, California, reflects a refined, professionalized version of the legacy IFB model. Through Lancaster Baptist Church, Chappell has built a large ministry known for excellence, structure, and polished presentation.

While firmly King James Only in practice, WCBC has pursued accreditation, developed strong music and media programs, and trained thousands of students for pastoral and missions work. Its emphasis is on leadership development, personal standards, and local church loyalty but with a softer tone than many older IFB institutions.

Chappell’s influence has grown nationwide among younger pastors who want IFB values without the chaos or cult of personality. However, the movement still carries many hallmarks of centralized leadership, strong institutional control, and limited openness to critique.
It remains a flagship model for churches that want to maintain traditional IFB commitments while appearing more mainstream and sustainable.Image
🧵 9. Maranatha Baptist University

Maranatha, located in Watertown, Wisconsin, has long stood on the border of the IFB world while maintaining a more evangelical and academically rigorous identity.

Founded in 1968, the school is not King James Only and is affiliated more with the Regular Baptist stream than revivalist IFB culture. Maranatha offers degrees in ministry, education, and business and places a strong emphasis on biblical fidelity, theological clarity, and pastoral excellence. Its tone is more academic and pastoral than emotional or confrontational.

Many conservative Baptist churches outside the IFB orbit send students here as a trusted alternative to legacy institutions. Though it shares roots with fundamentalist separatism, Maranatha today functions as a more open, theologically conservative Baptist university that distances itself from IFB legalism, authoritarianism, and cultural isolation.

Its alumni are often found in churches that prioritize biblical teaching and healthy church life while eschewing rigid standards or platform politics.Image
🧵 10. Crown College / Clarence Sexton Circle

Located in Powell, Tennessee, and founded by Clarence Sexton (now deceased) in 1991, Crown College presents one of the most polished and nationalistic expressions of traditional IFB culture. Rooted in loyalty to the King James Bible, revival-style preaching, and structured pastoral authority, Crown emphasizes themes of patriotism, church planting, and “the old-time religion.”

Sexton often blended Baptist separatism with an admiration for British Baptist history and America’s founding fathers, creating a unique brand that is both spiritual and historical. Crown alumni are trained with a heavy focus on pastoral ministry, Christian education, and service, but within a controlled and highly traditional framework.

Though the school avoids has avoided large scale scandal and chaos often associated with other IFB institutions, it maintains a strict line on doctrine, music, dress, and church governance.Image
🧵 11. Baptist College of Ministry / Van Gelderens / Falls Baptist Church

A highly revival-focused and pietistic circle, the Baptist College of Ministry (BCM), located in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, operates under the leadership of the Van Gelderen family. This movement is known for its emphasis on surrender, spiritual awakening, holiness, and prayer-saturated ministry. They are very influenced by the legacy Bob Jones University flavor of fundamentalism.

The BCM model promotes a theology of spiritual victory over sin, often drawing from Keswick-style teaching and personal consecration. Their conferences like the “Victory Conference” and “Revival Focus” events aim to reignite passion for revival and call Christians to deeper consecration.

Music and worship remain deeply conservative, and the preaching style is serious, quiet, and deeply introspective. While not widely known outside revivalist circles, BCM has significant influence in IFB camps committed to prayer ministry, conservative music, and full-time evangelism.

Though their theological positions are rooted in separation, their method is less bombastic than other IFB groups and often appeals to families and churches longing for deeper spirituality.Image
🧵 12. Reforming IFB Voices

In recent years, a number of pastors and leaders have emerged who retain their Baptist convictions and conservative theology while rejecting the toxic traits of legalism, authoritarianism, and isolation that often characterized the legacy IFB.

This group includes leaders like Josh Teis (Idea Network), Carey Schmidt (Emmanuel Baptist, CT), Kurt Skelly (Faith Baptist, VA), Kenny Baldwin (Crossroads Baptist, VA) and Bryan Samms (Jacksonville, FL). These men represent a quieter revolution within the IFB that is committed to expositional preaching, healthy leadership structures, grace-based ministry, and theological depth. While some still operate within IFB-adjacent circles, most avoid the label due to its cultural baggage.

They tend to attract younger pastors and church planters disillusioned with previous models but still committed to sound doctrine and missions. Their churches often include contemporary worship, relaxed dress codes, and emphasis on discipleship and leadership development.

This stream is not a formal fellowship but a shared mood: Christ-centered, theologically sound, and committed to reforming from within or alongside the IFB world.Image
🧵 13. Stephen Anderson / New IFB (NIFB)

Stephen Anderson, pastor of Faithful Word Baptist Church in Tempe, Arizona, launched the “New IFB” as a reactionary movement against both modern culture and what he perceived as compromise in older fundamentalist circles.

The NIFB holds to extreme King James Onlyism, hardline separation, and conspiratorial eschatology, antisemitic rhetoric, Holocaust denial, and aggressive anti-LGBTQ+ preaching, and aggressive door knocking evangelist that focuses on getting people to “pray a prayer” to be saved.

Steven Anderson is an alumni of Hyles Anderson college, and much of his ministry is just a more extreme version of many systems and philosophies of ministry he was trained in while studying under Hyles/Schaap.

This group has planted dozens of churches globally through livestreamed services and YouTube evangelism, creating a digital IFB subculture that is highly insular and militant.

Though numerically small, the NIFB’s online visibility has made it disproportionately influential in shaping public perceptions of the IFB. Even legacy IFB leaders have publicly disavowed Anderson’s network as cult-like. It remains one of the most radical expressions of modern Baptist separatism.Image
🧵 14. Revivalist Evangelist Circuit

The traveling evangelist tradition remains a backbone of IFB church culture. Figures like the late Tom Farrell, R.B. Ouellette, Scott Pauley, Tim Green, Larry Brown, and John Hamblin have preached in hundreds of churches, Bible colleges, youth camps, and revival meetings across the country.

This circuit is defined by a blend of high-energy preaching, emotional altar calls, and themes like America’s decline, soul-winning urgency, and personal holiness. These evangelists often operate independently but are treated like circuit-riding celebrities, drawing big crowds and shaping pulpit style and theology.

While some remain tied to legacy IFB institutions, others drift across fellowships, acting as bridge figures between traditional and reforming camps. They help reinforce revivalism, preaching cadence, and IFB cultural expectations across generational lines.Image
🧵 15. Mission Boards & Para-Church Ministries

While IFB churches are fiercely independent, a vast ecosystem of mission boards, youth camps, literature publishers, and support ministries function behind the scenes to connect them.

Organizations like Baptist International Missions, Inc. (BIMI), Macedonia World Baptist Missions, and Worldwide New Testament Baptist Missions serve thousands of missionaries sent by IFB churches.

Summer camps, evangelistic rallies, and leadership conferences (often hosted by churches or schools) provide continuity for IFB youth and reinforce standards, doctrines, and vocational paths.

Though not always visible to outsiders, these ministries form the infrastructure that keeps the movement alive beyond the Sunday pulpit. They function as “soft networks” of influence, creating pipelines for preacher boys, missionaries, and future leaders.Image
🧵 16. Unaffiliated Baptists

Not all who share IFB values wear the label. Many churches across the U.S. use the King James Bible, practice conservative worship, and uphold separation from worldly trends, yet remain independent of fellowships, Bible colleges, or branded networks.

Some of these churches are former IFB ministries seeking reform without completely abandoning traditional convictions. Others have never been formally aligned but function similarly in culture and belief.

These churches often reject the authoritarianism or baggage of IFB history while preserving local church autonomy and doctrinal conservatism. They represent both a soft landing zone for ex-IFB members and a quietly enduring thread within broader Baptist life.Image
🧵 17. Conservative Music Ministries & Worship Influencers

In IFB and fundamentalist circles, music is deeply tied to theology and identity. These ministries have helped shape worship philosophy, musical standards, and church culture across generations.

Steve Pettit Evangelistic Team: BJU-connected and known for acoustic, folk-style arrangements with reverent lyrics. Offered a softer, Appalachian tone within traditional boundaries. Influential during Pettit’s BJU presidency.

Galkin Evangelistic Team: Blending gospel clarity with conservative, modernized hymnody. Popular among reforming IFB and conservative Baptist churches looking for Christ-centered worship without “going contemporary.”

Herbster Evangelistic Team: Tied to institutions like Crown and West Coast. Known for polished vocal ensembles, high dress standards, and traditional revival-style music with patriotic themes.

The Wilds Christian Camp: Hugely influential in shaping conservative worship through camps, music publications, and songbooks. Known for scriptural lyrics, musical creativity, and broad use in GARBC, BJU, and Maranatha networks.

Majesty Music / Patch the Pirate: Ron and Shelly Hamilton’s family-friendly music empire. Beloved in children’s ministries, it combines storytelling and doctrine in a conservative musical framework. Also produces church music resources.

Faith Music Missions: Popular in Southern IFB churches. Offers gospel quartets, piano/organ duets, and old-style arrangements. Often sold at legacy IFB conferences and bookstores.

SoundForth: Once part of BJU, it produced choral and instrumental music for churches and schools. Though sold off in 2012, its catalog still circulates widely in conservative ministries.Image
🧵 Conclusion and a Request

That wraps up this addendum to my IFB history thread.

I’m sure there are even more groups, ministries, and voices I didn’t cover here. So let me know in the comments:

🔹 Are you connected to any of these circles?
🔹 Did you grow up in or serve within one of them?
🔹 Are there others I should add?

I’d love to hear your connections, experiences, and testimony whether you are still in the IFB world, have moved on from it, or are somewhere in between.

This conversation still matters! 👇🏼

#church #IFB #めおと日和 #Baptist #fundamental #music #kjv #abuse #denominations #hyles #pcc #Pensacola #maranatha #BJU #bobjones #Fundamentalism #Revivalism #KJVO #Separation #Preaching #Legalism #Exvangelical #Deconstruction #Reformation #Evangelism #Apologetics #Missions #Modesty #Tradition #Christianity #Campmeeting #Testimony

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Barzon

Josh Barzon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoshuaBarzon

Jun 25
🧵 The Evolution of the Independent Fundamental Baptist (IFB) Movement: A Historical Overview

No matter what denomination you’re in, the IFB has shaped your world…whether you realize it or not.

Its legacy is messy, massive, & often misunderstood.

This is the IFB story🧵👇🏼Image
🧵 Introduction and Disclaimer

The Independent Fundamental Baptist (IFB) movement has left a unique and complex mark on American religious life over the past century. Known for its strict theological conservatism, separatist mindset, and cultural traditionalism, the IFB movement emerged out of early 20th-century fundamentalism and has since splintered into numerous subgroups.

This 🧵 walks through the history of the IFB (from its late 19th-century roots to its present-day factions) highlighting key figures, institutions, doctrines, controversies, and cultural impacts along the way.

As someone who spent many years in various IFB circles, my goal is to offer an honest and objective look at this movement with its strengths, flaws, and influence.

🚨 DISCLAIMER: You may find points you disagree with or think need more nuance. I’ve done my best to condense a century of history into a readable format while remaining as historically objective as possible. This is not a hit piece. Just a concise historical overview.

Let’s dive in 👇🏼Image
🧵 1. Prehistory: Foundations of Fundamentalism (Late 1800s – Early 1900s)

Before there was an “IFB,” there was a fire kindling deep within American Protestantism. The late 19th century saw traditional Christian beliefs challenged on every front: science, philosophy, and theology. Darwin’s Origin of Species had sparked a cultural revolution. German higher criticism was sweeping through seminaries, questioning the reliability and unity of the Bible. And the social gospel movement was beginning to replace personal salvation with societal reform.

In this era of upheaval, a coalition of conservative Christians rose to defend what they called the “fundamentals of the faith.” These included the inerrancy of Scripture, the virgin birth, substitutionary atonement, the bodily resurrection of Christ, and the reality of His second coming. It wasn’t just about doctrine. It was about drawing a line in the sand.

Though the Independent Fundamental Baptist movement hadn’t yet taken form, its theological DNA was already being written. These early fundamentalists were not yet separatists. In fact, many fought to reform their denominations from within (Presbyterians, Baptists, Methodists, and others) united by shared convictions and a growing sense of urgency.

🔥 Key Figures:
• A. J. Gordon – Boston pastor and Baptist thinker who championed missions and premillennialism.
• B. H. Carroll – Founder of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, committed to inerrancy and Baptist distinctives.
• Curtis Lee Laws – The Baptist editor who coined the term “fundamentalist” in 1920, calling for a stand against liberal drift.
• R. A. Torrey – Evangelist, educator, and editor of The Fundamentals, the 12-volume defense of orthodox Christian beliefs.
• J. Gresham Machen – A towering Presbyterian scholar who walked away from Princeton to form Westminster Seminary, declaring war on modernist theology.

⚔️ Key Issues
• The rise of higher criticism and naturalistic theology; scholars began dissecting the Bible as merely a human document, questioning its authorship, unity, and divine origin. This shook confidence in Scripture’s authority.
• Erosion of belief in miracles and the supernatural; influenced by Enlightenment thinking, many theologians began to dismiss the virgin birth, resurrection, and other miracles as myth or metaphor, not historical fact.
• Modernism in seminaries and mainline pulpits; liberal theology gained ground in once-conservative institutions, leading future pastors and professors to reinterpret or reject core Christian doctrines.
• The struggle to define orthodoxy in a shifting age; with cultural, scientific, and theological norms rapidly changing, believers faced mounting pressure to adapt or hold firm to historic Christian beliefs, often at great cost.

🌎 Key Impacts:
• The birth of the term “fundamentalist” as a badge of doctrinal fidelity
• A surge in Bible conferences, revivalism, and printed materials to combat liberalism
• The formation of new institutions and seminaries committed to doctrinal purity
• A growing tension between fighting from within and separating entirely

⛪ From Cooperation to Conflict
What began as a united front would soon fracture. As denominations like the Northern Baptist Convention and the Presbyterian Church USA tilted further left, some conservatives stayed and fought. Others walked away. These fault lines would eventually give rise to the next generation of separatists, many of whom would go on to form the backbone of what would become the Independent Fundamental Baptist movement.

This was the calm before the storm. The IFB wasn’t born yet, but the stage was set.Image
Read 11 tweets
Jun 22
🧵 A Visual History of Christian Symbols

From crosses to cryptic marks, believers through the ages have used emblems to express their faith.

I learned a ton researching this, & I’m excited to share the origin stories behind Christianity’s most iconic symbols.

[a thread 🧵👇] Image
🧵/1 The Latin Cross

The most recognizable Christian symbol wasnt actually widely used until after Constantine’s Edict of Milan.

Its adoption came in the 4th century as the Church emerged from persecution & embraced the cross as a symbol of salvation. Image
🧵/2 The Fish (Ichthys)

Used by early Christians as early as the 2nd century during Roman persecution.

The Greek word ΙΧΘΥΣ was an acronym meaning “Jesus Christ/ God’s Son/ Savior.”

It served as a secret identifier for persecuted Christians. Safe, subtle, & deeply theological Image
Read 22 tweets
Jun 12
🧵How did such a recent Bible translation EXPLODE in popularity with pastors, theologians, and everyday readers alike?

Here’s the origin story and impact of the Christian Standard Bible.

[A thread 🧵 on the #CSB👇🏼 ] Image
🧵 1. The Origin Story: Seeds of a New Translation

The CSB didn’t emerge in a vacuum. Its roots go back to the late 1990s when the Southern Baptist Convention (concerned about accuracy and doctrinal fidelity in mainstream Bibles) set out to create a trustworthy, readable translation for its churches.

Thus, the Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB) was born.Image
🧵 2. The HCSB: A Good Start with Mixed Results

The HCSB had strengths:
▪️ Modern language with faithful exegesis
▪️ Fresh renderings of familiar verses
▪️ Unique translation choices (e.g. “Messiah” over “Christ” in the Gospels)

But it also faced critiques:
▪️ Inconsistent terminology across books
▪️ Jargon unfamiliar to some readers
▪️ An uneven blend of literal and dynamic translation

The result? A solid but sometimes awkward text. Valuable for study, but not always ideal for public reading or memorization.Image
Read 13 tweets
Jun 5
🧵A Tale of Two Translations: The Story of the NASB & the LSB

✴️ 2 translations
✴️ 1 legacy
✴️ A shared origin but two distinct path

Scroll down for a fascinating 🧵 exploring how they rose together, diverged, & sparked fresh debates about the future of Bible translation

🧵👇🏼 Image
🧵 It all began in 1901 with the American Standard Version (ASV) 🇺🇸

Before the NASB or LSB were dreamed of, the ASV (1901) was produced as the American revision of the English Revised Version (1881).

Its defining traits:
▪️ Rigidly literal (even clunky at times)
▪️ Emphasis on original-language accuracy
▪️ Yahweh used in marginal notes
▪️ Strong influence in early 20th-century seminaries

It became the gold standard for word-for-word study Bibles—though not for casual reading.Image
🧵 The Lockman Foundation & the Birth of the NASB (1971) 📖

In the post-WWII era, American evangelicals wanted a modern, literal Bible in the spirit of the ASV… but easier to read.

Enter the Lockman Foundation: an independent, non-denominational ministry committed to Bible translation.

In 1971, they released the New American Standard Bible (NASB), aiming to:

✅ Preserve ASV accuracy
✅ Remove archaic phrasing
✅ Serve pastors, scholars, and serious readers

It was an ASV for a new generation.Image
Read 12 tweets
Jun 1
🧵 The Story of the ESV: From Coffee Shops to Conference Stages — The Bible of a New Evangelical Era

How did a revision of a mainline “liberal” Bible turn into the flagship translation of Reformed evangelicalism?

It all starts with a controversy in 1952…

[👇🏼] Image
🧵 Origins in the RSV

The ESV’s roots go back to the Revised Standard Version—a 1952 translation positioned as the KJV’s heir.

It sparked backlash, especially from conservatives, for renderings like “young woman” in Isaiah 7:14.

But despite the controversy, the RSV was:

🧠 Linguistically rigorous

📚 Based on updated Hebrew & Greek texts

✍🏼 A formal, word-for-word approach

🎶 Retained the cadence of the KJV

The bones were solid, but the theology, many felt, was not.Image
🧵 Why the ESV Was Created

By the 1990s, evangelicals were translation-homeless.

• NIV: easy to read, but too loose.
• NASB: super literal, but often stiff and awkward.
• KJV/NKJV: rich but archaic or uneven in manuscript usage.

Crossway sensed the need: a modern, readable, theologically conservative Bible with literary beauty.

Goals:

🎯 Literal where possible

🕊️ Theologically sound

📖 Rhythmic like the KJV

🛠️ Usable for preaching, memorizing, liturgy, and studyImage
Read 13 tweets
May 30
🧵The NKJV: How a 1980’s Bible Translation is Becoming the Bible of Choice for a New Generation

It was criticized by the left & right.

Overlooked for decades.

But now the NKJV is experiencing a surprising revival!

[a 🧵 on the history & impact of the NKJV 👇] Image
🧵/📜 The History: Born from Tradition, Not Trend

In 1975, an international team of 130 biblical scholars, pastors, and language experts began a historic effort.

Their goal: revive the KJV tradition—but update the language for modern clarity, without leaving the Textus Receptus manuscript family.

👉🏼They didn’t want to reinvent the Bible.

👉🏼They wanted to make a good one better.

🗓 After 7 years of labor, the NKJV launched in 1982.

It was the fifth major revision in the King James lineage, following:

• 1611 KJV

• 1629 Cambridge

• 1769 Oxford (Blayney)

• 1873 Cambridge Paragraph Bible

The NKJV was the natural next step.Image
🧵/🧠 The Minds Behind the NKJV

The NKJV wasn’t a corporate invention. It was a scholarly, evangelical effort.

Led by:

• Dr. Arthur L. Farstad – General Editor, co-editor of the Majority Text Greek NT, passionate about continuity with KJV roots

• Dr. James Price – OT editor and Hebrew scholar from Temple Baptist Seminary (and author of "KJVO: A New Sect")

• Dr. Edward W. Goodrick – expert in biblical languages and co-author of the Goodrick-Kohlenberger numbering system (modern alternative to Strong’s)

• Dr. Radmacher, Thomas Nelson board of review, and others from Dallas Theological, Liberty, and Reformed circles

• Dr. Jerry Falwell Sr. – provided theological guidance and mobilized evangelical support

💡 Over 130 scholars, linguists, and pastors contributed to this work over 7 years.Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(