I have theories on why they look like this.
(I am a practicing member in good standing and attend temples regularly, I have seen more of the one on lower right than most people, and I just have theories, because the church's official description is just "directs you to God")
Take a look at some other temples. They come from very different belief systems but are all built to be, at some symbolic level, a place where a god dwells - and they are built to make that god comfortable.
(that's not the real Parthenon it's in Nashville but bear with me)
The cathedral in Reims has this nave taking up most of its expansive volume, a statement in stone of a God who is the Highest - the eye is forced upwards, there is a sense of dizzying height, the throne of the god in the Host
The interior of the Latter-day Saint temples, which can have similar proportions overall, are not like this. If it's tall, it doesn't have a huge nave, it has multiple stories. Verticality is just one element. The god enshrined here, it seems, does a lot of different things.
But the main rite done in these temples (the spooky one, yeah, that one) is done in what is essentially a play. The supplicant symbolically reenacts the story of the Creation, Fall, and God's covenants with Adam, and in the early temples each had its own stage.
(for time constraints, because the Church is dedicated to symbolically ushering every human who has ever lived through this rite, the rooms are now small movie theaters instead of stages - they are symbols of stages which are symbolic of the world, kind of a Borgesian recursion)
You walk in here, you're seated, and you are symbolically watching the Earth be created, same as you did before you were born. This room is, symbolically, the size of the Earth. Very important when considering what god lives here - the temples are *bigger on the inside.*
There is an actor who plays God, actors as Adam and Eve and Lucifer and other characters, and they break the fourth wall, they address the audience, the audience are characters, they are all Adam and Eve, we are watching our first parents show us how to obey God in first person.
In my Father's house are many mansions, in my Father's mansions are many worlds. The temple brings you to Edenic innocence, away from God's presence to the "World," and then, through obedience and the Gospel of Christ, back, redeemed. That is a LONG distance!
You complete the rite, cross the stage yourself, through the curtains to the "Celestial Room," symbolizing God's presence but not in any specific item, there's no Host or kami, it's basically a parlor, there are scriptures you can read in it. Then you leave and are busy elsewhere
Because you were *always* in the actual presence of God, the Spirit was *always* with you. The world we live in was Eden, is Babylon, will be Paradise, it will finish its own progression through these stages, and all of these stages are in all of these temples.
The temple is the world inside out, in a way, it is time inside out, because it's a templum, it's a measuring stone, it sets your compass for the world beyond, much as the Tabernacle was a surveyor's tent. It is a working building and it is sanctified for that purpose.
I've seen some people noting that the temples don't seem to have many windows, which is false, even in OP you can see some thin vertical windows on all of them, but they're practical lighting implements and not necessary, because the entire world's inside. You look inward there.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A Mr. Isaiah Thomas challenged my credentials (the Rosedale thread, some Sailer articles) by presenting "just one" of the books he had read, "White Flight" by Kevin Kruse, which reading made him more of an expert than me. Well, now I've read it. It doesn't talk about the causes.
Mr. Thomas did not attempt to correct me on any particular point of fact, simply my orientation toward "Nazis with substacks" over "real historians" like Kruse. Kruse is a real historian, and has a historian's penchant for tunnel vision.
This is not, as I suspect Mr. Thomas justifiably believes from its title, a general history of white flight. It is an attempt to link the "New Right" of 2005 with 20th century segregationist villains, and to present George W. Bush's colorblind conservatism as secretly racist.
The H1B discourse hits hard because the frustration of "getting a job" is or has been a huge financial drag for many of us, adding up to a national tragedy in aggregate, but has been consistently mocked as a skill issue, and often accepted, internalized, we put our heads down.
I believe that the boomer hate meme itself wouldn't have come about if the job market hadn't inexplicably become entirely hostile for labor at all levels, from the difficulty of getting in the door to the impossibility of advancement to the inflation of education requirements
But for many of us, we've lived in the Great Depression except everyone told us it wasn't. Lot of us gave up and went to basement to eat tendies and be online trolls, probably wouldn't've if there had been jobs. Might have had families. Guaranteed? No, sure, but there's a chance.
Bastion: Searching for hope in the ruins of your city
Transistor: Escaping your suddenly hostile, ruined city
Pyre: Gathering forces to reclaim your city
Hades: Sneaking past your dad to visit his ex-wife
Hades II: same but black and gay ig?
This isn't really fair to Hades, which strips the reclamation narrative of Pyre down to family relationships, the heart of any working city but cities just aren't important at that point because you've reclaimed them and they're still empty - this is the Millennial Journey
The first three Supergiant games all test gameplay elements to be perfected in Hades, while sticking closely to the theme of a lost city. This is a powerful Millennial image, the hypothetical Georgetown where they might have received the fulfilling cultured companionship promised
3d printed eggs + leaked celebrity genomes = populations of frail, sickly IVF kids who sort of look like a combination of one parent and whoever was famous 10 years ago
When the cost of breeding your favorite celebrities gets down to below 10k for combination of data, zygotes, bagwomb, and chemicals you'll start to see some manmade horrors
Thoughts on the "nukes aren't real" conspiracy theory. Much less challenged than some narratives that affect our lives much less like the moon landing, people get livid when you do, why? How could the governments hide such a big thing and why? I'll explain.
Conspiracy theories arise when official narratives have frustrating problems. Why haven't governments used nuclear weapons since they were invented? We're told they're Just Too Terrible and weigh on everyone's conscience, but how naive would you have to be to believe that?
We're told that the nations of the Earth are worried enough about their effects to suppress development through political and economic means and have been successful, though several unstable dictatorships have apparently developed them without any temptation to use them anywhere.
I feel bad for the people who advanced in a field because they were good at school rather than any deep understanding of the field itself and now must support their pride as expert professionals on pure assertion and credential, they were led out on a limb
#NotAllWomen in the academy are like this but they are easily identified, they are prim, slightly garish makeup, really just schoolteachers in whatever field, feeling the weight of the greatest responsibility of all schoolmarms (making sure boys aren't having fun)
the women that are actually good at their subject don't talk about being good about their subject they talk about their subject.