Introduced last night, NC House Bill 958 is cunning and terrible. Framed as administrative refinement, it in fact constructs new barriers to voting, chills civic participation, & shifts control over the electoral process in partisan & exclusionary ways. Here’s what it does:🧵
First, it delays and disqualifies ballots by tightening the rules that determine which ballots count. Minor errors by voters or poll workers,such as voting in the wrong precinct, can now lead to total ballot rejection, even if the voter was otherwise eligible.
Second, it allows election boards to remove precinct officials at any time, even on Election Day, & ban them from future service. This expands partisan discretion over poll worker selection, opening the door to retaliation or politically motivated removals.
Third, it prohibits members of the State & County Boards of Elections from publicly encouraging voter turnout, regardless of party. This silences the very officials tasked with protecting democratic participation & rebrands voter engagement as improper advocacy. This is lunacy.
Fourth, the bill pilots signature verification software for absentee ballots. This has proven to be a flawed & discriminatory tool that has disproportionately rejected ballots from elderly, disabled, & minority voters in other states. Ballot rejection by algorithm is a bad idea.
Fifth, it prohibits ranked-choice voting in all elections, foreclosing a popular reform that promotes majority consensus & discourages negative campaigning, without offering any policy justification whatsoever.
And finally, it empowers the executive director of the State Board of Elections to exempt up to 25 staff from civil service protections, increasing the risk of politically motivated hiring & weakening nonpartisan administration. Centralizing partisan control is the point.
HB 958 narrows access, weakens oversight, & chills participation. It transforms the State & County Boards of Elections from public servants into silent bureaucrats, strips voters of protections against official error, & sows distrust in the mechanisms meant to preserve democracy.
What can be done? Speak out, show up, & stay vigilant. Call your legislators & demand they oppose HB 958. Support voting rights groups challenging these restrictions. Educate your community about what’s at stake. This bill thrives on quiet passage. Make noise. Be loud. Say no.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Griffin finally conceded. But what the people of NC have endured—and what Republican judges, including those on the state’s highest court, have inflicted upon them—is unforgivable. This wasn’t a normal legal dispute. It was a premeditated, full-scale attack on democracy. 🧵
This was an orchestrated scheme to seize power by any means necessary. Griffin weaponized the law and transformed the courts from halls of justice into strongholds for corruption, where principles were twisted, and the truth was buried under a mountain of legal manipulation.
The Republican judges who countenanced this scheme turned judicial robes into shields for dishonesty, cloaking their power grabs in the language of law while mocking everything justice is supposed to stand for. Their conduct was nothing short of a desecration of the legal system.
For the first time in 125 years, elections in NC will no longer be overseen by a governor elected by the people, but by partisan operatives handpicked by a Republican state auditor, thanks to an anonymous, unexplained, two-sentence court order. 🧵
The new Republican-controlled board will now oversee every election in all 100 counties—including a still-disputed Supreme Court race that @AllisonJRiggs won, where GOP judges ordered thousands of ballots be discarded. The timing is not a coincidence. It’s a setup.
Let’s be clear: the people of North Carolina voted against this power grab—repeatedly. Courts had already ruled it unconstitutional. But Republicans waited for a lame-duck window, rammed it through, and found partisan judges willing to rubber-stamp it in secret.
As a N.C. native, former N.C. Supreme Court law clerk, & advocate for civic fairness, I am disgusted by the spectacle unfolding in the halls of the state’s highest court. It released this order tonight, , w/ an awful concurrence by Chief Justice Newby. 🧵rb.gy/nqceab
As I have warned before, regrettably, a cabal of self-serving Republican jurists seeks to subvert the will of the people through legal chicanery and political gamesmanship. Sadly, these are robed enablers of authoritarianism plotting to override the democratic process.
J. @AllisonJRiggs won the election. North Carolinians rejected her opponent, Judge Jefferson Griffin. Since the day he was declared the loser, he has engaged in a naked partisan ploy to overturn the will of the people by abusing the court system. It’s disgraceful & repugnant.
In State v. Daw, the Republican majority on the NC Supreme Court has fundamentally altered and reshaped habeas corpus, a critical shield against government overreach that empowers prisoners to challenge the legality of their confinement. A 🧵 on the opinion and what it means.
Phillip Brandon Daw was sentenced to prison in 2019. During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, Mr. Daw filed a habeas corpus petition arguing that the conditions in the prison where he was held put him at risk of serious illness due to his asthma, violating his constitutional rights.
The trial court denied Mr. Daw's petition relying on N.C.G.S. § 17-4(2), which says a habeas application should be denied when the petitioner is "committed or detained by virtue of the final order, judgment or decree of a competent tribunal of civil or criminal jurisdiction."
In a 62-page scorcher, J. Reeves methodically incinerates qualified immunity (QI) as having "no basis in law" & being an "extra-constitutional affront." This opinion could finally spell the end for the doctrine. REQUIRED READING for all who yearn for accountability & justice. 🧵
Here, , J. Reeves denies dismissal in a case where a Black man lost nearly 2 years m of his life awaiting trial in an "inhumane" detention center, due to a false murder accusation based solely on the discredited testimony of a drug-impaired informant.s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2467…
What’s more, the detective in the case ignored exonerating evidence & manipulated a lineup. Mr. Green sued Detective Thomas, along with other defendants, under § 1983 for violating his civil rights. Detective Thomas filed a motion to dismiss based on QI.
🚨🚨🚨 Today, the N.C. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Washington v. Cline. The majority opinion was authored by J. Dietz and the Court’s four other conservatives. J. @Anita_Earls dissented, with J. @AllisonJRiggs joining. This case is very important. See thread and SHARE!!🧵
It raises legal issues about whether dismissing criminal charges fully remedies constitutional harms from a speedy trial violation or if additional civil remedies are sometimes needed to fully redress injuries that criminal processes cannot address alone.
The case involves Frankie Delano Washington, who brought a civil lawsuit alleging violations of his right to a speedy trial under the state constitution.He argued that the 5-year delay between his arrest & trial prejudiced his defense & impaired his ability to challenge evidence.