That’s the difference. RAND just showed us what a national AI strategy actually looks like. It’s time to name the problem. Thread 🧵
(1/9)
You want public AI infrastructure? Good luck getting that from Nvidia, Google, or OpenAI.
Their goal isn’t national resilience. It’s quarterly returns. They serve shareholders, not the public. (2/9)
China builds national labs with five-year targets.
We build brand decks for VC pitches. Then get distracted by "safety" panels run by failed philosophers and mid-tier MBAs. (3/9)
They deploy AI in drones, hospitals, power grids, and classrooms.
We build another chatbot and call it "AGI." All while fighting over who gets access to GPUs. (4/9)
RAND makes it clear. China's AI stack is strategic, planned, and treated as national infrastructure.
Our stack is financialized, siloed, and bottlenecked by a handful of rent-seekers in San Jose. (5/9)
We let three public companies monopolize compute. Then act surprised when nobody outside the cartel can train anything.
“Open AI” is open in name only. And it never belonged to the public. (6/9)
It’s not about beating China’s models. It’s about breaking free from a system where AI is whatever makes stock prices go up.
The enemy isn’t Chinese tech. It’s our own captured architecture. (7/9)
This won’t be fixed by more VC. It will only be fixed by public infrastructure, public compute, and a clear mandate to serve the nation, not Nasdaq. (8/9)
RAND gave you the blueprint.
📘
Use it. Before the last sovereign function gets swallowed by API tokens and stock-based comp plans.
ASML’s days as an untouchable monopoly are numbered. China’s EUV breakthrough is real, and Western media is pretending it doesn’t exist. Here's what they're hiding.
For years, ASML has been propped up as an untouchable monopoly. The only firm capable of making EUV machines. The crown jewel of the West’s semiconductor stack. (1/9)
But this myth only survives because no one in Western media wants to acknowledge the truth. China has developed its own EUV tech. It uses LDP. And yes, it's real. (2/9)
Exhibit Q.2
Bloomberg says China’s industrial profits are sinking due to US tariffs and deflation. Once again, Western media mistakes a war footing for collapse. (1/10)
China’s factories aren’t losing money because they’re inefficient. They’re losing money on purpose. This is margin warfare. Bloomberg won’t say that. (2/10)
A third of China’s industrial firms are running at a loss. But they’re not folding. They’re backed by local state support. The mission isn’t quarterly profit. It’s industrial control. (3/10)
China wants to be the global AI superpower by 2030.
Unlike the West, it's not waiting on OpenAI or Nvidia to hand it over. China is using full-spectrum industrial policy to dominate the entire stack. From fabs to foundation models.
RAND just mapped it out. Thread 🧵
(1/9)
Forget the Silicon Valley myth. China’s strategy is not emergent or chaotic. It’s orchestrated.
National funds, provincial grants, compute vouchers, startup parks. Every layer of the AI stack is mapped, funded, and controlled. (2/9)
Millions of qubits? Cryogenic chip breakthrough? Western media hypes Australia. But China already runs 1,000+ qubits under cryo.
They won’t say it. We will.
Millions of qubits on a single chip now possible after cryogenic breakthrough | Live Science share.google/perzUTD5Y8bf9H…
Exhibit Q: #001 – Cryo Control but No China? 🧵
(1/9)
Live Science headline:
"Millions of qubits now possible after cryogenic breakthrough."
Not a single mention of China. No context. No acknowledgment that China already achieved what the West claims is just around the corner.
China bled for its republic. India shook hands for hers. That alone tells you what each was willing to risk for power. (1/11)
The PRC killed the landlord class and gave peasants land. That’s why it can lay high-speed rail across provinces in months. No lawsuits. No holdouts. (2/11)