Some recycled shapes and patterns, and some new. I'll add to this as the day goes on.
Let's start with lower build-up play. The full-backs hold the width with Doku and Savinho playing inside. Silva and Reijnders drop in line with Rodri.
With Juventus marking man-to man, Silva and Reijnders were happy to take their markers into deeper positions.
This was the trigger for Doku and Savinho to narrow their markers, forcing Juventus to have little horizontal coverage on the last line of their defence.
Which Ederson can pick out all day.
Nothing new here, but a warning to any teams going man-to-man against City.
Pep “Ederson was an incredible quarterback today, making incredible long balls for Omar and Erling"
The 4th goal, same routine.
If Juventus kept horizontal coverage on the defensive line, then Ederson would find Savinho or Doku in their inside positions.
The role of Ederson can't be understated. Juventus' only solution would be to apply pressure, opening up the link passes to find the spare man.
Higher up the pitch, City moved to their more recognisable shape with the wingers holding the width.
We will come to the slight tweak on this, but this shape is nothing we haven't seen before.
The wide connections offering constant width, depth and support options with enough rotations and movement to keep the opponent guessing to which player will offer each option.
Reijnders offers the depth in this instance with a run in behind.
The beauty of Nunes at right back is his ability to identify the runs beyond. He changes his support position to offer depth and create the second goal.
Rodri can offer the support position in this instance, and this allows an extra player (Silva) in the box.
The biggest tactical difference in last night's game. The role of Doku.
Part of the usual attacking shape for 70% of the game but adding an unpredicatblility for the other 30%
Here, Doku is on the right next to Savinho. The 3 man side connection becomes 4.
This forces Ait-Nouri to hold the width and in turn City can't cover their counter-pressing positions on the edge of the box.
It will be interesting to see how this develops. The freedom Doku is allowed does impact the rest defence structure to counter-press.
When Doku holds the width, City have their rest defence structure with Rodri +2 more preventing any easy escape on the second line of defence.
Will the unpredictability of a roaming player compromise this? Is the risk worth the reward? One to watch.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A quick thread on the in-possession structure of England and other successful European teams.
Starting with the deep three-player connection (CBs and DM)
- Providing the base for recycling the ball
- CB's stepping in if the free player, DM stepping out to cover
- Base of rest defence structure. Horizontal centre-backs positioning offering central channel cover
Moving onto the wide connections
- Providing beyond (over) the defensive line positioning and runs, below the defensive line (through) and beside (around) the defensive line options
- Freedom to rotate but fill one of the above roles
- Below option forms half space rest defence
Liverpool, to counter the Palace 3-4-3, made some untypical tactical moves which ultimately cost them.
Let's take a deeper look at it. 🧵
First, it's essential to share context.
The game was an even one, Liverpool nullified Palace's threat for a lot of the game, but when they couldn't - BIG chances.
Arne Slot
'We are not conceding a lot of chances, but we are conceding a lot of goals'
The defensive set-up from Slot was the reasoning behind this. In organised defending, despite unconventional roles for Kerkez, Jones and Gakpo, they looked solid.
The problem with unconventional roles always comes in the transition.
A few observations from the Liverpool game yesterday. Track these to see how they develop.
Salah, playing with Frimpong, is certainly going to feature more inside. They will rotate, but Salah positioned himself in a box midfield with Frimpong holding the width.
The double pivot.
Sbozoszlai worked alongside Gravenberch to try and provide central progression from the second build-up line. Both players would look to build through and then offer around options if they couldn't progress centrally.
Away from the 3-2 build-up, Kerkez and Sbozoszlai would rotate.
With Kerkez higher and holding the width, Wirtz dropped into the double pivot, and Gakpo moved inside.
Or simply, Kerkez held the Sbozoszlai position inside.
We put a post out yesterday about Chelsea having 25 attacking transitions in the first half and completing 18 of these with a pass into their forward players within 3-5 passes.
Before we cover tactics, it's essential to appreciate the energy and intensity Chelsea brought to the final. The success they had in the first 10 minutes fed that energy
“I think we won the game in the first 10 minutes. The message before the game was to make them understand that we were here to win. I think in those first 10 minutes, the team was there—it probably set the tone for the game.
Chelsea set up in a 4-4-2 press with Enzo joining Pedro on the first pressing line.
Palmer started in a deeper position, ready to jump if the ball was played to the left centre back position.
Chelsea looked to keep a +1 on the defensive line.