Some recycled shapes and patterns, and some new. I'll add to this as the day goes on.
Let's start with lower build-up play. The full-backs hold the width with Doku and Savinho playing inside. Silva and Reijnders drop in line with Rodri.
With Juventus marking man-to man, Silva and Reijnders were happy to take their markers into deeper positions.
This was the trigger for Doku and Savinho to narrow their markers, forcing Juventus to have little horizontal coverage on the last line of their defence.
Which Ederson can pick out all day.
Nothing new here, but a warning to any teams going man-to-man against City.
Pep “Ederson was an incredible quarterback today, making incredible long balls for Omar and Erling"
The 4th goal, same routine.
If Juventus kept horizontal coverage on the defensive line, then Ederson would find Savinho or Doku in their inside positions.
The role of Ederson can't be understated. Juventus' only solution would be to apply pressure, opening up the link passes to find the spare man.
Higher up the pitch, City moved to their more recognisable shape with the wingers holding the width.
We will come to the slight tweak on this, but this shape is nothing we haven't seen before.
The wide connections offering constant width, depth and support options with enough rotations and movement to keep the opponent guessing to which player will offer each option.
Reijnders offers the depth in this instance with a run in behind.
The beauty of Nunes at right back is his ability to identify the runs beyond. He changes his support position to offer depth and create the second goal.
Rodri can offer the support position in this instance, and this allows an extra player (Silva) in the box.
The biggest tactical difference in last night's game. The role of Doku.
Part of the usual attacking shape for 70% of the game but adding an unpredicatblility for the other 30%
Here, Doku is on the right next to Savinho. The 3 man side connection becomes 4.
This forces Ait-Nouri to hold the width and in turn City can't cover their counter-pressing positions on the edge of the box.
It will be interesting to see how this develops. The freedom Doku is allowed does impact the rest defence structure to counter-press.
When Doku holds the width, City have their rest defence structure with Rodri +2 more preventing any easy escape on the second line of defence.
Will the unpredictability of a roaming player compromise this? Is the risk worth the reward? One to watch.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The personnel obviously changes, but the reason Inter Milan's 5-3-2/3-5-2 system works is due to its balance.
Shifting between different systems makes them difficult to pin down, while asking players to assume positions that feel natural.
BALANCE - It's why some systems fail
The 5-3-2 default shape puts players in their natural positions, but as with all systems, it has weaknesses.
The weaknesses can be negated with players shifting positions.
For some players, this can mean moving to a position that isn't natural for them. Inter is different.
Examples of this - The wing-backs
While they are happy to defend in a back five they will also look to be aggressive and often find themselves as the highest players in the pressing system.
The final part of our collection on the tactical blueprint of the Arsenal manager.
- The High Press (central, wide and full press)
- The 4-4-2 Low Press
- Attacking Transitions
Part 2 of Mikel Arteta/ Arsenal methodology as we look at Attacking Organisation
- Build up play
- Creating the attack
- Structure and Fluidity
- Game intelligence
- Playing to players strengths
- Playing relationships
Attacking Organisation: Build-Up Play
Arsenal begins with a default 4-3-3 formation, but the real strength lies in its fluidity during build-up play. Five outfield players remain fixed in this structure: two centre-backs positioned deep to support goalkeeper David Raya and three players stretching the opponent’s defensive line. Arteta trusts the forward line to use their intelligence and relationships to drop onto deeper lines and support the build-up if necessary.
The remaining five players bring tactical flexibility. They often rotate positions and use counter-movements to facilitate forward progression. This adaptive element is key to Arsenal's attacking identity under Mikel Arteta.
Inside Mikel Arteta’s tactical blueprint and how Arsenal are mastering every phase of the game
A mega thread on every part of Arteta and Arsenal's game model
Part 1 - Set Pieces 🧵
We will outline clear patterns used by Arsenal within the four phases of the game and explain how they leverage set plays to their advantage, leading into one of the four phases:
Throw-ins (Middle and Final Third)
Arsenal players follow a simple process: they aim to penetrate the opponent’s defensive lines through well-rehearsed routines.
3-2 build-up
Saka and Martinelli controlling the full-backs while offering a threat in behind
Merino linking with Odegaard/Rice to control red zone and beyond
Rice and Odegaard moving beside Madrid midfield to offer progressive options.
3-2 Build-Up
Rice and Odegaard playing around the block.
Rice in particular, eats the ground up in front of him before the Madrid midfield can shift across the pitch.
Barcelona - The DNA, La Masia and the Influence of Hansi Flick
- The Barcelona DNA and the influence of La Masia
- Hansi Flick and how he has embraced the culture and added to it
- Patterns of play. 'side connections' 'rest defence' and 'open touch, run beyond.
🧵THREAD
Upon arriving in Barcelona, Flick faced the challenge of modernising the team while staying true to its identity. His adjustments have been significant, yet they align with La Masia’s core tactical framework.
Below, we analyse how Flick has leveraged Barcelona’s DNA to shape his tactical setup while simultaneously evolving the team’s recognisable playing style.
"Here, the tradition is to play with passing, but I also want them to go straight to the goal. I don't think my style has any major changes."