The Mongol conqueror Hulegu wanted the Romans, the “Empire of Nicaea,” to submit to them.
In 1257 Hulegu sent the Romans an embassy requesting they bow to their rightful Mongol masters!
The Romans had to play it smart!!
(A thread) 🧵
Roman diplomatic genius was put straight to work! In the words of Nicholas Morton: “Emperor Theodore II (Laskaris) responded to this deputation’s arrival with a shrewd piece of statecraft.”
They needed to make themselves look bigger and stronger than they were.
“When Hulegu’s representatives reached the border, rather than taking them straight to his court, Theodore ordered that they be brought to him by a long and meandering route in order to give a false impression of the size of the Empire of Nicaea.”
Theodore “also arranged for well-armed squadrons of soldiers to be stationed along the road to give the impression that his empire could deploy huge numbers of troops.”
Brilliant, I must say.
The Emperor thus found an amicable solution to the Mongol issue, they were basically a nominal Mongol client-state, though the Romans probably presented this more as an alliance of equals in their telling…
In 1260, under Michael VIII Palaiologos, a treaty was finally ratified!
They were treated better than some other than some other client states.
Theodore Laskaris, followed by Michael Palaiologos, was able to secure from this alliance the restoration of an Orthodox Patriarch in Antioch. Already the Crusader-state had submitted to Mongol overlordship
That demonstrated that the Mongols valued and respected their Roman allies more than Antioch - imposing Roman demands on them. The Romans were using this alliance and nominal submission to great effect, and keeping their dignity in the affair.
Securing some concessions like that likely allowed them to feel like it was more of an alliance than submission, regardless of how the Mongols may have interpreted it.
Both sides could take what they needed from it and present it favorably to their people.
The Empire of Nicaea had truly impressive leadership and statecraft - I can only imagine what those Emperors could have done in earlier eras with a greater Empire to work with! They punched above their weight.
Source: The Mongol Storm: Making and Breaking in the Medieval Near East by @NicholasMorto11
In 1043 a large enemy fleet unexpectedly appeared outside Constantinople.
It was the Rus!
The city “panicked in fear, as no preparations had been made to meet this unexpected foreign invasion.”
The Emperor prepared the makeshift Roman fleet, equipping it with liquid fire🧵
The Rus had launched several raids against Constantinople, the greatest being in 860 and 941. These were dangerous Viking style raids.
Despite good relations with the Romans, the Rus decided to try again.
Let’s just say that this decision was going to come back to burn them!
When they arrived, the navy was not strong and Monomachos had to act
Psellos says that he “gathered together some hulks of the old fleet and strengthened them with new thwarts, added some transport vessels used in the imperial service, and got ready for sea a few triremes…”
During the accession of Alexios Komnenos in 1081 a shameful event occurred in Constantinople. The Romans followed what Anna Komnene called “the example of the barbarians” as his army looted parts of the city.
A Roman army stole from churches and houses in their own capital! 🧵🧵
Alexios didn’t have the army needed to break through the land walls of Constantinople to topple Nikephoros Botaneiates.
According to Anna Komnene, “A man was sent therefore to the base of the wall….”
The rebels “after a lengthy exchange of words agreed to betray the city”
The Komnenians “armed themselves and after marshaling the whole army with great skill advanced slowly towards the city en masse. In the evening George Palaiologos approached the wall, received the signal, and climbed the tower with his men” The next morning…
Not only did the medieval Romans preserve most Ancient Greek texts they engaged with these texts, wrote commentaries, read them in their original form, and did their own kind of Christian philosophy!
An exploration of their contribution to and engagement with ancient wisdom
🧵
The Eastern Romans “engaged with the ideas of both pagan and Christian antiquity, carrying on the late ancient practice of writing commentaries”
This is essential what those who study Classical studies do today. This copying and studying was crucial for the survival of texts!
“Of course, if all the Byzantines did was make copies of older Greek philosophical works, I could pass over them briefly.”
Some people seem to mistakenly perceive the medieval Romans as just mindlessly copying texts just for us to inherit them today, instead of for their own use
Because the Eastern Romans maintained a secular administration in their government, it required an educational institution to train them!
This is what is known as the “University of Constantinople” - but was it truly a university and was it really a continuous institution?
They needed these institutions.
The “dual role of politician and scholar stemmed from the nature of Byzantine higher education. Since the year 360, holders of the highest posts in the imperial secretariat had been required by law to have completed a course of higher education.”
Education was incentivized because “promotions were promised to those who attained distinction in the liberal arts.”
These institutions and the success they could bring people helped create and maintain an educated elite administrative class of people in the empire.
“The Carthaginians had complied in 149BC with Rome's demand to surrender their 200,000 weapons and 2000 catapults. They did not know the Senate had already secretly decided 'to destroy Carthage for good, once the war was ended'”
The Fall of Carthage [A thread]
The Romans made a “surprise new demand, that they(Carthage) now abandon their city.” This “meant desertion of its shrines and religious cults. This is what the Carthaginians vainly resisted. Rome decided on 'the destruction of the nation'.'
Carthage was doomed
Rome’s “‘annihilation of Carthage and most of its inhabitants', ruining 'an entire culture', fits the modern legal definition of the 1948 United Nations Genocide Convention: intentional destruction 'in whole or in part, [of] a national, ethnical, racial or religious group'."
“They shredded her clothes and her body with pottery fragments, tore out her eyes, dragged her corpse through the streets of Alexandria, and then burned her remains.”
This was the terrifying fate of a philosopher named Hypatia of Alexandria.
How and why did this happen?! 🧵🧵
In my view Hypatia didn’t really do anything to deserve what happened to her.
However, she was to become a victim of a power struggle between Cyril, the Patriarch of Alexandria, and the Roman governor Orestes.
“As the conflict with Orestes heated up, Cyril and his associates began to blame their problems on the regular audiences that Orestes had with a female philosopher named Hypatia. The daughter of a prominent Alexandrian mathematician, Hypatia had been Alexandria’s leading thinker”