Hashim Mteuzi, PMP Profile picture
Jun 29, 2025 9 tweets 9 min read Read on X
They’re not just coming for immigrants.
They’re coming for us.

Trump’s EO on birthright citizenship revives Dred Scott logic—where being born here means nothing if your bloodline isn’t “approved.”

Here’s how this targets the citizenship of descendants of enslaved Africans: 🧵Image
Image
Image
1/x Birthright Citizenship Has Always Been a Shield for Black Americans

After the Civil War, the U.S. ratified the 14th Amendment specifically to overturn the Supreme Court’s Dred Scott decision, which said Black people could never be citizens of this country. The 14th made citizenship a right for all born on U.S. soil, regardless of race or ancestry. It was one of the only structural protections Black people had in a country built on our forced labor and legal exclusion. Without it, any hostile administration could decide we don’t belong.

Trump’s executive order weakens that shield. By redefining who qualifies as "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States, it inserts a new test: parental status. This change guts the guarantee that birth alone is enough. For Black Americans, whose ancestors were denied legal personhood and whose families fought generations for that citizenship, this is more than a policy shift. It’s a targeted rollback of the very legal floor that made our rights real. If this floor collapses, we fall further than most.Image
Image
2/x The Executive Order Quietly Creates a New Citizenship Test — and Black Folks Are Set Up to Fail

The order says you’re not a citizen at birth if your mother is undocumented or on a temporary visa and your father isn’t a citizen or green card holder. That means the government has created a two-parent immigration test to determine whether your birth counts. While this is framed as targeting new immigrants, the legal precedent it creates is much broader. It lays the groundwork for future citizenship to be tied to parental status, ancestry, or documentation history. That alone is dangerous.

But it’s especially dangerous for Black people. We know what happens when the state creates eligibility tests tied to documents: Black folks get excluded. This isn’t hypothetical. It’s what happened under Jim Crow with literacy tests, grandfather clauses, poll taxes, and more.

This new test isn’t about immigration enforcement. It’s about establishing a legal framework that makes citizenship conditional. And that framework almost always finds a way to trap us first.Image
Image
3/x Black Americans Face Unique and Intergenerational Documentation Gaps

Let’s be clear: this new system of proving parental status is not race-neutral. It directly intersects with a long history of documentation denial for Black people. Our ancestors weren’t allowed to be legally recognized as people, let alone citizens. Enslaved people weren’t issued birth certificates. After emancipation, many Black births went unrecorded due to lack of access to hospitals or refusal by white-run institutions to record them. Jim Crow only deepened this exclusion, especially in the South.

Today, many Black elders still lack official documents or have birth certificates with errors. These discrepancies cascade. If you needed your grandmother’s documentation to prove your mom’s status, and your mom’s to prove yours, the gaps compound fast. The federal government knows this. And it knows that Black Americans are more likely than any other racial group to lack access to required identity documents.

So when it introduces a citizenship test requiring proof of both parents' legal status, that is not a neutral rule. It’s a trap built on a rigged archive. One we were never supposed to pass.Image
Image
4/x What Starts with Newborns Won’t Stay There — Retroactive Expansion is Coming

Right now, Trump’s executive order applies only to children born after February 2025. But legal history tells us that exclusions rarely stay narrow. We’ve seen this playbook before: create a policy targeting one group, then expand it under new legal theories. That’s how voter ID laws began. That’s how felon disenfranchisement spread. And that’s what this EO sets up.

By establishing a rule that your citizenship depends on your parents’ status, it invites future attempts to question the citizenship of anyone who can’t prove that parental lineage. What happens when you apply for a passport? Renew a driver’s license? Register to vote? Black Americans, particularly in the South, already face aggressive voter purges and ID mismatches.

Now imagine being told your birth certificate isn’t enough—you need your parents' immigration records, too. Or worse: imagine being flagged for review because of where you live, how you look, or who your ancestors were.

The people most likely to be burdened, delayed, or denied are the same ones who always are. That’s not an accident. It’s the design.Image
Image
5/x This is Dred Scott in New Form: Ancestry-Based Citizenship by Another Name

Dred Scott told us plainly: if you're Black, your birth doesn't count. That ruling said descendants of enslaved Africans could never be citizens, no matter where they were born. The 14th Amendment was a direct rejection of that logic.

But this executive order walks us back. It says that birth in the U.S. isn’t enough if your parents don’t meet certain criteria. That’s not enforcement. That’s eugenics-era bloodline politics presented as federal bureaucracy.

The idea that your citizenship is invalid unless your parents "qualified" is indistinguishable from the old view that only some lineages are entitled to national membership. And we know who gets written out first.

This isn't theory. This is legal infrastructure being built to recreate caste systems—systems that always start by questioning our belonging.

Ending birthright citizenship for even a narrow class of people is a doorway. It opens the possibility of legally revoking what the 14th once promised: that we belong here, by birthright, no matter what they say.Image
Image
6/x It’s Bureaucratic White Supremacy — and it Hits Before You Know it

This EO doesn’t mention race. It doesn’t have to. That’s how structural racism works. On paper, this is about immigration. In practice, it’s about creating a paper trail that Black folks can’t meet. That’s the quiet part.

The math is simple: create a complex documentation system, ignore the historical inequities baked into who has records, then disqualify people based on that gap.

The state already knows Black people are more likely to be missing documents. It already knows the cost of getting them is a burden—in money, time, and access. So when it implements a system that weaponizes those exact gaps, the impact is racial even if the text is not.

It’s the same strategy that made poll taxes and literacy tests "race neutral" tools for exclusion. This is not just about who crosses a border. It’s about who the state sees as belonging in the first place.

And when that standard becomes proof-of-parenthood, you’ve turned citizenship into a loyalty test that we were never meant to pass.Image
Image
7/x The Threat Is Real, and it’s Immediate — Not Hypothetical

People will try to say this only affects a small number of births. That it's symbolic. But we’ve seen how these "symbolic" policies metastasize.

States are already purging voter rolls under the guise of "citizenship audits." People have already lost their IDs and passports due to clerical errors and mismatched documents. Black Americans—especially those with Southern roots or whose families never had stable paperwork—are already being flagged for denial.

This EO gives that targeting a legal foundation. It says citizenship is conditional. That means it can be questioned, suspended, revoked.

The impact won’t just be federal. States will follow. Bureaucrats will act with cover. And families who have always believed they were citizens by birth will suddenly find they need to prove it.

With what documents?
From whom? At what cost?

Citizenship isn’t just a status—it’s access to rights, to safety, to self-determination. This order puts all of that in play.
8/x The Fight Ahead: This is the Line We Can’t Let Them Cross

The Fourteenth Amendment is the legal foundation of Black citizenship. If they undermine that, nothing else holds. Not voting rights. Not equal protection. Not due process. All of it becomes negotiable.

That’s what this EO is really about. Not just who gets to be a citizen—but who gets to feel safe claiming it. This isn’t a policy debate. It’s a redefinition of what belonging means in America.

And if we let them erase birthright for one group, they will expand that erasure again and again.

Descendants of enslaved Africans fought for generations to secure citizenship—through war, through Reconstruction, through the Civil Rights Movement. That fight isn’t over. This EO is a direct challenge to it.

We can’t afford to respond with technocratic critiques. We need a loud, unapologetic defense:
of our history,
our rights, and
our future.

This is the line we must hold. [end thread]Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Mteuzi

Dec 9, 2025
What the Trump regime’s HUD cuts really mean, and who gets sacrificed in the process.

A thread. 🧵
Bookmark it. 🔖 Image
When the Trump regime rewrote HUD’s homelessness grants, they didn’t just tweak a program. They set off a chain reaction that will push tens of thousands of people — elders, disabled people, families, and veterans — straight back into harm’s way.

This wasn’t a simple case of mismanagement.
It was a structural decision about who gets to survive.
For two decades, HUD’s Continuum of Care (CoC) program has been the main federal pipeline that keeps people in permanent housing instead of on the street. Local governments and nonprofits use it to fund permanent supportive housing, rapid rehousing, and the staff who hold those systems together.

When HUD rewrote the CoC rules mid‑cycle, it didn’t just adjust a grant rubric — it pulled the rug out from under the core infrastructure that keeps hundreds of thousands of people indoors.
Read 34 tweets
Nov 30, 2025
If you want to understand the AI bubble, look at Exhibit A. One screenshot shows how wild and dangerous this whole thing really is. 🧵

OpenAI is burning $8 billion this year, projecting $115 billion in losses, and has committed $1.4 trillion to compute.

They want you to think this is innovation when it's really just a hi-tech house of cards.
People hear “AI” and think science fiction or magic.
But the truth is really simple.

This industry is built on spending money it doesn't have, chasing profits it cannot reach, using resources the public will eventually pay for.

That's the scam.

2/x
The company is already making $20 billion a year, and it still cannot even get close to breaking even.

Even Sam Altman says there will be no profits by 2030.

What kind of industry loses money at this scale while calling itself the future? One running on endless hype and vibes, not stability.

3/xImage
Read 20 tweets
Oct 19, 2025
For decades, the U.S. has toppled any Global South nation that tried to control its own resources.

Trump’s admission about Venezuela shows that playbook in use, fueled by troops, covert ops, and corporate greed.

A thread on modern imperial gangsterism. 🧵
Bookmark this. 🔖
Trump crudely confirmed that Maduro offered the U.S. “everything”: oil, gold, all of it, because he “didn’t want to f*** around with the United States.”

This wasn’t one of his exaggerations. Multiple reports show Maduro’s offer covered all existing and future oil, gold, gas, bauxite, and coltan projects, a total handover of Venezuela’s extractive sector, including the Orinoco Belt, home to the largest proven oil reserves on Earth.

But what Trump bragged about tore away the already frayed humanitarian mask. The so-called “drug war” was a resource war all along: imperial gangsterism in its purest form.

2/xImage
We need to understand that these talks took place under duress.

Trump had 10,000 troops stationed in the Caribbean, warships off Venezuelan waters, and CIA covert ops already authorized. U.S. forces even carried out six drone and naval strikes on boats accused of trafficking near Venezuelan territory. There have been 27-28 confirmed deaths.

While Trump sold this as “counter-narcotics,” U.S. intelligence officials privately admitted the real goal was regime change. The “offer” Maduro made wasn’t diplomacy, it was essentially a survival plea under siege.

3/xImage
Read 13 tweets
Sep 22, 2025
Stephen Miller just turned Charlie Kirk’s memorial into a white Christian nationalist war cry.

Here are 6 things you really need to understand about what he said, and exactly why it’s dangerous: 🧵
1. Reality denial

Charlie Kirk wasn’t killed by “the Left.” He was killed by a white man from a Christian MAGA family.

Miller and MAGA leadership can’t face that, so they invent an outside enemy. It’s a way to dodge accountability for the violence their own movement produces.
2. Projection

Miller raged about “envy, jealousy, hatred, violence.”
But those are the exact forces driving his movement.

White supremacist politics always project: accuse opponents of the crimes they commit. It never fails.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 19, 2025
When a ruler calls anti-fascism “terrorism,” they’re not talking about safety. They’re telling you exactly what kind of ruler they are.

Hitler did it. Mussolini did it. Franco did it.
Pinochet did it. And now Trump is doing it.

Bookmark this thread. 🧵🔖Image
Image
Image
Image
History is not subtle here. Hitler used the Reichstag Fire to crush left opposition overnight. Mussolini built a Special Tribunal to prosecute “anti-Fascist subversives.” Franco criminalized loyalty to Spain’s elected government retroactively and filled camps with teachers, unionists, and neighbors. Pinochet perfected the disappearance: no body, no case, no voice.

This moment is not an echo. It's a remix with newer technology, more data, and a propaganda machine that fits in your pocket. If you care about basic democratic life, if you care about Black freedom struggles, workers’ rights, Indigenous sovereignty, queer safety, immigrant dignity, or Palestinian solidarity, understand what is being done. Power wants obedience. It will call your resistance “terrorism” to get it.

I'm going to show you, step by step, how this tactic works, what it did to entire societies, and how the 2025 Trump White House is trying to run the same play. Stay with me.

2/x
Trump’s announcement sounds tough. Legally, it is empty. Politically, it is dangerous. You cannot designate an ideology as a terrorist organization. There is no domestic legal mechanism to do it. Even Trump’s own FBI Director from his first term has testified that “antifa” is a movement or idea, not a group you can list. That matters because the Constitution protects speech and association, especially when the viewpoint is unpopular. Courts have refused for decades to create a domestic terror list precisely because it would criminalize belief and dissent.

So why say it? Because the announcement is a signal to the state. It tells agencies how to set priorities. It greenlights broader surveillance, new RICO fishing expeditions, and selective prosecutions framed as “antifa-related.” It pressures universities, nonprofits, and funders to distance themselves from anti-fascist organizing. It chills protest before a single case is filed. This is how authoritarian power grows in the gray zone, using the language of security to make everyday democracy feel risky.

Layer in Project 2025 and you see the system. The blueprint collapses the wall between the White House and DOJ. It pre-drafts executive orders to deploy troops at protests. It rebrands civil rights enforcement to attack the movement ecosystem that defends multiracial democracy. When Trump says “designate,” cabinet surrogates float RICO for “those funding antifa,” and the bureaucracy begins treating the label as a new category of threat. The point is not to win in court. The point is to intimidate, isolate, and punish.

This is the next authoritarian escalation in their project plan. The target is not “violent extremists.” The target is political opposition to fascism.

3/xImage
Read 13 tweets
Sep 1, 2025
Donald Trump hasn’t made a real public appearance since Aug 26. Just a couple of blurry old golf photos, nothing more. No interviews. No meetings. No governing.

The White House is stone silent. If this feels like a cover-up, it’s because that’s exactly what it looks like. 🧵 Image
The White House has gone dark.
Blank schedules.
No updates.

Meanwhile, his VP hints at being “ready to assume the presidency.” This all looks like smoke from a fire they’re working overtime to contain.
When the presidency goes silent, it's not like power stops moving. Decisions are still being made—but by who?

If Trump is incapacitated and they’re hiding it, this is deception at the scale of a constitutional crisis.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(