What this means is that blaming stripping the full hearing protection act on the senate parliamentarian is a lie. The deceit has a purpose as I'll explain later.
The GOP has always been gun controllers at heart, much like the democrats, but knowing they need the support of gun owners to win. Feigning support for gun rights has always been just a political ploy.
@GunOwners @gunpolicy @dcodrea @WiscoDaveTRO @JDVance @LeaderJohnThune Multiple gun "influencers" and YouTubers came out with the same talking points yesterday, to wit, "removal of the $200 tax stamp is the "next best win." Winning it is not. It keeps suppressors on the list of NFA items, requiring registration with the ATF.
Someone back at the farm sent those talking points out ("Next Best Win") assuming that gun owners are a monolith and can be influences like socialist voters. This isn't true.
@GunOwners @gunpolicy @dcodrea @WiscoDaveTRO @JDVance @LeaderJohnThune As anyone knows who has read comments in the YT videos, or comments on my own site, or remarks at the various X accounts knows, gun owners are not to be herded. We aren't a monolith, and we don't listen to influencers.
But to Thune and others, we see you. We know what you're doing. Another thing you're doing is trying to give Cornyn something to run on in the next election.
Cornyn's reputation needed to be salvaged, you see. The best way to do that is to throw gun owners under the bus in the hearing protection act by blaming it on the parliamentarian, and then claim that Cornyn saved us from the mighty $200 fee.
But to @LeaderJohnThune , we see you. We know what you're doing. We know what you did. You have found the best way to lose gun owners in perpetuity.
@GunOwners @gunpolicy @dcodrea @WiscoDaveTRO @JDVance @LeaderJohnThune @TexasTribune We we look at the GOP and hear platitudes and then watch as you undermine liberty, it's worse than seeing nothing at all. Because that means you think you're using us.
Prior to the 2024 election, Pennsylvania gun owners had stayed silent in the elections, mainly not even voting. They were convinced to turn out in 2024, handing that state to the GOP. That won't happen again.
Saudi Arabia and UAE fear Iran’s nuclear weapons program. They have for years. Normally, when a nation decides to pursue this course, they get their engineers trained into nuclear with commercial reactors. That’s why they have both expressed interest in that. If Iran went nuclear, they were too. There is no lamenting the demise or delay in the Iranian weapons program in the halls of power in UAE or the house of Saud.
I still have articles from years ago detailing the plans for commercial reactors throughout the ME and the massive amount of money they were prepared to pour into the plans. This distrust is based on the Shia-Sunni divide, which runs hot throughout the Islamic world and always will. People are generally unfamiliar with the dynamics in the ME. Virtually every nation wanted to see the demise of Iran's nuclear program.
@TuckerCarlson Here is one such example. Nuclear Gulf: Experts sound the alarm over UAE nuclear reactors aje.io/n676u via
@AJEnglish
From aljazeera.com📷Nuclear Gulf: Experts sound the alarm over UAE nuclear reactors
1/ I don't think you understand how any of this works from an engineering standpoint. Let's rehearse a few details. The bombing of Fordow may have destroyed the mountain, or it may not have. I'll wait on evidence before weighing in with any certainty. That's what good analysts do.
@iwasnevrhere_ 2/ However, let me help you to understand what's going on now and will go on in the future. The centrifuges are utterly destroyed. Their balance has been completely disturbed, and they cannot work now. They have no power anyway.
@iwasnevrhere_ 3/ The centrifuges (and other parts of the enrichment process such as pipes, pumps, etc.) have been shaken to the point that a criticality safety analyst wouldn't even know where to start to understand if there was a criticality safety problem in the bowels of the mountain.
1/ I don’t think this is a very good article. I studied both the Fukushima and Chernobyl accidents, and in fact trained DOE safety engineers on the reactivity feedback characteristics of the RBMK reactors
2/ Chernobyl was problematic because of fission products (mainly Cs-137) and the fact that an active fire was blowing fission product inventory out of a weak containment design (and the Russian government left people in place).
3/ Fukushima was problematic because of a once in one hundred year tsunami. Chernobyl wasn’t good mainly because of government actions and the fact that the reactor design was targeted as dual purpose (power and Pu generation).