However a new peer-reviewed study funded by the U.S. government shows scientists engineering novel flu viruses with enhanced ability to infect humans.
They say it is for “surveillance” but as I’ll show it’s just semantic subterfuge.
Researchers took canine influenza (H3N2-CIV) and deliberately co-infected dog tracheal tissue with:
The 2009 pandemic swine flu (H1N1pdm) and the Avian flu H9N2 which is known for high cytokine storms in humans.
They then serially passaged the virus i.e. sped up evolution in a lab.
The result was “reassortants” or simply put, hybrid flu viruses containing gene segments from both parental viruses.
In their own words:
“The co-infection of canine tracheal explants by H3N2-CIV and H1N1pdm or H9N2-G1H led to a remarkably high rate of reassortment. […] All reassortants replicated with similar or greater efficiency as compared to the parental strains. […] The drastic enhancement in viral replication is concerning and implies a high potential of these reassortants to be introduced into the human population.”
Why yes, that is concerning considering they intentionally created new, viable flu strains with human infection potential by mixing animal and human-origin influenza viruses.
Designed to enhance transmissibility, replication, and potentially pathogenicity.
THIS GAIN OF FUNCTION
They:
1. Created novel viruses through intentional co-infection and passaging 2. Identified new phenotypes (greater replication and inflammatory potential) 3. Demonstrated enhanced infectivity in human cells
It checks the boxes laid out in the U.S. government’s own definition of gain-of-function, particularly as related to Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO) policies, which are supposed to restrict research that could make pathogens more dangerous to humans.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Contract no. 75N93021C00016)
The Hong Kong’s Health and Medical Research Fund
InnoHK, an initiative of the Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission
All under the guise of “pandemic preparedness.”
Think about this. They searched for and euthanized stray dogs, harvested their windpipes, and used them as mixing vessels to engineer novel flu viruses.
How fucked up is that?
This while using the same demented logic that gave us Wuhan’s bat coronavirus experiments and we all know how that turned out.
They even tested cytokine levels aka, markers of pathogenicity and found many of the lab-made strains provoked stronger immune responses than the natural viruses.
Some triggered high levels of TNF-α, associated with severe lung inflammation and ARDS.
One of the reassortants from H3N2-CIV and H9N2-G1H showed superior replication to both of its parents despite lacking the full high-cytokine PB2 gene from H9N2.
Meaning even partial gene swaps are enough to increase human infectivity.
Isn’t that special?
They create threats, then demand more funding to “monitor” the threats they’ve created. Quite a convenient way to keep the gravy train rolling isn’t it?
Then they redefine gain-of-function until it fits through the loophole and launder pandemic risk through academic institutions with plausible deniability.
If it wasn’t clear enough by now, lab-based viral engineering is still the most underreported existential risk of our time and yet they’re still doing it with funding and impunity.
@DrJBhattacharya and @RobertKennedyJr I implore you to look into this and withdraw the funding for these highly risky experiments that clearly meet the definition of gain of function despite what the researchers may claim.
This is yet another disaster waiting to happen, don’t let it happen on your watch.
Look at the scenario laid out in this report entitled “2024 National Blueprint for Biodefense”.
It presents a fictional but plausible bioterrorist attack occurring on July 4, 2025, designed as a narrative device to frame the report’s urgency and recommendations.
It’s essentially a dramatized worst-case scenario aimed at spurring policy action.
The setting is a fictional congressional joint inquiry convened in the aftermath of an unprecedented biological attack on U.S. soil.🤔
July 4, 2025 is chosen symbolically for maximum psychological and political impact.
Two days from now.
The attack is made with a genetically modified strain of Nipah virus that is engineered for high transmissibility and a 40%+ mortality rate.
It states that 280,000 human deaths occurred and 400,000 infections in one day.
There is also 200,000 animal deaths, indicating a zoonotic and agricultural biowarfare component and coordinated global attacks followed, killing tens of thousands in allied nations.
THE STRATEGY OF THE ATTACKERS
•They conducted small-scale trial runs ahead of time in various U.S. cities these went undetected.
•They leveraged a lack of preparedness, not just technologically, but bureaucratically and strategically.
•They exploited institutional complacency and false assumptions about the capabilities of state or terrorist actors.
Meet Susan Monarez, RFK Jr’s “handpicked” candidate to run the CDC.
She’s not a doctor.
She’s not a frontline scientist.
She is a biotech insider who’s spent 20 years building public-private partnerships between the feds and Big Pharma.
If confirmed, she’d be the first CDC Director without a medical degree in 70+ years.
Here’s what you’re not being told.
Monarez has spent her career not regulating industry but helping it navigate and exploit the federal health bureaucracy.
She’s been embedded at BARDA, DHS, the NSC, ARPA-H and now she’s poised to lead the CDC.
Blowback Nation: How the CIA’s Iran Coup Forged a Theocracy with Nuclear Ambitions
Operation Ajax – the 1953 Anglo-American coup in Iran – overthrew the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, ending Iran’s brief oil nationalization. U.S. and British intelligence orchestrated street riots and bribed officials to topple Mossadegh, largely to restore Western control of Iran’s oil and to prevent a feared tilt toward the Soviet bloc.
The motivations were explicit. Mossadegh had nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (BP today), enraging Britain, and he championed Iranian sovereignty over foreign oil concessions. London lobbied Washington to intervene, framing Mossadegh as a potential gateway for communism in the Cold War climate . In reality, U.K. officials privately admitted Mossadegh’s government was broadly democratic and nationalist but London and the CIA resolved to remove him to protect oil interests and Western hegemony.
🧵Astroturf Uprising: The Billionaire-Funded Machine Behind the LA ICE Protests
The LA “protests” are being coordinated or backed by groups publicly listed as partners of No Kings, a coalition that claims to be about “people power” and “no more oligarchs.”
But almost all of their “partners” are funded by oligarchs.
Let’s start with who’s visibly involved in the LA protests:
•ACLU SoCal
•Indivisible
•Color of Change
•Black Voters Matter
•American Federation of Teachers (AFT)
•Communications Workers of America (CWA)
•Sunrise Movement
All No Kings partners.
All with deep-pocketed backers. This is just the tip of the iceberg but a good primer to understand how this world works.
Just look at all their partners, it’s a who’s who of leftist activists groups:
The extensive global network of connections maintained by Paul David Hewson, better known as Bono, the lead singer of Irish rock band U2, reveals a complex web of relationships spanning non-governmental organizations, world leaders, billionaire philanthropists, and likely intelligence agencies.
He has positioned himself at the intersection of entertainment, politics, and global power structures, raising questions about the true nature and scope of his influence operations.
The genesis of Bono's political awakening can be traced to 1979, when he attended one of the Secret Policeman's Ball benefit shows organized by Monty Python's John Cleese for Amnesty International.
Bono later stated that this experience "became a part of me" and "sowed a seed," suggesting that his exposure to celebrity activism at this formative moment established a template he would later adopt and expand upon.