A damning report was released on Tuesday that exposes the IRS’s catastrophic failure to safeguard billions in seized digital assets. Missing keys, botched memos, asset tampering, etc.
The incompetence is systemic.
Full breakdown in the thread. 🧵👇🏻
The Treasury Inspector General’s report shows IRS Criminal Investigation drowning in digital asset seizures with no grasp of the tech, custody, or procedures required to handle bearer assets. They’re flying blind with billions in “crypto” under their control.
This is clearly structural incapacity. The institution lacks the competence, precision, and technical control required to manage digital assets at any level.
You’re looking at an institution that has seized over $8 billion in digital assets (almost entirely “crypto”) but lacks the most basic safeguards to ensure those assets aren’t lost, altered, or misrepresented.
If you watch Matt Kratter videos, you’re more capable! 🤦🏻♂️
Let’s start with the core failure: seizure memorandums, the primary document for logging and justifying asset custody, were missing or incomplete for dozens of high-value seizures. 👇🏻
Three seized assets worth over $2.8 million had no documentation at all. Another seventy-plus had no time-stamped record of when the seizure was recorded. Some memos listed wrong wallet addresses. Others couldn’t even distinguish between the source and the destination wallets.
This is basic chain-of-custody negligence. If a private custodian handled $2.8 million like this, they’d be shut down, indicted, or both.
More alarming is how the agency botched wallet handling and key management.
In one case, they shredded the recovery seed phrase to a government-controlled wallet. Had the private key also been lost, the funds would’ve been permanently gone.
In another case, agents couldn’t transfer seized Litecoin, so they converted it into Bitcoin, violating best practices by altering the form of the asset. That’s tampering!
Even worse, they failed to monitor wallets they knew were still active.
One wallet linked to dark web activity received additional Bitcoin after seizure. It was supposed to be tracked. It wasn’t. Why? Because the responsible specialist retired, and nobody picked up the chain of custody.
That wallet ended up with $14,060 more in tainted funds, unseized, unaccounted for, and effectively laundered under IRS stewardship.
Then there’s AFTRAK, the IRS’s asset tracking system, which somehow doesn’t track digital assets accurately. It doesn’t even have fields for crypto asset quantity or type.
Almost half the seized assets had incorrect location records. Several were mislabeled as being in hardware wallets when they’d already been transferred or liquidated.
One wallet listed in the system had 1.0764 BTC, but the actual amount was 1.1764 BTC—a discrepancy worth nearly $10,000. The IRS is seizing fractional, high-volatility digital assets but tracking them with systems built for forfeited cars and cash.
The agency claims it’s begun correcting these failures with new staff and updated guidelines.
But this is a fiat-trained bureaucracy wading into an adversarial, real-time, cryptographically-enforced monetary system it doesn’t understand. The report shows that the IRS has tried to force crypto assets into a legacy custodial framework designed for physical goods or database entries that can be reversed or overwritten.
What we’re seeing is the breakdown of legacy enforcement infrastructure when confronted with Bitcoin’s irreversibility, bearer nature.
The state can’t just “possess” Bitcoin the way it does with fiat. It has to prove competent custody, technical proficiency, and immutable recordkeeping.
This report makes it clear it cannot!
The federal government has proven that it can’t be trusted to control money it didn’t issue and doesn’t understand.
Bitcoiners should take note: the apparatus tasked with enforcing the monetary order is crumbling under the weight of digital monetary sovereignty.
The implications are massive.
The IRS is sitting on billions in volatile, easily mismanaged assets, without the technical skill, audit clarity, or operational safeguards required to steward them.
The chance for theft, loss, or manipulation is real.
And any future legal challenges against IRS seizures now have ammunition to claim due process violations and custodial mismanagement.
A damning look at how the IRS handles seized digital assets should obliterate any trust in their ability to audit self-custodied Bitcoin. If they can’t track wallets they control, how will they verify balances they don’t?
The SBR audit is a farce.
David Sacks is almost six months into his role as “Crypto Czar” and he still hasn't told us how much Bitcoin the United States stole.
The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is being pushed by the same political class whose agencies lose keys, shred seed phrases, tamper with seized assets, and misreport wallet balances.
They don’t understand what they’re trying to control and have no business holding Bitcoin.
⚠️Bitcoin Core defenders frame the OP_RETURN debate as overblown and irrelevant. They say Knots is poorly maintained and that all of this is just noise over a technical detail. But what they’re dismissing as noise is resistance to a dangerous shift in protocol culture. 🧵👇
The protocol is quietly being reshaped by developers aligned with VC-backed projects, while dissent is censored and filters are stripped away to make room for their payloads. But the pushback is coordinated now and announcements are coming that will make that clear.
Despite what they tell you, Knots is not a fringe codebase. It's 99.9% Core. The difference lies in its policy defaults, not its architecture. The real problem for Core defenders is that Knots prioritizes Bitcoin as money, and that makes it dangerous to those who don’t (them).
⚠️Bitcoin Core spent the last week accelerating changes that undermine node sovereignty, shutting down dissent and ridiculing anyone focused on Bitcoin as money.
This thread lays out exactly what they’re doing and how you can push back. 🧵👇
The push to remove OP_RETURN limits serves one goal: opening the door for arbitrary data to flood the base layer. This shift turns Bitcoin from a monetary network into a general-purpose junk drawer for VC sidechains that couldn’t survive on their own.
Last week we literally saw crytpo VCs who have actively been building Ethereum on Bitcoin on stage defending all of this. How has no one been fired?!
Most gold investors already understand that fiat currency is broken, inflation is theft and sound money is the only defense.
But too many continue to dismiss Bitcoin because they haven’t studied it (or worse, because Peter Schiff told them to).
This thread is for them. 🧵👇
Gold deserves respect for surviving currency collapses, war, and regime changes. It taught us about scarcity and central banking risks but clinging solely to gold ignores reality. The world evolved; monetary assets have too.
Bitcoin perfectly embodies and extends gold's core principles. If gold provided the analog blueprint for sound money, Bitcoin delivers its digital implementation.
Understanding gold's importance means you also already fully understand Bitcoin's fundamental value proposition.
Bitcoin was made for exactly what we’re seeing right now.
Gold is ripping, Treasuries are buckling, and central banks are slipping out the back door of the dollar system. The safe haven is failing.
What happens next? 🧵👇
Gold just broke $3,300. That’s a 39% rise in a year.
U.S. Treasuries are starting to behave more like junk debt than a safe haven, and central banks aren’t waiting around to see how it ends. They’re unloading bonds and shifting into gold.
This is a fracture in the system. The dollar was weaponized through sanctions, reserve freezes and SWIFT blacklisting and the message to the rest of the world was loud and clear. Now 30 countries are repatriating gold and 45 are trading outside USD.
Forget the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, it’s political fiction.
Here’s something real, bulletproof and actionable: BitBonds from VanEck
I dug deep trying to find holes. This thing holds water!
🧵👇
Here’s the basic structure: U.S. issues a 10-year bond, 90% Treasuries + 10% BTC purchased at issuance. Investors get full BTC upside until hitting a 4.5% annualized return. After that, gains split 50/50 with Treasury.
Why does this make sense for investors? Convexity. You’re trading a modestly lower coupon for massive upside exposure to BTC. Breakeven BTC CAGR ranges 8–17% (depending on coupon).
Here’s why Amazon’s not worth it, how to get Prime for free (if you must) and why quitting helps you, your wallet, and your country. 🧵
Amazon has quietly become China’s favorite export machine. Over 75% of new sellers are Chinese companies flooding the site with cheap, low-quality garbage. You’re not saving money. You probably haven't even noticed but you’re just buying more junk you don't need, more often.
Amazon Prime used to be a valuable convenience but now it's nothing more than a loyalty tax.
Prices are higher. Shipping is slower.
And unless you’re ordering overnight deliveries like a maniac, it’s a straight-up loss.