School feels like a prison? That's not a bug. That's a feature.
The modern education system wasn't created to enlighten minds—it was designed to break them into compliance. 🧵
Think back to high school.
Did you ever feel trapped in a machine with its own purposes, completely disconnected from what you wanted to learn?
That feeling reveals something fundamental: you weren't imagining the prison-like atmosphere. It was engineered that way.
The modern school system wasn't created for learning. It was invented by Prussians after their crushing defeat by Napoleon in 1806.
They needed obedient citizens who would follow orders without question.
So they created the world's first compulsory education system—not to enlighten minds, but to break them into compliance.
Before then, education happened in countless different ways. What we call "school" is actually a recent invention with a very specific purpose.
Ayn Rand called modern educators "comprachicos of the mind"—after 17th century groups who bought children and systematically deformed their bodies for entertainment.
Today's version is more sophisticated: they don't break bodies, they break minds. And parents deliver the children willingly, calling it "education."
The method is the same—take something naturally growing and force it into an unnatural shape.
This explains everything you hated about school:
— rigid time blocks like factory shifts;
— hierarchical authoritarian structure;
— students grouped by age not ability;
— predetermined career tracks.
These aren't bugs, they're features. The system is working exactly as designed to produce compliance, not curiosity.
The sad irony is that many teachers genuinely believe education is their purpose.
They work incredibly hard to actually teach their students. But the entire system they're trapped in is hostile to real learning.
They're constantly fighting upstream against a structure designed to produce conformity, not critical thinking.
Any real education that happens is almost by accident.
We've made a catastrophic mistake: we think schooling and education are the same thing.
Real education is driven by curiosity, happens throughout life, and develops your ability to think and question.
Schooling is about control, happens during one stage of life, and is standardized to produce uniformity.
The result? Students who can recite information but can't think independently.
Who seek approval from authority rather than trusting their own judgment.
Who've been conditioned to fear the very tool they need for survival: reason.
Understanding this difference is liberating.
Your frustration with school wasn't personal failure—it was a natural response to an unnatural system designed to break independent minds.
Ready to reclaim real education while navigating the academic system?
The first step is understanding how to stay intellectually free in an environment designed to suppress independent thinking.
Everyone Wants Democratic Transition for Venezuela
But how do you restore democracy in a kleptocratic state captured by criminal elites?
To understand the problem, you need to understand how Venezuela got here. This story is a stark reminder that freedom isn't lost overnight, but slowly dismantled, one piece at a time. 🧵
The Liberation Myth: Venezuela Started With a Promise
In 1811, Simon Bolivar liberated Venezuela from Spanish rule. He dreamed of a unified, free South America built on republican ideals.
But Bolivar's revolution created a nation, not stability. What followed was a century of chaos.
A Century of Strongmen: The 19th Century Belonged to Caudillos
After independence came civil wars, military coups, and regional warlords fighting for control. Venezuela cycled through dozens of governments.
Power didn't come from elections. It came from controlling enough armed men to take Caracas. Whoever seized the capital claimed to speak for the nation.
“I'm against Maduro, but I think what Trump did was wrong.”
This sentence sounds reasonable, balanced, and mature. The kind of thing a serious person would say to avoid seeming radical.
The problem is that this sentence is, morally, one of the worst possible positions on Venezuela. 🧵
Not because it's moderate. But because it's a conscious escape. That "but" isn't prudence. It's a silent plea for moral exoneration.
The attempt to appear sophisticated while avoiding the thing that morality often demands: to hierarchize evil. To say what is worse. To choose.
Let's be clear about what we're "balancing" here.
Under Maduro's "socialism of the 21st century," Venezuela collapsed into hyperinflation exceeding 1,000,000%. Systematic scarcity created mass starvation. Venezuelans resorted to eating dogs and scavenging trash to survive.
These aren't political talking points. These are documented atrocities.
They predicted the Great Depression. Then the 2008 crash. Then 2020's inflation surge.
A group of economists spent 150 years warning about the same pattern.
Nobody in power listened.
And every time, they were proven right.
This is the story of the Austrian School. 🧵
Modern economics had a fatal flaw.
For decades, mainstream economists treated the economy like a machine. Pull this lever, push that button, adjust interest rates here; boom, everything works perfectly.
But economies aren't machines. They're millions of people making billions of decisions every single day.
You can't predict human action with mathematical precision. The Austrian School understood this from day one.
It started in Vienna in 1871 when Carl Menger published Principles of Economics and asked a deceptively simple question: Why do people value things?
His answer shattered centuries of economic thinking.
Value isn't objective. It's subjective, based on individual human needs and desires.
Not labor hours. Not production costs. Human preferences.
In 1968, historian Robert Conquest published research showing Stalin killed millions.
Western intellectuals called him a propagandist. A Cold War hack. A CIA plant.
Then the USSR collapsed. The archives opened.
And every number he predicted was proven correct; or too conservative. 🧵
The 1960s had a serious Soviet problem.
While Conquest documented mass murder in Ukraine and the Gulag, Harvard professors praised Stalin's industrialization. British intellectuals visited Moscow and declared the future had arrived.
Anyone questioning this got dismissed as a reactionary.
One British historian refused to look away.
Robert Conquest spent the 1960s piecing together evidence from refugee testimonies, leaked documents, and demographic data that didn't add up.
His 1968 book "The Great Terror" documented Stalin's purges with precision.