1/ Before the word “tariff” became synonymous with President Trump, generations of American statesmen laid the foundation for the America First agenda of today.
Their ideas—rooted in sovereignty, security, and protection of American workers—embody the ongoing fight for American prosperity.
A THREAD 🧵
2/ Alexander Hamilton was the original architect of American economic nationalism.
In his "Report on Manufactures", he argued that tariffs were essential to defend U.S. industry and secure independence from Britain.
3/ Hamilton understood that political independence wasn’t enough.
The young American republic needed economic protection and system of fair trade to grow and survive.
4/ Henry Clay, known as the “Great Compromiser,” built on Hamilton’s legacy.
His “American System” prioritized:
A national bank, infrastructure investment, and most importantly: TARIFFS
5/ To Clay, tariffs were a vital tool of economic protection and industrial growth.
In 1824, he put it plainly:
“The tariff is to tax the produce of foreign industry, with the view of promoting American industry.”
Sound familiar?
6/ Clay helped implement the Tariff of 1824 to stop cheap British goods from flooding U.S. markets.
Nearly 200 years later, President Trump used Section 232 powers to shield U.S. steel and aluminum from Chinese overproduction.
7/ Like President Trump, Clay faced fierce opposition.
The southern–led Nullification Crisis—sparked by the 1828 and 1832 tariffs—nearly tore the Union apart.
But the tariffs were effective for working Americans and the principle still holds:
Protect our own industry—or risk dependence on foreign powers.
8/ Abraham Lincoln, the first Republican president, proudly called himself an “old-line Henry Clay Whig.”
He knew how vital tariffs were for national prosperity.
They uplifted American labor, funded internal improvements, and shielded the Union from foreign control.
9/ During Lincoln’s presidency, tariff revenue helped finance the military during the Civil War.
He believed that protecting American industry would also protect the American nation.
It worked: America industrialized rapidly during and after his presidency.
10/ Decades later, President William McKinley—an ironworker’s son and Clay disciple—picked up the torch.
He made it clear:
“Open competition between high-paid American labor and poorly paid European labor will either drive out of existence American industry or lower American wages.”
11/ In 1890, McKinley passed a landmark tariff raising duties above 50%.
By 1896, he ran for president as “a tariff man standing on a tariff platform.”
He won—and kept winning for American workers.
12/ Under McKinley, America led the world in agriculture, mining, and manufacturing.
He credited this success to fair, protective trade:
“These are the trophies which we bring after twenty-nine years of a protective tariff.”
13/ President Trump’s trade agenda—especially his assertive use of tariffs—draws from a long line of American economic tradition shaped by statesmen like Hamilton, Clay, Lincoln, and McKinley.
14/ The early GOP was the party of tariffs and industry.
From Lincoln to McKinley and into the 20th century, the Republican Party fought for American workers.
Trump has revived that GOP—reconnecting it to its pro-worker, pro-sovereignty roots.
15/ The America First agenda isn’t new.
Hamilton. Clay. Lincoln. McKinley. Trump.
Five leaders. One philosophy: Americans First -- ALWAYS.
Who should American economic policy protect first?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 India’s keyboard minions are hijacking X’s Community Notes to bury the facts.
They’re furious about losing unfettered access to U.S. markets—even as India, the Maharaja of Tariffs, keeps some of the world’s highest trade barriers.
2/ I posted the facts:
•India’s sky-high tariffs cost U.S. jobs.
•India buys Russian oil purely to profit.
•Those revenues fuel Putin’s war machine.
Frenzied Indian partisans swarmed—and cobbled together a flimsy Community Note to protest the truth.
3/ Their source for the Community Note? An article from The Times of India. Archived here ➡️ archive.is/HxBYQ
But the article proved me right, admitting:
👉India’s imports from Russia hit $67 billion in 2024—$53 billion of that was crude oil.
👉In 2021, before Ukraine: India’s total imports from Russia were just $8.7 billion.
🧵 One FBI. Two bad apples. BOTH from the same family.
Recently fired Special Agent Walter Giardina — who orchestrated my wrongful arrest — and his FATHER-IN-LAW former FBI Deputy Director Larry A. Potts.
This is the chilling saga of 2 disgraced agents linked by blood who have forever stained the Bureau’s reputation.
2/ Bad apple Larry Potts was FBI’s #2, demoted after two of the deadliest failures in Bureau history: Ruby Ridge and Waco.
3/ At Ruby Ridge, Potts was in the oversight chain when the FBI adopted special “rules of engagement” stating: “Any armed adult male… could and should be shot.”
🧵🚨 U.S. v. Peter Navarro is a landmark case of first impression. At stake: executive privilege & the very doctrine of constitutional separation of powers. This is SCOTUS-level “good law” waiting to be settled.
DOJ flipped position on Friday and it's HUGE -- Keep reading now!
Tip of the cap to @kyledcheney for flagging DOJ’s latest filing — where Trump’s DOJ flipped sides in support of @realpnavarro. But shame on @AP, @Reuters, @washingtonpost, @Law360, @business, & @CourthouseNews for ignoring this critical story.
Key Issue #1 ➡️ Do senior White House advisors have absolute testimonial immunity?
For more than 50 years, DOJ policy said YES. Biden’s weaponized DOJ flipped that precedent to put Navarro in prison. NOW SCOTUS must step in.
1/ President Trump’s 50% tariffs on Indian imports are now in effect.
This isn’t just about India’s unfair trade—it’s about cutting off the financial lifeline India has extended to Putin’s war machine. 🧵
2/ Here’s how the India-Russia oil mathematics works:
American consumers buy Indian goods while India keeps out U.S. exports through high tariffs and non-tariff barriers.
India uses our dollars to buy discounted Russian crude.
3/ Indian refiners, with their silent Russian partners, refine and flip the black-market oil for big profits on the international market – while Russia pockets hard currency to fund its war on Ukraine.
1/ The Wall Street Journal has been waging war on Trump’s tariffs since day one—predicting a “Navarro Recession,” runaway inflation, and economic collapse.
They’ve been WRONG every time.
Here are the top 5 myths they’ve pushed.
Let’s SHATTER them. 🧵
2/ Myth #1 — “Tariffs Are a Tax on Americans”
– The Myth the WSJ Doesn’t Want to Let Die
The WSJ said prices would spike.
Reality: Exporters absorbed the tariffs. No sticker shock on Asian electronics and European autos.
3/ Myth #2 — “Tariffs Create Chaos”
The WSJ confuses leverage with volatility.
It’s true that it’s not business as usual: America is WINNING now.
Tariffs forced deals that milquetoast diplomacy couldn’t dream of:
• The EU agreed to cut industrial tariffs & open ag markets.
• Japan pledged $350 billion to rebuild U.S. supply chains.
• Korea’s Hyundai/Kia investing billions in U.S. EV & battery plants.