This is one of my favorite scenes from one of my favorite war movies, and it is exactly why all those alpha, sigma, raw egg weirdos know nothing about women, war, or what makes a man a man
The men start the clip hardened. It is 1917, three years into the slaughterhouses of the trenches. The French Army is at its breaking point, they just had some of their own men executed for mutiny
They start jeering the German girl, she is an object and they are at their basest
But then she starts to sing. It is a German song called Der treue Husar (the faithful hussar), who learns his love is sick and dying and tries to make it back to her in time.
The French soldiers don’t understand the words, but a woman’s voice is a woman’s voice
It does what it always does: it completes men, and reminds them that beauty exists in the world beyond the horror they fight through. Her voice literally transforms them from barbarians back into sons, husbands, and fathers… and in the end, back into soldiers again
What is cool about this scene is that it was filmed in 1957, and the French Army extras were actually German police officers. That means most of the older ones were veterans of WW2. They knew what it was like at the front, far from those you loved.
Because soldiers at the front think about women. A lot. They think about their mother’s cooking, or their wives and daughters. They think about that smoke show who got away and the ones that didn’t.
It means something that in the most masculine environment possible, we still think of them. Even more so.
And no. Women are not perfect. For every happy thought there is someone at the MWR in Talil learning his woman is sleeping with her “friend” on her summer abroad.
But to deny what makes men men. What makes us fight harder, and longer, and pushes us to even greater heights is to fail to understand manhood at all.
It is an effort to intentionally weaken both men, and society. To isolate them from what can make them great.
No, you can’t let women control you, no more than you can let anyone control you. But if you only live for yourself, and ignore every siren’s call then you are no man at all.
Be stronger, be better, be complete.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What if I told you the lesson from GWOT wasnt if V Shaped Hulls are useful against China, rather is it the ability to create an Operational Needs Statement process for units in the field to know if V Shaped Hulls are needed or not?
We talk about battles, glory gained against the enemy and great stories of overcoming dreadful odds, but more often than not it is the thankless, tedious mental work done before two armies meet on the field that decides who wins and who loses
Like on the march to Fredericksburg
1/ By the winter of 1862, the Union Army of the Potomac had known little but defeat. They had been beaten like a drum four times at the hands of the Army of Northern Virginia, and had escaped with a draw in September of 1862, despite knowing the entire Southern battle plan.
2/ Nevertheless, the draw at Antietam breathed new life into the Union Army, but the fact remained that after a year and half of war, they were still only 35 miles into the Confederacy. That November, Lincoln replaced the slow moving McClellan with Ambrose Burnside.
Grab a beer, we are going to talk markets and people who put their finger on the scale of them. (And no, this isn’t a thread about the small hat people, so just stop)
Almost all of Salt Lake City’s housing woes can be told in the story of this one house.
Why does this house cost over $300,000? It is by all objective measures a shitbox in a not great neighborhood Well, we have this wonderful tool called Zillow to help us. zillow.com/homedetails/63…
But first, a little history. The American residential real estate market used to be pretty simple. I invest in my house, hoping the market goes up and when it is time to sell, I sell it for a profit. Homes were huge purchases. The biggest most people made.
Here is your guide to the “they march like bums” and the “we don’t need to march” debate.
The truth is somewhere in the middle, but neither side it wrong.
(Caveat: the side posting the North Koreans as an example are wrong. Clowns)
Caveat, I have had a drink or two.
1 For millennia, the ability of individual soldiers to march, turn, and act as one with their comrades is why the West became what it was. That is how wars were won. From Phalanxes to the triple line, tercios, hollow squares, and line volleys, the disciplen of the West dominated
2 the discipline and the order and the obedience became synonymous with success. The Roman Vegetius said
“Few men are born brave. Many become so through training and force of discipline.”
One of my favorite D Day stories is the HMS Rodney, who, while providing direct fire support at Gold Beach, slammed a 16 inch shell directly into a Panzer IV
Rodney had been damaged by am LCT, and had a 9 foot hole in her side, but refused to be left out of the fight
She knew the Germans had their big guns waiting for the Allies coming ashore. Despite water rushing into his ship, Rodney's Captain would be damned if Britain's sons went ashore without their big guns behind them
While the courage of the men in the small boats is without question, what amazes me most is the senior officers in the battleships who basically said "fuck it, we ball". Like USS Texas flooding its own damned torpedo room to bring its guns to bear and got the boys off Omaha
Why is what Thomas Ricks wrote either buffoonishly dumb, or a straight up lie?
He fails to understand both history and how wars are won. He mischaracterizes both the US experience building auxiliary forces, and how World War 2 was won. It is comically bad.
Let us start with the role of auxiliaries in general. Large powers throughout history have used foreign troops to bolster their imperial forces abroad. From the Greeks to the Americans. Balearic slingers fought with the Romans, and Montagnards fought with the Americans.
Auxiliaries provide a difficult skill (Genoese crossbowmen) or some local expertise (Crow scouts). They are useful... when used properly.