A meme circulating among some Christian Nationalists falsely claims Jesus wasn’t Jewish, citing mistranslations, selective quotes, and fringe theories.
1. Houston Stewart Chamberlain Quote
Claim: Chamberlain asserts that calling Jesus a Jew confuses race and religion or distorts the history of Galilee to favor Jewish narratives.
Debunking:
Chamberlain’s Bias: Houston Stewart Chamberlain was a 19th-century British-German author whose work, Foundations of the Nineteenth Century (1899), is widely regarded as a foundational text for antisemitic and racialist ideologies.
His views are not grounded in historical scholarship but in anti-Jewish propaganda that influenced later extremist movements, including Nazism.
Historical Context:
Jesus was born in Bethlehem, raised in Nazareth (Galilee), and lived in a Jewish cultural and religious context.
The Gospels (e.g., Matthew 1:1-17, Luke 3:23-38) trace his genealogy to King David, a central figure in Jewish history, explicitly identifying him as a Jew by descent and religious practice.
Race vs. Religion Misrepresentation: In Jesus’ time, "Jewish" referred to both ethnic descent (from the tribes of Israel, particularly Judah) and adherence to the religious practices of Judaism.
Jesus was both ethnically Jewish (from the tribe of Judah) and religiously Jewish, as evidenced by his participation in Jewish rituals like Passover (Luke 2:41-42, John 2:13) and teaching in synagogues (Luke 4:16-21).
Galilee’s Jewish Identity: Galilee was a predominantly Jewish region in the Second Temple period, as confirmed by archaeological evidence (e.g., synagogues, mikvahs) and historical sources like Josephus, a 1st-century Jewish historian.
Chamberlain’s claim about Galilee’s history is a distortion, falsely implying it was non-Jewish to distance Jesus from Jewish identity.
Conclusion:
Chamberlain’s quote is not a credible historical argument but a reflection of his antisemitic agenda, contradicted by both biblical and secular evidence.
2. John 7:1 Quote
Claim: The verse states Jesus avoided "Jewry" (Judea) because "the Jews sought to kill him," implying he was not Jewish or was opposed to Jews.
Debunking:
Context of John 7:1: The Gospel of John uses "the Jews" (Greek: Ioudaioi) to refer specifically to the religious authorities in Judea (e.g., Pharisees, Sadducees) who opposed Jesus, not to Jews as a whole.
This is a narrative device, not an ethnic or religious rejection of Jewish identity. Jesus himself is identified as a Jew in John 4:9 by the Samaritan woman.
Translation Note: The King James Version’s use of "Jewry" for Judea is an archaic rendering of the Greek Ioudaia, meaning the region of Judea, not a separate ethnic or religious category. Modern translations (e.g., NIV, ESV) clarify this by using "Judea."
Jesus’ Jewish Identity in John: The Gospel of John affirms Jesus’ Jewishness. For example, in John 4:22, Jesus says, “Salvation is from the Jews,” affirming the Jewish roots of his mission.
His avoidance of Judea was a tactical decision due to threats from specific authorities, not a rejection of his Jewish identity.
Historical Setting: Tensions between Galilean Jews (like Jesus) and Judean authorities were common due to regional and political differences, but this does not negate Jesus’ Jewish ethnicity or religious practice.
Conclusion: The verse is misrepresented to suggest Jesus was not Jewish, ignoring its context and the broader narrative of the Gospel, which consistently portrays Jesus as a Jew.
3. "Jew" as a Mistranslation of Ioudaios
Claim: The term "Jew" is a 17th-century mistranslation of Ioudaios, which means "Judean," not "Jew."
Jesus was a Judahite (descendant of Judah) and Judean (resident of Judea), but not a Jew, as modern Jews allegedly descend from Esau, not Jacob/Israel.
Debunking:
Meaning of Ioudaios: In the New Testament, Ioudaios (plural: Ioudaioi) refers to people of Jewish ethnicity and/or adherents of Judaism, often translated as "Jew" or "Judean" depending on context.
In Jesus’ time, it encompassed both those from Judea and Jews broadly (e.g., Galilean Jews like Jesus.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Scofield Bible is a specific edition of the Christian Bible, distinguished by its study notes, commentary, and theological framework provided by Cyrus I. Scofield, first published in 1909 and revised in 1917.
It is not fake and does not take away from the trueness of the Christian Bible whatsoever; rather, it’s a version that some Christians debate or "cope over" due to its distinct interpretive lens.
Below is how it differs from a "regular" Christian Bible:
Base Text:
Scofield Bible: Uses the King James Version (KJV) as its base text (in its original and most common editions), though newer versions may use translations like the New King James Version (NKJV).
The text and image this Christian provided appear is from a screenshot that argues a controversial and historically inaccurate view about the origins and identity of Jewish people .
Including a claim that they are not true descendants of the biblical Judahites but rather a "mixed or hybridized" group incorporating various ancient peoples (e.g., Edomites, Hittites, Canaanites, Khazars, etc.).
It suggests that modern Jews adopted the "religion of Babylon" rather than a direct Judahite identity, and it includes illustrations comparing ancient Hittite, modern "Jew," and Canaanite head profiles, implying a racial or ethnic blending
The claims in the document this Christian provided, attributed to Benjamin H. Freedman, is historically inaccurate and rooted in a discredited theory known as the "Khazar hypothesis."
Let’s address the key points and debunk them based on well-established historical evidence:Claim: Jesus was not a Jew, but a "Judean," and his ancestry is unrelated to modern Jews.Debunking:
Jesus was born in Bethlehem and raised in Nazareth, both in the region of Judea, around 4-6 BCE.
Jesus of Nazareth was born a Jew, lived his life adhering to Jewish religious practices, and died as a Jew. His ethnic and religious identity as a Jew is unequivocally supported by the Christian Bible and corroborated by historical scholarship.
The term "Christian" refers to those who followed Jesus after his death, recognizing him as the Messiah promised in Jewish scriptures.
Jesus himself never identified as a Christian, as this movement developed among his followers in the decades following his crucifixion. The following biblical passages affirm Jesus’ Jewish identity and the origins of Christianity as a movement of his followers.
Jesus did not reject Judaism, he positioned himself as a reformer within it, emphasizing a fulfillment of Jewish law and prophecy. His teachings and actions, as recorded in the New Testament, show a deep engagement with Jewish traditions, scriptures, and practices.
Jesus affirmed the Jewish law
Jesus explicitly stated that he came to fulfill, not abolish, the Jewish law (torah). In the gospel of Matthew, he says
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets, I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them
For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17–18, NIV).