Some insights for founders into the current state of crypto fundraising and some of my personal prediction on the future of crypto venture capital
👇
Setting the stage: It's tough out there
Fundraising is challenging because of upstream DPI and LP capital challenges.
Across the broader venture landscape funds are returning less dollars to LPs on the same timeframe of previous vintages. This in turn results in less dry capital to existing and new VCs which results in a tougher fundraising environment for founders.
What does this mean for crypto venture?
2025 slows on deals, but matches 2024 capital deployment pace
- Slower deal count potentially related to many VCs coming towards end of funds with less dry powder to deploy
- Still some large deals getting done by larger funds hence capital deployment being on pace to prev two years
Crypto M&A continues to improve over the past two years which bodes well for liquidity and exit opportunities.
Large recent M&A including NinjaTrader, Privy, Bridge, Deribit, HiddenRoaad, among others bodes well for consolidation and underwriting more crypto equity venture exits.
Deal count has been relatively consistent throughout the past year, with some larger, later stage deals getting done (announced) in Q4'24 and Q1'25.
This is largely as a result of more deals being very early pre-seed, seed, accelerators where there's always more capital.
Accelerators and launchpads lead deal count by stage
Since 2024, the market has seen a large number of accelerators and launchpads, potentially reflective of tougher capital environment and founders opting to launch tokens earlier.
Median Early Stage Deal Sizes Are Back on the Rise
Pre-seed has continued to increase YoY showing the availability of capital in the market at the earliest stages.
Seed, Series A, and Series B median round sizes are close or back to 2022 levels.
State of Crypto VC Prediction #1: Tokens as Primary Investment Mechanisms
A move away from dual structured tokens and equity towards a unified structure of one asset accruing value.
State of Crypto VC Prediction #2: The Convergence of Fintech & Crypto VCs
Every Fintech investor is becoming a crypto investor as they look to invest in the next generation of payments networks, neobanks, and tokenization platforms, all built on crypto rails.
The competition is coming for crypto VCs and many crypto VCs who haven't been investing in stablecoins/payments will struggle to compete with experienced fintech VCs.
State of Crypto VC Prediction #3: The Rise of Liquid Venture
"Liquid venture" – Venture like opportunities in the liquid token markets
Liquidity - the liquidity of public assets/tokens means for faster liquidity
Accessibility - access is hard in private VC, liquid venture means investors don’t always have to win a deal, they can just buy the asset. OTC options are also available.
Position sizing – as companies launch tokens earlier this means small funds can still build meaningful positions and large funds can similarly deploy into larger cap liquid names
Treasury deployment – many of the best performing VC funds have historical held their venture treasury in tokens such as BTC and ETH which have generated outsized returns. I personally expect this to become more normal in bear market cycles where VC funds call more capital in advance.
Crypto will continue to be at the frontier of venture capital.
The blend of public and private capital markets is where venture is heading, with more traditional venture funds opting to play in liquid markets (post IPO holding vehicles) or secondaries as companies delay going public. Crypto is at the frontier of venture.
Crypto continues to innovate on new capital market formation. And, as more asset move onchain, more companies will look towards onchain-first capital formation.
And finally, crypto outcomes tend to be even more power-lawed than traditional venture, with top crypto assets competing to be sovereign digital money and substrate layers for the new financial economy. The dispersion will be larger, but crypto's hyper-power laws and volatility will continue to drive capital into crypto venture in search of asymmetric returns.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Three Big Trends in DeFi:
1️⃣ Consumer DeFi – fintech-grade UX meets onchain yields
2️⃣ Real World Assets (RWAs) – the bridge to TradFi capital
3️⃣ DeFi as Platforms – evolving from standalone apps to DeFi platforms
Let’s break it down 👇
Trend 1: Consumer DeFi 📱
Consumer grade crypto apps are coming.
Think fintech-like UX but crypto backends focused on…
💡 Opinionated discovery
📱 Mobile first
📈 Power-user features (e,g. multi-collateral leverage)
⚡ Seamless onchain interactions
UX is key. 🚪
Tech is catching up:
🔗 Chain abstraction
🔐 Smart wallets
📱 Mobile-first interfaces
Together, these unlock easy-to-use crypto apps that feel just like fintech—but with DeFi on the backend.
While the world is no longer early to Bitcoin, we're still in the early innings of stablecoins with only 20-30 million monthly active users of stablecoins.
Over the course of the next decade, I expect this number to grow significantly as hundreds of millions of users interact with stablecoins – directly or indirectly – in their daily lives.
Some of the stablecoin opportunities we're excited about:
Great recent newsletter from @artemis__xyz about stablecoin activity.
Some takeaways that I thought were interesting 👇
The on and offramp space, once dominated by Moonpay continues to grow more competitive.
Recently, traditional large fintech Revolut has grown as a leading stablecoin onramp provider.
Exchanges are still key liquidity hubs for specific regions and corridors. For instance, stablecoin remittance activity from U.S. based CEX's like Coinbase and Kraken @Bitso has nearly doubled in 2024.
Stablecoin activity will be most impactful in emerging market corridors like LATAM, South East Asia, and Africa.
Thought provoking essay but I still stand in the fat app thesis camp.
While horizontal wallets certainly capture value today I think Applications will be better positioned than wallets in the future.
Applications will capture more value than horizontal wallets because: 1) Wallet fragmentation will happen. All large apps will launch their own wallets. 2) Every app in the future will be its own wallet capturing order flow and attention. 3) Crypto’s inevitable shift to mobile will favor applications over horizontal wallets.
1) All apps want to own the end user.
Wallets are increasingly commoditized and every sufficiently large app launches its own wallet - Uniswap, Coinbase, Magic Eden, Jupiter, etc.
I also disagree with the statement: “If an application increases its take rate, will users leave for a cheaper alternative?” Apps with retail users are sticky just like wallets are sticky.
The top applications all maintain healthy take rates - Uniswap, Magic Eden, Aave, Jupiter, Raydium.
2) Future apps launch with their own wallets.
There’s a reason we see fewer horizontal wallet companies being built today. New apps (whether consumer or defi) launch with their own wallets by default because of access solutions like Privy and Turnkey. It’s never been easier to integrate a wallet into an app. While horizontal wallets today have an advantage, new apps of the future can onboard users to their wallets directly. Apps like Farcsster are a one good example on this trend- people onboard to Warpcast directly.
Telegram bots are another perfect example of this - they’re first and foremost exchanges / trading apps but have wallets by default. They’ve grown because they offer better products (more social and convenient) that horizontal wallets.
Chain abstraction also arguably decreases the stickiness of Fat Wallets because it gets easier to move asset. Abstraction allows apps to vampire attack horizontal wallets to easily move funds to its own app integrated wallet without the user knowing or caring.
The superpower of crypto is creating new assets and markets.
Now, I try to ask the question – how could this business become an exchange? For certain businesses it’s very clear, but for others, it requires some imagination.
Let’s talk about exchanges, and where to find them 👇
One of the most common and successful business models in crypto is the exchange model which is why we've seen so many companies and protocols eventually adopt the exchange business model.
Exchanges are well-positioned to develop in scenarios were:
- New assets emerge onchain
- Apps control distribution and can introduce transactional behavior
- New services emerge that impact valuable onchain state or are somehow connected to transactions
- Crypto games control their own asset issuance and have open economies
- Developer platforms can introduce service marketplaces or auction houses for transactions
There are a few common crypto business models:
- Exchanges and marketplaces
- Transaction sequencing
- Asset managers
Let's dive into some examples 👇
Exchange Model
Subset 1) marketplace models – fee on transactions
- create a new asset and market (e.g. Polymarket, Perps)
- expand access to emerging asset (Coinbase and BTC)
- convenience fee (wallet swaps)
- SaaS enabled marketplaces – Proof marketplaces
Exchange subset 2): Liquidity servicing - build valuable pool of specialized liquidity and charge acces fee to end app (e.g. hooks) or match-maker fee (e.g. swaps)
- DEXs
- Lending
MEV / Transaction sequencing – own and monetize valuable order flow
- App PFOF (e.g. TG Bots)
- Sequencer model - own sequencer and MEV (e.g. L2)
- SaaS enabled tx sequencing and monitoring - RaaS, RPC providers, security providers, oracles etc.