🧵Baylor University, a large Baptist college in Texas, took $643K from a progressive foundation to push LGBTQ+ affirmation in churches, then returned it. But is this repentance or damage control? A look at the university’s moves in recent years reveals the truth:
2/ First, the recent grant. Baylor’s Diana R. Garland School of Social Work applied for and accepted the $643,401 grant from the Baugh Foundation, which funds projects and organizations that seek to liberalize Christian institutions.
3/ The grant was for a research project called “Courage from the Margins: Inclusion and Belonging Practices for LGBTQIA+ and Women in Congregations,” the purpose of which was to use the “lived experiences” of “LGBTQIA+” people to inform congregations about ways they can be more “inclusive.”
4/ Baylor was initially enthusiastic about the grant and the consequential research. On June 30th, they published a now-removed press release that lauded the “generous support of the Baugh Foundation” and the effort to make churches “spaces of healing and belonging” for LGBT-identifying people.
5/ Understandably, the professing-Christian university received swift backlash. Journalist @megbasham persistently sounded the alarm on Baylor’s compromise. Many, including Baylor alumni, shared the sentiment expressed by Pastor @DennyBurk here:
6/ Yesterday, BU’s president, Linda Livingstone, announced the school would be rescinding the grant, citing a collision of advocacy and Christian values. While people are praising this decision as Baylor doing the right thing, it’s worth noting that this doesn’t appear to be an honest mistake.
7/ This isn’t the first time Baylor’s taken far-left Baugh’s money. In 2018, for example, BU accepted a grant for a guide to navigate “decisions to be more inclusive in their practices and policies specific to LGBTQ+ persons.”
8/ In 2024, the Baugh Foundation funded the “Building Resilient Congregations research pilot project,” where Yancey and her team “ worked with selected congregations in three distinct areas: Accompaniment, Trauma Care, and LGBTQ+ Discernment.”
9/ BU’s quiet compromise on LGBT issues goes back at least 10 years. Post-Obergefell (2015), they quietly removed language on the sinfulness of homosexuality from their conduct code. It should be noted, however, that Baylor’s official statements about sexual ethics still affirm the biblical definition of marriage. Via the Dallas Observer
10/ In 2022, BU recognized its first LGBTQ student organization called Prism. Per reporting in the Baylor Lariat, BU’s LGBTQ policies are quite contradictory and confusing. The school apparently affirms biblical sexuality but prohibits its counselors from urging LGBT-identifying students to repentance.
11/ This shift has predominantly taken place under the leadership of President Livingstone, who seems to be a progressive herself. @megbasham reports that Livingstone attends an LGBTQ-affirming church. Also, in 2020, she expressed her (& Baylor’s?) support for the Marxist, anti-nuclear family organization, Black Lives Matter.
12/ There are many other examples of Baylor’s lack of courage to stand for biblical truth. Professors pushing radical transgender ideology, students protesting professing teachers who dare defend biblical truth. We go through their deconstruction on this episode. I’d share this episode + thread with those in your life who need the facts about what’s going on at BU. youtu.be/L7wiQvWG7_g
13/ As a Texan, I have many Baylor friends and know the loyalty to the university runs deep. I’ve gotten plenty of supportive messages since releasing our episode, but a lot of extremely angry ones, too, claiming I shouldn’t criticize a Christian college. Here’s what I’ll ask: What matters more? Baylor or the Bible?
14/ If you’re a Christian, you should be disturbed by the direction a once-solid Baptist institution is taking. May your ire be directed at its compromise, not at those criticizing the compromise. As an alum or a parent, you’ve spent thousands of dollars supporting BU. You have a right—and responsibility—to hold it accountable.
15/ In fact, it’s because there were believers willing to do what I call “raising a respectful ruckus” that BU rescinded this shameful grant. This is what courage does. When paired with persistence, it makes a difference. You have real power when you stand up and speak out. Keep doing it.
16/ Remember, we cannot out-love God. God is love (1 John 4:8), so the most loving thing we can do is agree with Him. He says holy sexuality is exclusive to the marital union between a man + a woman and that the only genders that exist are male + female (Gen. 1:27). He also says that homosexuality is a sin, a disordered desire that consumes the body and soul (Rom. 1).
17/ If we really love those in our care—at our churches, schools, and families—we must courageously, graciously, and clearly point them to the path of life and away from patterns of thought and action that will destroy them.
18/ By apparently believing it can out-nice God, Baylor is exchanging the God of Scripture for the god of self, and in so doing, endangers its mission and the very souls of those on its campus. May God have mercy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵1/ If you’ve heard of The @Innocence Project, you might think they serve a noble cause—freeing the “wrongly convicted.” But they’re actually left-wing activists whose toxic empathy shields monsters to push a radical agenda. Brace yourself for a horrific story:
2/ In 2002, Robert Roberson was convicted of murdering his 2-year-old daughter, Nikki. But in 2024, as he was about to be executed for his crimes in TX, The @Innocence Project took up his case, painting Roberson as a gentle “Forrest Gump” type who was wrongly convicted.
3/ Roberson’s name flooded headlines as an “innocent” autistic dad on death row, saved by a judge’s last-minute order, whose daughter died in his care from an accidental fall. Prominent figures rallied for him. But here’s what @Innocence doesn’t say:
When progressives call you a “Christian nationalist” or “fascist,” know it’s projection.
In Colorado, a new law bans sex-exclusive spaces, forcing camps to let males into girls’ areas—or face legal action. One Christian camp is pushing back. Here’s what you need to know 🧵
2/ For 75 years, IdRaHaJe (which stands for “I’d Rather Have Jesus”) has existed as a place where kids can learn more about Jesus, build friendships, and enjoy God’s creation. The camp, like all Christian entities, abides by the gender designations clearly spelled out in the first chapter of the Bible: “God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.” (Gen. 1:27)
3/ Colorado’s law prevents IdRaHaJe, and every other Christian-owned organization, from abiding by its beliefs. This is an obvious infringement upon their First Amendment rights, as my friends at @ADFlegal will successfully argue on their behalf. But, in Democrat-run states like Colorado, the process is the punishment. Remember Jack Phillips?
Hey @ejdickson - Thanks for your email. Happy to be included in your Rolling Stones piece. Quick question: Do you still believe pedophilia is a “sexual orientation” that can be satisfied by child sex dolls? Please let me know by EOD tomorrow. twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Considered writing a thoughtful response but decided it’s not worth it. Their “transphobia is a right-wing grift that pays” angle is obvious, and they’d never let go of it, no matter how sincere and convincing my rebuttal was. But, for anyone else:
I’ve been writing and talking about gender ideology since at least 2018. Dedicated a segment of my book to it, which I finished in 2019. Of course, as the movement has picked up momentum and entered into the mainstream, there has been more reason to discuss, analyze, and refute… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Black people should get away from white people, but if white people are in white-only spaces, it’s because they’re white supremacists 😀 Does anyone want to take a guess as to why so many people who posted black squares in 2020 have abandoned their “anti-racist” journey
It’s because it’s a legalistic, unrelenting religion with no redemption or grace, no chance of salvation. The rules aren’t even consistent. People will play along with the “do better” trash for a little while, but eventually the sanctification-without-justification stuff gets old
Why does it take longer than a day to count votes in blue areas? Probably because corrupt people are appointed to run the elections. Look at Harris County, TX - huge county trying to oust the liberal judge largely responsible for the uptick in violent crime. Who was appointed? 1/
His name is Clifford Tatum. He ran elections in DC for years, despite complaints of corruption & that elections under his watch were a “disaster” and like voting “in a third world country.” He also owes over $100k in income tax, so that’s cool. washingtonexaminer.com/dc-elections-c…
So, out of ALL the people who could’ve run the election process in one of the biggest counties in the country, this was the guy who was picked. Apparently no one in Houston, or all of Texas, was available. Only guy they could find was a DC guy with a horrible track record.
A student at an event tonight asked me if I think conservatives should be content with building competing companies & institutions with our values. I said no. I want to build our own and then take theirs. I want us to take over & dominate every single thing the left has ruined.
We’ll know we’re getting there when companies, teachers, journalists, doctors & politicians count the cost of promoting transing the kids and decide it’s way, way too high.
The left will shriek about this, emotionally extorting you into weakness even while they continue to dominate and destroy everything you hold dear. Trust me, the side throwing pro-lifers into prison while inflicting violence with impunity isn’t actually offended by talk of power