Since I published this blog on Wednesday, begging (again) my MP @ChrisMurrayMP to vote against the disastrous Universal Credit & Personal Independence Payment Bill, I've found out how he chose to spend his day 🧵
While Parliament debated whether to remove the benefit lifelines that keep disabled people from starvation, I see he was out enjoying a ‘terrific lunch’
Than he was off to the British Museum for a nice afternoon hanging out with the big boys and girls (mostly boys), before dashing back to the Commons to vote for disabled people already in dire poverty to be made even poorer.
‘Vive l’entente cordiale’ has long been my motto when engaging with politicians. I want to engage & be constructive. But can you see, Chris, why posting about your wee jolly as disabled people fear for their lives doesn’t feel very ‘cordiale’?
Do you understand why it feels like a slap in the face? A 2-fingered gesture of contempt towards your disabled constituents? I guess there must be a junior Minister role awaiting you in the next reshuffle. What’s it to be 🤔. Foreign Office?
Chris, I so wanted to believe you when you told me you came into Parliament to make life better for ordinary & disadvantaged people. I welcomed your willingness to engage, & I’ve engaged with you in good faith.
As I said in my blog, I know that everyone going into politics with such good intentions will likely confront the clash between integrity & ambition, self-interest & the interests of constituents. It quickly becomes clear which has the upper hand.
I'm genuinely sorry, genuinely very disappointed, to say that in your case it certainly has, with no discernible sign of struggle😢. May I suggest you now turn your attention to reviving 'l'entente cordiale' with your disabled constituents, that your actions have destroyed 🙏
@ChrisMurrayMP @threadreaderapp please unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On Wednesday they take away #AssistancetoLive. On Friday -today - they may give #AssistanceToDie. On Wednesday they take away our Personal Independence. They make us dependent. They take support away from unpaid carers on whom we depend. 🧵
On Friday they look set to give people who feel dependent – a burden – a way out. In just a few days they go from #TakingThePIP to #TakingOurLives.
For yeas disabled people fought for #RightsNotCharity, for an equal fundamental human right to life. To live. Without fear. With the dignity of rights. For recognition that we are #EquallyHuman. We are not 'other'. We may be your child, your mum, your bestie. Maybe you. Any day.
Good news @Keir_Starmer @RachelReevesMP! You can raise more than £5bn without implementing #PathwaysToPoverty [autocorrect] or raising taxes. All you need to do is implement Labour’s Manifesto commitment to clamp down on tax legally owed but unpaid. You’re welcome! 🧵
It also says "Labour will address unfairness in the tax system..abolish non-dom status... replacing it with a modern scheme for people genuinely in the country for a short period..end the use of offshore trusts to avoid inheritance tax..."
The total tax gap—the difference between tax legally owed and actually paid—is estimated at £39.8 billion (HMRC 2022–23 data, published mid‑2024). It’s due to a combination of ‘failure to take care’ (errors), error and evasion, and tax avoidance.
I honeslty don't think the public & many politicians in Scotland/ Scottish MPs realise just how devastating this could be for people in Scotland & (any) @scotgov 's ability to exercise devolved power to diverge from Westminster. 🧵
This isn't just about a massive cut to Scotland's budget (the fact it isn't happening right away is irrelevant), but because of how closely intertwined the 2 systems are, with eligibility for devolved benefits contingent on getting reserved ones and vice versa.
So if the PIP assessment is to be how you get Universal Credit additional health/ incapacity payments, how does that work if Adult Disability Payment, Scotland's currently very similar version of PIP is no longer the same?
How can @leicesterliz have the bare-faced cheek to trumpet support for carers while ensuring that hundreds of thousands lose their carers allowance because those they care for lose PIP😡. Increasing the earnings limit for carers allowance is a fat lot of use if you've lost it! 🧵
A 2024 report by Carers UK and the Centre for Care found unpaid carers in the UK provide £184.3 billion worth of care annually—equivalent to funding a second NHS! Personally I think that's more than enough. But not, it seems, for Liz and @RachelReevesMP carersuk.org/reports/valuin…
Social care is in crisis & the UK Govt has kicked reform into the long grass again where it's been repeatedly kicked for many years. Review after review has lead nowhere. And who are the victims of this epic policy failure? Yes, disabled people & their unpaid carers.
1/7 This morning I wrote to the individual who has the honour (he may consider it misfortune!) to be my MP, begging him not to support the proposed cuts to disability benefits. Here's what I said [with a few typos removed! No room to put in Alt text - DM me if needed]. 🧵
2/7 I began by recalling when I chaired the last Labour Govt's Disability Employment Advisory Committee when another 'Pathways to Work' was around, explaining why it & many other such progs don't work as expected, & why it's vital to see it from the employer's perspective.
3/7 I agree the situation is unsustainable, that being the soaring rise in sickness & disability due to an NHS on its knees, failure to manage & learn from the pandemic & ongoing devastating health impacts. If you want to reduce the benefits bill, maybe invest in clean air!
Let me be even blunter than @danny__kruger. The private sector is driven by profit. To involve them in delivering assisted dying means making it profitable. Will they be set 'kill targets'? Will they be paid bonuses for exceeding them?
When you introduce a profit motive & if there's more profit to be made from killing people than keeping them alive, if you turn the process into a safeguard-free zone with no meaningful oversight, guess what happens.
Maybe investing our tax-payers money on a new privatised death service is what Starmer & co mean by prioritising 'growth' over everything else. Let the bodies of the otherwise unprofitable pile high, if that's what it takes? Didn't Boris Johnson say something similar?