🧵Why the Epstein story matters so deeply to the political right—and why sweeping it under the rug is not just offensive, but a civilizational betrayal:
This isn’t just about Epstein. It’s about what his case reveals: a nexus of unaccountable power, intelligence cover, institutional rot, and elite impunity. The story touches every nerve the American right has been warning about for a century.
Since FDR, the right has feared the unchecked expansion of the administrative state. But the real danger wasn’t just bureaucracy—it was the fusion of that bureaucracy with the intelligence community, financial elites, and transnational interests.
Epstein is the singular window into this world. A man with no clear source of wealth, deep ties to U.S. and foreign intelligence, and access to the most powerful people in the world—running a blackmail operation under institutional protection.
The CIA won’t talk. The FBI walked away. The media refused to dig. And Israel—whose alleged involvement through cutouts like Wexner is whispered about but never investigated—remains off limits. That silence says more than any report ever could.
For decades, the right has asked: Who really governs? Who watches the watchers? Epstein gave us a glimpse. And what we saw was not a “conspiracy theory”—it was conspiratorial governance: intelligence services operating with total impunity.
This isn’t just about criminal sexual behavior—though the abuse of underage girls is itself an unspeakable crime, and one that demands real justice. But the fact that such crimes were instrumentalized for power is what makes this even more sinister.
The use of sexual blackmail to compromise institutions and shield a network of elites is not a subplot—it’s the playbook. This was kompromat as statecraft, and it operated in the open, protected by the very agencies tasked with protecting us.
The reason the Epstein story haunts the right is that it confirms our deepest suspicions:
—Our intelligence agencies are political actors.
—Our elites are compromised.
—Our allies are unaccountable.
—And our institutions lie to preserve their power.
Worse still: every time the Epstein story is buried, the very institutions doing the burying destroy their own legitimacy. The cover-up corrodes the foundation they claim to defend—rule of law, transparency, democratic accountability.
This is what Eisenhower warned of—not just a “military-industrial complex,” but the seamless merger of state power, private capital, and foreign intelligence. Epstein is a grotesque fruit of that fusion. Ignoring it won’t make it go away.
The right sees Epstein not as an aberration, but a revelation. A moment when the mask slipped. When the postwar liberal order—underwritten by secrecy, mutual blackmail, and “strategic alliances”—showed its true face.
So no—we won’t move on. Not because we’re obsessed with scandal, but because the Epstein case is the Rosetta Stone for understanding the modern American regime. And the regime knows it.
That’s why it must be buried.
That’s why we must never let it be.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread: The West was never meant to be ruled by Law but by Men made wise through Incarnation.
We often say the West is founded on “the rule of law.” That sounds noble, but it is not the highest form of order. In Scripture, law is not the end of human governance but its tutor.
Paul calls the law a paidagĹŤgos; that is a pedagogue/tutor who restrains the immature until the Son comes. It belongs to the time before human maturity, when men were still children under guardians.
The Incarnation changed that. The Word became flesh so that humanity itself might become royal, sharing in Christ’s authority over the cosmos. The rule of law yields to the rule of mature men.
It is often said that the U.S. intelligence community was born to fight the Left.
In truth, the OSS and early CIA were creatures of the Left — progressive, Anglophile, and anti-traditional from the beginning.
The Office of Strategic Services (OSS), founded by FDR and Donovan, was not a conservative project.
It was staffed by New Deal idealists, Ivy League internationalists, and Popular Front sympathizers who saw their mission as defeating fascism and imperialism.
Because the Soviets were wartime allies, OSS recruitment was ideologically loose.
Many officers admired the socialist experiment or moved comfortably in left-liberal circles.
FDR did not mind. The OSS was part of his vision of a global New Deal.
Not urinating or defecating will lead to very bad things for you. Quickly.
That blunt bodily fact is a theological metaphor we’ve stopped taking seriously. The “body” of Christ was meant to teach political truth as much as spiritual: bodies must remove contaminants to survive. Scripture repeats this lesson again and again.
In the Old Testament the community is treated like a living organism. When sin, idolatry, or uncleanness enter the camp the remedy is surgical, immediate, and public: remove the thing that will rot the body. Think of the commands to purge evil from the camp. The language is biological, not merely ritual.
Why were the real federalists of the founding era—the ones who believed in a league of sovereign states—branded “Anti-Federalists”? And why does this matter today? How does this relate to the growth of the Deep State managerialist nightmare?
The answer is not pedantic history. It reveals how language itself is a weapon, how elites invert meaning to consolidate power, and why local self-government is always the first casualty of empire.
Originally, “federal” meant a covenant (foedus): sovereign states cooperating in alliance. The “Anti-Federalists” defended this. The so-called “Federalists” rebranded the term to bless centralization.
On the American frontier, everyone was functionally a Baptist.
That’s the tradition I came from, and I’m thankful for it.
But over time I’ve come to see baptism—especially of our children—in a way that reflects citizenship and ceremonial cleansing.
I was baptized as a young adult in a Southern Baptist church. I’m grateful for that season and for my Baptist brothers and sisters. But I have come to believe the paedobaptist position better reflects the Bible’s teaching.
Here’s why, with grace and charity.
Baptism is not first an expression of my faith; it is first God’s claim upon me.
It is His sign of citizenship—marking me as belonging to His Kingdom, just as circumcision marked Abraham’s household before they could speak or believe.
đź§µ THREAD: A Summary of the Declassified Evidence on 2016 Election Intelligence Manipulation
Declassified documents now confirm what many suspected: a small circle of intelligence officials manipulated 2016 election reporting to undermine the incoming president—and Tulsi Gabbard is demanding consequences.
1/ Recently declassified documents from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence raise serious concerns about the conduct of senior intelligence officials during the 2016 presidential transition. This thread outlines the timeline and evidence with a focus on transparency and accountability.
2/ In early September 2016, internal DHS and ODNI assessments stated that there was no indication of Russian efforts to alter vote tallies or voting infrastructure. One memo dated September 2 noted that Russia probably was not attempting to influence the election outcome through cyber means.