Here we go on safari which autocorrects I think and therefore is easier to type fast on. Although I'm not sure it's doing that atm
why isn't it making the3 spelling right? Oh yes it is. as long as the first letters are correct the rest goes well, so make sure the first few letters are right.
I hope the judge is still writing longhand. As long as I can hear I can probably keep up, as long as the awful women
Also included in category of women will be any natal man who has a GRC. Means word women in EA excludes any natal woman with a GRC to say acquired gender is male, and excludes any man without a GRC whether or not that person claims a GI. That is the new category of woman and man.
Our side's position is much simpler. We say that ss 9.3 get out applies. Whether you are a boy/girl man /woman is immutable from conception, an immutable biological state. Woman remains a woman even if she has a GRC and a legal fiction that says her gender is male.
MK lost control of his car on black ice on A423. He skidded off road and rolled into a ditch. Police and ambulance came and took him to hospital. Police removed debris and their slow sign. They did nothing about the black ice.
Later MR skidded on the black ice, crashed into the care driven by x. They crashed and both died.
Mrs s took police to court for claim against police.
SC unanimously dismisses her appeal. The grounds that the police made matters worse - no such liability. Claim was that police made matters worse because Mrs was warning drivers of dangers and would have continued.
Court said could have been liability in tort of negligence
if person intervenes knowing it could limit other people helping - the interfering principle. But here police couldn't have know that Mr was warning. Police couldn't have foreseen that their arrival would have interfered with his warnings. They saw him a a victim.
On agreed/alledged fact interference principle couldn't work. Police couldn't know that MR was warning others. They couldn't have foreseen that their arrival interfered with his warning.
Judgement moves from liability to acts to liability for commissions.
Claimant urged exceptions upon court. Police didn't have control of danger and no duty could arise