@Serendipity Profile picture
Jul 15 7 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Tweet 1
And 2
A nd 3
and on we go
Until the end
@threadreaderapp
@threadreaderapp Please unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with @Serendipity

@Serendipity Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Serendipity4737

Feb 5
first tweet
Here we go on safari which autocorrects I think and therefore is easier to type fast on. Although I'm not sure it's doing that atm
why isn't it making the3 spelling right? Oh yes it is. as long as the first letters are correct the rest goes well, so make sure the first few letters are right.

I hope the judge is still writing longhand. As long as I can hear I can probably keep up, as long as the awful women
Read 7 tweets
Feb 5
first tweet
second tweet and it doesn't automatically corret his wa Need to use safari.
and on we go as fast as poss. Third and fourth tweet. Don't worry c puncuation etc. they just need to read
Read 6 tweets
Nov 26, 2024
Now start
Also included in category of women will be any natal man who has a GRC. Means word women in EA excludes any natal woman with a GRC to say acquired gender is male, and excludes any man without a GRC whether or not that person claims a GI. That is the new category of woman and man.
Our side's position is much simpler. We say that ss 9.3 get out applies. Whether you are a boy/girl man /woman is immutable from conception, an immutable biological state. Woman remains a woman even if she has a GRC and a legal fiction that says her gender is male.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 25, 2024
This is the first tweet
MK lost control of his car on black ice on A423. He skidded off road and rolled into a ditch. Police and ambulance came and took him to hospital. Police removed debris and their slow sign. They did nothing about the black ice.
Later MR skidded on the black ice, crashed into the care driven by x. They crashed and both died.

Mrs s took police to court for claim against police.
Read 8 tweets
Nov 25, 2024
This is the first post
SC unanimously dismisses her appeal. The grounds that the police made matters worse - no such liability. Claim was that police made matters worse because Mrs was warning drivers of dangers and would have continued.

Court said could have been liability in tort of negligence
if person intervenes knowing it could limit other people helping - the interfering principle. But here police couldn't have know that Mr was warning. Police couldn't have foreseen that their arrival would have interfered with his warnings. They saw him a a victim.
Read 9 tweets
Nov 25, 2024
Pinned tweet
On agreed/alledged fact interference principle couldn't work. Police couldn't know that MR was warning others. They couldn't have foreseen that their arrival interfered with his warning.

Judgement moves from liability to acts to liability for commissions.
Claimant urged exceptions upon court. Police didn't have control of danger and no duty could arise
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(