Investigating Jeffrey Epstein: Intelligence Connections and the "Little Black Book" 🧵
I became curious enough about the claims surrounding Jeffrey Epstein recently to do some research. My investigation was not exhaustive—I didn’t dive into the numerous books written about Epstein’s ties but instead just used basic internet searches and summaries from those who have studied the source material and reportedly are showing the most damning evidence. My goals were twofold: Was Epstein an intelligence asset, and what evidence supports this? And what exactly is the so-called "little black book"?
I became curious enough about the claims surrounding Jeffrey Epstein recently to do some research. My investigation was not exhaustive—I didn’t dive into the numerous books written about Epstein’s ties but instead just used basic internet searches and summaries from those who have studied the source material and reportedly are showing the most damning evidence. My goals were twofold: Was Epstein an intelligence asset, and what evidence supports this? And what exactly is the so-called "little black book"?
TL:DR
Public information on Jeffrey Epstein's alleged intelligence ties originates from two sources: Vicky Ward and Ari Ben-Menashe. Ward’s claims rely on hearsay from a highly unreliable source, with most reports circling back to her work. Ben-Menashe, a former Mossad operative, claimed in 2019—post-Epstein’s arrest—that he knew of Epstein’s activities since the 1980s. His ties to controversial groups undermine his credibility.
This narrative fuels a moral outrage trap, weaponized by influencers for political gain. These actors often exhibit selective indignation, loudly condemning trafficking when it suits their agenda while ignoring or downplaying similar issues elsewhere, revealing their hypocrisy and opportunistic motives.
Public information on Jeffrey Epstein's alleged intelligence ties originates from two sources: Vicky Ward and Ari Ben-Menashe. Ward’s claims rely on hearsay from a highly unreliable source, with most reports circling back to her work. Ben-Menashe, a former Mossad operative, claimed in 2019—post-Epstein’s arrest—that he knew of Epstein’s activities since the 1980s. His ties to controversial groups undermine his credibility.
This narrative fuels a moral outrage trap, weaponized by influencers for political gain. These actors often exhibit selective indignation, loudly condemning trafficking when it suits their agenda while ignoring or downplaying similar issues elsewhere, revealing their hypocrisy and opportunistic motives.
Was Jeffrey Epstein an Intelligence Asset?
In exploring whether Epstein was an intelligence asset, I attempted to avoid speculative "six degrees of separation" connections and looked for direct evidence. I found only two primary sources: journalist Vicky Ward and former Mossad agent Ari Ben-Menashe.
In exploring whether Epstein was an intelligence asset, I attempted to avoid speculative "six degrees of separation" connections and looked for direct evidence. I found only two primary sources: journalist Vicky Ward and former Mossad agent Ari Ben-Menashe.
Vicky Ward’s Claims
In 2003, Vicky Ward wrote an article for *Vanity Fair* about Epstein’s lifestyle, including allegations of predatory behavior based on testimony from two victims. During her research, Ward interviewed Epstein about his "girls" and his former associate, Steven Hoffenberg. Epstein reportedly threatened to sue her, and Ward claims he visited the magazine’s offices to intimidate the editor, threatening to sink the company if the article was published. The editor denies these threats occurred. Ultimately, the sections about Epstein’s predatory behavior were cut, with the magazine citing failure to meet legal standards for publication. Ward insists those sections were initially approved, but the magazine disputes this [3].
Ward also references unverified claims that the editor received threats, including a severed cat head on his lawn and a bullet on his porch. However, these incidents occurred later, were unrelated to Epstein, and coincided with the magazine’s criticism of the Bush administration [3].
In 2003, Vicky Ward wrote an article for *Vanity Fair* about Epstein’s lifestyle, including allegations of predatory behavior based on testimony from two victims. During her research, Ward interviewed Epstein about his "girls" and his former associate, Steven Hoffenberg. Epstein reportedly threatened to sue her, and Ward claims he visited the magazine’s offices to intimidate the editor, threatening to sink the company if the article was published. The editor denies these threats occurred. Ultimately, the sections about Epstein’s predatory behavior were cut, with the magazine citing failure to meet legal standards for publication. Ward insists those sections were initially approved, but the magazine disputes this [3].
Ward also references unverified claims that the editor received threats, including a severed cat head on his lawn and a bullet on his porch. However, these incidents occurred later, were unrelated to Epstein, and coincided with the magazine’s criticism of the Bush administration [3].
In a 2021 *Rolling Stone* article, Ward cites a 2002 interview with Steven Hoffenberg, who claimed Epstein operated in intelligence circles. Hoffenberg, however, had motives to discredit Epstein, as he blamed Epstein for cooperating with prosecutors against him and for allegedly stealing money (the latter claim is unconfirmed). Hoffenberg’s connections overlapped with Epstein’s, making his accusations less reliable without corroborating evidence [8, 23].
Ward’s claims also tie Epstein to Robert Maxwell, a media mogul and a smuggler, and Douglas Leese, an arms trafficker. Robert, Ghislaine Maxwell’s father, was involved in smuggling for multiple nations, including Israel, and built a media empire speculated to be an information network [20, 21, 22]. Israel's fondness for Robert is most likely due to him trafficking weapons to Israel in time for the 1948 Israel Arab war.
Leese’s connection is limited to referring Epstein to Hoffenberg to manage Hoffenberg’s finances, which presumes Epstein was handling Leese’s finances at some point beforehand, however Leese has no clear ties to any intelligence agency [19, 20].
Leese’s connection is limited to referring Epstein to Hoffenberg to manage Hoffenberg’s finances, which presumes Epstein was handling Leese’s finances at some point beforehand, however Leese has no clear ties to any intelligence agency [19, 20].
Ward’s strongest claim comes from a 2019 article referencing a 2016–2017 interview with a former White House official. The official alleged that Alexander Acosta, the prosecutor in Epstein’s 2007 case, was told to back off because Epstein was an "intelligence asset" [1]. However, this claim has significant issues:
1. **Timing and Bias**: Ward didn’t publish this claim until 2019, after Epstein’s arrest, despite her long-standing interest in exposing him. The claim emerged during a politically charged period when many in Washington opposed the Trump administration, potentially influencing the official’s motives [1].
2. **Hearsay**: The claim relies on a chain of hearsay: Ward heard from the official, who may or may not have heard from Acosta, who was allegedly told Epstein was an intelligence asset. This spans at least a decade, with no corroborating evidence [1]. It should be noted that Ward explicitly claimed that the official presented this information unprompted and without prior knowledge of her previous involvement with Epstein.
4. **Informant Status**: Epstein was a federal informant until at least 2008 [23]. The "intelligence asset" reference might simply relate to his informant role, though this is speculative.
It should be noted that almost all claims to Epstein being Intelligence refer back to this 2019 article. The rest refer back to Ari Ben-Menashe’s book.
1. **Timing and Bias**: Ward didn’t publish this claim until 2019, after Epstein’s arrest, despite her long-standing interest in exposing him. The claim emerged during a politically charged period when many in Washington opposed the Trump administration, potentially influencing the official’s motives [1].
2. **Hearsay**: The claim relies on a chain of hearsay: Ward heard from the official, who may or may not have heard from Acosta, who was allegedly told Epstein was an intelligence asset. This spans at least a decade, with no corroborating evidence [1]. It should be noted that Ward explicitly claimed that the official presented this information unprompted and without prior knowledge of her previous involvement with Epstein.
4. **Informant Status**: Epstein was a federal informant until at least 2008 [23]. The "intelligence asset" reference might simply relate to his informant role, though this is speculative.
It should be noted that almost all claims to Epstein being Intelligence refer back to this 2019 article. The rest refer back to Ari Ben-Menashe’s book.
Ari Ben-Menashe’s Claims
Ari Ben-Menashe, an Iranian-born former Mossad agent who left the agency in 1989, claimed in some 2019 interviews and a 2020 book that Epstein was a Mossad operative [24]. Ben-Menashe joined Israel’s IDF Signals Intelligence in 1974 and later Mossad in 1977. In 1989, he was arrested for trafficking military aircraft to Iran and claimed he was an Israeli agent, expecting Israel to intervene. They did not. Afterward, he made high-profile claims, including involvement in the Iran-Contra affair and delaying the Iranian hostage release for Reagan’s reelection. Some of his claims were partially accurate, others disproven [17, 22].
Ari Ben-Menashe, an Iranian-born former Mossad agent who left the agency in 1989, claimed in some 2019 interviews and a 2020 book that Epstein was a Mossad operative [24]. Ben-Menashe joined Israel’s IDF Signals Intelligence in 1974 and later Mossad in 1977. In 1989, he was arrested for trafficking military aircraft to Iran and claimed he was an Israeli agent, expecting Israel to intervene. They did not. Afterward, he made high-profile claims, including involvement in the Iran-Contra affair and delaying the Iranian hostage release for Reagan’s reelection. Some of his claims were partially accurate, others disproven [17, 22].
Ben-Menashe alleges he saw Epstein and Robert Maxwell together, with Epstein instructed to target Bill Clinton [24]. However, his account raises questions:
- He failed to mention Epstein until 2019, despite claiming they worked together before 1989. His memory of events is vague, and he admits uncertainty about details.
- Since the 1990s, Ben-Menashe has worked with Russian and Arabic groups, some with interests in destabilizing the U.S., which undermines his credibility [14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25].
- His claims lack corroboration beyond speculative testimonies.
- He failed to mention Epstein until 2019, despite claiming they worked together before 1989. His memory of events is vague, and he admits uncertainty about details.
- Since the 1990s, Ben-Menashe has worked with Russian and Arabic groups, some with interests in destabilizing the U.S., which undermines his credibility [14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 22, 25].
- His claims lack corroboration beyond speculative testimonies.
Anecdotal Evidence
In a 2022 article, some of Epstein’s trafficking victims described him threatening to use CIA connections against them or their families to ensure compliance. While these threats align with intimidation tactics, they don’t confirm actual intelligence ties [10].
In a 2022 article, some of Epstein’s trafficking victims described him threatening to use CIA connections against them or their families to ensure compliance. While these threats align with intimidation tactics, they don’t confirm actual intelligence ties [10].
Conclusion on Intelligence Ties
The evidence for Epstein as an intelligence asset is circumstantial and relies heavily on hearsay. Ward’s claims hinge on a single, uncorroborated source, and Ben-Menashe’s credibility is questionable due to his history and motives. Epstein’s informant status may explain some references to intelligence, but no solid evidence confirms he was an asset for any agency except as an informant for the FBI.
Another thing to be added is when Ben-Menashe and Ward, both in writing each of their own books on the subject, collaborated with fiction authors James Patterson, James Robertson, Melissa Cronin and Dylan Howard.
The evidence for Epstein as an intelligence asset is circumstantial and relies heavily on hearsay. Ward’s claims hinge on a single, uncorroborated source, and Ben-Menashe’s credibility is questionable due to his history and motives. Epstein’s informant status may explain some references to intelligence, but no solid evidence confirms he was an asset for any agency except as an informant for the FBI.
Another thing to be added is when Ben-Menashe and Ward, both in writing each of their own books on the subject, collaborated with fiction authors James Patterson, James Robertson, Melissa Cronin and Dylan Howard.
What Are the Epstein Files and "Little Black Books"?
The so-called "Epstein files" or "client list" are often portrayed as a definitive record of elites involved in Epstein’s illicit activities, potentially used for blackmail. However, the reality is less sensational.
The so-called "Epstein files" or "client list" are often portrayed as a definitive record of elites involved in Epstein’s illicit activities, potentially used for blackmail. However, the reality is less sensational.
The "Little Black Book"
Two documents referred to as a "little black book" exist:
1. A 2004–2005 contact list, found in 2009 and published in 2015, containing over 1,500 contacts, including businesses and personal connections, some underlined or circled [5, 12].
2. A 1997 contact list, reportedly found in 2021, similar in nature [12].
These are essentially Epstein’s Rolodex, akin to a phone’s contact list, and are publicly available. They tie Epstein to many individuals but don’t explicitly list "clients" or confirm illicit activities.
Two documents referred to as a "little black book" exist:
1. A 2004–2005 contact list, found in 2009 and published in 2015, containing over 1,500 contacts, including businesses and personal connections, some underlined or circled [5, 12].
2. A 1997 contact list, reportedly found in 2021, similar in nature [12].
These are essentially Epstein’s Rolodex, akin to a phone’s contact list, and are publicly available. They tie Epstein to many individuals but don’t explicitly list "clients" or confirm illicit activities.
Flight Logs and Videos
Flight logs from Epstein’s private plane are public and connect him to various high-profile individuals. Videos seized from Epstein’s properties are considered child pornography and cannot be released. Speculation about additional individuals in these videos exists, but no evidence confirms this, at least not to any meaningful degree.
The topic of filming sexual activities is common among several “kink” circles, not necessarily for blackmail but for personal reasons. Don't ask me why, I'm not entirely sure either.
Flight logs from Epstein’s private plane are public and connect him to various high-profile individuals. Videos seized from Epstein’s properties are considered child pornography and cannot be released. Speculation about additional individuals in these videos exists, but no evidence confirms this, at least not to any meaningful degree.
The topic of filming sexual activities is common among several “kink” circles, not necessarily for blackmail but for personal reasons. Don't ask me why, I'm not entirely sure either.
The "Client List"
No verified "client list" exists beyond the black books and flight logs. Claims of a comprehensive blackmail list stem from rhetoric rather than evidence. For example, one of the first to talk about it, Isaac Kappy, who claimed knowledge of such a list, died by suicide shortly after making these statements, and his social media activity suggested instability, undermining his claims.
Public figures like Pam Bondi, Donald Trump, and Elon Musk have referenced a "client list," but their statements appear to echo circular rhetoric rather than concrete evidence. This rhetoric has caused and will continue to cause severe damage to the Trump administration and it highlights the need to check what one claims is true else it comes back around and shows you the bullet hole in your foot.
No verified "client list" exists beyond the black books and flight logs. Claims of a comprehensive blackmail list stem from rhetoric rather than evidence. For example, one of the first to talk about it, Isaac Kappy, who claimed knowledge of such a list, died by suicide shortly after making these statements, and his social media activity suggested instability, undermining his claims.
Public figures like Pam Bondi, Donald Trump, and Elon Musk have referenced a "client list," but their statements appear to echo circular rhetoric rather than concrete evidence. This rhetoric has caused and will continue to cause severe damage to the Trump administration and it highlights the need to check what one claims is true else it comes back around and shows you the bullet hole in your foot.
Looking at the Blackmail Narrative
The idea of a gift-wrapped "client list" assumes Epstein was blackmailing elites, which explains his wealth and avoiding investigation. However, several points challenge this:
- If such a list existed and threatened powerful figures, it’s unlikely it would remain intact or accessible. Elites with the means to suppress it would likely destroy or edit it.
- If Epstein was being used to blackmail elites, he did a rather poor job of it as his behavior was known for several years before any charges were brought against him.
- If Epstein was blackmailing elites, a "dead man’s switch" to release the list upon his death would be expected, yet no such mechanism has surfaced.
- If the elites are in fact as perverse as the theory claims, blackmail wouldn't necessarily be needed as the participants would willingly follow along.
While Epstein’s network involved powerful individuals, the lack of actionable evidence suggests the "client list" is more myth than reality. Releasing existing files won't satisfy those seeking definitive proof regardless of how thorough they are.
The idea of a gift-wrapped "client list" assumes Epstein was blackmailing elites, which explains his wealth and avoiding investigation. However, several points challenge this:
- If such a list existed and threatened powerful figures, it’s unlikely it would remain intact or accessible. Elites with the means to suppress it would likely destroy or edit it.
- If Epstein was being used to blackmail elites, he did a rather poor job of it as his behavior was known for several years before any charges were brought against him.
- If Epstein was blackmailing elites, a "dead man’s switch" to release the list upon his death would be expected, yet no such mechanism has surfaced.
- If the elites are in fact as perverse as the theory claims, blackmail wouldn't necessarily be needed as the participants would willingly follow along.
While Epstein’s network involved powerful individuals, the lack of actionable evidence suggests the "client list" is more myth than reality. Releasing existing files won't satisfy those seeking definitive proof regardless of how thorough they are.
Why Circumstantial Evidence Falls Short
Circumstantial evidence, like that surrounding Epstein, is prone to *narrative framing*, where the same facts can support opposing stories. For example:
- Luke Skywalker can be framed as a heroic pilot or a mass-murdering terrorist.
- Han Solo shooting first or second alters his character’s morality.
- The Jedi Order can be seen as flawed but well-intentioned or malicious in pushing Anakin to the dark side.
- The Nuremberg Trials saw Germans frame their actions as "following orders or doing what they thought was the right thing" versus the Allies’ view of the Germans breaking absolute moral good.
These examples show how framing shapes perception, making circumstantial evidence unreliable without concrete proof.
Circumstantial evidence, like that surrounding Epstein, is prone to *narrative framing*, where the same facts can support opposing stories. For example:
- Luke Skywalker can be framed as a heroic pilot or a mass-murdering terrorist.
- Han Solo shooting first or second alters his character’s morality.
- The Jedi Order can be seen as flawed but well-intentioned or malicious in pushing Anakin to the dark side.
- The Nuremberg Trials saw Germans frame their actions as "following orders or doing what they thought was the right thing" versus the Allies’ view of the Germans breaking absolute moral good.
These examples show how framing shapes perception, making circumstantial evidence unreliable without concrete proof.
Final Thoughts
During my research, reference [20] stood out to me as a collection of compelling evidence suggesting Epstein acted as a honeypot blackmailer for intelligence groups and/or organized crime. However, much of it emotionally recounts three instances of a pedophile ring being dismantled, only to be obstructed by "higher-ups," creating a suggestive but inconclusive link to Epstein that tugs at the reader’s emotions without definitive proof. The claims rest heavily on Ward and Ben-Menashe’s assertions, with remaining connections relying on the unreliable "six degrees of separation" method, insufficient for proving guilt.
The Epstein case is driving a wave of disenchantment and moral outrage, yet those fueling it often display selective judgment, overlooking other, sometimes more egregious, wrongdoers. History shows that moral outrage, whether justified or not, is a potent political tool capable of building or toppling nations. This tactic is central to Marxism, notably employed by Lenin, Stalin, and Mao, and is also discussed in Alinsky's writings
I don’t doubt Epstein’s crimes or the likelihood of broader elite involvement, but actionable evidence is scarce. Be cautious of those exploiting moral outrage for their own ends, saying things that tickle itchy ears. Vet information carefully—the devil himself appears as an angel of light.
During my research, reference [20] stood out to me as a collection of compelling evidence suggesting Epstein acted as a honeypot blackmailer for intelligence groups and/or organized crime. However, much of it emotionally recounts three instances of a pedophile ring being dismantled, only to be obstructed by "higher-ups," creating a suggestive but inconclusive link to Epstein that tugs at the reader’s emotions without definitive proof. The claims rest heavily on Ward and Ben-Menashe’s assertions, with remaining connections relying on the unreliable "six degrees of separation" method, insufficient for proving guilt.
The Epstein case is driving a wave of disenchantment and moral outrage, yet those fueling it often display selective judgment, overlooking other, sometimes more egregious, wrongdoers. History shows that moral outrage, whether justified or not, is a potent political tool capable of building or toppling nations. This tactic is central to Marxism, notably employed by Lenin, Stalin, and Mao, and is also discussed in Alinsky's writings
I don’t doubt Epstein’s crimes or the likelihood of broader elite involvement, but actionable evidence is scarce. Be cautious of those exploiting moral outrage for their own ends, saying things that tickle itchy ears. Vet information carefully—the devil himself appears as an angel of light.
Additional Notes
- *Mint Press News* compiles articles on Epstein, suggesting he was a linchpin in a global blackmail network. However, this relies on the unproven assumption of a coordinated intelligence operation. mintpressnews.com/mega-group-max…
- Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted for trafficking to Epstein, reinforcing their partnership.
- Claims of a "client list" often aim to provoke outrage rather than provide evidence. Most acknowledge the reality of elite misconduct without needing manufactured scandals.
- *Mint Press News* compiles articles on Epstein, suggesting he was a linchpin in a global blackmail network. However, this relies on the unproven assumption of a coordinated intelligence operation. mintpressnews.com/mega-group-max…
- Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted for trafficking to Epstein, reinforcing their partnership.
- Claims of a "client list" often aim to provoke outrage rather than provide evidence. Most acknowledge the reality of elite misconduct without needing manufactured scandals.
References
[1] [The Daily Beast: Epstein’s Story Played Out in Plain Sight] thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epstei…
[3] [NY Post: Graydon Carter Found Severed Cat Head] nypost.com/2019/08/23/van…
[5] [ZeroHedge: Epstein’s Little Black Book (Archived)] web.archive.org/web/2019072808…
[8] [Rolling Stone: Epstein and Intelligence Agencies] rollingstone.com/culture/cultur…
[9] [Newsweek: Epstein Not a Spy, Says Dershowitz] newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstei…
[10] thedailybeast.com/epstein-shared…
[12] [Business Insider: Epstein’s Other Little Black Book] businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstei…
[14] [The Guardian: Myanmar Hires PR Agent] theguardian.com/world/2021/mar…
[15] [RFERL: Bishkek’s Deal with Ex-Israeli Spy] rferl.org/a/the-curious-…
[16] [Middle East Monitor: Ex-Israel Spy Lobbies for Sudan] middleeastmonitor.com/20190723-ex-is…
[17] [Time: Espionage, Con Man, or Key to a Mystery?] time.com/archive/671803…
[19] [Wikipedia: Steven Hoffenberg]
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Ho…
[20] [YouTube: Epstein Documentary] m.youtube.com/watch?v=yrm8aO…
[21] [Wikipedia: Robert Maxwell] en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Ma…
[22] [Wikipedia: Ari Ben-Menashe] en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ari_Ben-M…
[23] [FBI Vault: Jeffrey Epstein] vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein
[24] [Mint Press News: Ben-Menashe on Epstein] mintpressnews.com/ari-ben-menash…
[25] [AP News: Russian Interference] apnews.com/article/russia…
[1] [The Daily Beast: Epstein’s Story Played Out in Plain Sight] thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epstei…
[3] [NY Post: Graydon Carter Found Severed Cat Head] nypost.com/2019/08/23/van…
[5] [ZeroHedge: Epstein’s Little Black Book (Archived)] web.archive.org/web/2019072808…
[8] [Rolling Stone: Epstein and Intelligence Agencies] rollingstone.com/culture/cultur…
[9] [Newsweek: Epstein Not a Spy, Says Dershowitz] newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstei…
[10] thedailybeast.com/epstein-shared…
[12] [Business Insider: Epstein’s Other Little Black Book] businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstei…
[14] [The Guardian: Myanmar Hires PR Agent] theguardian.com/world/2021/mar…
[15] [RFERL: Bishkek’s Deal with Ex-Israeli Spy] rferl.org/a/the-curious-…
[16] [Middle East Monitor: Ex-Israel Spy Lobbies for Sudan] middleeastmonitor.com/20190723-ex-is…
[17] [Time: Espionage, Con Man, or Key to a Mystery?] time.com/archive/671803…
[19] [Wikipedia: Steven Hoffenberg]
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Ho…
[20] [YouTube: Epstein Documentary] m.youtube.com/watch?v=yrm8aO…
[21] [Wikipedia: Robert Maxwell] en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Ma…
[22] [Wikipedia: Ari Ben-Menashe] en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ari_Ben-M…
[23] [FBI Vault: Jeffrey Epstein] vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein
[24] [Mint Press News: Ben-Menashe on Epstein] mintpressnews.com/ari-ben-menash…
[25] [AP News: Russian Interference] apnews.com/article/russia…
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
　
