鍾翔宇 Xiangyu Profile picture
Jul 19 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Some updates from the ground in Taiwan 🧵

Political chaos, economic strain, and democratic backsliding are all accelerating, all with the @ChingteLai administration at the center of it. Here's what you need to know:Image
If you've been following me, you'd know about the "Great Recall" that's going on right now. Basically, the DPP decided that it's an affront to democracy for an opposition-held legislature to vote against DPP policy. Their solution is to recall KMT legislators.
However, the DPP's recall strategy is collapsing. Even they internally admit that only 4 seats might flip. They need 6 to gain a majority. But the damage has been done: society is now more polarized than ever, and dialogue is basically impossible at this point.
The legislature has been reduced to petty insults, physical confrontations, and even spitting. Liberalism in psychosis is basically what the situation is.
Many people are hurting economically, yet the administration claims it's "out of money" EVEN THOUGH over the past 5 years, Taipei collected nearly NT$1.8 trillion in tax surpluses. Where did it all go?
Ordinary families and small businesses are getting crushed by inflation, tariffs, and a weakening currency. Direct stimulus is the least the government can do, but they're claiming to not have the cash. Again, where did it go? Someone should look into it.
Even disaster response has been politicized. After a typhoon hit Tainan and Chiayi, residents were left without water and power for days. The Lai administration was slow to act, and pro-DPP media downplayed the desperate situation.
City and county governments led by the opposition stepped up, sending help while the DPP was more concerned with the "Great Recall."
All of this happening right before the "Great Recall" vote on July 26th is karma for the DPP.

The people say fuck you to the @DPPonline and @ChingteLai.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 鍾翔宇 Xiangyu

鍾翔宇 Xiangyu Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @notXiangyu

Jun 29
In the west, the story of Hitler is mostly framed around his nationalism and his views on Jews. We're told to hate him because he was a bigot, while the political economy of the Nazis is not mentioned.

Fascism isn't just bigotry + nationalism, but finance capital in crisis mode. Image
Hitler wasn't some blind, hateful maniac, but rather a tool. Specifically, a last-ditch effort by finance capital to destroy the Soviet Union after the west failed to crush the Bolsheviks in the Russian Civil War.

Hence why Wall Street and western elites backed him early on.
But western liberals & the elites they serve don't want you thinking about that

So they hyperfocus on Hitler's antisemitism, and depoliticize fascism into just "hate speech" + "right-wing vibes.

The end result is fascism being understood as an aesthetic and not a class project
Read 16 tweets
Jun 2
🧵Why is the KMT more popular than the DPP among Taiwan's Indigenous peoples, especially on the east coast?Image
The KMT has a long history of clientelist politics in Indigenous areas, dating back to martial law. Vote-buying—cash, rice, alcohol—was once common, especially in the east coast counties of Hualien and Taitung. Not exactly clean, but very tangible.
Many Indigenous voters to this day think "at least the KMT got close with us and bought our votes. What does the DPP offer? Token indigenous politicians who don't know our lives?”

It's realpolitik in action.
Read 12 tweets
May 25
A lot of the loudest "anti-whiteness" rhetoric in the US isn't coming from the marginalized poor like we're supposed to believe, bur rather from elite liberals through their heavily assimilated minority tokens.🧵 Image
Image
Image
Elite liberals who are more often than not Ivy-educated (with a bullshit degree), NGO-employed, media-savvy PMCs. Their tokens are minority children from upwardly mobile families, that have fully absorbed elite liberal norms — in speech, dress, values, and worldview.
They posture as critics of whiteness, but their entire worldview is shaped by elite liberal institutions that are dominated by the very "rich white men" they publicly denounce.
Read 13 tweets
May 24
The Chinese idiom popularized by Deng Xiaoping, 韜光養晦 (tāo guāng yǎng huì), is often translated as "hide your strength, bide your time." But while the spirit is captured by this translation, the poetic nuance is completely lost. 🧵 Image
韜 tāo means to conceal
光 guāng means light
養 yǎng means nurture or cultivate
晦 huì means darkness or obscurity
There is an element of yin and yang in this phrase. Light here symbolizes yang energy — brightness, power, assertiveness, and visibility.

Darkness in turn symbolizes yin energy — quietness, subtlety, hiddenness, and receptivity.
Read 6 tweets
May 19
Why do baizuo view the working class with disgust and worship the lumpenproletariat instead? Why do they call truckers "fascists" while defending drug dealers? Because the New Left turned "Marxism" into controlled opposition and we are still feeling the effects today🧵
Communists see the industrial proletariat as representatives of general labor and are thus the agent of revolution. But during the Cold War, the New Left emerged in the west—college-educated radicals who swapped factories for campuses and class struggle for culture war.
The New Left imported ideas from Popper, Foucault, and postmodernism. Economics? Too crude. Instead, they focused on identity, language, and power. Cultural critique replaced class struggle. And with that, the working class became the implicit enemy.
Read 11 tweets
May 15
🧵Debunking the Myth That Marx Wanted to "Abolish the Family"Image
Claim: "Marx wanted to abolish the family!"

Reality: Marx and Engels criticized the bourgeois (capitalist) family as an institution tied to property, inheritance, and women's oppression—NOT family bonds themselves!

Key distinction: Institutions vs. relationships.
In the Communist Manifesto, Marx writes:

"The bourgeois family… will vanish as a matter of course with the vanishing of capital."

He's talking about the family under capitalism, where it functions as a property/class unit—not families in general.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(