Post

https://x.com/Mteuzi/status/1946716176467296360

https://x.com/mteuzi/status/1944890554749534229?s=46&t=x7IW_BYI7Nb0PYJB_Eimwg

More from @Mteuzi

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

@Mteuzi

Jul 14

Why do so many people suspect Donald Trump of being a pedophile?

Let’s walk through the documented history—his words, his actions, his associations.

None of this is theory. It’s all on the record.

BOOKMARK THIS THREAD 🧵

1/x Trump and Jeffrey Epstein

Trump called Epstein a “terrific guy” in 2002, adding:

“It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do—and many of them are on the younger side.”

They partied together for years. Epstein later said he was Trump’s “closest friend for 10 years.”

2/X Flight Logs & Mar-a-Lago

Trump flew on Epstein’s plane at least seven times.

They were so close Epstein had unrestricted access to Mar-a-Lago—until they allegedly fell out over a real estate deal.

Not ethics. Not morality. Money.

Read 13 tweets

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

@Mteuzi

Jul 9

🧵THE POST-9/11 SECURITY SCAM

Let me take you back...

It’s December 2001. The world is still reeling.
A failed shoe bombing attempt makes headlines.

Weeks later, TSA starts making millions of us take off our shoes at the airport.

It felt strange, but we obeyed.

They said it was for our safety.
But what they really built was a $500 billion grift.

Now, in 2025, they’re quietly rolling it back—
Not because it was wrong.
But because the next phase of profit and control has already begun.

Here’s the story they don’t want told. ⬇️

Fear turned into fortune.

TSA’s budget in 2003? $827 million
TSA’s budget in 2025? $11.8 billion

That’s a 1,327% increase, totaling $260 billion in spending.

And that’s just the agency itself.

DHS also handed out $276 billion in security contracts to private firms.
Over half a trillion dollars—routed from public funds into private pockets.

All hidden by telling us it was for our “safety.”
2/x

A gold rush for contractors.

Raytheon. Lockheed. Northrop Grumman.

The same companies profiting from war started showing up at your local airport—selling scanners, sensors, biometric ID systems.

These weren’t competitive deals.
They were guaranteed revenue streams, protected by procurement loopholes and cost-plus pricing.

Security became a business model.
And fear was the marketing strategy.
3/x

Read 5 tweets

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

@Mteuzi

Jun 29

They’re not just coming for immigrants.
They’re coming for us.

Trump’s EO on birthright citizenship revives Dred Scott logic—where being born here means nothing if your bloodline isn’t “approved.”

Here’s how this targets the citizenship of descendants of enslaved Africans: 🧵

1/x Birthright Citizenship Has Always Been a Shield for Black Americans

After the Civil War, the U.S. ratified the 14th Amendment specifically to overturn the Supreme Court’s Dred Scott decision, which said Black people could never be citizens of this country. The 14th made citizenship a right for all born on U.S. soil, regardless of race or ancestry. It was one of the only structural protections Black people had in a country built on our forced labor and legal exclusion. Without it, any hostile administration could decide we don’t belong.

Trump’s executive order weakens that shield. By redefining who qualifies as "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States, it inserts a new test: parental status. This change guts the guarantee that birth alone is enough. For Black Americans, whose ancestors were denied legal personhood and whose families fought generations for that citizenship, this is more than a policy shift. It’s a targeted rollback of the very legal floor that made our rights real. If this floor collapses, we fall further than most.

2/x The Executive Order Quietly Creates a New Citizenship Test — and Black Folks Are Set Up to Fail

The order says you’re not a citizen at birth if your mother is undocumented or on a temporary visa and your father isn’t a citizen or green card holder. That means the government has created a two-parent immigration test to determine whether your birth counts. While this is framed as targeting new immigrants, the legal precedent it creates is much broader. It lays the groundwork for future citizenship to be tied to parental status, ancestry, or documentation history. That alone is dangerous.

But it’s especially dangerous for Black people. We know what happens when the state creates eligibility tests tied to documents: Black folks get excluded. This isn’t hypothetical. It’s what happened under Jim Crow with literacy tests, grandfather clauses, poll taxes, and more.

This new test isn’t about immigration enforcement. It’s about establishing a legal framework that makes citizenship conditional. And that framework almost always finds a way to trap us first.

Read 9 tweets

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

@Mteuzi

Jun 23

You ever wonder why the U.S. is so obsessed with Iran?

Why we’ve been on the brink of war for decades?
It all traces back to one coup in 1953—a story most people in the U.S. were never taught.

But once you know what really went down?
Everything else falls into place.
🧵👇🏾

1/x The Coup That Shaped the Modern Middle East

On August 19, 1953, Iran’s experiment with democracy was violently terminated. The United States, through the CIA, and the United Kingdom, via MI6, orchestrated a covert operation—Operation Ajax—to overthrow Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh. Why? Because he dared to nationalize Iran’s oil industry, challenging the profits and control of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, now known as BP.

Mossadegh wasn’t a revolutionary socialist—or even particularly radical. He was just about democracy. A secular nationalist with overwhelming popular support, he embodied Iran’s desire for sovereignty. But in the eyes of the “West,” that sovereignty threatened economic domination. And so, with the Shah’s complicity and CIA field agents on the ground, a violent coup ensued.

What followed was not only the installation of an authoritarian monarch but also the beginning of a long, tangled history of U.S. imperial involvement in the Middle East. The coup became a model for future interventions—in Latin America, Southeast Asia, and beyond. It taught the U.S. ruling class that if a democratically elected government gets in the way of profits, it can be dealt with.

For Iranians, the betrayal was unforgettable. It is remembered as the moment the West chose oil over justice, capital over freedom, and empire over self-determination. And the aftershocks are still felt—every drone strike, every sanction, every threat or act of war carries the echo of that fateful day in 1953.

2/x Why Mossadegh Had to Go (In Their Eyes)

Mohammad Mossadegh’s rise wasn’t sudden—it was the culmination of decades of anti-colonial organizing, constitutionalism, and the desire for economic independence. By 1951, he was appointed Prime Minister by the Shah with overwhelming parliamentary support. One of his first acts? Nationalizing Iran’s oil industry.

At the time, British interests controlled the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), which paid Iran a pittance while extracting massive profits. Mossadegh moved to assert control over these resources. The Iranian parliament voted unanimously to nationalize oil. For the Iranian public, this was a watershed moment—an assertion that Iran would no longer be a playground for Western capital.

But Britain wasn’t having it. They imposed a global boycott on Iranian oil, tanking the country’s economy. They also began pushing the U.S. to intervene. Initially, the Truman administration resisted. But when Eisenhower came into office in 1953, the calculus shifted. Anti-communist hysteria was at its peak. The Dulles brothers—John at State, Allen at CIA—saw Mossadegh’s independence as a threat, even though he was a committed anti-communist.

The narrative became: nationalization = socialism = Soviet threat. It was a lie, but it worked. The real threat was never communism—it was an example. If Iran could nationalize its oil and remain sovereign, others might follow: Venezuela. Indonesia. Iraq. The U.S. couldn’t allow a successful model of independent development to thrive. Mossadegh had to go.

And so, democracy was crushed—not in the name of freedom, but in the name of profits and imperial control.

Read 11 tweets

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

@Mteuzi

May 6

What if I told you hospitals and state governments have been running a decades-long scam to siphon off federal Medicaid funds—legally?

Billions of taxpayer dollars. No oversight. No accountability.

Let’s break down one of the biggest cons in U.S. healthcare: 🧵

It all started in 1989.
New Hampshire’s GOP governor had a budget crisis.
Instead of raising taxes or cutting costs, they invented a loophole:

Tax hospitals → inflate Medicaid costs on paper → get more $$ from the feds.

The state keeps the extra.

This wasn’t about helping poor people.
It was a “workaround.”

The governor himself later admitted:
“I was happy to game the federal government.”

Now 49 states use this same trick to inflate their Medicaid match.
It’s fraud—but blessed by policy.

Read 12 tweets

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

@Mteuzi

Apr 29

“We had their ads taken down.”

That’s not a slip. That’s the Speaker of the House bragging about censorship.

And it’s even worse than it sounds. 🧵

Mike Johnson stood at a press conference today and openly admitted that Republicans pressured platforms or outlets to remove ads from Democrats in swing districts.

Not because of a court ruling.
Not because of a fact-check.
Because they didn’t like what the ads were saying.

His justification?

“We sent them a cease and desist letter because we pointed out they were lying.”

Let’s be clear:
A cease and desist letter is not a legal ruling.
It’s just a threat—anyone can send one.
It proves nothing.

Read 7 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @Mteuzi

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!