JP solves one of Chelsea's biggest problems ~ low blocks!
The one who Chelsea will improve, and vice versa!
Thread!
Joao Pedro is a generalist with specialist traits where it hurts. He’s a player that always seeks to achieve ‘balance’ and his football IQ is a testament to that matched by his physical/technical gifts.
In this thread I discuss why he solves a massive issue for Chelsea: low blocks. This is not a scouting report, so will only highlight some of his key qualities that pertain to the topic at hand.
First of all there needs to be a fundamental shift in his thinking. Remember he's a balanced thinker who likes to make the best decisions. This is good but it means plays like what we see below happens.
I think the general message to JP as a player should be goals. Even when he has a picture in his head, if there is just as good a chance of him getting off a good shot if he simply forces the situation a little, he should be encouraged to take it. The quality is there.
Last season he averaged 1.7 shots per game which is poor for a ST/SS profile and this was one of the biggest reasons why imo.
Link up Play / Dictating : Link play is essentially a player serving as the reference in which the team can move the ball through. It's not just on the ball, it's off it as well.
JP is one of the best 9s at linking play. Understands how to go from 0 to 100 or slowly dropping to bait DF without them noticing, good shielding technique to turn, clean first touch, consistently sees the whole pitch and can also link up without the ball ~ knows what spaces to take to create better conditions for others.
Can struggle against physically strong CBs, but understands how to unsettle with slight pushes/nudges to create 50/50’s. Good leap/heading and 6ft so often challenges for aerial balls.
Good shielding technique and hard to get ball from him when he’s in front ~ means he’s often good with ball played in the channel / to a chest height ~ elite hold up play in stationary situations. Press resistance to maintain the ball and often make the right pass after bringing it down. Can be used as a pillar in build-up/higher up the field.
One of the best at staying on his toes and repositioning in the box. The moment chaos descends in the box you want JP on your side. Excellent at moving in relation to what teammate can see, which often makes him an accessible option. Possesses stealer legs.
Emphasis on arriving into space as he often lacks the strength to beat CBs under contact in the box. Lacks deceit/fakes/feints with his movement ~ often uses the blindside and speeds towards the intended direction.
JP is aerially elite in the box. There is a precision/intent with how he attacks crosses, no angle bias with his headers ~ generates power from all types of crosses and possess incredible control. A massively underutilized quality at Brighton imo. This is a player that should be getting at least 7 goals a season aerially.
Chelsea struggled against teams that set up in a back 5 against us last season. It was due to a multiple of factors like our wingers sometimes struggling against aggressive FBs back2goal, lack of a box ST who can handle contact and finish off actions / the box movement to generate chances in these situations, poor finishing capacities, lack of aerial prowess, lack of dribblers, etc.
To discuss how JP is useful against these teams, lets first talk about how we set up.
Chelsea often set up in the 3-1-6 against back5s, but we’ve recently seen a more dynamic iteration of this setup with one of the 8s allowed to drop into the pivot, etc.
It's important to understand that JP is not the best at occupying CBs against low blocks~ struggles to bully CBs in these scenarios + lacks the deceit to 'consistently' create spaces(movement can create spaces for others though). The best profile at doing this is Delap, but remember what I said JP was really good at in regards to his box movement? Arriving into spaces. The SS
Note - Dont take this as JP being useless as the ST against low blocks. Body orientation, stays on his toes, aerial threat, understands to drop and arrive, in between CBs all good + potential there to develop this area of his game.
In the video you can see how he matches the rhythm of the ball holder with his run while slowly sneaking into the blindside, knows when to wait and springs into action once pass is made to Minteh. A 1st time pass and its a tap in.
Once again you can see how smart JP is when exploiting the spaces others create with their runs. Notice how inch-perfect he times when to stop (the moment Mitoma scans). A simple pass and its a first time finish (has the technique to execute)
JP is one of the best players at attacking during these situations. If PL teams continue pushing their defensive line at the edge of the box like we saw last season, JP could potentially be one of the most dangerous players attacking half space crosses. Good movement even when leading the last line, but even more dangerous when he can take advantage of the spaces created by someone in front of him.
Against low blocks JP struggles with getting off shots in crowded situations. Often gets blocked or lacks the quick close control/release needed to in these scenarios. This means he requires more 1st time finishes (headers/direct shots) against these types of opposition and these scenarios are most possible when arriving into spaces (SS)
JP is a top associative player that is able to generate advantages in the tightest of spaces. As the ST against low blocks, you lose this aspect of his game as he would often be more focused on pinning/runs.
Delap/JP should be a nice combo against blocks
JP also possesses the quality to receive the ball in tight spaces, manipulate angles and create. While I think more emphasis should be placed on playing off the ST with runs/give and go's, he can slip in Delap/Palmer/Enzo when they run in behind as well
Gittens playing on the left is key because JP does not need to focus on support as much because Gittens is a dribbler who can handle 2/3 v 1s. This allows JP to focus on exploiting spaces and scoring goals.
The balance a Delap/JP/Enzo/Palmer forms is top as well.
As the 9 Joao Pedro is a hybrid between Nico/Delap
More pass-first compared to Jackson yet can carry, highest IQ out of all our STs, balanced between dropping/running in behind, can fight for long balls through the channels/aerially, etc.
He's an option at ST against highlines / mid-blocks and can fulfill multiple different roles.
Enhancer ~ Can play all 5 attacking lanes, enhance the qualities of those around him due to associative/passing capability but not as good in iso situations as a Nico.
False 9 ~ One of the best false 9s in the world. IQ is off the charts, top short/medium/long passer and arrives into space well. Just needs the right profiles around him.
Also he wins pens. Chelsea lacked this last season!
Generally JP is a really good player that will help us in many ways.
He's never scored 10 non-pen goals in the PL. I believe Chelsea can help him reach 16+ non pen goals if we platform him correctly game by game. He's due for an explosion!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Enzo Maresca offers a glimpse into the future, demonstrating the qualities of an elite coach capable of guiding Chelsea to major trophies, and the proof? Ask PSG.
A Thread!
First of all we need to talk about the lineup. PSG do not possess any aerial/physical outlets and always play with a false 9, so emphasis on mobility rather than box defending or aerial/physical dominance. This is why Chalobah starting over Tosin was key.
Gusto starting was key because the spaces have always been in behind PSG's full backs, and you needed someone athletic to take advantage + handle their wingers 1v1.
The balance in the lineup in regards to box defending, natural aggressors, duel winners, runners, passers and profiling of players were all perfect. Perfectly set up to win all our 1v1 duels on/off the ball, yet had the right mix of control/exp/match winners.
As we dive deeper into the analysis, we will see why EM picked the perfect lineup.
Lets start from the back ~ build-up.
As we’ve seen all season, a 4(+1)-2-5 is often how we build up, but Chelsea knew how to move to exploit the spaces behind PSG. Check out the video ( remember ~ “surgical” ).
Chelsea look to complete the European set ~ the student faces the master.
A Thread
Real Betis finished 6th in Laliga with 60 points. They've given every single top 5 side in Laliga a tough game and its because they are genuinely a good team. Extremely well balanced to play multiple styles on/off the ball.
Will give a general overview of how they play and talk about what we can exploit.
Betis build up in a 424 ~ GK in the center with wide CBs in the box. FB's wide and a staggered pivot. Loads of wide triangles with pivot constantly supporting through offball runs, becoming passing options, etc. Isco is always close by to drop and receive after shuffling from the team. Wingers are allowed to drop to support, and CMs are encouraged to take up different roles.
Aim of their build up from goal kick is to lure you in, create spaces and directly attack the last line. A team that requires you to be fully focused, or you will be ripped open. Their N9 (Bakambu) is a good aerial option who they can go long to, and generally dangerous on the transition.
Marescas calculated game plan dismantled the Saints! Why did Chelsea struggle in the first 15 minutes? Enzo's recent form? Etc..
A Thread!
It was an intriguing XI from Maresca. One would expect he would rotate the squad, but he made 7 changes compared to the XI against Villa. A few got their first/second PL start(s) and a line up that lacked physicality in the front line.
As we go through the thread, we understand his rationale.
Maresca mentions the plan being to go man2man from the get go, but it wasn't fulfilled by the players. Often we would see scenarios in the picture below. In this instance Noni goes to press(with man2man in mind), but there is no cover behind him.
Chelsea faced their most difficult opponent in the Conference League yet and managed a deserved win.
- How did Chelsea play
- Player performances
- Future dynamics
Etc..
A Thread!
Chelsea lined up in the usual 3-2-5 with Casadei and Veiga forming the pivot. We got to see Nkunku in the half spaces and Sancho playing RW for the first time at Chelsea. We were really good IP.
As you can see in the image below, HEI set up in a very aggressive mid-block that matched our numbers and tried to pounce on the counter whenever we lost the ball. Due to this shape, we consistently progressed play by getting Guiu to drop deep into tons of space and release a pass to one of the pivots or the 10s. We also looked to take advantage of their setup by using double movements and running into the space in behind. Guiu would often act like he was dropping and run in behind or drop to allow Nkunku to run in behind. We created about 2 big chances from this and many dangerous moments.
In the second half, Chelsea switched to a 3-1-3-3 with Casadei as the lone 6, and three 10s in LCM Veiga, Nkunku central, and KDH RCM. This worked extremely well in the first 20 minutes. We kept overloading their last line and our wingers were seeing much more of the ball which helped us pin them in. A player like Sancho who thrives with players around him benefited from this setup as he could interchange with the players around him.
Many deemed the LIV game the first real test for Maresca and he made an intriguing tactical tweak by pushing Gusto into the 10 role. Since then, he’s done the same in all of Chelsea's PL games. Do we need a change? Etc.
A Thread!
Let's first discuss how Chelsea played before this tweak. It was the usual 4-2-3-1 starting formation that turned into a 3-2-5/3-3-4 IP. As can be seen in the image Enzo Fernandez will often join the attacking 5 while Malo Gusto often inverted into midfield.
The half-space players in this system are box-box 8s. They have the duty of dropping deeper to aid build-up, joining the attacking line to help/score goals, counter-pressing, and tracking back in transitions. Palmer is good at doing what is required on the ball. He’s not very good at doing what is required off the ball. This is where Enzo comes in.
When a FB inverts, teams often try to exploit the space they leave behind when there is a turnover, which will happen. This forces the inverted FB to recover their normal position which means temporarily you only have 1 midfielder covering the middle of the pitch. Thus, one of the 8s must possess the capacity to track back and join the 6 to form the pivot and QUICKLY.
Enzo Fernandez can run, but he’s not the quickest, and against teams with lethal transitional quality, that interval in which he’s running to cover is all they need to hurt you. Maresca believes Lavia to be superior physically to Enzo(for now), so it's not an option he wants to consider against Liverpool, Newcastle, United, and Arsenal. This meant Enzo was not going to simply play in the pivot like Lavia as well.
There has been many discourse around Chelseas midfield. I talk about whether a midfield 3 of Lavia/Caicedo/Enzo could work. Can a pivot of any of these 3 work ideally? If not, why? Do Chelsea already have solutions?, Etc..
A Thread!
Let's start by giving a summary of their profiles(according to me IG).
Caicedo: Caicedo is a ball-winning box-box 8(can play as a destroyer 6). He’s got the ability to massively help in build-up, the second phase, an underrated passer in general, and a good off-ball playmaker. OOP he’s best when allowed to roam and excellent in short-medium spaces but good enough in large spaces. Excels in aerial and ground duels, good counter presser, blocks passing lanes well, can be overly aggressive stepping out, good defender outwide and can struggle when chasing(tends to foul a lot to prevent chasing). Overall Caicedo is our best OOP midfielder by a long mile.
Lavia: Lone 6 in possession. His quick turns, body control, excellent vision, pausa, and ball manipulation make him extremely press-resistant (It's almost impossible to get the ball off him). His short-medium passes are really good, especially low passes. This allows him to progress play in build-up and 2nd phase. OOP he’s good in the counter-pressing, blocks passing lanes well, and strong in the ground duels(will hold off on his aerial duels until I see more.) He’s good in short-medium spaces but lacks the athleticism to cover large spaces, can be overly aggressive in stepping out of the block, struggles when chasing, does not protect zone 14 enough(improving), easily gets dragged into joining the backline(improving ), and decent defender outwide.
Enzo: Enzo is a box-box passing 8. Someone who helps in build-up and controls the game in the second phase. Due to his passing capabilities, he can create in the second phase and final third. Enzo is another short-medium space player who's good at counter-pressing and winning ground duels. Shares similar weaknesses to Lavia but Enzo reads better than Lavia.
After giving a brief summary of what they give you, lets look at what they dont give you.