Good[win] - the drops that made me a believer - and a past in the future proven:
🧵/1- So I wanted to show you guys an amazing set of drops in the Qdrops, when Q was giving us a final lesson on establishing comms, via Misspellings, deleted post/repost correction Delta's, timestamps, gaps, between posts, Qdrop-Trump tweet delta etc. This was a "learn our comms" session.
At this point we are 3 months into the Drops, anons have already seen a lot to suggest total coordination, between Q and Trump, establishing that Q and Trump(Q+) are in fact part of Q group. One of the ways that this has been accomplished is Qdrops being confirmed via a future Tweet by Trump. And we are going to focus on the biggest proof of them all imo, as there were a lot of very obvious ones in this series of around [15] drops— So here we go...
🧵/1- So I wanted to show you guys an amazing set of drops in the Qdrops, when Q was giving us a final lesson on establishing comms, via Misspellings, deleted post/repost correction Delta's, timestamps, gaps, between posts, Qdrop-Trump tweet delta etc. This was a "learn our comms" session.
At this point we are 3 months into the Drops, anons have already seen a lot to suggest total coordination, between Q and Trump, establishing that Q and Trump(Q+) are in fact part of Q group. One of the ways that this has been accomplished is Qdrops being confirmed via a future Tweet by Trump. And we are going to focus on the biggest proof of them all imo, as there were a lot of very obvious ones in this series of around [15] drops— So here we go...
🧵/2- On January 6th Q posted drop #481 @ 16:42ET, it pointed to two previous delta's that we had confirmed via the Qdrop then Trump tweet, future proves path method starting back in December. (picrel). These showed delta markers [5] and [10], and the post that Q pointed to came from an "anons" proof drawing, that was posted at 16:08ET on the 6th as well. Now i said "anon" because it is always been mine and many anons belief that Q also posted anonymously at times to prod us along, and if you notice the timestamp in the drop being quoted is 1+6+0+8(rule: we eliminate zero's for summation of digits, obviously) this equals [15], important for later.
🧵/3- So Now we have Q -cue up these marker posts on the 6th, then the first post that we get in the wee hours on the AM of January 7th(1/7 or 17 😎) at 01:21am is this drop #483 (picrel). Which again via summation of digits is 4+8+3=[15], again important for later. Inside that post we have 150 repeated twice, and again we remove zero's leaving us w/ [15] & [15]. Now we always use pattern recognition when seeking confirmation of comms, and so far we have a post that is pointing to two markers [5] and [10] that equal [15] in a drop with a timestamp that equals [15] on the 6th, and the first drop #483 on the 7th that along with the timestamp contains 3 [15]'s.
🧵/4- Now the other thing we look for is misspellings, this will come in to play here, and will come into play several times later so follow along. @ 03:28 am, Q drops post #492(picrel), now the previous post had 3 [15]'s in it, and the post dropped in the 3am hour is #492 or 4+9+2=[15] and this post includes a misspelling that will again come into play later in a big way. This misspelling in WIN, and it should be WHEN, and it goes - "We will never lose again WIN this is finished". OK so now that takes us to 2 tweets by Trump.
🧵/5- @ 21:21ET (the tweet in the picture is PT, but anons use ET for decodes) on January 7th, Trump tweets a quote from an article by Michael Goodwin, it is a two part post, Now for some important context: when this happened Twitter had character limits, so when posting a tweet that exceeded the limits most ppl would cut the part that was excessive, post the tweet, hit the + & then paste the excessive part & post it as a follow up & that usually took at most a few seconds, but not for this tweet🤔.
So in the first post Trump misspell's a word, that word just happens to involve a missing Q👀. He spells consensual, instead of the word consequential. Trump then waits exactly [15] mins till 21:36ET to post the 2nd part , which is an OBVIOUSLY a long time, & that 2nd part ends with..."Thank you Michael Goodwin" 👈👀(picrel)
So in the first post Trump misspell's a word, that word just happens to involve a missing Q👀. He spells consensual, instead of the word consequential. Trump then waits exactly [15] mins till 21:36ET to post the 2nd part , which is an OBVIOUSLY a long time, & that 2nd part ends with..."Thank you Michael Goodwin" 👈👀(picrel)
🧵/6- Ok So now that Trump has posted These two tweets, Q then follows up with several drops to confirm what just happened(picsrel). And this is where it get's juicy. Drop #497 posted at 22:05ET, says:
Good[win]
[win]/when
[15]
Q
This is obviously calling out the drop by Q at 3am, with drop #492 that via summation of digits = [15], that drop like Trumps tweet both have misspellings, and Q points out that his misspelling of WIN vs WHEN was intentional by stating "[win]/When", tying said misspelling in #492 in perfectly with, relative to that tweet, were the future tweets of the Good[win] article by Trump, & there is a perfect [15] delta between the two tweets of said article, by Trump.
I was in the breads since late at night on the 6th, about 4 covfefe's in and '👀', and when this hit, I was mind-blown, could not believe what i had just witnessed, it was so obvious, that my previous 90% belief that Q was legit, became 100% and i adjusted to a 40k ft elevation, and have never once lost altitude since, flying the comfy skies. But Q was not done...at all.
Good[win]
[win]/when
[15]
Q
This is obviously calling out the drop by Q at 3am, with drop #492 that via summation of digits = [15], that drop like Trumps tweet both have misspellings, and Q points out that his misspelling of WIN vs WHEN was intentional by stating "[win]/When", tying said misspelling in #492 in perfectly with, relative to that tweet, were the future tweets of the Good[win] article by Trump, & there is a perfect [15] delta between the two tweets of said article, by Trump.
I was in the breads since late at night on the 6th, about 4 covfefe's in and '👀', and when this hit, I was mind-blown, could not believe what i had just witnessed, it was so obvious, that my previous 90% belief that Q was legit, became 100% and i adjusted to a 40k ft elevation, and have never once lost altitude since, flying the comfy skies. But Q was not done...at all.
🧵/7- Q then posts drop #498 at 22:09 (picrel)
LOCK: 15-10-5
DEFCON [1]
[1] SIG
Q
So calling out the LOCK: 15-10-5 markers we've discussed, and then cues up a new marker of [1] at the time anons thought this meant Defense condition 1, and that we were being given a countdown, and Q drops as per Q's own instructions contain multiple meanings, this shows two meanings..a Countdown of sorts to a [1] delta, while also calling out a future incoming [1] delta, which will happen when Trump posts the corrected set of tweets, but first.
LOCK: 15-10-5
DEFCON [1]
[1] SIG
Q
So calling out the LOCK: 15-10-5 markers we've discussed, and then cues up a new marker of [1] at the time anons thought this meant Defense condition 1, and that we were being given a countdown, and Q drops as per Q's own instructions contain multiple meanings, this shows two meanings..a Countdown of sorts to a [1] delta, while also calling out a future incoming [1] delta, which will happen when Trump posts the corrected set of tweets, but first.
🧵/8- In the next drop by Q #499(picrel) at 22:10, and i'm only going to mention this, because it also pertains to these comms future comms and previous comms(and significant ones via Assange), but for ease of understanding we will ignore the significance other than to just explain the drop, he's pointing us to wikileaks where the book the fire and the fury by Michael Wolfe has two chapters, Chap 6 & 10, where the titles have been edited to have a Q in place of "o's". and in this post Q confirms that [15] delta and anon points it out. But again we will not focus on these other proofs for this thread, beyond that, so onward back into the Goodwin article tweets....
🧵/9- Q then posts Drop #500 at 22:18ET(picrel):
DEFCON 1
4-10-20
FIRE & FURY
(9) states of CLAS-ready go-live.
(34) commands LIVE.
CODES command ACTION.
[non-nuclear].
[1] OWL [1]
Q
There's a lot here, for others comms as I've said, but for the sake of this thread so as not to confuse anyone, just focus on the fact that Q is really stressing that [1] delta & again the Defcon 1, now shown without brackets, and he's pointing it out like this because anons in the breads, me included, are all sliding on the Defcon 1, reading it incorrectly. But it becomes clear what the meaning in Trumps next set of tweets... the correction tweets and the ones that are still on his account.
DEFCON 1
4-10-20
FIRE & FURY
(9) states of CLAS-ready go-live.
(34) commands LIVE.
CODES command ACTION.
[non-nuclear].
[1] OWL [1]
Q
There's a lot here, for others comms as I've said, but for the sake of this thread so as not to confuse anyone, just focus on the fact that Q is really stressing that [1] delta & again the Defcon 1, now shown without brackets, and he's pointing it out like this because anons in the breads, me included, are all sliding on the Defcon 1, reading it incorrectly. But it becomes clear what the meaning in Trumps next set of tweets... the correction tweets and the ones that are still on his account.
🧵/10- So anons monitoring Twitter point out that Trump just posted a corrected tweet of the first half of the Goodwin article, @ 22:23ET(I just screenshotted this off his account and I am west coast so time is PT, you can check this for yourself against your own timezone via links in the last posts of this thread) and he has now properly spelled 'consequential' so all eyes move to twatter, as we are looking for what the delta between that tweet and the second tweet will be, as it was so very significant as per the first misspelled tweets [15] gap, and remember it should only take seconds for that second half to be posted as per standard practice when posting on x back in the day with those pesky Character limits. Sooo let's continue...
🧵/11- So again we are all eyes on the twatter and in 1 minute Trump then posts the second tweet, with the second half of the Goodwin quote.
Did you catch it?
1 MINUTE, again not the seconds it should take, but 1 MINUTE.
Now if just a rando set of tweets, no big deal, but the fact that the first one was a 15 minute gap, and Q calls out the sequence, "countdown" as "Lock: 15-10-5" then Q continually posts [1] and then that second set of Tweets has a [1] minute gap, that along with all the other "coincidences" the odds become insane that it was not intentional.
And we then learn later the defcon is(next post in thread), in this sense beyond pointing to the countdown pointed at before leading to the second set of tweets, which TBH didn't even need to be corrected, people made mistakes all the time, and without an ability to edit, most people just let em be, if they did correct them they didn't wait nearly an hour to do so🤷♂️, but yet Q called out that [1] as if he knew for a fact that it would be corrected later, and he posted 2 times right up to post #500 "coincidentally" also a summation of digits equalling [5] which via "LOCK: 15-10-5 Q cued up the [1] Via DEFCON1, @ 22:18ET(pic3rel) which was coincidentally [5] mins before Trump tweeted his first corrected Tweet @ 22:23ET. So yeah that was pretty obvious😎, and was again Q teaching us definitively their comms.
Did you catch it?
1 MINUTE, again not the seconds it should take, but 1 MINUTE.
Now if just a rando set of tweets, no big deal, but the fact that the first one was a 15 minute gap, and Q calls out the sequence, "countdown" as "Lock: 15-10-5" then Q continually posts [1] and then that second set of Tweets has a [1] minute gap, that along with all the other "coincidences" the odds become insane that it was not intentional.
And we then learn later the defcon is(next post in thread), in this sense beyond pointing to the countdown pointed at before leading to the second set of tweets, which TBH didn't even need to be corrected, people made mistakes all the time, and without an ability to edit, most people just let em be, if they did correct them they didn't wait nearly an hour to do so🤷♂️, but yet Q called out that [1] as if he knew for a fact that it would be corrected later, and he posted 2 times right up to post #500 "coincidentally" also a summation of digits equalling [5] which via "LOCK: 15-10-5 Q cued up the [1] Via DEFCON1, @ 22:18ET(pic3rel) which was coincidentally [5] mins before Trump tweeted his first corrected Tweet @ 22:23ET. So yeah that was pretty obvious😎, and was again Q teaching us definitively their comms.
🧵/12- So that Defcon? was also IMO Def(inite or definitive) & Con(firmation) as Q will allude to in drop #511 02:00ET at the end of the drop series(pic1rel) which posting now just to show you, but there are more drops before Q get's there), so that we would have confirmation of the sequence, via the posting of Trumps last half of the tweet. And the [1] delta gap satisfied that as confirmation.
Now not only was this exercise supposed to show us how to read their comms, as post #506 shows(pic2rel) it also served for helping anons draw the graphic, and to create the clock, as a [1], [5], a [10], a [15] and also a [0] Delta all have their own meaning for comms as per which direction the comm was pointing us, past, present, future, pre-Trump tweet or post-Trump tweet, w/ zero delta meaning simultaneous.
This is a very hard thing to explain, and not necessary for this thread, + I'm not a clockfag(term of endearment🫡) which takes highly weaponized autism to even start to undertsand it, but I'll show you what i mean by posting a pic of an un-related example of the Qclock(pic3rel), so yeah when you see it you'll understand why I'm not even gonna try🤯🤯. And because of the aforementioned complexity of the Qclock, those that understand them and made them don't get nearly the credit they deserve IMO, so o7 Clockfags! But anyway, back to this series of proofs...
Now not only was this exercise supposed to show us how to read their comms, as post #506 shows(pic2rel) it also served for helping anons draw the graphic, and to create the clock, as a [1], [5], a [10], a [15] and also a [0] Delta all have their own meaning for comms as per which direction the comm was pointing us, past, present, future, pre-Trump tweet or post-Trump tweet, w/ zero delta meaning simultaneous.
This is a very hard thing to explain, and not necessary for this thread, + I'm not a clockfag(term of endearment🫡) which takes highly weaponized autism to even start to undertsand it, but I'll show you what i mean by posting a pic of an un-related example of the Qclock(pic3rel), so yeah when you see it you'll understand why I'm not even gonna try🤯🤯. And because of the aforementioned complexity of the Qclock, those that understand them and made them don't get nearly the credit they deserve IMO, so o7 Clockfags! But anyway, back to this series of proofs...
🧵/13- Ok so now that we have Trump having posted the corrected set of tweets, Q then goes on to confirm everything, and I am just going to post all of those drops here for your own reading pleasure, the meaning of them should be clear. (picsrel) but don't leave yet, because there's more and it's actually a new revelation that I believe anons were not meant to find back then, and Q purposefully distracted us from it. But it's a future proves past that will blow your mind😎 (note: drop #510(pic4rel) anon says PT, his timing is NOT PT, but actually he is an hour off because if you look at Trumps corrected tweets that are actually still up (I will link these in the last posts) you will see that depending on your Timezone you can confirm that he is in fact an hr off.
🧵/14- Ok so now that we have completed that series of posts, with the final drop(picrel) made @ 0200:00 on January 8th explaining Defcon, which was for all the anons in the bread at the time that still may not have gotten it, we are going to shift gears for this next series of posts.
This will imo prove that way back in 2018 Q told us that Trump would serve as the 47th President of the United states and that it was ALWAYS part of the plan. Meaning as we've all come to realize, the 4 years of JoeBama was baked in, and was a very(optically) necessary part of the plan. To help achieve a mandate for the reckoning needed to destroy the Deepstate/Cabal, once and for all.
This will imo prove that way back in 2018 Q told us that Trump would serve as the 47th President of the United states and that it was ALWAYS part of the plan. Meaning as we've all come to realize, the 4 years of JoeBama was baked in, and was a very(optically) necessary part of the plan. To help achieve a mandate for the reckoning needed to destroy the Deepstate/Cabal, once and for all.
🧵/15- I will explain later how/why this all came about via a couple Dan Delta's to a Trump Truth, a Bondi delta to the Trump truth, and a correlation to a qdrop about Epstein that directly tied into those delta's and Trumps Truth. And how when i pointed this out to @truestormyjoe, he responded back saying it reminded him of certain posts from the above post series (Good[win]) which made me go back and revisit that entire chain of posts in the first place to kick off this thread, and being those drops were what made me once and for all comfy, in knowing Q was legit made me feel this thread would be good for people looking to level up their comfy. And I will drop that Thread as a follow up to this one AFTER I show you what I think is probably the ultimate proof of THE PLAN for those still unsure, but willing to do the work to actually dig in the drops, they are IMO the outline to what will for generations be the greatest story ever told. Buckle up...
🧵/16- First a little summary and context: So we have established that the Qdrops in the series of drops we detailed above, were to establish comms, by showing how delta's, misspellings matter, timestamps matter, etc and we were shown this specifically via Q using Qdrops & Trump tweets, and the timing between those tweets in each set of tweets for confirmation...
Well imho we ALL missed a big one back then, and even though anons at the time started on that, path Q threw us off the trail with posting drop #510, and I believe it was very purposeful, because it was in 2018, and had we focused on it, it would have caused a lot of issues.
And since the drops aren't meant to be understood before something happens but only once something has happened via looking back, which is a very important aspect of the qdrops, because what they show us they also show [THEM]. But anyway Q loves to make the future prove past and this was a doozy💥
Well imho we ALL missed a big one back then, and even though anons at the time started on that, path Q threw us off the trail with posting drop #510, and I believe it was very purposeful, because it was in 2018, and had we focused on it, it would have caused a lot of issues.
And since the drops aren't meant to be understood before something happens but only once something has happened via looking back, which is a very important aspect of the qdrops, because what they show us they also show [THEM]. But anyway Q loves to make the future prove past and this was a doozy💥
🧵/17- So anons at the time, now keyed into looking at the gap in the tweets knowing, via drop #497, the significance the gap of [15] mins was.
And it's very very important to realize that we did not know at this time whether there would even be a corrected set of tweets.
So when the first corrected tweet dropped as i pointed out before, we were focused on waiting for the delta of the second half of the tweet.
And it happened and anons did what anons did and the theories and takes ran wild, and as such the subject of the gap between the the two sets of tweets came up, logically wondering if the gap between the the first set of tweets with the misspelling and the second set of corrected tweets, was also something important to look at, but then in the midst of putting all the pieces together, and the following Q drops only pointing to the gaps between each set, and not between the actual sets, Q dropped post #510(picrel), where he confirmed what had happened via the anons post, while pointing out that ALL anon missed was the defcon1 [1] marker for the second tweet time in the corrected set of tweets. So believing we had found all there was to find, that was the last i thought about it until Stormy made me go back and look with that "reminds me of these posts" comment the other day, and wow... here it comes...continued...
And it's very very important to realize that we did not know at this time whether there would even be a corrected set of tweets.
So when the first corrected tweet dropped as i pointed out before, we were focused on waiting for the delta of the second half of the tweet.
And it happened and anons did what anons did and the theories and takes ran wild, and as such the subject of the gap between the the two sets of tweets came up, logically wondering if the gap between the the first set of tweets with the misspelling and the second set of corrected tweets, was also something important to look at, but then in the midst of putting all the pieces together, and the following Q drops only pointing to the gaps between each set, and not between the actual sets, Q dropped post #510(picrel), where he confirmed what had happened via the anons post, while pointing out that ALL anon missed was the defcon1 [1] marker for the second tweet time in the corrected set of tweets. So believing we had found all there was to find, that was the last i thought about it until Stormy made me go back and look with that "reminds me of these posts" comment the other day, and wow... here it comes...continued...
🧵/18- Now remember the quote is about Trumps presidency being an enormously consequential presidency, and while it was enormous i think that this is actually the Most consequential presidency, his second Presidency...the 47th Presidency of the United States of America and in the NEXT post I will show you something that just happened the day after a convo where Stormy and I were talking about this in a thread and i had Dm'd him re a Trump post he alerted me to about it, cause Joe sees that kinda sheeit 🫡
But enough hype... Are you ready for this? The time between the last misspelled tweet @ 21:36ET and the first post of the corrected tweet @ 22:23 was.....
47 minutes or a [47] Delta🤔👀😳😱😎
Now just sit and think about that...
all the way back in 2018, in a series of posts that specifically dealt with delta's between tweets, when it would seem that the delta between the two tweets sets would/should be an obvious opportunity to teach us more into how to read comms, so it could have been another 15 minutes, or it could have been 17 minutes, it could have been any number of minutes, and not to mention how freaking big of a gap it was between incorrect to corected tweet, allowing Q to drops several times to direct us to the [1] delta of completion...
that the number of minutes between just happened to be 47 freaking minutes...
coincidence, amongst a very large number of coincidences from just that series, on top of 1000's of coincidences we have witnessed since Q came on the scene? Well let's look at one more shall we👇
But enough hype... Are you ready for this? The time between the last misspelled tweet @ 21:36ET and the first post of the corrected tweet @ 22:23 was.....
47 minutes or a [47] Delta🤔👀😳😱😎
Now just sit and think about that...
all the way back in 2018, in a series of posts that specifically dealt with delta's between tweets, when it would seem that the delta between the two tweets sets would/should be an obvious opportunity to teach us more into how to read comms, so it could have been another 15 minutes, or it could have been 17 minutes, it could have been any number of minutes, and not to mention how freaking big of a gap it was between incorrect to corected tweet, allowing Q to drops several times to direct us to the [1] delta of completion...
that the number of minutes between just happened to be 47 freaking minutes...
coincidence, amongst a very large number of coincidences from just that series, on top of 1000's of coincidences we have witnessed since Q came on the scene? Well let's look at one more shall we👇
🧵/19 Here's the Trump truth(picrel) I alluded to in that last post.... imo confirming the Qdrop, by using the word consequential, and this time not related to the Goodwin article, but in direct relation to his current time as President... The 47th President in fact.
I had also dropped my theory on the [47] on 8kun as well, did a certain someone see it?
Who knows but it wouldn't be the first time IYKYK😎 but regardless still a heck of a "coincidence" after all these years, using that word again, and as Stormy posted today, that word was once again used this time by speaker Johnson in the same context of Trumps 47th presidency(vidrel)
Anyway, the choice to know is yours the choice to believe is yours, but I think if you open your mind, and include the context of everything we've seen the past 8+ years, we arrive at too many coincidences to be mathematically possible. And I for one am comfy AF! o7 gise!
#WWG1WGA
#NCSWIC
#TrusThePlan
Please continue to next posts for live links to Trump tweets.
I had also dropped my theory on the [47] on 8kun as well, did a certain someone see it?
Who knows but it wouldn't be the first time IYKYK😎 but regardless still a heck of a "coincidence" after all these years, using that word again, and as Stormy posted today, that word was once again used this time by speaker Johnson in the same context of Trumps 47th presidency(vidrel)
Anyway, the choice to know is yours the choice to believe is yours, but I think if you open your mind, and include the context of everything we've seen the past 8+ years, we arrive at too many coincidences to be mathematically possible. And I for one am comfy AF! o7 gise!
#WWG1WGA
#NCSWIC
#TrusThePlan
Please continue to next posts for live links to Trump tweets.
🧵/20 Also here is the corrected Trump tweet still up, for you to confirm the time of, and if you want to the link of the second Tweet, it's in the next Post.
https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/950206338411499520
🧵/21 Here's the final Trump half of the Corrected Trump tweet. Also I will post the follow up thread as per the Dan Trump Dan Bondi [1][1][2] Delta's that correlated to the Qdrop of the Epstein case, that started this entire convo.
I sincerely hope you enjoyed this thread, it was a doozy to make but believe it needed to be.
And maybe, hopefully if i did a good enough job explaining it, some were able to adjust altitude to a 40k ft view with the realization that there is a plan, and it's going perfectly.
And if you did enjoy it and feel inclined to give me a follow, well that never sucks.
Cheers o7
x.com/realDonaldTrum…
I sincerely hope you enjoyed this thread, it was a doozy to make but believe it needed to be.
And maybe, hopefully if i did a good enough job explaining it, some were able to adjust altitude to a 40k ft view with the realization that there is a plan, and it's going perfectly.
And if you did enjoy it and feel inclined to give me a follow, well that never sucks.
Cheers o7
x.com/realDonaldTrum…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
