Thread by @NextNewsNetwork

🚨BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard just dropped the most damning declassification in U.S. intelligence history—and President Trump declared:
“This was treason... They got caught.”

The Russia Hoax was a manufactured lie.

Let’s dive deep. 👇🧵

2/25
The declassified House Intel report exposes how Obama’s team weaponized intelligence to falsely accuse Trump of colluding with Russia.
It centers on the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA)—ordered just after Trump won.
📄 (Pg. 1)

3/25
The report shows Obama, Brennan, Clapper & Comey ignored proper intel protocols and fast-tracked the ICA to push the narrative that Putin helped Trump win—despite their own analysts warning there was no proof.
📄 (Pg. 5, 43)

4/25
Quote:
“CIA officers warned that the assessment lacked sufficient evidentiary basis and violated tradecraft standards.”
Yet Obama officials insisted on publishing it anyway—just 2 weeks before Trump’s inauguration.
📄 (Pg. 5)

5/25
The so-called “high confidence” claim that Putin wanted Trump to win was based on a single sentence fragment—
CIA officers warned it was cherry-picked and misinterpreted.
📄 (Pg. 4–6)

6/25
Quote:
“The ICA did not agree on whether Putin directly intended helping Trump... That judgment rested on a questionable interpretation of one unclear sentence.”
📄 (Pg. 4)

7/25
Intel officials prepared two versions of a key CIA report.
The Obama team deleted the version that didn’t support the “Putin helped Trump” narrative.
They ordered the politicized version to be published.
📄 (Pg. 5)

8/25
The ICA’s main argument?
“Putin developed a clear preference for candidate Trump.”
But… that judgment was based on fragmentary, poorly sourced material.
Analysts warned: “The ICA failed to clarify the fragment’s meaning.”
📄 (Pg. 6–7)

9/25
Obama officials ignored contradictory intelligence that showed Putin was preparing for a Clinton win.
Quote:
“A Russian source said Russia was planning for candidate Clinton’s victory.”
📄 (Pg. 13)

10/25
Another bombshell quote:
“Senior Russian officials warned that if Clinton won, the U.S.–Russia relationship would need to be repaired.”
📄 (Pg. 14)
They didn’t expect Trump to win—and prepared for Clinton.

11/25
So why did the Obama admin claim otherwise?
Because they suppressed this evidence:
“The ICA omitted evidence that undermined the judgment that Putin preferred Trump.”
📄 (Pg. 14)

12/25
It gets worse.
The report shows the ICA used the Steele Dossier—despite it being debunked, unverifiable, and clearly political.
Yet Obama’s intelligence leaders insisted on including it.
📄 (Pg. 23–24)

13/25
Quote from senior CIA official:
“We were trying to determine who the Steele subsource was. The question is, why did we go with this report?”
📄 (Pg. 24)

14/25
And when analysts objected, guess what CIA leadership said?
“Yes, but doesn’t it ring true?”
They knew it didn’t meet standards—but they used it anyway.
📄 (Pg. 24)

15/25
FBI Director Comey even wrote a memo saying it was “very important” to include the dossier—despite knowing it was a political op funded by Hillary Clinton.
📄 (Pg. 25)

16/25
The FBI and CIA knew the dossier relied on discredited Russian sub-sources, but included it anyway to frame Trump.
One FBI agent even said:
“The Steele sub-source network could not meet basic verification standards.”
📄 (Pg. 26)

17/25
Steele’s reports were peddled to 5 major media outlets before the ICA was finalized.
One FBI agent testified the goal was to shape the public narrative before Trump took office.
📄 (Pg. 29)

18/25
Obama’s intelligence leaders coordinated closely with media.
The ICA report notes they leaked dossier content to CNN—sparking a media firestorm used to discredit Trump.
📄 (Pg. 25–27)

19/25
The ICA violated multiple core standards:
Failed to explain alternative hypotheses

Omitted contradictory reporting

Relied on raw HUMINT without proper sourcing
📄 (Pg. 33)

20/25
Quote:
“The ICA did not address the possibility that Russia never expected Clinton to lose.”
Or that they were hedging against any U.S. administration.
📄 (Pg. 34)

21/25
Even pro-Clinton Russian officials warned Moscow NOT to assume she’d win.
But those voices were excluded.
Why?
Because the Obama team had already decided the narrative.
📄 (Pg. 35)

22/25
As the report makes clear:
“The ICA authors disregarded their own analysts’ concerns... Intelligence that undermined the ICA’s key judgment was withheld.”
📄 (Pg. 36–37)

23/25
There was no consensus in the IC.
NSA, for example, only gave “moderate confidence” to the Putin-Trump claim.
Yet the final ICA said “high confidence” across the board.
📄 (Pg. 7, 33)

24/25
The classified ICA and unclassified ICA differed—but only the public version was seen by the media.
It was crafted to convince the world Trump was illegitimate.
📄 (Pg. 44)

25/25
President Trump was right:

“They tried to rig the election, and they got caught.”
The declassified report confirms it—a premeditated coup by Obama’s intel machine.

There MUST be consequences.

Follow @NextNewsNetwork for the full reckoning.

BONUS: Don’t take our word for it—read the bombshell evidence yourself:

📄 dni.gov/files/ODNI/doc…

📺 BONUS: Want to see it all for yourself? Our cameras were rolling—watch the full historic press briefing where DNI Tulsi Gabbard and WH Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt exposed Obama’s intel coup against Trump in real time:

▶️

This is history unfolding—watch and share.

https://x.com/NextNewsNetwork/status/1948104780347331014