Jeremy Konyndyk Profile picture
Jul 24 14 tweets 4 min read Read on X
As a longtime humanitarian who has battled famines and hunger crises, I fear that starvation in Gaza has now passed the tipping point and we are going to see mass-scale starvation mortality.

A thread on famine momentum, famine response, and what it means for Gaza today.
The latest reporting shows telltale signs of rapidly accelerating mortality - the kind of classic famine scenario we know from places like Sudan or Somalia.

Barring a massive reversal of Israeli policy, there is a little standing in the way of total collapse.
Throughout last year Gaza ebbed and flowed at the brink of famine, but never passed the tipping point.

Israeli aid obstruction kept Palestinians perpetually underfed but always relented just enough to avoid mass hunger mortality, as we wrote last Sept:
refugeesinternational.org/reports-briefs…Image
That changed in March when the cease-fire collapsed and Israel imposed a blockade that de facto continues to the present day.

The GHF and the other trickles of aid that Israel is permitting are not a meaningful "lifting" of that blockade, and are not changing the trajectory.
The result: starvation deaths that had previously been one-off cases are now emerging in growing clusters.

43 starvation deaths (at least) in the last three days, compared to 68 recorded over the course of the war.

Both figures are likely undercounts, but the trend here is key. Image
Famines gain momentum if they are not controlled early.

The time to prevent starvation deaths is weeks prior, when people reach a state of severe malnutrition.

The time to prevent severe malnutrition is months earlier, when long-term food deficits set in.
By the time people start dying in large daily numbers, both of those windows have been missed.

This famine has now gathered momentum, accrued over months of worsening deprivation and the collapse of the relief effort due to Israel's blockade.
Once a famine gathers momentum, the effort required to contain it increases exponentially.

It would now take an overwhelmingly large aid operation to reverse the coming wave of mortality, and it would take months.

Gaza is entering its darkest chapter yet.
Normally the reports and images now emerging would trigger a massive int'l response.

So – what needs to happen?

By this point, food alone is not enough. For people weakened by prolonged starvation, famine can kill in multiple ways - and response strategy must cover them all.
When I led these operations for the US govt, they would cover:
- Food aid (obviously)
- Malnutrition treatment
- Health care (disease can kill malnourished people before starvation does)
- Clean water (for consumption & food prep)
- Sanitation (to prevent spreading disease)
Famine response has made great strides over the years and can be miraculously effective when given the space to work.

The innovation and evolution in response tactics has made famines much rarer in recent decades.

But nothing like this is remotely possible right now.
Humanitarians can't tackle the famine until the political and security obstacles are removed.

Israel's aid restrictions and ongoing incessant violence towards Palestinian civilians make a proper famine response effectively impossible.
Instead of allowing and facilitating a genuine famine response, Israel is persisting with this GHF farce and using it as a pretext to block legit aid groups.

It is fundamentally unserious and cynical - and as the reports out Gaza make clear, it is failing on the merits.
Every world leader needs to ask themselves if they are ready to be complicit in a famine on their watch.

If they are not, they must act decisively now, using every possible political and diplomatic tool, to pressure Israel to lift this unlawful and murderous blockade.

/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeremy Konyndyk

Jeremy Konyndyk Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JeremyKonyndyk

Jun 4
For days, GHF and its defenders tried to "debunk" the massacre claims by arguing "but this didn't happen *at* the GHF sites."

As we know, the people killed were in the crowds walking long distances through IDF perimeters TO REACH THOSE VERY SITES.

Which GHF now...admits.
The whole episode says a lot about the sincerity of whoever is pulling the strings at GHF.

First instinct is to put out a gaslighting press release denying the massacre reports, while pretending that whatever happens outside their perimeter has nothing to do with them.
Only after *another* massacre (which they also initially try to debunk) does GHF belatedly acknowledge that...maybe...there are some issues with an aid model that forces huge crowds of hungry people to cross long distances and then clusters them along IDF force positions.
Read 4 tweets
May 27
Seasoned humanitarians do not operate this way because it's a terribly risky and ineffective way to deliver aid.

Quick 🧵 on what seems to have gone wrong, and why nothing about today's events was surprising.

(subtitle: humanitarians know stuff, actually)
One thing that relief workers learn early is that managing desperate crowds is TOUGH.

So you generally try to deliver aid in a way that avoids drawing more people than you can manage and serve at a given site.

More sites = smaller crowds = manageable distribution. Not this: Image
The GHF model is the total inverse of that.

Rather than dispersing people across many sites, GHF concentrates them at very few sites with very grandiose aspirations of serving huge numbers.

As evidenced by today's chaos, GHF had no plan for what that would mean in practice.
Read 15 tweets
May 9
"We will take your baby and deport you without her.”

Blockbuster new report from us @RefugeesIntl and our partner @humanrights1st documenting shocking stories of asylum seekers unlawfully disappeared, abused, and expelled by Trump's @CBP and @ICEgov.

Read on. 🧵 Image
Our teams interviewed numerous asylum seekers who have been unlawfully expelled from the US to Costa Rica, Panama, and their home countries (where they face real risk of persecution or torture, likely constituting refoulement).
We found a consistent pattern of government abuse and deception intended to subvert legal oversight and to deny people's rights.

Some of these accounts appear consistent with the practice of enforced disappearance under international law.
Read 17 tweets
May 4
Teachable moment here.

I don't love using the term "humanitarian principles" b/c it sounds like an ethical creed.

That's not what the principles are. They are fundamentally a *tool* to enable safe humanitarian access.

A tool refined by years of hard lessons.

Quick🧵
Saying something "contravenes humanitarian principles" rarely persuades non-humanitarians.

When I was in government, that approach never worked.

Instead I would argue for why supporting independent, neutral humanitarian action *stood the best chance of operational success.*
I see the principles as two pairs:

The *what*: hum'n action seeks to protect life (Humanity) on the basis of need alone (Impartiality).

The *how*: hum'n action does not take sides in a conflict (Neutrality) and operates apart from political & military objectives (Independence) Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 24
More an amputation than a major re-organization.

The core structure of @StateDept remains intact and mostly unchanged.

But they amputate the US government's foreign aid capacity and eviscerate other soft-power tools.

A 🧵
Here's a cross-walk of the prior State org chart to the new one released by Rubio (links to both below).

🟥 items appear to be fully eliminated.

🟨 items are retained but reshuffled

🟩items are new to the org chart

New: state.gov/wp-content/upl…
Old: 2021-2025.state.gov/department-of-… Image
Image
DepSecs unchanged.

5 of the 6 undersecretaries unchanged; 1 eliminated and replaced by a revising the foreign assistance budget director (Marocco's old job).

Primacy of the regional bureaus is preserved/reinforced.

No cuts announced to overseas posts.
Read 17 tweets
Mar 31
Aid leaders have been warning for 2 months that the gutting of @USAID would leave US unable to respond to major global disasters.

We are now seeing that play out in real time with the Myanmar quake - reality is calling bullshit on the Trump admin's narrative.

🧵
In today's press briefing @statedeptspox bizarrely "rejected the premise" that a meaningful US response requires USAID staff "to be physically there."

As the guy who used to deploy those teams - this is total nonsense.

You can't conduct search-and-rescue virtually. Come on.
The reality is that other countries began deploying their teams immediately - and the US would have too, under any prior administration (including Trump 1).

But Elon, Pete Marocco, and Rubio have wrecked the USG's ability to do this.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(