🧵 Thread based on Chapter 6: “Analogous Considerations Drawn from the Study of the Dream State” from The Multiple States of the Being — by René Guénon — The only true metaphysician in recent times.
1/ Dreams are not mere subjective illusions. They are real states of existence — subtler than waking life, but still within the domain of individual manifestation. The study of dreaming offers a symbolic analogy for understanding other planes of being.
2/ Each state of being is defined by a set of conditions. The waking state is governed by sensory input, corporeal interaction, and spatial-temporal fixation. The dream state operates on a different set of coherent conditions — more fluid, less dense, but no less structured.
3/ One does not say that the dream is “unreal” merely because its contents differ from waking norms. The coherence of a world depends on its own internal laws. Every state, including dreams, has its own mode of time, space, and causality.
4/ The transition from waking to dream illustrates the multiplicity of states within individual consciousness. What appears discontinuous from the outside is, inwardly, part of a greater continuum of being — stratified by degrees.
5/ What binds the states together is not memory or sensory continuity, but identity of subject. The being remains one, even as it experiences differing modalities. The dreamer is not a different being from the waking person — only another deployment of the same individual.
6/ In dream, forms arise without physical input. Yet they are not arbitrary: they are governed by psychic causality, symbolic affinity, and internal necessity. This indicates the presence of laws beyond the physical, which also govern higher planes of existence.
7/ The ability to pass from waking to dream — and back — reveals that consciousness is not fixed in a single state. It can move between modes. This movement is a key symbol of how the being may traverse levels of reality within itself.
8/ What dream symbolizes in the individual, the subtle states symbolize in the total being: realities not accessible to the senses, but governed by their own structures — intermediate between the corporeal and the spiritual.
Aristotle has a work on dream by the way
9/ The study of dreams is thus a preliminary initiation into metaphysical understanding. It breaks the false solidity of the physical and shows that being is not confined to a single mode. Multiplicity of states is the rule, not the exception.
10/ The loss of memory between waking and dream does not imply a break in the being. Memory is conditioned by each state’s structure. What seems “forgotten” is simply inaccessible across thresholds — just as other states of being remain veiled from waking life.
11/ To say the dream and waking states are “separate” is a false projection of succession. The being is not divided — only human perception is. From a total viewpoint, all states coexist. Separation arises from subjective limitation, not objective structure.
12/ The dream state is not merely symbolic — it is structurally homologous to states after death. Just as one withdraws from the corporeal domain during sleep, so death marks the being’s entry into the subtle order. The analogy thus becomes a symbolic preparation for initiation.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Apart from its scientific, educational, and other exoteric impact, Islam exerted a hidden influence in the West: subtle, initiatic, and largely unnoticed by those unaware of metaphysical transmission.
2/ It would be inaccurate to speak of this influence in terms of external expansion or political power. It concerned neither conversion nor domination. It touched what still retained, within Western forms, a connection to higher principles.
3/ This influence occurred where certain symbolic, artistic, or intellectual forms remained open to vertical influx.
In modern languages, “poverty” implies lack. But in the metaphysical order, al-faqr signifies detachment from what is not the Real. It is not absence of things, but absence of selfhood. The faqīr is poor not because he owns nothing—but because he is nothing.
2/ The individual, insofar as he is individual, is nothing. No quality, no act, no state belongs to him in truth. He subsists entirely by the Principle, without which he would vanish. To know this is poverty. To live it is fanā’.
3/ Detachment follows necessarily. When the being recognizes that all manifestation is illusory in relation to the Principle, he becomes indifferent to its forms. Not passively—but with a lucidity that dissolves their claim to reality.
Salafīs/Wahhābīs are among the most intellectually dishonest and egotistical groups in existence. They stubbornly reject truth, hiding behind articles, links, and the names of select shuyūkh they blindly follow (taqlīd).
2/ They cannot think straight; their brain fuses when shown their flaws. They resort to ad hominem and takfir when out of filthy tricks. They claim to follow only the Qurʾān and Sunnah, but barely engage beyond a few verses.
3/ —perhaps 20—and around 30 bookmarked ḥadīths cherry-picked from websites like . Their approach to learning Islam is superficial, relying on Google searches rather than deep study. They sideline the broader Qurʾān and Sunnah, fixating on interpretationssunnah.com
Democracy is founded on the illusion that truth can be produced by the masses. It assumes quantity determines quality. In the traditional view, the real is established by principle, not by vote. No truth is born from below.
“Multiplicity cannot dictate unity.”
2/ All legitimate authority descends from above, through a chain rooted in the Principle. Democracy inverts this: it ascribes sovereignty to the collective—an amorphous psychic totality. It is the regime of formlessness, of disorder clothed as freedom.
Modern man experiences time as a straight line — a narrow arrow from “past” to “future.” But this is merely the most external layer. Tradition knows 3 orders of time:
– Cyclical
– Linear
– Supra-temporal
Each with a distinct ontological status
2/ The first is Cyclical Time — the time of cosmic rhythms, the cycle of days, years, ages. It is the movement of manifestation within total possibility. Its symbol is the wheel (chakra, rota), and its law is repetition.
3/ Cyclical time governs traditional societies, initiatic rites, and sacred calendars. It mirrors the infinite combinations of a finite set of archetypes. It is the domain of the Great Year, of yugas and kalpas, of births and dissolutions.
Origin of the word “Hindu” and the extreme corruption of the (ex)-followers of Sanātana Dharma 🧵
How traditional metaphysics can explain the ‘Hindutva’ phenomenon.
1/ Hindu is not a word of spiritual origin. It is a geographical term, a Persian distortion of Sindhu, referring to those east of the Indus. It was never used in any authentic Vedantic or dharmic scripture to define the doctrine itself.
2/ Sanātana Dharma never required a name, for it is not a religion but the metaphysical ordering of the cosmos. When a name was given from within, it was Dharma, or more fully Sanātana Dharma—eternal order, not ethnic tribalism.