@ErikHovenkamp @LeeHepner Here's where I'm getting stuck: "The supplier's profit maximizing price depends on d(p)." Putting some numbers on it, let's say A sells an extra 50 units at retail due to its price advantage. B used to sell 100 at retail for profitable price $7 but can now sell only 50 at $7.
@ErikHovenkamp @LeeHepner Where I'm getting hung up is why/how S would find it profitable to offer B a lower price when S knows that B can sell at profitable price $7, keeping in mind that overall market units sold--and therefore where S is on its own cost curve--hasn't changed.
@ErikHovenkamp @LeeHepner This is a good point: "That discount made his contract with the big buyer less profitable, not more." Absent empirics, tho, I don't think we can tell definitively whether that dynamic or the "B-now-accounts-for-less-of-my-sales" dynamic is more pervasive/powerful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
With all the antitrust/Big Tech news swirling around, I've seen a lot of confusion on here about how antitrust works. People are making the same mistakes over and over. We can do better! Here's a quick, easy illustrated guide to avoid the 5 most common mistakes:
Mistake #1: "These other products compete with the Defendant's products, so they must all be in the same market."
Fixing the Mistake:
Mistake #2: "The Defendant already bought the target company, so that acquisition can't be illegal!"
If we abandon public research funding, then we will increasingly let Big Tech incumbents steer the direction of genAI innovation. One problem? Most of them already control highly profitable cloud services, which biases them toward inefficient compute-heavy tech. Short 🧵 (1/x)
GenAI has the potential to be a general-use technology. That means whole ecosystems will grow up around whatever foundational tech/business model catches on and takes root. (Like how the surveillance adtech industry grew up around the zero-price targeted-ad biz model.) (2/x)
If you can control the base long enough for an ecosystem to spring up around it, path dependence can set in. Why does that matter? Here's a very simple model of how owning a highly profitable cloud-services biz can distort your incentives:
AAG Jonathan Kanter sent shockwaves thru the antitrust community yesterday by calling out corporate-funded advocacy dressed up as scholarship. I've seen a thing or two, but a recent experience w/ this left me shook. Check it out: 🧵 (1/x)
Earlier this year, the pro-enforcement community was surprised and upset when Google got an invite to address the California Law Review Commission on whether the state’s antitrust laws need updating.
But I’d spoken to the Commission a few weeks earlier, gotten curious, and dug around the other speakers and comments. I’m no stranger to encountering industry-funded research. What I found shocked me, though.