1/ When Bitcoin was released in 2009, many saw it as revolutionary, but few understood a key fact: it was an MVP (Minimum Viable Product). It wasn’t the final version but a proof-of-concept to demonstrate its potential. 🌍💡
2/ Satoshi Nakamoto launched Bitcoin to test its feasibility, build a community, and spark innovation. He knew the design would evolve over time, with others contributing to scale and refine it. This was the foundation—not the finish line. 🚀
3/ What even fewer anticipated was that Satoshi himself laid the groundwork for a full-scale release—a version capable of handling global demand and enterprise-level transactions.
Enter the era of TeraNode. 🔗
4/ TeraNode represents the next evolution in Bitcoin’s journey.
The Great Deception: The Myth of Full Node Power in BTC
For years, BTC advocates have perpetuated a grand illusion: the idea that running a “full node” grants individuals meaningful influence over the BTC network.
This narrative has been sold to enthusiasts as a means of empowerment, a way to “participate in consensus” and uphold BTC’s decentralized ethos. But this could not be further from the truth.
The cold reality is this: full nodes wield no real power over BTC’s functionality, consensus, or security. They are spectators in a game controlled entirely by miners.
The fixation on the price of tokens, such as Bitcoin (BTC), Bitcoin SV (BSV), or any other cryptocurrency, tends to overshadow the profound technological and societal implications of blockchain technology.
Here's why this focus might be missing the bigger picture and why the innovations introduced by blockchain, particularly as conceptualized by Dr. Craig Wright, could be considered one of humanity's great achievements:
### **1. Misdirection of Focus:**
- **Speculative Nature:** The public's obsession with price movements often turns blockchain technology into a mere speculative asset class, akin to gambling.
Thread 🧵: The Hunt Brothers, BTC, and the Lessons of Market Collapse
1/ In the late 1970s, two billionaires — the Hunt Brothers — tried to corner the global silver market. Prices skyrocketed from $1.50/oz to nearly $50/oz — a 3,200% gain.
Speculation and leverage drove it.
Sound familiar?
BTC is now over $105,000, up 3,400%.
2/ The Hunt Brothers believed silver was the ultimate hedge — “sound money” to escape fiat collapse.
Today, Michael Saylor calls BTC “digital gold.” He’s not just buying — he’s borrowing billions to acquire over 200,000 BTC.
1/ Thinking BTC’s success = price? You’ve been deceived.
Price is a shallow metric used to hypnotize you into ignoring the failure of BTC to do what it was invented for: become usable money.
A thread 🧵 on why BTC’s “price cult” is a lie.
2/ Let’s go back to basics.
Satoshi Nakamoto didn’t write:
“Hey guys, let’s make the next digital gold speculation bubble!”
BTC was supposed to be peer-to-peer electronic cash. Scalable, fast, low-fee money for EVERYONE. Read the white paper.
Not an asset to hodl.
3/ BTC’s price is high.
And what does that really tell us?
•Billionaires pumped it
•You speculate on it
•Media shills it
But can you use it to buy coffee?
Can a kid in Africa afford fees?
Can a business rely on it for payments?
No.