This would be a huge expansion of the civil commitment system in the United States!
The administration says it will only target people who can’t or won’t get treatment. But the administration is gutting the very services that provide that treatment.
Remember Trump's "big, beautiful bill"? It’s got an ugly reality: Steep cuts to Medicaid that hurt people who need it the most.
Being uninsured makes it nearly impossible to access mental health care or substance use treatment.
He's also slashed billions of dollars from addiction and mental health programs.
"In so many cases, these are life-saving programs and services, and we worry for the wellbeing of those who have come to count on this support."
So while claiming to prioritize "safety," he is gutting the very programs that work. 🚩
Forcibly hospitalizing unhoused people does not get them the treatment & care they need. Especially now, when so many states are reeling from budget cuts.
With the safety net shredded, what will happen to these people?
In many cases, they’ll be put straight into actual prisons and jails – which are NEVER appropriate places for treatment.
➡️ More than half of people in state prison reported having a mental health problem, yet only 26% received professional help since entering prison.
➡️ Incarceration itself is traumatizing and can inflict serious mental damage on people.
People with substance abuse disorder are also already targeted–and failed–by the system.
Data shows that people who have been arrested or incarcerated are more likely to have substance use disorder, and jails in particular cannot provide the necessary care:
And when people are shuffled into the system, they are more likely to be homeless.
Unfortunately, being homeless makes formerly incarcerated people more likely to be arrested & incarcerated again, creating a revolving door.
The truth is that there's an inextricable link between housing, mental illness, drug use, and criminalization.
The solution is not forcibly hospitalizing people. It's housing.
Housing First offers housing with no strings attached. It recognizes housing as the first step in responding to homelessness, rather than something to work toward.
This executive order is bad and misguided. It will result in far more people locked up simply because they’re experiencing homelessness, mental health crises, or substance use issues.
The good news is that state and local governments don’t have to help this misguided effort.
The federal government will certainly dangle $$$ to entice them to implement their policies, but they have the ability to say no. If the money comes with these types of strings attached, it isn’t worth the cost.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Contact with loved ones is essential behind bars. But phone calls are expensive, and distance can make family visits rare or impossible.
That's where mail comes in – a crucial form of communication that people behind bars rely on far more than the average person.
The average person might be able to afford an extra 5 cents per stamp, but it is a real burden on incarcerated mailers.
And prisons appear to be paying incarcerated people less today than they were in 2001. Stamp prices have more than doubled since then: prisonpolicy.org/blog/2017/04/1…
"She’s spent around $20,000 total on calls from prison during the six years her husband has been inside—all so that he could continue fathering their three children while he served out his sentence."
Contact with loved ones is a lifeline for incarcerated people – and telecom companies use that to fill their pockets with hundreds of millions of dollars.
And now, the @FCC is letting them continue to get away with it.
@FCC In 2024, a groundbreaking ruling set much-needed price caps on calls behind bars that were supposed to go into effect this year
But the FCC caved to sheriffs & telecom companies, letting them exploit incarcerated people & their loved ones for 2 more years prisonpolicy.org/blog/2025/07/0…
The article is right. Prison populations have — for the most part — fallen over the last 15+ years.
That is a reason to celebrate and have hope for the future.
But those trends aren’t guaranteed to continue…and there are reasons to doubt they will.
The progress that has been made in recent years is due to reforms that curtail the use of grotesquely long sentences, reduce the number of people incarcerated for minor offenses, and stop treating addiction, poverty, and mental health issues as crimes.
Incarcerated people have to "douse themselves with toilet water" to cool off from sweltering heat, and Texas still refuses to provide air conditioning in prisons.
Texas would rather FALSIFY DATA than install air conditioning in prisons, all while temps routinely exceed 100° and put people in dire situations: texastribune.org/2025/03/21/tex…
And keep in mind that without A/C, there is no relief from extreme heat for people behind bars.
Take a look at the commissary at one TX federal prison that charges $30 for personal fans, profiting off incarcerated people's misery: