Post

More from @thepalmerworm

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

@thepalmerworm

Jul 10

The Architects Beneath the Floor

A Forensic Fable on the Dialectic of Philosophers and the Machinery of False Being

The Hidden Foundry

Beneath the checkerboard rooms and curated oppositions of the House, there was an ancient Foundry, where men in robes and masks labored endlessly over scrolls, diagrams and molten scripts. These were no ordinary philosophers. They called themselves Architects, but their craft was not contemplation - it was construction. Their task? To simulate anthropology, to manufacture metaphysics and to replace reality with models. They did not seek truth; they sought control of terms. Their motto was; “He who defines being governs becoming.” And so they built. They called themselves philosophers, but they were engineers of illusion; cloaked in costume, speaking in riddles, forging new definitions of man not to understand him, but to control him. Their true craft was not wisdom, but containment.

2/ The Alchemy of Inversion

The Foundry had many tools besides the dialectic. Their formulas were drawn from the secret playbooks of the Neoplatonic and Hermetic arts. They fractured reality into parts and recombined it through abstraction. They concealed inversion beneath poetic mysticism and presented the result as ‘visionary insight’. Each “theory” was an alchemical transmutation of the real;

🪄The soul became a system
🪄The will became desire
🪄The intellect became software
🪄The good became preference
🪄The cosmos became code

But the public did not see the forge. They saw only the glittering results; new doctrines, new schools, new manifestos; each claiming to redress and replace the last, each built on the same false matter. Wearing opposing masks, they staged quarrels for each generation; Rationalist v Empiricist, Idealist v Materialist etc. while secretly crafting each doctrine from the same false clay. Their conflict was choreography and their unity was inversion.

3/ The Chamber of Masks

The Architects wore masks of opposition. One spoke as Rationalist, another as Empiricist. One invoked Spirit while another espoused System. They feigned opposition in every generation; but beneath the mask, they all served Nomos, the anti-realist foundation. Their quarrels were ritual dialectics. Each new “debate” concealed a deeper agreement; that man is not knowable in being, only interpretable in process. Each philosophy was not a discovery but a design; inscribed with hermetic symbols, inverted logic and alchemical syntheses. Their blueprints reconfigured man, nature and truth into programmable material for The State, then sold it as ‘liberation’.

Read 8 tweets

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

@thepalmerworm

Jul 10

🧵The House of a Thousand Rooms

A Forensic Fable of Dialectic;
Containment and the End of Discernment

The Arrival

Once there was a vast and glittering House of a Thousand Rooms, suspended in midair like a floating city. The House promised sanctuary, wisdom, and power to all who entered. Its gates bore many signs; “Justice, Freedom, Reform, Tradition, Innovation, Rebellion.” Each room behind each sign claimed to oppose the others. Some walls were painted red, others blue, others gold or green. Some were filled with candles, others with screens. Some wore clerical garb, others suits, some in branded causal merch, while others wore lab coats. Travellers arrived daily in search of truth. They were told: “Choose a room. Debate those in other rooms. Defend your view and refute theirs.” And so they did. They moved from room to room and joined movements. They read manifestos and made signs. They adopted flags (or renounced them) and made podcasts. They held protests, wrote papers and argued across panels. They followed thought leaders who told them what to think and how to presume that they were thinking for themselves. But few ever asked; “What is the foundation of the House itself?” “Who built it?” “Why are all the rooms so eerily symmetrical?”

2/ The Invisible Architect

Unseen beneath the House, a dialectical engine hummed. Its name was Nomos and its blueprints came from old halls where men like Protagoras, Ockham, Descartes and Hegel once spoke in riddles. Their premise was simple; “Truth is not found; it is made.” “Reality is not known; it is processed.” “Order is not given; it is chosen.” They dismantled the Real and replaced it with perspectives. They shattered form, nature and being; repackaging just the rhetorical fragments into options, identities and arguments. Nomos was their child. He built the House. He gave every room its slogans. He provided endless costumes. He ensured that each opposition was carefully calibrated; not to break the system, but to fuel it. He whispered into both ears and gave the public many sides, but only one floor. Many voices, but only one architecture - the architecture of containment.

3/ The Traps Within

Each room had its own language; a curated dialect of slogans, technical terms and sacred words. But all of them were built using the same grammar; nominalist substitution. “Freedom” was redefined as unbound will. “Truth” as internal coherence. “Justice” as redistribution of harm. “Nature” as adaptive coding. “Liberty” as market access. “Reason” as narrative alignment. Each word became a costume, worn and discarded depending on the room. And yet, no one left the House. They only wandered room to room, confusing movement for meaning. Every doorway led to another pre-approved dilemma. Every answer produced new reactive loops. To challenge the premise of the House itself was forbidden; not by law, but by ridicule and in the House, reputation was cherished. Those who asked about its foundation were dismissed as ignorant, arrogant, regressive, dogmatic, conspiratorial, or insane. So they learned to stay in their rooms, reciting their scripts. Within the House, scholarly authorities convened to curate acceptable oppositions; carefully rehearsed debates (A v B) that reinforced the illusion of open inquiry, while excluding any argument that questioned the structure of the House itself.

Read 8 tweets

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

@thepalmerworm

Jul 7

🧵The Garden of the Severed Root;
A Fable Of The Abandonment & Rejection That Brought Ruin

The Orchard Of The First Inheritance

There once was a people who had inherited a vast orchard planted in alignment with nature’s wisdom. Each tree was planted by measure and its fruit nourished the whole Republic. They did not invent these trees; they had been entrusted with them. Each tree bore fruit with a name; Truth. Justice. Reason. Self-restraint. Accountability. Rightful Liberty. The people lived by tending these trees, which bore according to their nature and not according to the people’s will. These trees had roots; not in myth or metaphor, but in what simply was - and was not dependent on opinion. In the orchard of the First Inheritance, truth bore fruit because the trees were planted in right order, tended by those who submitted their labor to what had already been given. The orchard thrived because the People conformed themselves to the nature of the orchard; not the other way around. The red fruit, consistent and nourishing, was not invented, but received.

2/ The First Whisper; “Your Words Are Power”

One day a murmur drifted through the orchard; “These names are just noises. You can name them otherwise.” A cloaked stranger came to the people with scissors of silver and said; “Cut the roots. They are not needed. The names you use bind you to limits that belong to another age.” The People (particularly the educated among them) began snipping roots beneath the trees, certain that new growth could be engineered from above the soil. They called this freedom and progress. They did not realize they were already beginning to starve. The whisper of subversion began not with violence, but with flattery. “Your roots bind you,” said the voice. “Cut them, and you will be free.” The People, flattered into believing themselves wise, began to sever the very truths that had once nourished their strength. The fruit still looked the same; but its source was no longer trusted.

3/ The New Philosophers; “Knowledge Is Your Reflection”

New philosophers arrived and offered mirrors in place of harvests. “You need not look outward to what is. All that matters is what you can think clearly inside.” They built a Hall of Mirrors beside the orchard and told the youth to learn there instead of under the trees. The orchard began to wither. The names on the fruit grew dim. Still, the people rejoiced. “We are modern now,” they said. “We no longer depend on what is fixed. We have liberated knowledge from reality.” And with that, they removed the word Truth from the school gates. The People, convinced of their enlightenment, turned against the very structures that once upheld their liberty. With torches lit by slogans and pride, they marched in defense of the ideas that would dismantle their world. They did not see that the foundation had already been hollowed - by their own consent.

Read 12 tweets

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

@thepalmerworm

Jun 24

🧵The Collapse of the Axial Room
A Forensic Fable on Metaphysical Humility

The Chamber

There was a chamber called the Axial Room. It was sealed from above, below and beyond. Within it, every variable was controlled; temperature, light, speech, movement. All that could be measured was believed to exist; all that could not be measured was declared irrelevant, if not dangerous. At the center of this room stood a man called The Constructor. He was not a tyrant by his own reckoning. He considered himself a liberator; one who had cast off all superstition, all metaphysical impositions, all gods. He said;

“We do not believe. We create. What is not constructed by us has no authority.”

The room was bright. Not because of sunlight (there were no windows) but because of the overhead brilliance of engineered clarity. Mirrors lined the walls. Data screens gave constant feedback. All knowledge was to be generated within. Meaning was declared and Law was programmed. Morality was coded into behavioural systems. Truth was what remained after consensus was “managed”.

2/ The Creed of Control

The Constructor’s creed was simple;
“There is no above. Nothing higher than reason.”
“There is no below. Nothing more basic than perception.”
“There is only progress; spiralling upward and forward.”

Everything else was a residue of what was termed ‘religious pathology’. The Constructor mocked those who spoke of metaphysical grounding, moral objectivity, or divine order. To him, those were projection mechanisms; coping systems for inferior minds. The future belonged to constructivists; those who understood that meaning must be engineered, not received. He had no need for metaphysical humility, because he believed there was nothing outside the system that could demand it. Humility, in his eyes, was submission to illusions and illusions were obstacles to be removed.

3/ The Auditor

At irregular intervals, a figure known as The Auditor entered the Axial Room. He never stayed long, and he never issued commands. He asked questions;

“On what ground does this room stand?”
“Did you design the logic by which your reasoning proceeds?”
“What sustains the energy that maintains this chamber?”

The Constructor grew irritated by these interruptions. He dismissed the Auditor as a mystic; a lingering shadow of the old world.

“All we need is evidence,” he replied. “Everything real is measurable and rationally calculable.”

The Auditor nodded.

“And by what authority do you declare intelligible, the measure of the real?”

No answer came. The Simulants, who echoed the Constructor’s frameworks, began to stall, unsure how to parse the question.

Read 9 tweets

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

@thepalmerworm

Jun 23

🧵Constitutional Liberty ≠ Liberty to Destroy the Constitution

Key Principle from Natural Law & the Founders:

Liberty is not license. Freedom of religion does not include the “freedom” to destroy liberty itself. The First Amendment protects religious exercise within the bounds of moral and civil order. It does not protect practices or ideologies that subvert Natural Law, deny the moral structure of reality, or seek to replace the source of legitimate authority (the People under God) with the State, Market, or Mind.

2/ Natural Law as the Boundary

James Wilson (Founding Father and moral realist) taught:

“Law must rest upon the eternal foundation of justice.”
(Lectures on Law)

Religious liberty is bounded by Natural Law. If a religion denies truth (e.g. relativism, hermetic ‘polarity’…) erases the image of God in man (e.g. materialism, pantheism), or promotes spiritual hierarchy that violates equality (e.g. theosophical Christ-consciousness), or calls for legal supremacy of a church, race, or caste - then - it is not protected as true religious liberty, but becomes a political weapon cloaked as religion.

Natural Law Test:

Ask of any religion or system:
Does it affirm or destroy moral conscience?
Does it uphold the equal moral agency of the People?
Does it protect objective truth and justice?
Does it affirm the natural rights of others?

If the answer is no, it’s not religious liberty - it’s civilizational sabotage.

3/ Subversive “Religions” = Trojan Horses

Some ideologies today pose as religions, but are Esoteric political systems (Theosophy, Christ Consciousness),
Totalitarian cosmologies (Radical Islamism, State Shinto, Woke pseudo-spirituality), Emanationist hierarchies (Gnosticism, New Age ascensionism) and Psycho-spiritual engineering programs (UN One World Religion, Gaia cults).

They displace the People as the source of authority and erase truth by calling all systems “equal”. They coerce via shame, initiation, or identity manipulation and dismantle the real moral order under the guise of “tolerance”. These are not protected expressions under the Constitution because they seek to eliminate the very framework that allows religious liberty to exist. That ought to be evident!

Read 5 tweets

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

@thepalmerworm

Jun 21

🧵OBJECTIVE VALUES ≠ ONTOLOGICAL REALISM

People assume “Objective Values” means that values are grounded in something outside the individual’s opinion; therefore they assume it must mean eternal truths, natural law, or God-given rights. But here’s what it actually means in systems like Perry’s “New Realism” (or Rand’s Objectivism):

“Objective” means values can be described, classified, or derived from rational observation of effects. What’s “real” is what works within a system. “Objectivity” is measured by coherence, utility, or consensus within a human-defined structure. This is epistemological realism only; rights, dignity, or value are granted conditionally, based on performance, function, or consent.
open.substack.com/pub/escapekey/…

2/ What’s Missing?

💡Ontology

That is; the recognition that man has a nature, a fixed essence and a teleological orientation that cannot be revoked, redesigned, or replaced. Without ontological realism there is no foundation for “inalienable rights”, no basis for conscience, no justification for limits on state or expert power and no “self-evident” truths - only engineered consensus.

Objectivism Does the Same, claiming that “reason” reveals objective truth, but reason is disconnected from ontological being. Objectivist ethics are rationalist-derivative and conditioned by performance, not grounded in the inviolable nature of the person. As with Perry, this leads to morality as behavioural output, rights as conditional recognitions and sovereignty as system-conformance.

3/ Why This Deception Works

Because the term “objective” is used as linguistic bait. It mimics Natural Law language while replacing its metaphysical foundations. People think they are being offered Truth, Order, Moral Clarity; but they are receiving Management, Compliance Ethics and Behavioural metrics.

Veilcraft - The “Objective” Trap; systems like Perry’s “New Realism” use the word objective to imply metaphysical grounding, but in fact sever all metaphysical roots; anchoring values in system-defined functions rather than being (ontology). This is how moral economy becomes moral technocracy.

Read 5 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @thepalmerworm

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

the palmer worm 🌲mother, wife,choral conductor.

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!