🧵Club Of Rome Veilcraft Supreme🪄🐍🍎
‘First Principles and First Values of Evolving Perennialism’ (May 2023, Office for the Future)
The document presents itself as a unifying moral and philosophical framework designed to guide humanity through “meta-crisis,” claiming to recover “universal first principles” from spiritual traditions (especially the “perennial philosophy”) while promoting a vision of “planetary wholeness,” “dignity,” and “shared sensemaking.” It repeatedly uses terms like “sacred,” “sovereignty,” “truth,” “beauty,” and “goodness” to create the illusion of continuity with traditional metaphysical and moral realism. This is the doctrine of Game B - so remember who is cheerleading that initiative to “Phoenix The Republic” among many other goals.
‘First Principles and First Values of Evolving Perennialism’ (May 2023, Office for the Future)
The document presents itself as a unifying moral and philosophical framework designed to guide humanity through “meta-crisis,” claiming to recover “universal first principles” from spiritual traditions (especially the “perennial philosophy”) while promoting a vision of “planetary wholeness,” “dignity,” and “shared sensemaking.” It repeatedly uses terms like “sacred,” “sovereignty,” “truth,” “beauty,” and “goodness” to create the illusion of continuity with traditional metaphysical and moral realism. This is the doctrine of Game B - so remember who is cheerleading that initiative to “Phoenix The Republic” among many other goals.
2/ Operational Function
Beneath the sacred-sounding language, the document is a technocratic blueprint for embedding a totalitarian panentheistic monism into global governance. It does not defend Natural Law, Popular Sovereignty, or the inalienable rights of persons as metaphysically real. Instead it enables and facilitates Ontological Reversal:
It replaces being with becoming (process metaphysics)
Nature with emergence (constructivism)
Virtue with integration (systems compliance)
These shifts operationalize gnostic and neoplatonic metaphysics disguised as moral universalism.
🐍Synthetic “Spiritual” Grammar:
The “First Principles” are not grounded in ontology but in functional coherence within global systems; a coded moral-operational grammar fit for AI, behavioural algorithms and socio-technical modeling.
🐍Prisca Theologia Weaponized:
The “ancient wisdom” cited (Hermes Trismegistus, Plotinus, Teilhard de Chardin, etc.) is deployed not as spiritual formation but as epistemic architecture to justify planetary-scale soft-totalitarian convergence; governed by predictive behavioural models, not conscience or moral agency.
☠️Universal Moral Operating System:
The framework is designed to supersede all constitutions, religions, and legal traditions by embedding algorithmic authority beneath the appearance of pluralistic agreement. It is morally neutralized, consensus-driven and behaviorally enforced.
☠️Technocratic Containment of Dissent:
Language of “wholeness,” “transcendence,” “universal dignity,” and “meta-integration” is used to diffuse opposition and suppress political sovereignty by subsuming it into the rhetoric of “planetary consciousness evolution”.
Beneath the sacred-sounding language, the document is a technocratic blueprint for embedding a totalitarian panentheistic monism into global governance. It does not defend Natural Law, Popular Sovereignty, or the inalienable rights of persons as metaphysically real. Instead it enables and facilitates Ontological Reversal:
It replaces being with becoming (process metaphysics)
Nature with emergence (constructivism)
Virtue with integration (systems compliance)
These shifts operationalize gnostic and neoplatonic metaphysics disguised as moral universalism.
🐍Synthetic “Spiritual” Grammar:
The “First Principles” are not grounded in ontology but in functional coherence within global systems; a coded moral-operational grammar fit for AI, behavioural algorithms and socio-technical modeling.
🐍Prisca Theologia Weaponized:
The “ancient wisdom” cited (Hermes Trismegistus, Plotinus, Teilhard de Chardin, etc.) is deployed not as spiritual formation but as epistemic architecture to justify planetary-scale soft-totalitarian convergence; governed by predictive behavioural models, not conscience or moral agency.
☠️Universal Moral Operating System:
The framework is designed to supersede all constitutions, religions, and legal traditions by embedding algorithmic authority beneath the appearance of pluralistic agreement. It is morally neutralized, consensus-driven and behaviorally enforced.
☠️Technocratic Containment of Dissent:
Language of “wholeness,” “transcendence,” “universal dignity,” and “meta-integration” is used to diffuse opposition and suppress political sovereignty by subsuming it into the rhetoric of “planetary consciousness evolution”.
3/ Primary Purpose:
To install a metaphysically inverted, AI-compatible moral grammar; derived from ancient emanationism and gnostic perennialism, as the core operating system of a post-constitutional, post-sovereign, technocratic world order. Its function is compliance through spiritualized consent, not liberty. It is however, marketed as “Freedom”. This instrumentalization of hermetic principles and alchemical processes is not a ‘return to wisdom’. It is a sophisticated ontological coup, hiding in sacred robes and guru charisma, rewiring man’s interior orientation so that he demands his own behavioural programming. It reanimates the prisca theologia not for reverence, but for predictive success in managing man as system of impulses - inputs and outputs, not a person with moral agency. It is Luciferian gnosis for the age of algorithms.
To install a metaphysically inverted, AI-compatible moral grammar; derived from ancient emanationism and gnostic perennialism, as the core operating system of a post-constitutional, post-sovereign, technocratic world order. Its function is compliance through spiritualized consent, not liberty. It is however, marketed as “Freedom”. This instrumentalization of hermetic principles and alchemical processes is not a ‘return to wisdom’. It is a sophisticated ontological coup, hiding in sacred robes and guru charisma, rewiring man’s interior orientation so that he demands his own behavioural programming. It reanimates the prisca theologia not for reverence, but for predictive success in managing man as system of impulses - inputs and outputs, not a person with moral agency. It is Luciferian gnosis for the age of algorithms.
4/ ‘First Principles and First Values of Evolving Perennialism’
(Office for the Future, 2023)
(Office for the Future, 2023)
5/ Monistic, Emanationist and Neoplatonic Foundations
The document openly declares a 🐍monistic metaphysical vision:
“The one is manifest as the many and the many are expressions of the one.”
“This worldview can be called non-dual, integral, holistic, cosmotheandric, evolutionary and participatory…”
“Panentheism is an accurate name for the metaphysical picture being offered.”
This aligns explicitly with Neoplatonic, Rosicrucian and Theosophical metaphysics; not with classical Realism. The use of “participatory” and “cosmotheandric” language under neoplatonic emanationism marks a rejection of distinction between Creator and creation, erasing metaphysical hierarchy and replacing it with emanationist continuity.
☠️Club of Rome Endorsement and Operational Network☠️
‘First Principles & First Values’ proudly admits institutional affiliation:
“This document was composed with support from the Office for the Future… launched under the auspices of The Club of Rome…”
This places the entire operation squarely within the technocratic global policy infrastructure:
Club of Rome
Tavistock-aligned think tanks
UN/SDGs
Evolving Perennialism spiritual-epistemic compliance schema
The document openly declares a 🐍monistic metaphysical vision:
“The one is manifest as the many and the many are expressions of the one.”
“This worldview can be called non-dual, integral, holistic, cosmotheandric, evolutionary and participatory…”
“Panentheism is an accurate name for the metaphysical picture being offered.”
This aligns explicitly with Neoplatonic, Rosicrucian and Theosophical metaphysics; not with classical Realism. The use of “participatory” and “cosmotheandric” language under neoplatonic emanationism marks a rejection of distinction between Creator and creation, erasing metaphysical hierarchy and replacing it with emanationist continuity.
☠️Club of Rome Endorsement and Operational Network☠️
‘First Principles & First Values’ proudly admits institutional affiliation:
“This document was composed with support from the Office for the Future… launched under the auspices of The Club of Rome…”
This places the entire operation squarely within the technocratic global policy infrastructure:
Club of Rome
Tavistock-aligned think tanks
UN/SDGs
Evolving Perennialism spiritual-epistemic compliance schema
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
