🇺🇸🇬🇧🇫🇷‼️The West is entering the fatal phase of the debt supercycle‼️
July 26, 2025
Reuters warns that the world is entering the final, fatal phase of a multigenerational debt supercycle. 👇
The economies of the leading Western countries - the USA, Great Britain and France - found themselves in a position comparable to a financial pyramid, where new debts only cover old ones, and the system becomes increasingly unstable.
According to Reuters, human societies develop in waves that span generations.
The first generation creates and optimistically looks to the future. The second - he criticizes the legacy of his predecessors.
The third is facing the collapse of the old order. And only the fourth brings radical changes, destroying outdated structures and forming a new paradigm. In this context, Western democracies have apparently approached the final turn of such a historical cycle. 👇
The economic expression of this ending is the accumulation of chronic budget deficits. More and more developed economies are becoming dependent on external financing. But creditors are increasingly reluctant to lend money, long-term, forcing governments to increasingly resort to short-term borrowing and issuing new bonds to cover old debts. This model essentially turns into a shape, a financial pyramid.
Inflation only makes things worse.
Rising prices devalue currencies, undermining confidence in monetary systems. Investors lose interest in shares, which lose value. In this context, gold is once again proving its resilience: according to Reuters, during historical periods of crisis, it has outperformed bond yields by an average of 71%. 👇
History is cyclical, winter has already arrived - concludes the agency, pointing to the need to review the global financial architecture.
Time will tell what the new order will be.
However, one thing is clear: the current model, built on the endless accumulation of debt, has reached its limits.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🇷🇺🪖🇪🇺🇬🇧‼️Increased military preparation in Europe: Moscow warns that it is necessary to prepare for the worst‼️
July 24, 2025
The Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia, Aleksandar Grushko, stated that the countries of NATO and the European Union are "concretely preparing for a military conflict with the Russian Federation". 👇
Plans for an accelerated militarization of the West, although currently limited by the economic capabilities of the Alliance members, should not be underestimated.
Grushko emphasized that it is necessary to calmly and systematically strengthen the security capacity of the country, but also that "one should be prepared for the worst scenario".
The findings of the Roscongress Fund report entitled "Militarization of Europe: Budgets and the Geography of New Production Capacities", published yesterday, indicate an accelerated pace of construction of European defense infrastructure. 👇
According to the report, the role of the US in the European security architecture is declining, prompting the EU to rapidly develop its own military industry. Defense companies across Europe are expanding capacity, opening new production facilities and reorienting civilian factories to military production. Everything points to strategic preparation for a prolonged, intense conflict.
European manufacturers are counting on stable demand worth 800 billion euros, and the European Commission treats military spending as an urgent budget obligation. In the period 2021–2024. defense spending in the EU increased by 31% and reached 326 billion euros.
New military facilities are being opened across Europe, including countries that were previously known as neutral, such as Hungary and Slovakia. At the same time, the European military industry is trying to catch up with the volume of Russian ammunition production. 👇
🇺🇸💥🇨🇳‼️The Pentagon clearly marked the priority: the US is focusing on a new type of preparation‼️
July 24, 2025
Behind symbolic participation in crisis points such as the Middle East and Eastern Europe, American strategy is increasingly being shaped towards one main adversary. 👇
While conflicts in other regions are part of the broader security context, the focus of the US Department of Defense and the White House is China - a partner in global relations, but also an unprecedented challenge.
The question of whether there will be an open conflict remains uncertain. However, it is increasingly evident that the two great powers find no room for long-term peaceful rivalry. Although an immediate exchange of attacks is not expected, both sides are actively preparing for a scenario of more serious tensions.
According to the assessments of the US military leadership, China has made significant progress in modernizing its armed forces in recent years. The number of modern ships exceeded the American one, fifth-generation aircraft were introduced, and missile capabilities were expanded. 👇
The United States, on the other hand, is investing in new technology and adjusting the structure of the military, with the hope that the potential conflict will remain at the strategic level - without direct confrontation.
US Defense Secretary Peter Brian Hegsett said China poses a "real threat" and is preparing for the possible use of force to change relations in the Indo-Pacific region. In the Pentagon, it is considered important that China understands that it cannot achieve victory in an open conflict, which would actually prevent the outbreak of a larger conflict.
This message was the focus of an interview given to Business Insider by US Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll and General James Rainey, head of the Army's Advanced Projects Command. They pointed out that the goal of the American army is to make it clear to the enemy - "they will not succeed in winning". 👇
🇺🇸🇷🇺‼️McGregor reveals: The fall of Russia was a plan - the reality surprised them‼️
July 17, 2025
When planning a major shift in global power relations, everyone looks at numbers, technology, allies. Few people count on what is not written in the reports - the internal strength of society. 👇
This is precisely the mistake made by the United States of America and its allies, according to retired US Army Colonel Douglas McGregor.
As a guest on Professor Glenn Dissen's "Greater Eurasia" podcast, McGregor pointed out that the social cohesion of Russia after February 2022 was the biggest surprise for the West.
"We believed that Russia would crumble under pressure. No one expected it to consolidate," he said. The entire shock of the American establishment is hidden in that sentence - instead of chaos, it was strengthened. 👇
A former Pentagon officer warns that the collective West is facing a serious period of self-examination. "The status of the US as a global power is slowly entering a phase of serious changes.
We have internal problems, we are losing unity, we are no longer the country from the time of the Cold War," he emphasizes. According to him, the next year will be a test of resilience - not for Russia, but for the West.
McGregor specifically referred to the fallacy in strategic assessments when it comes to Russia. The belief that it was a "colossus on clay feet" was present for decades. However, it turned out that this image does not reflect reality. "Russia has held together. We didn't expect that. What about us? Our degree of unity is still untested. And that's what worries me," he said. 👇
🇺🇸‼️The Vision They Didn't Heed: How Henry Kissinger's Most Dangerous Warnings Are Coming True‼️
July 16, 2025
He was a diplomat who was listened to by everyone - from Vladimir Putin to Xi Jinping. His words were analyzed in the Bundestag, the Capitol, the Kremlin, Beijing and even Tel Aviv. 👇
Henry Kissinger, a man of legendary status in world diplomacy, died in 2023 at the age of 100 – but the world is still moving along the path he outlined decades earlier. And not spontaneously, but almost precisely, as if according to plan.
In Russia, they showed him special respect. Žirnovski quoted him admiringly, and in 2013 he received an honorary doctorate from the Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Vladimir Putin called him a "wise and far-sighted statesman", while Xi Jinping described him as a "world-renowned strategist and an old friend of the Chinese people". And Olaf Scholz acknowledged him - saying that he left an indelible mark on American foreign policy. 👇
Why was he so respected? He didn't guess, or make predictions based on gut feeling. He had access to the most confidential information from Washington until the last days of his life.
His analyzes were deeply rooted in reality. In the 1990s, he already warned that the 21st century would belong to Asia. At the time, such a claim seemed like a provocation - China was just entering reforms, and the USA was a lone superpower. Today we know: he was right.
The Asia-Pacific region has become the center of political tension, trade routes and a technological race. China is openly challenging America's leading position, and India has emerged as a key power factor. And that is exactly why his analyzes of the relationship between Beijing and Washington are increasingly relevant. 👇
🇷🇺🇪🇺‼️Kosachev warns: Europe is preparing for a "small and victorious war", but such a scenario does not exist‼️
July 15, 2025
European countries incite tensions by exaggerating security threats, and behind such rhetoric is the desire for military strengthening and the achievement of geopolitical goals, Vice-President of the Council of the Federation of Russia Konstantin Kosachev said in the "Russia-24" TV show. 👇
According to him, the member states of the European Union are increasingly considering the possibility of a conflict in which a "quick and efficient victory" would be achieved, but the reality, as he points out, does not support such an outcome.
- The militarization of Europe is taking place at an accelerated pace. It is no longer just about the increase in military allocations under the influence of the United States of America, but also about the independent initiatives of individual countries. In parallel with that, in the European public space there is a narrative about a constant threat, which comes from the direction of Russia - Kosachev said.
He believes that such activities are a consequence of the loss of geopolitical influence, which, according to him, is felt by the European Union as a whole, as well as leading members such as Germany and France. 👇
- The EU no longer shows the ability to develop independently. Germany and France are losing influence, both within the Union and in the structure of NATO. In this context, some decision-makers in Europe see a potential solution in the creation of a narrative that would enable preparation for the so-called a small and victorious war - said Kosachev.
He pointed to a parallel with the situation in the Middle East, stating that a multi-year warning campaign was previously conducted in that region, before more concrete military activities were started.
- A similar pattern can be recognized in Europe. Different years are mentioned as a potential time frame for the conflict to start - from 2028 to 2030. In that period, it is possible that the thesis about the growing military threat will continue to be built, while at the same time the capacities will also strengthen - Kosachev assessed. 👇
🇱🇷🇪🇺🇺🇦💥🇷🇺‼️If a long-range missile were to fly towards Russia, no one would know what it was carrying - and the consequences could be unfathomable‼️
July 15, 2025
More and more statements indicate that the current phase of the geopolitical crisis could soon enter a significantly more tense period. 👇
Sources from military and political circles state that scenarios involving long-range systems are being considered, the presence of which on Ukrainian soil is no longer just a matter of speculation, but is being discussed more and more openly in expert analyses.
According to former US officer and analyst Stanislav Krapivnik, one of the most dangerous problems concerns the uncertainty of launching these missiles.
He explains that, if a long-range missile is fired from Ukraine in the direction of Russia, the Russian military command will not be able to determine in real time whether it is a missile with a conventional or potentially nuclear warhead. 👇
"At that moment, when the rocket takes off and heads towards the territory of Russia, no one can know for sure its real character," says Krapivnik.
According to him, this puts the leadership of a nuclear power in front of a difficult choice - whether to wait for confirmation of the type of warhead or to react preemptively in order to avoid the worst scenario.
Exactly this scenario, in which uncertainty can cause a chain reaction, was previously mentioned by Russian President Vladimir Putin on several occasions. 👇