History’s most effective weapon never killed anyone…
Yet it toppled empires, crushed civilizations, and is destroying us right now.
The French revolutionaries discovered it.
The Soviets perfected it.
And for the past decade, we’ve been drowning in it... 🧵
“Demoralization” is the weapon of choice for revolutionaries.
Their ambition?
Break the will of the mighty without direct conflict (spiritual warfare).
Their method?
Make the strong doubt their own strength (disillusionment).
The result?
The undefeatable become self-defeated.
What essential power do they seek to extinguish?
Moralis (Latin): relating to character, conduct, custom, and mores.
Why?
Because mores are your guiding star to excellence.
It anchors your sense of honor, focuses your purpose, and grounds your judgment.
Without it, you're a ship without a compass, your willpower becomes aimless, scattered to the winds.
Demoralization is designed to strip the heroic of their moral compass — An assault against the spirit of man that ungrounds him from his self-understanding and higher purpose.
What’s the forgotten truth about achieving excellence?
History reveals a simple but unrealized truth:
It’s not just about how skilled you are.
Technical mastery alone creates a craftsman.
But mores + skill creates legendary excellence.
Why?
Because mores are the essential ingredient that guides the pursuit of perfection.
Excellence flows from an inner flame, not just from the desire to perfect technique alone.
That’s why history’s greatest leaders had sacred rituals to protect their psychological edge.
They knew demoralization was more dangerous than any enemy.
What are the signs of mass demoralization today?
• Elite educational institutions crumbling at their core purpose
• Professional standards falling from “excellence” to “good enough for your lifestyle”
• Leaders choosing popular decisions over righteous ones
• The exceptional becoming “problematic”, the mediocre becoming the norm
• Necessary competence disappearing from high-stakes leadership roles
What was Napoleon’s secret weapon?
He carried Plutarch’s works even on his campaigns in Egypt.
Plutarch was a his moral compass, a constant reminder of excellence.
His contemporaries said “he lived out of Plutarch’s pages.”
Pasquale Paoli remarked, “There is nothing modern in you; you are entirely out of Plutarch.”
Napoleon didn’t read for tactics, he read Plutarch to absorb the spirit of greatness.
But modern education does the opposite of what the greats (like Napoleon) did:
It inverts the classical education model, confusing the morale of the youth through demoralization:
• “Be critical,” but never inspired
• Question heroes, but never emulate them
• Dismiss greatness as an unjust privilege
• Treat excellence with suspicion, distrust, and identity politics
The devastating result:
• A generation trained to doubt
• Heroes viewed with skepticism
• Excellence seen as “over the top”
• Greatness treated as suspicious
The solution is ancient:
• Study greatness unapologetically
• Let yourself be inspired
• Emulate the principles of excellence from the past
• Rebuild your spirit with inspiration
Remember:
• A demoralized society can’t compete
• A cynical culture can’t create
• A suspicious mind can’t soar
• A doubting spirit can’t achieve
If you like this tweet, I curate this exclusive newsletter on the lessons of glory and power:
• Discover Plutarch's forgotten insights on leadership
• Access exclusive transcripts with maps and images
Cato never wore a crown, yet corrupt Roman officials TREMBLED at his name.
Rome’s most unyielding senator revealed a paradox of power that’s been hiding in plain sight for 2,000 years... 🧵
1. Make disagreeable choices with conviction
While Roman senators wore purple-trimmed togas to flaunt status, Cato entered the Senate with simplicity, dressed in a plain tunic.
When Caesar offered him a lucrative provincial post to get him out of Rome, he refused.
Cato did not budge, his statements held true integrity.
Even his enemies had to admit it: Cato could not be bought.
When both Caesar and Pompey tried to draw him into political alliance through family marriage offers, he rejected them. Every refusal amplified his independence.
2. Stand firm in the face of mockery
The Roman elite mocked Cato for his simple lifestyle and stubborn principles.
Plutarch records that Cato never responded, he simply kept living the same way. This unnerved his rivals.
Caesar even wrote a pamphlet titled "Anti-Cato", an entire essay meant to discredit him. That’s how much his integrity stung.
In 54 BC, Caesar faced impossible odds in Britain.
His response revealed 3 principles that can separate a world historical conqueror from a forgotten also-ran... 🧵
1: Adaptability wins. Be the Fox.
Caesar's legions were struggling against British charioteers who were riding up and down the field around like Indo-European warlords. (They used effective hit-and-run tactics). So, Caesar didn't stick to Roman doctrine. Instead, he innovated.
His heavy infantry was outmaneuvered, so he adapted his cavalry tactics:
He ordered them to fight in loose formation, to maintain gaps between riders, thereby dispersing the momentum of the chariots in useless pass-throughs. It's kind of wu-wei.
Then, his enemies refused open battle.
He changed his strategy:
- Burned villages in "King" Cassivellaunus's territory.
- Destroyed British grain fields that were ready for harvest.
They eventually came out to fight, and exposed themselves to defeats on the battlefield.
Great leaders evolve fast (and Caesar was faster than most)
2: Information Gluttony
Before landing, Caesar meticulously gathered intelligence about Britain's geography, tribes, and politics.
But then, he kept gathering intel after arriving. He discovered, for instance, that the Britons practiced family wife swapping, a fact which your average grug might consider just weird and useless, but you never know when that kind of information might come in handy. Caesar loved the details.
He loved studying their technology too: besides the chariots, he was particularly struck by a special kind of light raft the Britons used to navigate rivers. This technology proved decisive later in the Civil War, when a historic flood crippled supply lines during the Battle of Ilerda.
Caesar also learned about the family feuds of the various tribes in the coalition opposing him. It wasn't gossip, it was crucial intel.
When British tribes united under Cassivellaunus, Caesar knew their weaknesses and internal rivalries. This knowledge proved decisive: