Ethnic Cleansing in Karelia, USSR: Finland’s Dirty Secret of WWII
Finland was far from a victim, they were in bed with the Nazis, engaging in the same practices.
From 1941 to 1944, the Finnish army occupied Eastern Karelia (USSR), where it established a regime of terror targeting the Soviet population of the region. Not soldiers but civilians.
On October 24, 1941, the first Finnish concentration camp for Soviet civilians of Slavic origin, including women and children, was established in Petrozavodsk. The goal was ethnic cleansing: the elimination of the Russian population in the Finnish-occupied region of Karelia.
🧵👇
By the end of 1941, over 13,000 civilians were imprisoned. By mid-1942, the number rose to nearly 22,000. In total, around 30,000 people passed through 13 camps. Roughly one-third died, from starvation, disease, and forced labor. These figures do not include POW camps, where conditions were equally deadly. Since most men were drafted in the early days of the war, the majority of the labor force in the camps consisted of women and children.
In April 1942, Finnish politician Väinö Voionmaa wrote home:
“Out of 20,000 Russian civilians in Äänislinna, 19,000 are in camps. Their food? Rotten horse meat. Children scavenge garbage for scraps. What would the Red Cross say if they saw this?”
In 1942, the death rate in Finnish camps exceeded that of German ones. Testimonies describe corpses being hauled daily, teenagers forced into labor, and women and children made to work 10+ hour shifts in forests and camps, unpaid until 1943.
Camp No. 2, unofficially known as the “death camp,” was notorious for its brutality. It held “disloyal” civilians, and its commandant, Finnish officer Solovaara, became infamous for public beatings and killings. In May 1942, he staged a mass beating of prisoners simply for begging. Those who resisted forced labor, often in brutal logging camps, were beaten to death in front of others “as a lesson.”
According to the Soviet Extraordinary State Commission, Finnish forces conducted medical experiments on prisoners and branded them with hot iron unlike the Nazis, who tattooed. Finland also engaged in slave trading, selling abducted Soviet civilians for agricultural labor.
An estimated 14,000 civilians died in Karelia between 1941 and 1944, excluding POWs. But many of the dead labeled as “prisoners of war” were actually civilians: most rural Soviets lacked passports, and anyone of conscription age was assumed to be a soldier.
In 2021, the FSB declassified the names of 54 Finns responsible for the genocide of the Soviet population.
During WWII, Finland actively participated in the Siege of Leningrad by coordinating with Nazi Germany and blocking the city from the north. By cutting off supply routes and surrounding the city from their side, the Finnish army helped maintain the deadly encirclement. As a result, over 1.5 million people died, 97% from starvation, including more than 400,000 children. Finland’s role in the siege is often downplayed, yet their strategic cooperation was essential to sustaining the blockade and its catastrophic human toll.
Such absolute, bloodthirsty hatred toward the civilian population, which led to crimes against humanity, cannot be justified by anything. Yet today, we hear no remorse. Instead, we hear more hatred, border closures, NATO membership, and so on. It’s a disease.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of Russia’s most legendary landmarks is Saint Basil’s Cathedral. I’ve seen it countless times, yet as I grow older, its architecture amazes me more and more. It looks strikingly futuristic, even by today’s standards and it was built all the way back in the 16th century. The cathedral is truly one of a kind. Its architecture is filled with sacred symbolism.
A Symbol of the Heavenly Jerusalem
Saint Basil’s Cathedral was originally conceived as a symbol of the Heavenly Jerusalem - the paradise city, an earthly image of the Kingdom of God. The idea came from Metropolitan Macarius, and the architects sought to embody it in the cathedral’s design and decoration.
This is precisely why the cathedral appears so unusual. Its composition with nine chapels blooming around the central one like the petals of a flower was meant to evoke the image of the Garden of Paradise. In the ornamentation and frescoes, one finds grapevines, fantastical flowers, leaves, curls, and patterns that do not exist in nature.
These are not mere decorations, but a visual expression of spiritual meaning and heavenly imagery: the paradise.
The Eight-Pointed Star
When viewed from above, the eight smaller chapels of the cathedral form an eight-pointed star - one of the oldest Christian symbols, and a symbol of the Virgin Mary. This design was no accident, as the cathedral is dedicated to the Intercession of the Most Holy Theotokos.
It’s incredible, but this 60-meter-tall building standing on a hill has no foundation. The entire massive structure rests on a solid stone substructure - a raised basement level. It served for a long time as a storage place for the tsar’s treasury. The entrance had been sealed off and was only rediscovered in the 1930s during restoration work.
Two Wests: An Internal Power Struggle Over the Future
When people talk about “the West” as one big united political and cultural force, that’s really oversimplified. In reality, there’s been a growing civil war inside the West itself which is a fight among the elites over who gets to shape the future. It’s a clash between two completely different ways of seeing the world.
That bring us to the question: what is the essence of today’s geopolitical conflict?
Russia has traditionally been viewed as an “anti-system” force in relation to the West. This is precisely why the West has consistently sought to dismantle Russia whether it was the Tsarist Empire, the Soviet Union, or the Russian Federation. That is what also unites the "Two Wests" today.
However, as an internal conflict between globalists and nationalists is unfolding, its divide is spreading to other countries as well. Ukraine being a prime example.
On one side, we have the globalists. This includes the Vatican, the European Union (with France and Germany at the forefront), the U.S. Democratic Party, financial networks like George Soros’s Open Society, and major tech giants like Google, Meta, and Microsoft. Backing them are media outlets like CNN, The New York Times, and the BBC – all pushing the narrative of “universal values”, pro–immigration laws, pro–lgbtq laws.
This coalition wants to erase national borders and, just as importantly, national identity itself whether it’s Italian, French, German, or anything else. The goal is to replace deep-rooted cultural, religious, and historical identities with a standardized global model. Gender, tradition, faith, language – everything gets blurred. In place of countries and churches, they push for rule by transnational institutions like
🔷the UN
🔷WHO
🔷WTO
🔷IMF
Ideologies / Philosophies:
🔷 Postmodernism – rejection of absolute truths, deconstruction of traditions, moral relativism
🔷 Transhumanism – the belief in “enhancing” humans through technology, AI, and bioengineering
🔷 Neoliberalism – prioritizing global markets and multinational corporations over nation-states
🔷 Cultural Marxism / Woke ideology – fighting perceived “privilege” and dismantling traditional social roles
🔷 Climate radicalism – using environmental policy as a tool for centralized global control
🔷 Theology of “universal brotherhood” (Fratelli Tutti) – merging religious identities into a unified humanist framework
🔷 Universalism – promoting the idea of a “citizen of the world” over national identity
On the other side is the national-conservative camp. At its core are
🔷The U.S. Republican Party, especially the pro-Trump wing.
🔷Evangelical Protestants
🔷Right-leaning intellectuals and independent journalists
🔷Business groups that reject ESG agendas and digital surveillance.
🔷Israel’s right-wing bloc (Netanyahu, religious Zionists), which, while operating within the global system, sees national sovereignty and a unique religious mission as the key to survival.
🔷Zionists
Their aligned media and platforms include Fox News, Breitbart, and X/Twitter under Elon Musk. Institutions and think tanks often associated with this camp include the Heritage Foundation, Turning Point USA, PragerU, and various evangelical networks like The Family Research Council and Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN).
Ideologies / Philosophies:
🔷 Traditionalism – preserving religious, cultural, and moral values rooted in historical continuity and identity
🔷 Sovereigntism – prioritizing national self-rule over supranational governance (UN, WHO, EU)
🔷 Zionism
🔷 Biblical Nationalism – common among U.S. Evangelicals, links national identity to divine prophecy. In this view, the modern State of Israel is seen as a fulfillment of Biblical promises. The return of Jews to their land is believed to be part of God's plan.
🔷 Economic Patriotism
🔷 Family-Centered Ethics – emphasis on the nuclear family, biological sex, and parental rights
🔷 Civilizational Identity – belief in the uniqueness, resilience, and spiritual role of one’s own nation or civilization (e.g., American exceptionalism, Israel as the Jewish homeland, Christian Europe)
“Russia bad” is a cool slogan until you compare real life.
Here’s what they don’t want you to see about childbirth, medicine, education, and raising a family.
🇷🇺 vs 🇺🇸 let’s go.🧵👇
🏥 Healthcare:
🇷🇺 Free under compulsory insurance. Even major surgery or cancer = $0.
🇺🇸 $200+ per doctor visit if uninsured. Hospital stay? $20,000+.
Monthly insurance: $500–$1,200.
The “freedom” to choose bankruptcy.
👶 Childbirth:
🇷🇺 $0 includes ultrasounds, lab tests, meds, even C-section.
🇺🇸 $18,865 on average (and that’s with insurance).
Welcome to the land of freedom… to go into medical debt.
Let’s drop the fairy tales. Yeltsin was not being “misled,” “naïve,” or “hoping for democracy.” Yeltsin’s submission to the West was a calculated move rooted in geopolitical capitulation, personal power preservation, and elite betrayal.
🧵👇
Yeltsin actively collaborated in dismantling Russia
After the collapse of the USSR, the key question was: What happens to Russia now? The West wanted to eliminate Russia as a global power. Not just militarily, but civilizationally.
And Yeltsin agreed.
🔸He destroyed Russian influence in the former Soviet space.
🔸Abandoned long-time allies (Iraq, Serbia, Cuba, Vietnam).
🔸Broke up strategic economic and military networks.
🔸Let Western interests control Russian exports, from oil to rare metals.
This was a deliberate role in reducing Russia to a peripheral “resource colony.”
The 1990s elite was a colonial administration
Yeltsin’s circle wasn’t made of statesmen who were:
🔸radical liberals (Chubais, Gaidar),
🔸asset-stripping oligarchs,
🔸Western-linked technocrats.
Their goal was to break the country apart, extract wealth, and integrate themselves into the Western elite as managers.
Yeltsin was not “Russia’s leader” but a transition figure, tolerated and supported because he dismantled the state without resistance.
He traded the country’s sovereignty to stay in power
By 1996, Yeltsin was:
🔸polling below 10%;
🔸facing mass protests;
🔸presiding over economic collapse and war in Chechnya;
🔸hated by the military, pensioners, and workers alike.
Without Western money, political tech, media, and diplomatic backing, he would’ve been finished.
In return for reelection help, he sold off what remained:
🔸NATO expansion (despite promises),
🔸IMF domination of Russian fiscal policy,
🔸American advisors embedded in ministries,
🔸strategic industries handed to Western-aligned oligarchs.
The Brutal Execution of the Romanov Family
To this day, people in Russia mourn this event, not only because of the family’s tragic fate, but because of the sheer cruelty involved.
Although Tsar Nicholas II had already abdicated the throne, that was not enough for the revolutionaries. In 1918, a decision was made to eliminate the entire Romanov family.
The murder took place in a specially prepared basement room in the Ipatiev House. The windows were sealed to muffle the sound of gunfire. Furniture was arranged under the pretense that the family was being photographed or relocated. In reality, the room had been turned into a killing chamber. They were summoned downstairs, unaware of what was about to happen.
Led into the room for slaughter were not only the entire family, but also their loyal doctor, maid, valet, and cook.
Bullets weren’t enough to kill them. So they used bayonets and blunt force. On children.
The children didn’t die right away. They had jewelry sewn into their clothes and corsets, which stopped the bullets.
The youngest son, Alexei, was still alive after the shooting. According to modern forensic experts, he was shot, stabbed with bayonets, and slowly dying until someone crushed his skull with a heavy object. While he was still alive.
On the wall of the room, in red letters, a quote in German had been written:
“Belsatzar ward in derselben Nacht von seinen Knechten erschlagen.”
Which translates to: “Belshazzar was slain that same night by his servants.”
The floor was soaked in blood. After the initial volley of gunfire, the executioners had to finish off the survivors with bayonets and rifle butts, causing even more bleeding.
The bodies lay crumpled together in the room, blood pooling and seeping through the floorboards.
Many researchers believe the execution had ritualistic overtones.
From Yurovsky’s Report (commander of the execution squad):
“Alexei was sitting in the same position, not showing signs of life, but when we approached him, he was still alive… we had to finish him off separately.”
“The girls screamed. We had to finish them with rifle butts and bayonets.”
Who gave the order?
The official Soviet version claimed that Lenin had no involvement. But there is a growing body of indirect but compelling evidence to the contrary.urovsky’s own memoir (1920), he states that the order came from the center:
“I received instructions from the regional Soviet that a decision had been made in Moscow by the Central Executive Committee.”
How Russia Was Winning the War, but Lost to Revolution: Understanding This Is Key to Today’s Geopolitics
🧵👇
When it comes to World War I, most people barely remember anything and what they do remember is usually straight out of old Soviet propaganda: that it was just some “imperialist bloodbath” and Russia got “senselessly dragged into it.” In reality, the war has been almost wiped from public memory. But the truth is Russia actually held its own. It showed serious military strength, strategic toughness, and massive sacrifice only matched later by World War II.
And no, Russia wasn’t defeated on the battlefield. It was taken down from the inside by revolution and chaos.
A War Russia Didn’t Want
World War I didn’t really begin because of Archduke Franz Ferdinand’s assassination, that was just an excuse. The real cause was a power struggle between global systems. Britain and the U.S. were building a world order based on finance, colonies, and control of trade routes. Germany, rising fast, had its own model: industrial, centralized, and ready to challenge British dominance.
Caught between them was Russia: massive, independent, and rich in resources. Its government wasn’t controlled by banks, and it followed its own imperial logic. That made it a problem for both sides.
But Russia didn’t want war. Tsar Nicholas II had proposed an international peace forum years earlier (a prototype of the League of Nations), and in July 1914 he tried to stop Austria’s aggression against Serbia through diplomacy. But Germany didn’t want diplomacy, it needed a quick war, before Russia became too strong to defeat.
When Serbia was threatened, Russia stepped in to defend a fellow Slavic, Orthodox nation. At the time, Russia stood as the defender of the Orthodox faith, and this was widely recognized and understood.
In the end, Germany declared war on Russia, not the other way around.
Russia: The Backbone of the Entente
People forget, but without Russia, the Entente would’ve collapsed early in WW I. While Britain and France were still mobilizing its people, Russia was already out there fighting and not just one enemy, but three empires at once: Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire.
The Russian front stretched nearly 2,000 kilometers which is way longer than the Western Front. Russian soldiers were battling on land from the Baltic Sea to the Caucasus Mountains. And unlike in the West, where the Germans were split, in the East they sent their elite forces,the best they had. By 1917, more German divisions were fighting Russia than France.
Russia stepped up when it mattered most. In August 1914, it launched an attack on East Prussia, forcing Germany to pull troops from the West which helped save Paris. Then Russia hit Austria-Hungary hard in Galicia, taking Lviv. Later, it stopped German pushes toward Warsaw and Lodz.
Even during setbacks in 1915, Russia still kept the front alive and helped save Serbia and Romania. And in 1916, in the Caucasus, Russia crushed Ottoman forces and took key cities like Erzurum and Trabzon.
Then came the Brusilov Offensive - one of the most successful attacks of the whole war. It shattered Austro-Hungarian lines and nearly knocked them out of the war.