Inside Corbyn’s Record on Antisemitism: Decades of Denial and Division 🧵
Jeremy Corbyn’s career is a decades-long saga of controversy, during which he has been regularly accused of abhorrent antisemitism. He, of course, denies these allegations.
Here is a look at his career as a politician and what has led to the development of these opinions. 🧵:
1. Corbyn began his political journey in the 1970s as a socialist firebrand in London’s Labour scene.
He was elected to Haringey Council in 1974, and quickly immersed himself in activism, supporting groups like Anti-Fascist Action, the Anti-Apartheid Movement, and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.
However, his strong support for a united Ireland is what drew a lot of criticism, particularly due to his associations with the IRA.
2. In the 1980s, Corbyn had close ties with Sinn Féin, the political wing of the IRA.
He met their leader, Gerry Adams, several times, including at the Labour conferences in 1983 and 1989.
In 1984, just weeks after the IRA’s Brighton bombing that killed five people, he invited IRA members to visit Westminster.
The Sunday Times reported that he was linked to 72 events supporting the IRA.
Corbyn pictured with Gerry Adams:
3. Corbyn’s response was that he was working towards peace, meeting with Sinn Féin to help resolve the Troubles.
He supported the 1998 Good Friday Agreement.
However, his refusal to clearly and strongly condemn IRA violence, led to accusations that he sympathised with terrorists.
4. By the 1990s, Corbyn’s focus shifted to Middle East conflicts, particularly Palestine.
A long-time patron of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, he advocated for Palestinian rights but faced backlash for ties to Islamist terror groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, both proscribed by the UK for targeting civilians and advocating Israel’s destruction.
In 2009, Corbyn sparked outrage at a parliamentary event, calling Hamas and Hezbollah “friends”:
5. Corbyn expressed regret and said that using “inclusive language” was a mistake.
However, his 2013 trip to Gaza, partly funded by £2,800 from Interpal, a charity that was later investigated for links to Hamas, and his attendance at Al Quds Day rallies where antisemitic banners were displayed only raised more suspicion.
In 2015, he praised Iran’s “all-encompassing revolution,” even though the country is known for its anti-Israel rhetoric.
6. Antisemitism allegations followed Corbyn throughout his career.
In 2012, he defended a London mural called “Freedom for Humanity” by Mear One, which showed bankers with exaggerated antisemitic features.
7. On Facebook, he called its removal censorship, only apologising in 2018 after backlash, claiming he missed the imagery’s implications.
8. Other incidents kept adding up. In 2019, the Jewish Labour Movement gave a submission to the Equality and Human Rights Commission listing nine examples of Corbyn’s repeated ties to antisemitism.
These included defending a Holocaust denier back in 2010, praising a 1903 book that claimed Jews controlled global finance in 2011, and questioning why an activist was expelled over antisemitic comments in 2016.
9. During his time as Labour leader from 2015 to 2020, Corbyn faced a major antisemitism crisis within the party.
In 2020, the Equality and Human Rights Commission found Labour responsible for “unlawful” harassment and discrimination.
The report pointed to 23 cases where Corbyn’s office had interfered in how antisemitism complaints were handled.
This included reducing punishments for offenders and not properly training staff to deal with the issue.
10. After the EHRC report was released, Corbyn was suspended from the Labour Party in October 2020 for saying that antisemitism had been “dramatically overstated” by his political opponents.
Although he was briefly readmitted to the party, he lost the Labour whip in November 2020, which meant he could no longer stand as a Labour MP.
His refusal to fully accept the EHRC’s findings, and his insistence that outside forces had exaggerated the problem, ultimately sealed his fate.
11. In 2024, Corbyn ran as an independent in Islington North and defeated the official Labour candidate, cementing his break from the party.
Following his full expulsion for defying Labour leadership, he went on to form a new political party in 2025.
The party, formed alongside Zarah Sultana, is made up almost entirely of Muslim members. Given the ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza, this has further intensified scrutiny of Corbyn’s anti-Israel views and his allegedly antisemitic stance.
12. Labour’s poor showings in the 2017 and 2019 elections under Corbyn’s leadership were extremely damaging.
Many pointed to the antisemitism controversies as a key factor in the party’s decline during that period.
Now, with his new party reportedly made up almost entirely of Muslim members, it's not inaccurate to say that he’s moved further toward the political margins.
However, given the current state of UK politics, his new party is unlikely to gain any meaningful ground and will probably only serve to split the Labour vote.
The man once praised by his supporters as “the best prime minister Britain never had” will likely remain nothing more than a figment of leftist imagination, a fading relic of failed ambitions that never stood a chance.
I truly appreciate everyone who takes the time to read my threads. They take a lot of research and effort to put together. If you’d like to support, you can do so through the link below. Every bit of support means a lot, and I’m very grateful. Thank you!
The Lengths to Which the Far Left Will Go in Order to Distort or Entirely Dismiss Reality 🧵
It’s increasingly clear that many on the left hold such extreme views that they feel justified in lying to promote a version of reality that simply doesn’t exist.
You see it everywhere, from gender ideology to the Israel–Gaza conflict. Facts are far too inconvenient, so they gaslight anyone who dares to question their narrative.
Even worse, their actions are dangerous. By sympathising with perpetrators of horrific crimes in the name of virtue signalling, diversity, and avoiding the label of racism, they put innocent lives at risk.
It's completely delusional. In most cases, it borders on mental illness. Here are just a few examples 🧵:
1. A leftist activist who was less than honest about the identity of the men who sexually assaulted her. She later admitted that she lied because she didn’t want to fuel racial tensions. Never mind that her lies could have put the lives of other young women at risk and might have allowed the perpetrators to go unpunished.
2. This pathetic excuse for a human being who describes himself as a "feminist" and "anti-racist" cried because the man who raped him was going to be deported back to Somalia. And no, this is not a case of Stockholm syndrome. It goes beyond that and is tied to a broader, morally bankrupt ideology: the belief that rapists and degenerates like this deserve another chance at life, even if it means putting more innocent people at risk in a civilised society.
What They Don’t Tell You About Dubai – The “Porta Potty” Scandal 🧵
Most people see Dubai as a glamorous place filled with wealth, supercars, and skyscrapers like the Burj Khalifa.
However, behind all the hype and pretentious Instagram photos of people looking away from the camera, staring into the distance from an infinity pool with some predictably lame caption about “chasing dreams,” lies a reality that’s rarely discussed.
So, if you’ve ever heard the term “porta potty,” you might already have an idea of where this is going.
1. A few years ago, stories began circulating about wealthy Middle Eastern men offering absurd amounts of money to Instagram models and influencers for “private trips.” At first, it sounded like just another form of luxury escort work, but that changed once people saw the conditions attached.
2. Women were being flown out for thousands, sometimes even hundreds of thousands of dollars or more. Not just for sex, but for acts that go far beyond most people’s boundaries. Things that involved being urinated and defecated on. Yes, literally being used as human toilets.
John Paul II - The Only Pope of the Last 100 Years That Truly Mattered🧵
1. Born on May 18, 1920, in Wadowice, Poland. Karol Jozef Wojtyla grew up in a very devout Catholic family. When he was just 8 years old, his mother passed away, and when aged just 12, his brother Edmund, a physician, also passed.
Karol was then primarily raised by his father, Karol Wojtyła Sr. a former army officer and a deeply religious man who instilled in his son a strong sense of discipline and moral integrity. Karol shared a very strong bond with his father, which left a lasting impression on him and would shape the man he would become.
As he entered young adulthood, Karol enrolled at Jagiellonian University in Kraków in 1938, where he studied philosophy and literature. However, his studies were cut short by the outbreak of World War II in 1939. Germany invaded Poland and the university was shut down by the Nazis. Karol was forced to work in a quarry and later in a chemical factory to avoid deportation and in order to be able to support himself.
Karol Wojtyła pictured with his mother, at his First Holy Communion, and as a young man:
2. Despite the dangers of the German occupation, Karol felt a deep calling to the priesthood. In 1942, he began his studies for the priesthood in secret, enrolling in an underground seminary run by the Archbishop of Kraków.
The clandestine studies were carried out in secret flats and secret rooms as religious study had been prohibited by the occupying forces. His commitment to his calling and religion grew deeper in this time despite great danger to himself.
The Often Omitted Fact of Nazis Who Fled to the Middle East, Part III: MODERN DAY INFLUENCE 🧵
In previous threads, I’ve explored the history of Nazis who fled to the Middle East after the Second World War. I discussed the influence they had on Arab Muslim governments and societies, and how that legacy continues to shape modern-day terrorism.
In this thread, the third instalment in the series (though there are several, additional related threads), my goal is simple:
To present clear and compelling evidence of the profound impact Nazi ideology had on parts of the Middle East. This includes the spread of extremist beliefs and the troubling hypocrisy of those who try to label Israel as the “new Nazis.” 🧵:
1. The IDF finds a copy of the Arabic translation of Mein Kampf in a Gazan home:
2. Another example of an Arabic translation of Mein Kampf found in Gaza.
Yes, you read that right. Hugo Boss, the luxury fashion brand known for its high-end menswear, womenswear, accessories, and fragrances, had strong ties to Nazism before and during the Second World War.
To be clear, the purpose of this thread is to inform and point out some ironic historical facts. It is not intended to encourage boycotts or discourage anyone from buying their products.
History is rarely simple, and hopefully this thread will help shed light on just how complex it can be 🧵:
1. Founded in 1924 by Hugo Ferdinand Boss in Metzingen, Germany, the company initially produced general-purpose clothing.
By the 1930s, it began manufacturing uniforms for the Nazi Party, including for the SS, SA, and Hitler Youth.
2. Hugo Boss joined the Nazi Party in 1931, before Hitler rose to power, and his company benefited from contracts to manufacture uniforms.
The SS uniforms in particular were meticulously designed to project authority and fear. While Hugo Boss’s factory didn’t design them, it produced them according to precise specifications and profited significantly in the process.
Hitler’s Admiration for Islam: The Lesser-Known Fact That Shaped Nazi Ideology and, in Turn, Islamic Extremism 🧵
1. Hitler was highly critical of Christianity and its emphasis on compassion, humility and forgiveness. He regarded it as a religion fundamentally incompatible with Nazi ideology and its broader ambitions.
Islam, on the other hand, was seen by Hitler as possessing qualities more suited to conquest and national unity. He often described it as a "warrior religion", praising its focus on discipline and unwavering loyalty.
He admired what he saw as a form of devotion that was absolute, a commitment that would not be easily abandoned or betrayed. In his view, these traits made Islam a more suitable foundation for the kind of authoritarian and militaristic society the Nazis aimed to create.
Hitler and the Grand Mufti Amin al-Husseini
2. Both Hitler and Heinrich Himmler, head of the SS, were privately fascinated by Islam’s militaristic traditions and strict social order.
They believed that, had it taken root in Europe earlier, it might have been more in tune with the spirit and values they wished to instil in the German people. However, despite their admiration, the Nazis would never have officially embraced Islam, as it was ultimately seen as the religion of a racially "inferior" people in their worldview.
This racial hierarchy made any formal association impossible, yet it did not stop Hitler and Himmler from expressing deep respect for what they viewed as Islam’s uncompromising discipline, loyalty and willingness to wage war in the name of belief. Their interest reflected the regime’s broader obsession with strength, order and absolute ideological commitment.
Heinrich Himmler (left) stood next to Adolf Hitler: