🧵 A Short History of the Southern Baptist Convention (#SBC)
200 years ago, the SBC didn’t exist.
Today, it is America’s largest Protestant denomination.
How did it start, and what’s next for the SBC? Scroll down to uncover the fascinating story… (🧵below👇🏼)
🧵 1. Disclaimer about this Thread on the SBC ⚠️
This thread you are about to read is just a brief overview of the SBC. There is no way to cover every event or perspective in a short history like this. I have my sources listed below for further reading on this topic.
Please read with an open mind and a desire to learn more about the SBC.
If you see something missing or needing revision, drop your thoughts in the comments!
Here we go!
[the beginnings of the SBC] 🧵 👇🏼
🧵 2. 1700–1814: Colonial Baptists and the Awakenings (Pre-SBC Roots)
Colonial Baptists emerged as a minority shaped by English confessions and supercharged by the First and Second Great Awakenings.
Frontier revivals produced Separate Baptists who prized believer’s baptism, regenerate church membership, and strict congregational autonomy, yet they also formed loose associations to share preachers and funds.
Cooperation was always instrumental, never coercive, and that instinct to “partner, but not be ruled” became ingrained in southern Baptist DNA.
✴️ Key events: Great Awakenings sweep colonies; early regional associations form.
👤 Key figures: Shubal Stearns, Isaac Backus, John Leland.
As missions required structures and money, the tension between autonomy and coordination sharpened.
🧵 3. 1814–1845: The Triennial Convention and Rising Tension
The 1814 Triennial Convention centralized foreign missions for American Baptists, proving cooperation could scale. Yet disputes over slavery exposed fault lines.
Northern boards refused to appoint slaveholding missionaries; southerners viewed that as moral overreach and economic disenfranchisement.
The argument was no longer whether to cooperate, but who defined its ethical boundaries and controlled its funds. The mission field, ironically, became the arena for a domestic moral crisis.
👤 Key figures: Luther Rice, William B. Johnson, Basil Manly Sr.
Convinced autonomy was essential, southern leaders gathered in Augusta to start anew with the birth of the SBC.
🧵 4. 1845–1865: Birth in Augusta and Survival through War
In May 1845, 293 delegates meeting at First Baptist Church, Augusta, created the Southern Baptist Convention with a minimalist constitution and two mission boards. Evangelistic passion and the defense of slavery were intertwined from inception.
The Civil War soon devastated southern society, but the fledgling Convention held together through itinerant preaching, makeshift gatherings, and lean budgets. Even in crisis, the SBC functioned as a cooperative engine without hierarchy, a pattern that would persist.
👤 Key figures: William B. Johnson, James P. Boyce, Isaac T. Tichenor.
Reconstruction demanded rebuilding and institution-building to stabilize mission work.
🧵 5. 1865–1900: Reconstruction, Institutions, and a Southern Empire
After the war, Southern Baptists worked to rebuild and spread the gospel, focusing on freedpeople, Native Americans, and growing towns. While some efforts reflected the attitudes of the time, many were driven by sincere faith and a willingness to sacrifice.
The Woman’s Missionary Union (1888) and the Sunday School Board (1891) supplied organization and literature, while seminaries in Greenville (later Louisville) and Fort Worth trained pastors.
By century’s end, the SBC dominated Southern Protestantism, marrying revivalist fervor to an increasingly sophisticated institutional framework.
👤 Key figures: Lottie Moon, Annie Armstrong, B. H. Carroll.
Multiple entities now vied for dollars. A unified financial plan became imperative.
🧵 6. 1900–1925: Modern Pressures and the Need for Structure
Rapid growth exposed both financial inefficiency and growing doctrinal uncertainty. With each SBC entity appealing separately for funds, many congregations were overwhelmed by overlapping requests and unclear priorities.
At the same time, debates over evolution, biblical inspiration, and higher criticism stirred deep concern among pastors and laypeople alike, threatening to erode unity. Leaders realized that long-term cooperation would require more than enthusiasm , it needed structure.
A unified giving plan and a clear doctrinal baseline became essential. The goal was to protect missions and sound theology while preserving Baptist distinctives like local church autonomy and voluntary association without creating a top-down hierarchy.
✴️ Key events: Early twentieth-century fundraising drives; mounting doctrinal controversies.
👤 Key figures: E. Y. Mullins, George W. Truett, J. B. Gambrell.
In 1925, Baptists adopted two anchors: a cooperative funding stream and a shared confession.
🧵 7. 1925–1945: Cooperative Program and Baptist Faith and Message
By the 1920s, the SBC faced growing pressure to organize its expanding ministries and clarify its theology. Financial strain, overlapping board appeals, and concerns about liberal theology led to two major 1925 milestones: the launch of the Cooperative Program and the adoption of the first Baptist Faith and Message.
The CP allowed churches to give through one unified channel to support all SBC work. The BF&M (partly a response to modernist ideas) affirmed core doctrines while preserving church autonomy.
Together, they stabilized the Convention through the Great Depression and WWII. As other denominations split over modernism, the SBC quietly reinforced its commitment to biblical authority and cooperative mission.
✴️ Key events: 1925 CP launched; 1925 BF&M adopted; Depression and WWII test the system.
👤 Key figures: M. E. Dodd, L. R. Scarborough, Herschel Hobbs (in the next generation).
Postwar expansion would bring even more growth and expose moral and theological fault lines.
🧵 8. 1945–1965: Boom Years and Blind Spots
In the postwar era, the SBC experienced unprecedented growth. Millions of Americans moved to the Sunbelt, and Southern Baptist churches grew alongside them. Membership surged, seminaries expanded, and institutions like hospitals, publishing houses, and colleges multiplied.
W. A. Criswell became wildly popular and influential in shaping the SBC during this era while Billy Graham’s crusades gave Baptists a global voice in the evangelical world. Yet this era of institutional strength also exposed moral weaknesses.
The Convention often reflected, rather than challenged, the racial attitudes of the segregated South. It spoke forcefully on issues like alcohol and communism, but hesitated (or remained silent) on civil rights and racial equality. The booming growth masked underlying inconsistencies between theology and public ethics, tensions that would surface in the decades ahead.
✴️ Key events: Sunbelt surge; media evangelism; expansion of hospitals, seminaries, and colleges.
👤 Key figures: Billy Graham, W. A. Criswell, R. G. Lee.
The 1963 BF&M revision and growing concern about doctrinal drift would soon push these deeper issues to the surface.
🧵 9. 1965–1978: Civil Rights Crossroads and Doctrinal Shifts
As American society confronted the realities of racial injustice, many SBC churches remained resistant to change. While a few congregations embraced integration, most either avoided the issue or reinforced the status quo.
Despite steady growth, the Convention offered little moral clarity during the civil rights era, while concerns about theological liberalism increased. The 1963 BF&M update aimed to modernize doctrine, but many felt it lacked clarity on biblical authority and inerrancy.
The Broadman Commentary series, published by the SBC’s own press, was accused of promoting neo-orthodox or liberal views, further stoking fears of doctrinal drift. Younger pastors and seminary graduates began to express frustration that the Convention lacked both theological conviction and moral courage.
By the late 1970s, conservative leaders had developed a strategy to recover biblical authority not by changing the system, but by using the system.
👤 Key figures: Herschel Hobbs, Paige Patterson, W. A. Criswell.
In 1979, the Conservative Resurgence began. An organized effort to restore inerrancy and reshape the direction of the SBC.
🧵 10. 1979–2000: Conservative Resurgence
Adrian Rogers’s election in 1979 launched the Conservative Resurgence which was a coordinated movement to restore the SBC’s institutions to a firm stance on biblical inerrancy. Conservatives organized to elect presidents who appointed like-minded trustees, gradually reshaping seminaries and agencies. Faculty changes and doctrinal tightening followed, especially in the SBC’s six seminaries.
Moderates, alarmed by what they saw as politicization and narrowing boundaries, left or formed groups like the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship (1991). In 2000, the BF&M was revised to affirm inerrancy and limit the pastoral office to qualified men.
The result was doctrinal unity and renewed confidence, but also lasting institutional wounds and questions about how reform was pursued.
Following the Conservative Resurgence, SBC leaders shifted focus to structural reform and evangelistic strategy.
The Great Commission Resurgence Task Force (2010) proposed major changes to increase missional effectiveness, redirecting Cooperative Program funds and prioritizing church planting and global outreach. NAMB and IMB streamlined efforts to partner directly with local churches.
At the same time, a surge in Calvinist theology (especially among younger pastors) sparked internal debate. The “Young, Restless, Reformed” movement brought renewed focus on preaching and ecclesiology, but raised concerns about tribalism and theological division.
LifeWay pivoted to digital content, while ethnic and urban engagement gained ground. Designated giving grew, but the SBC’s core institutions remained strong and focused on gospel advancement.
👤 Key figures: J. D. Greear, David Platt, Johnny Hunt, Thom Rainer.
As online discourse and cultural shifts accelerated, deeper tensions within the SBC began to surface.
🧵 12. 2014–2018: Diversity Push, Gender Debates, Digital Crosswinds
By the mid-2010s, SBC debates increasingly played out in public view. Social media amplified tensions, turning internal disagreements into national flashpoints.
Issues of racial reconciliation, gender roles, and political alignment revealed deep generational and cultural divides.
Complementarianism remained official SBC doctrine, but disputes over titles (especially applying “pastor” to women in non-preaching roles) sparked ongoing controversy. At the same time, efforts to broaden ethnic representation and expand minority-led church planting gained momentum.
Disaster relief work continued, and evangelism remained central, but trust in SBC institutions was starting to fray. The Convention’s identity was being shaped as much by online discourse as by confessional statements.
✴️ Key events: Growth of multiethnic networks; early CRT debates; gender/title controversies; public social media conflict.
👤 Key figures: Russell Moore, Beth Moore, Steve Gaines, Fred Luter Jr.
By 2019, explosive revelations about abuse and long-simmering cultural divisions forced the Convention into a reckoning.
🧵 13. 2018–2023: Abuse Reckoning and Pandemic Disruption
In 2019, The Houston Chronicle exposed hundreds of mishandled sexual abuse cases in SBC churches, shaking the Convention. Messengers approved reforms with task forces, a credentials committee, and an offender database. But progress was slow, revealing the limits of SBC polity and the urgency for accountability.
COVID-19 further disrupted church life. Services went online, baptisms declined, and many churches struggled to recover. Membership losses accelerated, and younger generations drifted. In 2023, Saddleback Church was removed for ordaining women pastors, reigniting debates on complementarianism and cooperation.
Yet core ministries endured. IMB missionaries served faithfully, NAMB planted churches, and SBC Disaster Relief remained a trusted witness. Reform efforts gained ground, but questions of leadership, unity, and doctrinal clarity remained unresolved.
👤 Key figures: JD Greear, Rick Warren, Bart Barber, Bruce Frank, Ronnie Floyd, Willie McLaurin
These years tested the SBC’s foundations setting the stage for what kind of future the Convention will choose.
🧵 14. 2023–Future: Renewal, Resolve, and the Road Ahead
Despite deep challenges, the SBC enters the future with enduring strengths: a passion for missions, a grassroots structure, and thousands of churches committed to gospel work.
At the 2023 and 2024 annual meetings, messengers affirmed reforms to address abuse, clarified doctrinal boundaries, and sent a signal that accountability and theological clarity can coexist. IMB missionaries continue to serve among the least reached. Church plants are taking root in urban and multicultural settings.
Disaster relief teams remain a shining witness in times of crisis. Younger leaders are rising with a renewed desire for humility, integrity, and mission over spectacle.
If the SBC can hold fast to its core commitments (Scripture, cooperation, and the Great Commission) it may not just survive but thrive in the decades ahead.
👤 Key figures: Bart Barber, Vance Pitman, H.B. Charles Jr., thousands of local pastors.
The SBC’s future won’t be easy, but neither was its past. Its greatest strength may still be ahead with ordinary churches united by an extraordinary gospel.
🧵 15. Conclusion
This overview is meant to offer a high-level summary of the Southern Baptist Convention’s complex and often contested history. It does not cover every event, institution, figure, or theological nuance, nor does it attempt to resolve all ongoing debates.
The SBC is a diverse and decentralized body. Its history includes both inspiring faithfulness and deep failure, moments of courage and seasons of compromise. You may find that your perspective on certain eras, figures, or controversies differs and that’s entirely welcome.
The goal here is not to provide the final word, but to invite further curiosity, reflection, and conversation about how the SBC became what it is today and what it may become in the future.
Question: What did I miss? What did I get right? What did I get wrong? Let’s keep this conversation going in the comments below! 👇🏼 💬
🧵 Sources & Further Reading
For more reading on this topic, check out several of my sources I used below to compile this thread.
📚 Books
The Baptist Story: From English Sect to Global Movement — Chute, Finn, Haykin
A History of the Baptists — H. Leon McBeth
Baptist Ways — Bill J. Leonard
Southern Baptist Convention: A Sesquicentennial History — Jesse C. Fletcher
One Sacred Effort: The Cooperative Program of Southern Baptists — Chad Owen Brand & David E. Hankins
The Conservative Resurgence in the Southern Baptist Convention — James C. Hefley
Baptists in America: A History — Thomas S. Kidd & Barry Hankins
The SBC and the 21st Century (ed. R. Albert Mohler Jr.)
🖥️ Articles / Essays
Houston Chronicle (2019) investigative series on SBC abuse
“Understanding the Southern Baptist Convention” – The Gospel Coalition, Joe Carter
“The Conservative Resurgence” – 9Marks, Mark Dever
“A Short History of the Southern Baptist Convention” – SBC Website
“Why Saddleback Was Removed from the SBC” – Baptist Press, Brandon Porter
The Baptist Faith & Message: What It Is and Why It Matters” – Baptist Press, David Dockery
In 2011, seven high-profile pastors gathered for an unscripted roundtable called Elephant Room.
It promised raw dialogue on church, theology, & ministry.
But instead, sparked a controversy that reshaped the future of evangelicalism.
🧵 1. What Was the Elephant Room?
In early 2011, an influential Pastor named James MacDonald launched “The Elephant Room”, a roundtable-style event where well-known evangelical pastors tackled controversial topics in ministry.
Framed as an honest, unscripted space for gospel-centered dialogue, it promised clarity through conversation. “Gospel men having gospel conversations,” as MacDonald put it.
But beneath the surface, it stirred deep concerns: could public unity be maintained without theological clarity? Could platform personalities confront error without falling into it?
🧵 2. What Set the Stage for the Elephant Room?
By 2011, evangelicalism was under strain. The seeker-sensitive movement had built massive churches but left many questioning theological substance.
At the same time, the rise of New Calvinism brought renewed focus on gospel centrality, yet it remained fragmented and was still sorting out its convictions on ministry models, cultural engagement, and church practice.
Debates over multisite strategies, prosperity theology, emotionalism, church discipline, cultural relevance, and the rise of celebrity pastors were heating up.
A new generation of leaders was being shaped more by conference stages and YouTube clips than by creeds, confessions, or historic ecclesiology.
The Elephant Room emerged in that moment: an ambitious attempt to unify these competing visions under one roof.
He is one of the most influential theologians of the last century.
But how did a young skeptic become a global voice for gospel clarity & Reformed truth?
This 🧵 traces how Sproul rose & became dominant influence for generations to come 👇
🧵 1. The Childhood of Sproul (1939–1957)
Robert Charles (R.C.) Sproul was born in Pittsburgh on February 13, 1939 into a working-class family with Presbyterian roots but little spiritual depth.
His father, a World War II veteran, suffered multiple strokes after returning home. As a teenager, R.C. gave up sports to help care for him. When his father lay dying, he quoted Scripture, but R.C. (unfamiliar with the Bible) responded harshly. It was the last thing he ever said to him.
That moment of regret would leave a permanent mark on his soul.
🧵 2. The Conversion of R.C. Sproul (1957)
In September 1957, R.C. arrived at Westminster College, not as a believer but as a college athlete looking to have fun.
One night, while heading off campus to drink with friends, he realized he was out of Lucky Strike cigarettes and returned to the dorm to buy more. There, the football team captain invited him to sit and talk about God. After quoting Ecclesiastes, the man spoke with such wisdom and clarity that R.C. was shaken.
That night, beside a cigarette machine, R.C. Sproul was born again.
John MacArthur will likely go down as the most influential pastor /theologian of the 20th and 21st centuries.
Now in the sunset of his ministry, his legacy is clear. Below is a 🧵 on how he became “Pastor John.” 👇🏼
🧵 1. Born Into a Preacher’s Home (1939)
John Fullerton MacArthur Jr. was born June 19, 1939, in Los Angeles, CA. His father, Jack MacArthur, was a Baptist pastor, radio preacher, and conference speaker.
John grew up steeped in Scripture, Christian radio, and ministry life. But his first love wasn’t the pulpit. It was the football field.
In fact, MacArthur dreamed of playing professionally. Friends called him tough, athletic, and competitive. He once said, “I wanted to hit people, not help them.”
But God had other plans.
🧵 2. A Car Crash That Changed Everything (1957)
At 18 years old, John was involved in a horrific car crash on Route 66. He was ejected from the vehicle, flipped through the air, and landed 100 feet away. Miraculously, he lived.
He spent months recovering. But that season wasn’t just physical rehab. It was spiritual awakening.
MacArthur later said:
“God basically put me in a hospital bed and said, ‘Are you ready to listen now?’”
It was then he surrendered to the call of ministry. His dreams of football died on that road, but a lifelong mission to preach Christ was born.
🧵 10 Pivotal Events in Church History
(Part 1: AD 33–500)
Church history is a deep, rich, & complex topic. Many wiser minds have written entire volumes on it.
But this thread is a simple, concise overview for those new to church history or those wanting a quick “snapshot”👇🏼
🧵 1. The Resurrection of Jesus (c. AD 33)
📍 What Happened:
Jesus of Nazareth, crucified by Roman authorities, rose bodily from the dead on the third day and appeared to over 500 eyewitnesses over a span of 40 days. This confirmed.
👤 Key Figures:
Jesus Christ, Mary Magdalene, the apostles, over 500 witnesses (1 Cor. 15:6)
🔎 The Effect:
The resurrection is the cornerstone of Christian faith. It confirmed Jesus’ divinity, proved His power over death, and turned fearful disciples into bold witnesses who launched a global movement.
🧵 2. Pentecost – The Coming of the Spirit (c. 33 AD - Acts 2)
📍 What Happened:
Fifty days after the resurrection, the Holy Spirit descended on believers gathered in Jerusalem. They spoke in tongues and preached the gospel boldly.
👤 Key Figures:
Peter, the 120 disciples, the Jewish pilgrims in Jerusalem
🔎 The Effect:
3,000 were saved. The Church was filled with divine power, and began to grow rapidly across ethnic and linguistic boundaries. The Spirit was now dwelling in God’s people.
🧵 A Short History on Charles Spurgeon: The Prince of Preachers
How did a teen convert with no degree become the most printed preacher in history?
Why do millions still read his sermons over a century later?
Let’s follow the fascinating story of Charles H. Spurgeon. 🧵👇
🧵 1. A Young Soul Set on Fire
Born in 1834 in Kelvedon, Essex, Charles Haddon Spurgeon was raised in a devout home surrounded by Puritan books and old Baptist theology. His grandfather was a pastor, and young Charles often spent hours in his study, devouring the writings of Bunyan, Owen, Baxter, and Flavel. He was intellectually sharp, morally serious, and spiritually hungry from an early age.
But it wasn’t until the age of 15 that the gospel pierced his heart. Lost in a snowstorm, he ducked into a Primitive Methodist chapel, where a lay preacher called out from Isaiah 45:22: “Look unto me, and be ye saved.”
That single verse changed his life. Within a year, he was preaching. Without formal education, titles, or connections, he began to stir hearts with passion and clarity that would define him for the rest of his life.
🧵 2. London’s Boy Preacher
At the age of 19, Spurgeon became pastor of New Park Street Chapel in London. The church was small and aging, but his arrival changed everything.
Crowds exploded. Sermons were printed in newspapers. Critics called him "sensational", but thousands kept coming. By the age of just 22, he was a household name. At just 19, Spurgeon was called to pastor New Park Street Chapel in London. It was a historic church, but its glory days were past. That changed almost overnight. The teenage preacher’s voice thundered through the sanctuary, blending theological depth with engaging humor, vivid word pictures, and urgent gospel appeals.
Crowds surged. Newspapers reported his sermons. Some critics dismissed him as theatrical, but the people kept coming. He preached Christ crucified, not himself. And it showed. By age 22, he was already one of the most recognized voices in the English-speaking world. What London saw as a spectacle, God was using to spark a revival.
His secret? A deep love for Scripture, gospel-centered messages, and a delivery that blended thunder and tenderness. What began as novelty turned into an unstoppable movement of grace.
🧵 IFB 2.0: Exploring Its Modern Groups and Subcultures
This post is an addendum to my previous thread on the history of the IFB, looking beyond the legacy stream (and mainstream connotation) to explore the many distinct circles that make up the fragmented IFB world today. 🧵👇🏼
🧵 Introduction and Disclaimer
Yesterday, my thread on the history of the Independent Fundamental Baptist (IFB) movement absolutely blew up! … and I’m deeply grateful for the thoughtful discussions it sparked.
One theme I consistently heard (both from former IFB members and those still in it) is that the article was fair, accurate, and balanced in how it addressed the broader culture and trajectory of the movement.
That means a lot to me.
That said, many also noted (rightly) that the IFB world isn’t monolithic. There are many circles, camps, and subcultures within the IFB label. some harsher than others, some more refined, and some actively reforming.
My original thread primarily focused on the mainstream connotation of “IFB” which is what most people think of when they hear the term. That includes the revivalist, authoritarian, King James Only stream most closely shaped by Jack Hyles, The Sword of the Lord, and their institutional legacy. This is still the most dominant and influential expression of the movement today.
But in fairness to the diversity within the IFB world, I’ve put together this short addendum highlighting other groups that exist within or adjacent to the IFB. Each with their own tone, emphasis, and theological posture.
Below is a concise overview of several of these distinct IFB-aligned branches. I hope you enjoy this, and let me know in the comments at the end if you are part of (or were part of ) any of these IFB circles. 👇🏼
🧵 1. Hyles/Sword of the Lord Legacy
Rooted in revivalism, King James Onlyism, and loyalty to strongman leadership. This camp includes Hyles-Anderson College, First Baptist Church of Hammond (IN), Jack Trieber (Golden State Baptist College), and Jeff Fugate (Commonwealth Baptist College) and other smaller institutions.
The Sword of the Lord newspaper under Curtis Hutson and Shelton Smith helped define the preaching style, doctrine, and ministry philosophy for decades. Loyalty to high standards and pastoral authority remains central, even as some distance themselves from past scandals.
Preaching is typically topical, emotional, and tied to personal application, with an emphasis on soul-winning, bus ministries, and hard-line separation from worldly culture.
The legacy of Jack Hyles continues to shape this stream’s views on church growth, pastoral power, and family roles. It remains the most visible and controversial face of the IFB to outsiders.