Battle of the Crater and the Siege of Petersburg đź§µ
1/ On July 30, 1864, the Battle of the Crater erupted during the Siege of Petersburg, Virginia—a grueling 9-month campaign that foreshadowed WWI trench warfare. Union Lt. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant’s 100,000 troops besieged Gen. Robert E. Lee’s 50,000 Confederates defending Petersburg, a key rail hub supplying Richmond. The Crater involved a Union mine explosion under Confederate lines, creating chaos but ending in disaster. Total siege casualties exceeded 70,000; the Crater alone claimed 5,300. This thread details the siege’s buildup, the Crater’s drama, and its impact—a brutal chapter in the Civil War’s final year.
Background to the Siege of Petersburg
2/ By spring 1864, Grant’s Overland Campaign had bloodied Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia through battles like the Wilderness and Spotsylvania, costing 55,000 Union casualties. Grant shifted south, crossing the James River to target Petersburg—Richmond’s lifeline with five railroads. Capturing it would starve the Confederate capital. Lee, anticipating the move, rushed troops to defend the city’s 10-mile fortifications. On June 15, Union Maj. Gen. William F. Smith probed but delayed, allowing Lee to reinforce. The siege began as Grant opted for encirclement over direct assault, setting a prolonged stalemate.
Union Arrival and Initial Attacks
3/ Grant’s forces arrived at Petersburg on June 15, 1864, with 18,000 troops under Smith facing just 2,200 Confederates. Hesitant attacks captured some outer works but failed to seize the city, costing 11,000 Union casualties over four days (June 15–18). Maj. Gen. Ambrose Burnside’s IX Corps and others charged fortified lines, met by enfilading fire. By June 18, Lee had 20,000 defenders entrenched. Grant, realizing a quick victory was impossible, ordered trenches dug, initiating a 292-day siege. Skirmishes and raids continued, extending lines to 35 miles as both sides burrowed in.
Stalemate and Trench Warfare
4/ From late June 1864, Petersburg devolved into trench warfare, with soldiers enduring sniper fire, artillery barrages, and disease in muddy ditches. Union lines snaked around the city’s east and south, cutting railroads like the Weldon. Confederates built elaborate fortifications with abatis and bombproofs. Raids, like the June 22 Wilson-Kautz cavalry strike on rails, disrupted supplies but cost heavily. Heat, rats, and dysentery plagued both sides; desertions rose. Grant’s strategy: extend lines to overstretch Lee while probing weaknesses, turning the siege into a war of attrition that favored Union resources.
The Crater Plan and Mining Operation
5/ By July 1864, Burnside’s IX Corps faced a Confederate salient 150 yards away. Lt. Col. Henry Pleasants, a mining engineer, proposed tunneling under it to plant explosives. Approved by Grant and Meade (skeptically), Pennsylvania coal miners dug a 511-foot shaft starting June 25, ventilating with an ingenious air system. By July 23, they placed 8,000 pounds of powder in galleries under the fort. The plan: detonate at dawn July 30, then assault through the breach with Maj. Gen. Edward Ferrero’s USCT division leading, followed by others to exploit the gap toward Petersburg.
Preparations and Last-Minute Changes
6/ As the mine neared completion, tensions rose. Meade, fearing political fallout, replaced Ferrero’s trained Black troops with Ledlie’s inexperienced white division to lead the assault— a decision Grant approved. On July 29, fuses were set for a 3:30 AM blast. Over 15,000 Union troops massed, including Ferrero’s men in reserve. Confederates suspected tunneling but countermines failed to locate it. Lee reinforced the sector with Mahone’s division. Dawn approached amid high hopes for a breakthrough, but the plan’s alterations and poor leadership foreshadowed disaster.
The Explosion and Initial Chaos
7/ At 4:44 AM on July 30, after fuse failures and relighting, the mine detonated with a massive roar, hurling earth, guns, and 300 Confederates skyward. The blast created a 170-foot crater, 30 feet deep. Ledlie’s division charged but milled in the crater, trapped by steep walls and debris. Confederate survivors, stunned but rallying, fired from the rims. Elliott’s South Carolina brigade held the flanks. Union troops, leaderless (Ledlie hid in a bombproof), clustered helplessly as Confederates under Mahone counterattacked by 8:00 AM, turning the breach into a killing ground.
The Assault Turns to Slaughter
8/ As Union divisions piled in, chaos reigned. Ferrero’s USCT troops advanced bravely but faced murderous crossfire in the crater. Hand-to-hand fighting erupted; Confederates bayoneted and shot down into the pit. By 9:30 AM, Mahone’s charge sealed the breach, capturing hundreds. Heat and thirst tormented the trapped; some Union soldiers surrendered, others fought to the death. The attack collapsed by 1:00 PM, with Grant calling it off. Casualties: 3,798 Union (504 dead, 1,881 wounded, 1,413 missing); 1,500 Confederate. The Crater became a symbol of mismanagement and horror.
Aftermath and Investigations
9/ The Battle of the Crater’s failure prolonged the siege, boosting Confederate morale while demoralizing Union troops. Grant lamented it as a “stupendous failure,” blaming poor execution. A court of inquiry faulted Burnside, Ledlie (drunk during battle), and Meade’s changes. Ledlie was dismissed; Burnside resigned. The siege dragged on, with Grant extending lines and raiding rails, like the August Weldon Railroad destruction. Petersburg fell April 2, 1865, after Lee’s lines broke, leading to Appomattox. The Crater’s toll underscored the war’s evolving savagery.
Conclusion
10/ The Siege of Petersburg and Battle of the Crater exemplified the Civil War’s shift to entrenched warfare, costing over 70,000 casualties in a brutal stalemate. Grant’s persistence wore down Lee, but the Crater’s explosion—meant for breakthrough—devolved into a massacre due to flawed leadership and plans. The July 30, 1864, debacle, with 5,300 casualties, highlighted innovation’s risks and human error. Petersburg’s fall sealed the Confederacy’s fate, ending the war within a week. This campaign’s grinding horror foreshadowed modern conflicts, a testament to endurance and sacrifice in America’s bloodiest chapter.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ The American Revolution (1775–1783) killed ~50,000, with battles marked by muskets, bayonets, and disease. Exact casualty counts are estimates—records were spotty, especially for militia and civilians. The bloodiest clashes, ranked by total casualties (dead, wounded, missing/captured), shaped the fight for independence. From Bunker Hill’s early shock to Yorktown’s climax, these battles tested patriot resolve against British might. This thread details the top 8, based on best estimates, exploring context, combat, and toll—a brutal foundation for a new nation.
Battle of Bunker Hill (June 17, 1775)
2/ Bunker Hill (mostly Breed’s Hill), near Boston, saw ~2,440 casualties (British ~1,150; American ~450 dead/wounded, 30 captured). 2,200 British under Gen. William Howe attacked 1,200 patriots under Col. William Prescott on fortified hills. Three frontal assaults faced musket volleys—“Don’t fire until you see the whites of their eyes!” British victory came at a cost: 226 dead, 828 wounded. Americans lost 140 dead, 310 wounded. The battle’s heavy toll boosted patriot morale, proving they could stand against redcoats, setting a defiant tone for the war.
Battle of Camden (August 16, 1780)
3/ Camden, South Carolina, inflicted ~2,224 casualties (American ~900 dead/wounded, 1,000 captured; British ~324). Maj. Gen. Horatio Gates’ 3,700 patriots, mostly militia, faced Lt. Gen. Charles Cornwallis’ 2,100 regulars. A dawn British charge shattered untrained American lines; militia fled, leaving Continentals overrun. Gates’ rout was the war’s worst patriot defeat, costing 250 dead, 650 wounded, 1,000 prisoners. British losses were 68 dead, 256 wounded. Camden emboldened Loyalists but spurred patriot regrouping under Nathanael Greene.
Marquis de Lafayette, America’s French Ally 🧵
1/ Marquis de Lafayette, the young French noble who became a Revolutionary War hero, forged a bond with America that shaped its fight for independence. His daring and devotion earned him lasting fame. Join me to explore his life of courage and alliance—a story of passion and liberty.
Early Life
2/ Marie-Joseph Paul Yves Roch Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de Lafayette, was born on September 6, 1757, in Chavaniac, France, to a wealthy aristocratic family. His father, Michel de Lafayette, died in battle when he was 2, leaving his mother, Marie-Louise, to raise him. Educated in Paris at the Collège du Plessis, Lafayette joined the French army at 13, his noble roots and ambition fueling a drive for glory.
Pre-Revolutionary Career
3/ By 1771, Lafayette was a second lieutenant in the French Musketeers, training under elite officers. Inspired by Enlightenment ideals and America’s rebellion, he defied King Louis XVI’s orders in 1777, purchasing a ship to sail to America at 19. Arriving in South Carolina, he offered his services to the Continental Congress, seeking to aid the Patriot cause.
1/ On this day in history: July 30, 1945 – The USS Indianapolis, a heavy cruiser that had just delivered critical components for the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, was sunk by two torpedoes from the Japanese submarine I-58 in the Philippine Sea. The ship went down in just 12 minutes, marking one of the worst naval disasters in U.S. history. Of the nearly 1,200 crew aboard, about 300 perished immediately – but for the 900 who made it into the water, the real nightmare was just beginning. Let’s unpack the horrors they endured over the next four days.
2/ The initial sinking was chaotic: Hit just after midnight, the first torpedo blew off the bow, and the second struck amidships, causing explosions and fires. Many men were asleep; others were thrown overboard. The ship listed heavily, and with communications knocked out, no distress signal was sent – or at least, none was acted upon promptly. Survivors clung to debris, life rafts, and each other in oil-slicked waters, unaware that rescue might not come for days.
3/ As dawn broke, the men faced extreme exposure: Floating in shark-infested Pacific waters under a relentless sun, with no food, little fresh water, and temperatures swinging from scorching days to chilling nights. Dehydration set in quickly; many drank seawater, leading to saltwater poisoning – causing delirium, violent convulsions, and death. Hallucinations plagued survivors, with some imagining islands or ships that weren’t there.
General Hunter Liggett, WWI American Commander đź§µ
1/ General Hunter Liggett, a key American commander in World War I, helped solidify victory over Germany with his strategic leadership of the First Army. A career soldier, his life exemplified perseverance and tactical brilliance. Join me to explore his journey from frontier posts to European battlefields—a story of duty and innovation.
Early Life
2/ Hunter Liggett was born on March 21, 1857, in Reading, Pennsylvania, to a modest family. His father, James Liggett, a farmer and miller, and mother, Margery Templeton Liggett, raised him with values of hard work. Educated locally, Liggett entered West Point in 1875 on a competitive appointment, graduating 3rd in his class (1879). His academic excellence and determination set the foundation for a distinguished military career.
Early Military Career
3/ Commissioned a second lieutenant in the 5th Infantry in 1879, Liggett served on the Western frontier, garrisoning posts in Montana and Texas. He participated in campaigns against Native tribes, honing skills in logistics and small-unit tactics. Promoted to first lieutenant in 1884, his steady service and administrative prowess marked him as a rising officer in the peacetime army.
8 Bloodiest Battles or Operations of the Korean War
1/ On this day, July 27, 1953, the Korean War armistice was signed at Panmunjom, ending three years of conflict that killed over 2.5 million. No peace treaty followed, leaving the peninsula divided. The war’s bloodiest battles featured U.S. and South Korean forces, with allied support, against North Korean/Chinese armies in brutal terrain. This thread ranks the top 8 by estimated casualties, from Chosin’s freeze to Pusan’s siege, exploring context, combat, and toll—a grim legacy of the “Forgotten War.”
Battle of the Chosin Reservoir (November 27–December 13, 1950)
2/ Chosin Reservoir was the Korean War’s bloodiest, with ~78,000 casualties (U.S. ~17,843 including non-battle; Chinese ~60,000 est.). 15,000 U.S. Marines and Army troops faced 120,000 Chinese in sub-zero cold. Ambushed in mountains, U.S. forces fought a fighting retreat, using air support and artillery. Frostbite claimed thousands; the “Frozen Chosin” became legend. The U.S. evacuation saved forces but at horrific cost, halting Chinese advances and stabilizing the front, a strategic draw amid tactical hell.
Battle of the Pusan Perimeter (August 4–September 18, 1950)
3/ Pusan Perimeter claimed ~100,000 casualties (U.S./South Korean/allied ~20,000; North Korean ~80,000 est.). U.S. and South Korean forces ~140,000, with some British/Australian support, defended a 140-mile perimeter against 98,000 North Koreans. Intense fights at Naktong Bulge and Taegu featured tank battles and infantry assaults. U.S. air/naval superiority and reinforcements broke the siege. The victory stabilized South Korea, enabling Inchon landing, but its grinding attrition set the war’s tone for stalemate.
Thread: McClellan Takes Command and the Army of the Potomac đź§µ
1/ On this day in 1861—July 26—following the Union defeat at the First Battle of Bull Run, Major General George B. McClellan assumed command of the newly formed Army of the Potomac. McClellan, a West Point graduate and experienced engineer, was tasked with rebuilding and organizing the demoralized forces around Washington, D.C. He transformed it into a well-drilled army of over 100,000 men, emphasizing training and logistics. However, his cautious approach would later draw criticism from President Lincoln for delays in engaging Confederate forces.
2/ McClellan’s tenure ended on November 9, 1862, when he was relieved by Lincoln after the Antietam Campaign. Despite stopping Lee’s invasion of Maryland, McClellan failed to pursue the retreating Confederates aggressively, frustrating the administration. He was replaced by Major General Ambrose E. Burnside, a loyal subordinate known for his distinctive sideburns and prior successes like capturing Roanoke Island. Burnside reluctantly accepted, inheriting an army eager for action but soon leading it into the disastrous Battle of Fredericksburg in December.
3/ Burnside’s command lasted only until January 26, 1863, following the humiliating defeat at Fredericksburg, where Union forces suffered over 12,000 casualties in futile frontal assaults against entrenched Confederates. His ill-fated “Mud March” in January further eroded confidence. Lincoln replaced him with Major General Joseph Hooker, a brash and ambitious officer nicknamed “Fighting Joe.” Hooker reorganized the army, improved morale with better rations and furloughs, and boasted of bold plans, leading to the Chancellorsville Campaign in the spring.