🧵 In February 1974, before his arrest and exile, Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote "Live Not By Lies" - his final message to the Soviet people. His insight is crucial for understanding why Educational Liberty advocates reject School Choice programs. 
Solzhenitsyn spent 8 years in Stalin's gulags. He won the Nobel Prize for exposing Soviet totalitarianism in works like "The Gulag Archipelago." But his most practical advice wasn't about grand resistance - it was about personal integrity in the face of systemic lies.
His key insight: Totalitarian systems survive not primarily through force, but through the PARTICIPATION and COMPLICITY of ordinary people who know the system is built on lies but go along with it anyway for personal safety or advantage.
The simplest and most accessible key to our self-neglected liberation lies right here: Personal non-participation in lies." - Solzhenitsyn. The system collapses when people simply refuse to repeat what they know to be false.
He argued: Stop repeating lies you know are false. Stop participating in ceremonies you know are fake. Stop supporting causes you know are wrong. Stop pretending to believe propaganda. The entire system depends on your complicity.
How does this apply to School Choice? The fundamental lie: That ESA programs, vouchers, and tax credits represent genuine educational freedom when they actually EXTEND government control over previously independent institutions.
The participation: When private schools, churches, and homeschool families accept ESA funding despite KNOWING it will compromise their independence. They participate in the lie that government funding can coexist with genuine autonomy.
The corruption: These institutions become dependent on and complicit with the very system they once criticized. They can no longer speak truth about government education because they're now part of it. Mission drift follows funding.
School Choice advocates say: "We can take Caesar's coins and remain independent."
But Solzhenitsyn would ask: "Why are you participating in a system you know corrupts everything it touches? Why validate the lie with your complicity?"
But Solzhenitsyn would ask: "Why are you participating in a system you know corrupts everything it touches? Why validate the lie with your complicity?"
Every private school that accepts ESA funding validates the premise that government should fund education. Every church that takes vouchers legitimizes state authority over religious instruction. Every homeschool family that accepts tax credits endorses the system.
The lie becomes: "We can work within the system to change it." Solzhenitsyn knew better. The system changes YOU, not the other way around. Regulatory capture is inevitable. Independence gradually erodes until only the appearance remains.
Sweden believed the lie. Their voucher system was supposed to preserve educational diversity while providing funding. Result: Educational decline, increased segregation, and eventual government control over all schools. The "choice" became an illusion.
Michigan believed the lie. Charter schools were supposed to create competition and innovation. Result: "Notorious for weak oversight," poor performance, and taxpayer-funded mediocrity. The promise of excellence became systematic failure.
College funding believed the lie. Federal student aid was supposed to make higher education accessible and affordable. Result: Skyrocketing costs, administrative bloat, ideological conformity, and graduates buried in debt. The promise became a trap.
Solzhenitsyn's alternative: "Live not by lies." In education, this means building truly independent institutions even when it's harder. It means choosing the difficult path of private funding over the seductive ease of government programs.
Practical application: Support institutions like New Saint Andrews College and Classical Conversations that reject government funding. Choose homeschool curricula that receive no state approval. Support churches that maintain educational ministries without seeking tax benefits.
The cost is real: Higher tuition, fewer resources, greater sacrifice. But Solzhenitsyn understood that freedom requires sacrifice. "The kingdom of lies has, before our very eyes, been built by our hands." It can also be dismantled by them.
Educational Liberty advocates aren't being stubborn or idealistic. They're applying Solzhenitsyn's wisdom: Refusing to participate in systems they know are corrupt, even when participation offers short-term advantages. Truth and freedom are worth the cost.
"And he who is not sufficiently courageous to defend his soul — don't let him be proud of his 'progressive' views, & don't let him boast that he is an academician or a people's artist, a distinguished figure or a general. Let him say to himself: I am in the herd, and a coward." - Solzhenitsyn
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
