1/ The 1870-1925 "prosperity" was built on three pillars of violence:
2/ 1. Reconstruction-era suppression of Black labor value (wages undercut by Jim Crow)
3/ 2. Indigenous land seizures enabling speculative booms (1.5 billion acres stolen by 1920)
4/ 3. Imperialist looting of Global South resources (US fruit companies in Honduras, oil in Mexico)
5/ Lebergott's metrics obscure class reality:
• Top 1% held 45% wealth by 1916 (IRS data)
• 40% of industrial workers lived in poverty (1912 Senate report)
• Life expectancy for urban poor: under 30 (SSA records)
6/ This wasn't shared prosperity—it was primitive accumulation’s final frenzy.
7/ The immigrant labor surplus served capital’s needs:
• Broke 1877 & 1894 railroad strikes
• Depressed wages by 30% in key industries (steel, textiles)
• Enabled Taylorist speed-ups that doubled injuries
8/ "Prosperity" flowed upward while workers died at 3x today’s rate.
9/ The era’s technological gains were confiscated by capital:
• Real wages rose just 0.6% annually 1870-1914 (vs. 4% productivity gains)
• Rockefeller’s fortune grew 1000x while miners starved
• 35,000 workers died yearly in accidents (equivalent to 9/11 every month)
10/ This wasn’t capitalism "working"—it was capitalism unchecked:
• No child labor laws until 1938
• No minimum wage until 1938
• No OSHA until 1970
The bloodstained foundation of modern inequality.
📢 Engage: Does "prosperity" mean anything when 1% capture 90% of gains? #GildedAge2
📘 Sources:
• @EconomicPolicy’s wage-productivity gap studies
• @HenryLouisGates; Stony the Road on Reconstruction economics
• @CambridgeCore Journal of Economic History’s Gilded Age mortality data
@EconomicPolicy @HenryLouisGates @CambridgeCore 💡 Final Thought: "Lebergott measured GDP growth. Marxists measure coffins built and strikes broken."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Piketty’s r>g formula brilliantly quantifies capital’s inherent inequality drive—but his reformist solutions ignore the political reality: capital always dismantles regulations when worker power wanes. The post-war "intervention" was itself a product of revolutionary threats.
2/ The fatal flaw in Piketty’s "regulation" prescription:
• Capital controls of the 1940s were imposed under Soviet/union pressure
• Progressive taxation peaked alongside labor militancy (CIO strikes)
• Financial deregulation began immediately as working-class power declined
The mid-20th century prosperity of the U.S. and Northern Europe was not proof that capitalism "works"—but rather evidence of what happens when capital is temporarily forced to concede to working-class power. 🧵⬇️
This period was an exception, not a rule, and its conditions were unsustainable by design.
1. The Myth of the "Golden Age"
The post-war boom (1945-1975) was built on three unstable pillars:
1/ The images from Gaza are not just "tragedy"—they are the deliberate, calculated result of Zionism’s settler-colonial project, backed by the full force of US-led imperialism.
2/ Children eating sand, journalists wasting to death on camera, mass starvation as policy: this is not collateral damage. It is the logical endpoint of a racist, expansionist state built on ethnic cleansing.
THREAD: The empire’s collapse might not mean chaos—but opportunity. Let’s break down why fracturing America could weaken capital and empower people's movements. 🧵
1/ The United States is crumbling from within. Political gridlock, wild regional inequalities, and cultural civil wars reveal a failed imperial project. Rather than fear balkanization, socialists should prepare to turn fragmentation into liberation.
2/ The myth of American "unity" has always masked brutal contradictions. Mississippi and New York might as well be different countries economically. The Pacific Northwest and Deep South share no common political vision. This isn't a nation - it's a coerced empire.
THREAD: The Hidden Empire—How U.S. Private Investors Gobble Up Global Land (And Why It Matters) 🧵
1/ While everyone talks about US military bases abroad, a quieter conquest is happening: American private investors buying up foreign land at record rates. From Brazilian farms to Lisbon apartments, here’s what’s happening—and why it’s neo-colonialism.
2/ FARMLAND GRABS: US agribusiness and pension funds control 8.3 million hectares of foreign soil—equal to 80% of Portugal. Much is in Brazil, where soy barons like SLC Agricola profit from deforestation.
1/8 The great divergence began in 2001. As America spent $2.3 trillion destroying Afghanistan (@BrownUniversity), China built the Qinghai-Tibet Railway—the world's highest train line. Twenty years later, US failure stares at Chinese rails reaching Europe. #PostAmericanWorld
2/8 $8 trillion in US war spending bought chaos. China's $8.1 trillion infrastructure investment built 40,000km of high-speed rail, lifted 800M from poverty, and achieved higher life expectancy than America (@WHO). Bombs boost @LockheedMartin's stock; bridges boost longevity.