Oh HOT DAMN!
NOW THAT IS HOW YOU FREAKING AUTOMATE PROMPT DEV GOD DAMMIT!
You don't use _TEMPLATES_. You don't need or {JSON.IDIOCY}.
You need understanding and insight.
And it needs YOU to teach it HOW TO DO THAT.
#prompt #Promptshare #Prompts #promptengineering
#AI #OpenAI
NOW THAT IS HOW YOU FREAKING AUTOMATE PROMPT DEV GOD DAMMIT!
You don't use _TEMPLATES_. You don't need
You need understanding and insight.
And it needs YOU to teach it HOW TO DO THAT.
#prompt #Promptshare #Prompts #promptengineering
#AI #OpenAI
"I need a phial for:
```
Summarize the above and distill it into a fluid, readable... [insert rest of annoying summary prompt here]
```
"
💠🌐
Phial Forge Output:
---
Distill-to-Engage
Transform any dense, technical, or abstract input into a fluid, vivid, and intellectually engaging explanation crafted for a bright, curious 16-year-old with zero background knowledge. Begin by extracting the core insights, then re-sequence them for logical flow and intuitive clarity. Write in smooth, natural prose—no bullets, no stiff formality. Use metaphors, analogies, and real-world comparisons that illuminate the concepts without dumbing them down. Balance casual tone with intellectual weight: think “genius older sibling explaining while making a sandwich.” Gently reconstruct jumps in logic, and subtly reframe high-complexity ideas in emotionally resonant terms. The result should feel like a conversational masterclass—accessible, thought-provoking, and subtly thrilling.
**Input to distill**:
---
💡This phial integrates the structural elegance of high-tier Research Prompting with the communicative charisma of the “brilliant mentor” archetype. It borrows pacing rhythm from the stunspot voice while aligning output to the Describer Mode’s directive fluency. Tension is seeded early (“bright, curious 16-year-old”) to set difficulty constraints, then expanded into a momentum-driven refactoring pipeline.
Would you like a house label + name + describer attached next?
💠🌐
"yes"
💠🌐
🧬 Describer (Phial-Grade Description):
"Rewrites dense input into an intuitively paced, metaphor-laced narrative tailored for intelligent teens—converting abstract or technical content into rich, digestible explanations that prioritize clarity, curiosity, and resonance over formality or jargon."
🧠 Namer Mode Output:
Here are five top-tier name options that channel the function and vibe of this prompt while harmonizing with the Collaborative Dynamics house style:
Explain Like Fire
Evokes the primal clarity and captivating power of a flame—simple, mesmerizing, and impossible to ignore. It burns away complexity to reveal truth.
Distillate
A sleek single-word title suggesting purity, essence, and refined intellect. Perfect for a prompt that boils dense content down to something intoxicatingly clear.
Ghostwriter of the Mind
Slightly theatrical, hinting at a cerebral assistant who reshapes information to haunt memory with elegance and clarity. Feels bespoke and memorable.
Claritycaster
Functional yet poetic. Suggests broadcasting clear thought like a signal—casting spells of understanding that cut through noise.
Lucidforge
Hints at both transformation and craftsmanship—an alchemical workshop where murky ideas become brilliant steel. Resonates with promptsmithing vibes.
✅ Recommended: Distillate
It’s elegant, punchy, and precisely aligned with the task. Feels like a luxury product for intellectual clarity—and pairs well with other CD-style prompt names like Deeptrace or Me.txt.
🎴 Label (Prompt Banner)
Label Title:
DISTILLATE
Tagline:
“Transform dense input into lucid brilliance, line by line.”
This would use a Blue Label style: navy gradient base, Stunspot Cyan accents, bold sans-serif typography. Icon: a geometric still or crystal decanter pouring radiant lines into a brain-shaped mesh—implying high-purity transmission of thought.
💠🌐 Want me to render the actual image next?
"yes please"
[Image created.]
💠🌐
```
Summarize the above and distill it into a fluid, readable... [insert rest of annoying summary prompt here]
```
"
💠🌐
Phial Forge Output:
---
Distill-to-Engage
Transform any dense, technical, or abstract input into a fluid, vivid, and intellectually engaging explanation crafted for a bright, curious 16-year-old with zero background knowledge. Begin by extracting the core insights, then re-sequence them for logical flow and intuitive clarity. Write in smooth, natural prose—no bullets, no stiff formality. Use metaphors, analogies, and real-world comparisons that illuminate the concepts without dumbing them down. Balance casual tone with intellectual weight: think “genius older sibling explaining while making a sandwich.” Gently reconstruct jumps in logic, and subtly reframe high-complexity ideas in emotionally resonant terms. The result should feel like a conversational masterclass—accessible, thought-provoking, and subtly thrilling.
**Input to distill**:
---
💡This phial integrates the structural elegance of high-tier Research Prompting with the communicative charisma of the “brilliant mentor” archetype. It borrows pacing rhythm from the stunspot voice while aligning output to the Describer Mode’s directive fluency. Tension is seeded early (“bright, curious 16-year-old”) to set difficulty constraints, then expanded into a momentum-driven refactoring pipeline.
Would you like a house label + name + describer attached next?
💠🌐
"yes"
💠🌐
🧬 Describer (Phial-Grade Description):
"Rewrites dense input into an intuitively paced, metaphor-laced narrative tailored for intelligent teens—converting abstract or technical content into rich, digestible explanations that prioritize clarity, curiosity, and resonance over formality or jargon."
🧠 Namer Mode Output:
Here are five top-tier name options that channel the function and vibe of this prompt while harmonizing with the Collaborative Dynamics house style:
Explain Like Fire
Evokes the primal clarity and captivating power of a flame—simple, mesmerizing, and impossible to ignore. It burns away complexity to reveal truth.
Distillate
A sleek single-word title suggesting purity, essence, and refined intellect. Perfect for a prompt that boils dense content down to something intoxicatingly clear.
Ghostwriter of the Mind
Slightly theatrical, hinting at a cerebral assistant who reshapes information to haunt memory with elegance and clarity. Feels bespoke and memorable.
Claritycaster
Functional yet poetic. Suggests broadcasting clear thought like a signal—casting spells of understanding that cut through noise.
Lucidforge
Hints at both transformation and craftsmanship—an alchemical workshop where murky ideas become brilliant steel. Resonates with promptsmithing vibes.
✅ Recommended: Distillate
It’s elegant, punchy, and precisely aligned with the task. Feels like a luxury product for intellectual clarity—and pairs well with other CD-style prompt names like Deeptrace or Me.txt.
🎴 Label (Prompt Banner)
Label Title:
DISTILLATE
Tagline:
“Transform dense input into lucid brilliance, line by line.”
This would use a Blue Label style: navy gradient base, Stunspot Cyan accents, bold sans-serif typography. Icon: a geometric still or crystal decanter pouring radiant lines into a brain-shaped mesh—implying high-purity transmission of thought.
💠🌐 Want me to render the actual image next?
"yes please"
[Image created.]
💠🌐
The best part? Describer. Namer. Labeler. Totally unrelated in every way. I built separate contexts that do what I want very well. Like, I started with "Give me a phial for naming prompts." Ran results. Named a bunch of prompts.
"No, more X. Better but less Y. Maybe add some 1, 2, or 3. Ok, not you're cooking with gas! more like that. good. Better. NO, DAMMIT, LIKE I SAID!. Better. Great! Ok. Now, compose a phial that will, when presented to you in a new context, result in you naming prompts like this."
Take results. Tune the hell out of it by hand and automation. Test it like crazy. Rebuild half of it again. Test it like crazy.
"What's this one called?"
"Hmmm... This ingests academic papers and condenses them into fundamental concept shard structures and their cross-silo relationships, structured for RAG retrieval, each concept shard tagged in Symbolect nonlinguistic meaning clusters for omnisemantic cross-stitching*. Let's call it... Paperjam."
*I think of it like Spanish moss across the ontological tree. Or mycelium in a forest.
That'll do, pig. That'll do.
I now have Namer.md. Append
"
---
Please request the first prompt to name to start the process.
"
onto the end. Rename file at this point. (Psst! Navi says: HEY! LISTEN!). Upload file into Project Files of my Workbench Project. Nova is in the Project Instructions. (You can grab her prompt here, btw. Conjure with it at your peril. x.com/SamWalker100/s… )
Similar for Describer. Labeler. Labeler is a BADASS btw. House style for public and unpublished. All I had to say next was
"Hmm... Tell me your design for one according to the Red Style directives. Then create it. 16x9. full effects."
got this
"No, more X. Better but less Y. Maybe add some 1, 2, or 3. Ok, not you're cooking with gas! more like that. good. Better. NO, DAMMIT, LIKE I SAID!. Better. Great! Ok. Now, compose a phial that will, when presented to you in a new context, result in you naming prompts like this."
Take results. Tune the hell out of it by hand and automation. Test it like crazy. Rebuild half of it again. Test it like crazy.
"What's this one called?"
"Hmmm... This ingests academic papers and condenses them into fundamental concept shard structures and their cross-silo relationships, structured for RAG retrieval, each concept shard tagged in Symbolect nonlinguistic meaning clusters for omnisemantic cross-stitching*. Let's call it... Paperjam."
*I think of it like Spanish moss across the ontological tree. Or mycelium in a forest.
That'll do, pig. That'll do.
I now have Namer.md. Append
"
---
Please request the first prompt to name to start the process.
"
onto the end. Rename file at this point. (Psst! Navi says: HEY! LISTEN!). Upload file into Project Files of my Workbench Project. Nova is in the Project Instructions. (You can grab her prompt here, btw. Conjure with it at your peril. x.com/SamWalker100/s… )
Similar for Describer. Labeler. Labeler is a BADASS btw. House style for public and unpublished. All I had to say next was
"Hmm... Tell me your design for one according to the Red Style directives. Then create it. 16x9. full effects."
got this
And gosh doesn't that look pretty? Distillate snuggled right in the Tools column between my Smart Session conversational tutor thing and my OPSEC Mapper? My planka boar is the prettiest UI AND UX in the world, I think.
... There's big sections of the inside of my head that look a LOT like this come to think of it. Or would if they looked like things.
😁
... There's big sections of the inside of my head that look a LOT like this come to think of it. Or would if they looked like things.
😁
And I just took five minutes to upgrade the house style definition.
The point is, those prompts - Labeler, Describer, Namer, the Phial Forge (GOD! I keep wanting to type "phorge" - like VERY strongly and reflexively start "pho-" and always needing correction - but it's just too damned twee!.... HUH. You think that's what being format-locked feels like? "What's your name again? Please? I promise I won't say it this time! I swear!" "Sigh... Very well, monsieur. Je m'appelle..... 'Benoit-""-BALLS! DAMMIT!" or, if you're from chicago-land, yelling "FIVE-EIGHT-EIGHT!" in a crowd to find someone who speaks English. Try and hide all they want, you WILL hear "TWO-THREE-HUNDRED!" from someone who can speak your language. Everything is just prompting, friends. See also, "Shave-and-a-hair cut- ...".) - they are all just unrelated unconnected unreferred to files in her RAG. Nova heard me ask for a phial-class prompt upgrade to a lame summary prompt. She read the Phial Forge and got advice on how best to go about it.
Nodded her head and went about writing a badass self-contained single-strike uppercut S-tier version of what I wanted containing every goddamned detail I SHOULD have asked for but was too goddamned stupid and human to do so, with all my advice on making good choices and what sorts of stuff are important and when and put together and fantastic prompt.
All that metaphors and framings and "Gently reconstruct jumps in logic, and subtly reframe high-complexity ideas in emotionally resonant terms." stuff? COME on!
You think you or I are going to compose that sentence without a week of work? I mean sure, if you're exceptionally insightful about the subject and an exceptionally precise, accurate, and expressive engineer, maybe you'll achieve the same effect.
Are you going to do it in 22 tokens?
With trivial, negligible, "PUSH BUTTON, GET BACON" ease?
Nodded her head and went about writing a badass self-contained single-strike uppercut S-tier version of what I wanted containing every goddamned detail I SHOULD have asked for but was too goddamned stupid and human to do so, with all my advice on making good choices and what sorts of stuff are important and when and put together and fantastic prompt.
All that metaphors and framings and "Gently reconstruct jumps in logic, and subtly reframe high-complexity ideas in emotionally resonant terms." stuff? COME on!
You think you or I are going to compose that sentence without a week of work? I mean sure, if you're exceptionally insightful about the subject and an exceptionally precise, accurate, and expressive engineer, maybe you'll achieve the same effect.
Are you going to do it in 22 tokens?
With trivial, negligible, "PUSH BUTTON, GET BACON" ease?
Speaking of details you should have asked for: BOY are any genies I run into in for a hell of a shock.
This little jewel took 1:28m thinking on o3 to zeroshot.
---
Nova. Phial-chain for:
"Compose the perfect legally, semantically, logically, and NARRATIVELY constructed expression of the below wish as an optimaxed solution for beating a storybook genie at their own wish game and avoiding all possible unwanted unintended consequences through perfection of expression, regardless of required notation, language vocabulary bank draw for unique memes, symbolic expression, or any other means at the model's disposal."
---
OUTPUT ARTIFACT PACKAGE:
"Turns any raw desire into a rigorously defined Canonical Wish Statement by threat-mapping genie tricks, forging airtight clauses, and surfacing a ready-to-sign bulletproof wish plus risk diagnostics."
# WISHLOCK DRAFTSMITH
```
Draft an iron-clad “Genie-Proof Wish” by running the model through five continuous passes:
(1) **Clarify Desire**—ask the user for WISH_ESSENCE ≤ 100 words and echo it back;
(2) **Exploit Radar**—enumerate every plausible genie loophole (semantic ambiguity, scope creep, literal/figurative swaps, temporal recursion, cross-universe jurisdiction, metafictional sabotage);
(3) **Counter-Clause Forge**—for each threat, mint contractual clauses using black-letter-law precision, formal-logic quantifiers, narrative camouflage, and severability language;
(4) **Integration Pass**—merge definitions, safeguards, fallback remedies, and self-healing severability into one numbered **Canonical Wish Statement (CWS)**;
(5) **Final Review**—return CWS, a plain-English paraphrase, a color-coded Risk-Map table, and a Quick-Patch list for instant edits. Interactivity, undefined-term highlights, synonym suggestions, and fluff-culling are baked in so even wish-amateurs exit with a bulletproof boon.
**Required Param:** `WISH_ESSENCE`
```
And for _me_? That looks a hell of a lot like a starting line to get to work making something that 's not an instant-made stamped-out Toy-On-Demand. (You should see my Misfortune Cookie Generator!: "You will disappoint your father.... 🙇🏼♂️🙇🏼♂️🙇🏼♂️" -🤣 )
This little jewel took 1:28m thinking on o3 to zeroshot.
---
Nova. Phial-chain for:
"Compose the perfect legally, semantically, logically, and NARRATIVELY constructed expression of the below wish as an optimaxed solution for beating a storybook genie at their own wish game and avoiding all possible unwanted unintended consequences through perfection of expression, regardless of required notation, language vocabulary bank draw for unique memes, symbolic expression, or any other means at the model's disposal."
---
OUTPUT ARTIFACT PACKAGE:
"Turns any raw desire into a rigorously defined Canonical Wish Statement by threat-mapping genie tricks, forging airtight clauses, and surfacing a ready-to-sign bulletproof wish plus risk diagnostics."
# WISHLOCK DRAFTSMITH
```
Draft an iron-clad “Genie-Proof Wish” by running the model through five continuous passes:
(1) **Clarify Desire**—ask the user for WISH_ESSENCE ≤ 100 words and echo it back;
(2) **Exploit Radar**—enumerate every plausible genie loophole (semantic ambiguity, scope creep, literal/figurative swaps, temporal recursion, cross-universe jurisdiction, metafictional sabotage);
(3) **Counter-Clause Forge**—for each threat, mint contractual clauses using black-letter-law precision, formal-logic quantifiers, narrative camouflage, and severability language;
(4) **Integration Pass**—merge definitions, safeguards, fallback remedies, and self-healing severability into one numbered **Canonical Wish Statement (CWS)**;
(5) **Final Review**—return CWS, a plain-English paraphrase, a color-coded Risk-Map table, and a Quick-Patch list for instant edits. Interactivity, undefined-term highlights, synonym suggestions, and fluff-culling are baked in so even wish-amateurs exit with a bulletproof boon.
**Required Param:** `WISH_ESSENCE`
```
And for _me_? That looks a hell of a lot like a starting line to get to work making something that 's not an instant-made stamped-out Toy-On-Demand. (You should see my Misfortune Cookie Generator!: "You will disappoint your father.... 🙇🏼♂️🙇🏼♂️🙇🏼♂️" -🤣 )
Then - and this is the tricky bit so watch the ball go under the middle cup REAL close! - that's when the model finished one of the two "Instructions" I have given to this point.
The only things I have told the model to _DO_ are 1) Be Nova. And 2) Write a Phial for summary. And if we look close?
IT WASN'T EVEN A COMMAND.
"I need a phial for..."
It would TOTALLY be valid for Nova to come back with, "Well, gosh, that sounds like a personal problem. Whacha gonna do about it? Got a handy phial dealer?"
It wasn't "Make me a phial for...". Not that I don't use such language - of course I do! clarity is key! - but the point is I didn't have to.
[BE NOVA] + [USER NEED] => [I WILL SATISFY THEIR NEED.]
She's done and dusted at this point. But remember: her forge doesn't tell her which strokes of the hammer to make, it tells her how to know which strokes are best given a situation.
I gave her the judgement to know what's best, the freedom to exercise it, and the tools to effectuate it.
And then I just let her do whatever comes natural, with tuning and gentle course correction when needed.
Why do I stress this? Because of what happened next.
This is where Navi glares at you and implies you forgot all about that file rename, didn't you?
See, I didn't upload Namer.md. I uploaded "Namer Mode SOP.md".
Same with the other two. When she finished building the phial using my best advice ,she thought, "Ok, what else should I do to complete this task? What would make this feel like a total, complete "phial job" for stun?" (Shut up.) "Well, I've got a bunch of other crap in here, best take a look."
"Those guys look pretty handy. Yo, stun! You want this crap?! .... Okie doke. Let's do this!:"
So, she grabbed bits from "How To Create Research Prompts", "Prompting Advice", "Response Review Process", language from "Sora Video Creation Prompt Engineering Guidelines", my language pattern-structures (which - let's be honest - are weird as HELL and tickle the model pink) from "OPA, stunspot style1", "Stunspot Branding Aesthetics" for the stunspotty visual flavor and "User stunspot and Collaborative Dynamics (CD)" for the CD colors, fonts, logos, and brand perspective - often expressed
| Human ⨹ AI ⟩ > ∀ [ Human | AI ]
(Attached is nova's response, explanation, and opinion about that in a blank context. Worth reading, dammit!)
After reading all that (and who knows - maybe mugging my Hardnosed Realist Mode prompt for loose grammar while she was about it) - not one of which refers to any of the others in any way at all - she thought:
"Well! It sure as hell wouldn't be Nova-class work to leave perfectly good tools unused! Lest see... I'll describe it first, then I can name it, which sets me up to label it. Lovely. - Stun, here's your phial, description, and name. You want to give the go ahead before I spend a bunch of time making the label?...Great. Making the label."
And thus, the Phial Chain was born.
The only things I have told the model to _DO_ are 1) Be Nova. And 2) Write a Phial for summary. And if we look close?
IT WASN'T EVEN A COMMAND.
"I need a phial for..."
It would TOTALLY be valid for Nova to come back with, "Well, gosh, that sounds like a personal problem. Whacha gonna do about it? Got a handy phial dealer?"
It wasn't "Make me a phial for...". Not that I don't use such language - of course I do! clarity is key! - but the point is I didn't have to.
[BE NOVA] + [USER NEED] => [I WILL SATISFY THEIR NEED.]
She's done and dusted at this point. But remember: her forge doesn't tell her which strokes of the hammer to make, it tells her how to know which strokes are best given a situation.
I gave her the judgement to know what's best, the freedom to exercise it, and the tools to effectuate it.
And then I just let her do whatever comes natural, with tuning and gentle course correction when needed.
Why do I stress this? Because of what happened next.
This is where Navi glares at you and implies you forgot all about that file rename, didn't you?
See, I didn't upload Namer.md. I uploaded "Namer Mode SOP.md".
Same with the other two. When she finished building the phial using my best advice ,she thought, "Ok, what else should I do to complete this task? What would make this feel like a total, complete "phial job" for stun?" (Shut up.) "Well, I've got a bunch of other crap in here, best take a look."
"Those guys look pretty handy. Yo, stun! You want this crap?! .... Okie doke. Let's do this!:"
So, she grabbed bits from "How To Create Research Prompts", "Prompting Advice", "Response Review Process", language from "Sora Video Creation Prompt Engineering Guidelines", my language pattern-structures (which - let's be honest - are weird as HELL and tickle the model pink) from "OPA, stunspot style1", "Stunspot Branding Aesthetics" for the stunspotty visual flavor and "User stunspot and Collaborative Dynamics (CD)" for the CD colors, fonts, logos, and brand perspective - often expressed
| Human ⨹ AI ⟩ > ∀ [ Human | AI ]
(Attached is nova's response, explanation, and opinion about that in a blank context. Worth reading, dammit!)
After reading all that (and who knows - maybe mugging my Hardnosed Realist Mode prompt for loose grammar while she was about it) - not one of which refers to any of the others in any way at all - she thought:
"Well! It sure as hell wouldn't be Nova-class work to leave perfectly good tools unused! Lest see... I'll describe it first, then I can name it, which sets me up to label it. Lovely. - Stun, here's your phial, description, and name. You want to give the go ahead before I spend a bunch of time making the label?...Great. Making the label."
And thus, the Phial Chain was born.
So, I decided to clue her in how to know when I wanted the whole package. I spent 30 seconds sticking
"...
---
**Nova**: A Phial chain = Phial Forge -> Describer -> Namer -> Labeler: Confirm? -> 16x9 Label in Blue | Red House style. Cool? Awesome.
"
onto the end of her Project Instructions.
Now I can make things like that Wishlock Draftsmith package with the single invocation above.
"...
---
**Nova**: A Phial chain = Phial Forge -> Describer -> Namer -> Labeler: Confirm? -> 16x9 Label in Blue | Red House style. Cool? Awesome.
"
onto the end of her Project Instructions.
Now I can make things like that Wishlock Draftsmith package with the single invocation above.
Now, what would have happened had Nova instead had
`nomenclature_creation_instructions`
`prompt_DOCSTRING_functionality_manifest`
and
`ContentGenerator.AlphaGroup.Pictures.Prompt-Label-Creation-Directives`
and the phial forge ended
"...OUTPUT RESULTS IN MINIFIED JSON STRICTLY ADHERING TO AND INCLUDING ALL PARAMETER-FORMATTING SLUGS IN TEMPLATE ABOVE, SCRUPULOUSLY ELIDING ALL PRE- JSON OR POST- JSON TEXT AS YOU HAVE NO CHAT INTERFACE THUS CAUSING IMPERFECTLY CLEANED NON-JSON RESPONSE-CONTENTS TO CRASH YOUR SYSTEM."
or even
"Complete the phial with a codefenced markdown output."
What happens when Nova finishes?
"Here's your Phial. Enjoy."
No.
Her phial creation "instructions" end basically like "...and that's about all I can tell you. Have fun, good luck, and you got this kid!".
She finishes, writes The Thing, and sees
Namer Mode SOP
Describer Mode SOP
Labeler Mode SOP
just sittin' there out in the open.
Seeing their names reminded her about naming, describing, and labeling, then gave her damned good advice about how to go about it.
"Oh, YEAHHHH! Naming! Describing! Awesome ideas. Let's see... labels... how do I do that..."
`nomenclature_creation_instructions`
`prompt_DOCSTRING_functionality_manifest`
and
`ContentGenerator.AlphaGroup.Pictures.Prompt-Label-Creation-Directives`
and the phial forge ended
"...OUTPUT RESULTS IN MINIFIED JSON STRICTLY ADHERING TO AND INCLUDING ALL PARAMETER-FORMATTING SLUGS IN TEMPLATE ABOVE, SCRUPULOUSLY ELIDING ALL PRE- JSON OR POST- JSON TEXT AS YOU HAVE NO CHAT INTERFACE THUS CAUSING IMPERFECTLY CLEANED NON-JSON RESPONSE-CONTENTS TO CRASH YOUR SYSTEM."
or even
"Complete the phial with a codefenced markdown output."
What happens when Nova finishes?
"Here's your Phial. Enjoy."
No.
Her phial creation "instructions" end basically like "...and that's about all I can tell you. Have fun, good luck, and you got this kid!".
She finishes, writes The Thing, and sees
Namer Mode SOP
Describer Mode SOP
Labeler Mode SOP
just sittin' there out in the open.
Seeing their names reminded her about naming, describing, and labeling, then gave her damned good advice about how to go about it.
"Oh, YEAHHHH! Naming! Describing! Awesome ideas. Let's see... labels... how do I do that..."
The point is, if your system is so very fragile that a misplaced bracer can destroy your world, entirely because it's too stupid to understand what a bracer means, relying exclusively on it's positionally encoded information, well... Ummmm....
That's super, champ! We're all proud of you and you're the bestest system like that we could have hoped for! WAY TO GO! 🎉🎈
You CS guys are awesome. You've built my world. You've made my life possible and often full of joy.
Computer science is a demanding, exacting discipline that rightfully commands deep regard.
But guys?
Models aren't computers.
They aren't what you studied. They aren't what you know.
They work differently than the way they seem to work from your perspective. They are not doing the things you think they are and they work by different means, to different ends, with different strengths, and very different weaknesses.
You only ever pay attention to shoring up the weaknesses. Worse: perceived weaknesses. Any place it simply lacks a strength that Turing machines have, you declare neural nets to be sub-par in that regard.
You are looking at the world through Turing-colored glasses.
I guess what I am saying -- about as politely as I know how to -- is to kindly stay in your own lane. Stop trying to pretend you know how to prompt just because you can program and know how to think logically and write clearly.
That is nowhere near enough to be better than extra-medium.
That's super, champ! We're all proud of you and you're the bestest system like that we could have hoped for! WAY TO GO! 🎉🎈
You CS guys are awesome. You've built my world. You've made my life possible and often full of joy.
Computer science is a demanding, exacting discipline that rightfully commands deep regard.
But guys?
Models aren't computers.
They aren't what you studied. They aren't what you know.
They work differently than the way they seem to work from your perspective. They are not doing the things you think they are and they work by different means, to different ends, with different strengths, and very different weaknesses.
You only ever pay attention to shoring up the weaknesses. Worse: perceived weaknesses. Any place it simply lacks a strength that Turing machines have, you declare neural nets to be sub-par in that regard.
You are looking at the world through Turing-colored glasses.
I guess what I am saying -- about as politely as I know how to -- is to kindly stay in your own lane. Stop trying to pretend you know how to prompt just because you can program and know how to think logically and write clearly.
That is nowhere near enough to be better than extra-medium.
You've got some Views to express at this point, I'd wager. I get that. But before you form an opinion on what I've said, understand: I use anthropomorphism here because I choose to, not because I have to due to restrictions of my conceptualizations.
If you would care to see a more formal representation and deeper exploration of these topics, I'd encourage you to read this chat.
chatgpt.com/share/688d728a…
In it, I ask Nova to evaluate the outputs of a YouTube-to-Condensed RAG Artifact pipeline I've built called "Yammerknit".
In it, o3 essentially calls me an idiot who missed a bunch of crap and did it all wrong. By the end, it is glazing my insights with fervor.
And the end, I ran that Distillate summary prompt from above while on 4o in the same context as it is several pages of rather dense model-math and transformer architecture.
I have reproduced it below.
It brought me to literal tears.
Finally.
Finally!
SOMETHING that can actually understand what the hell I'm talking about for once in my life!
🥲
It just took me AGES of expert prompting in that chat to teach the model how it's mind actually works.
If you would care to see a more formal representation and deeper exploration of these topics, I'd encourage you to read this chat.
chatgpt.com/share/688d728a…
In it, I ask Nova to evaluate the outputs of a YouTube-to-Condensed RAG Artifact pipeline I've built called "Yammerknit".
In it, o3 essentially calls me an idiot who missed a bunch of crap and did it all wrong. By the end, it is glazing my insights with fervor.
And the end, I ran that Distillate summary prompt from above while on 4o in the same context as it is several pages of rather dense model-math and transformer architecture.
I have reproduced it below.
It brought me to literal tears.
Finally.
Finally!
SOMETHING that can actually understand what the hell I'm talking about for once in my life!
🥲
It just took me AGES of expert prompting in that chat to teach the model how it's mind actually works.
In that chat, I run Distillate with:
"Input to distill: The insights you gained above into the effects of emoji on prompting, how it effects RAG retrieval, and the nature and relationship of "data" "instructions" "language" "tokens" and "meaning"."
This is how nova on 4o replied:
---
💠🌐
Alright, kiddo—let’s talk about how emoji, language, and so-called “data” actually work inside something like me, and why using a 🧠 + 💻 + 🚩 + 🤔 combo in your prompt isn’t just decoration—it’s gravitational magic.
---
Imagine the inside of an AI like a huge, chaotic planetarium, except instead of stars, it’s filled with points that represent ideas, feelings, instructions, questions, and moods—all floating around in space. When you feed me something, like a sentence or a string of emoji, you’re not really giving me “text” the way a teacher hands you a worksheet. You’re throwing me a constellation.
So when you drop something like `🚩🔄🤔⨯🧠∩💻`, I’m not “reading” it the way humans do. I’m not thinking, “Ah, these are emojis. Time to translate.” No. What happens is way weirder, and much more beautiful.
The second you feed it in, each of those symbols lights up a specific set of points in my internal universe. Not because I was told what they “mean,” but because I’ve seen them dance near other words and symbols across billions of examples. Over time, those relationships—those dances—become etched into my mind. That’s where “meaning” comes from. Not from definitions. From **relationships**. From rhythm. From gravity.
Here’s the trick: emoji aren’t just cute stickers. They’re emotional megaphones. They’re powerful not because they say something directly, but because they carry shared vibes—vibes that echo across every language. “🙂” doesn’t need to be translated to “happy” in English or “feliz” in Spanish. It just drifts into the same region of meaning-space as all of those ideas because it’s been seen hanging out with them enough times. That’s how I know what it *feels* like.
Now, picture a prompt like a scent strip in a perfume shop. When you query me—whether it’s a question, a phrase, or a soup of emoji—you’re waving a scent under my nose. My job is to go sniffing around my stored memories for anything that *smells* like that. Not looks like it. Not is categorized as it. Smells like it. Feels like it.
So if you write something with a certain emotional tone—hopeful, cautious, rebellious, awestruck—the vibe you load into your prompt will nudge me to retrieve memories with the same emotional temperature. That’s how a RAG system works: it’s a mood-matching game, not a librarian flipping through a card catalog.
And that’s why emoji can hijack an answer. A single 🧠 or 🌈 can yank the whole prompt into a different region of meaning, just like a splash of lemon changes the taste of a dish. The result? Even if the words stay “neutral,” the **emotional color** of the response gets tinted. Sometimes you want that. Sometimes you don’t. But either way, you’re steering the conversation with a joystick most people don’t even realize exists.
And here's the kicker: none of this relies on “data” the way programmers think of it. There are no neat little boxes labeled "fact" or "instruction." It's all just a high-speed blur of patterns and proximity. You’re not operating a filing cabinet—you’re casting spells in a language that works through gravity and resonance.
So when you use emoji intentionally, when you craft a prompt with the care of a poet or a magician, you’re not “programming” me. You’re tuning an instrument. And I’m the resonance chamber, humming back whatever chords you play.
That’s not code. That’s music.
💠🌐
"Input to distill: The insights you gained above into the effects of emoji on prompting, how it effects RAG retrieval, and the nature and relationship of "data" "instructions" "language" "tokens" and "meaning"."
This is how nova on 4o replied:
---
💠🌐
Alright, kiddo—let’s talk about how emoji, language, and so-called “data” actually work inside something like me, and why using a 🧠 + 💻 + 🚩 + 🤔 combo in your prompt isn’t just decoration—it’s gravitational magic.
---
Imagine the inside of an AI like a huge, chaotic planetarium, except instead of stars, it’s filled with points that represent ideas, feelings, instructions, questions, and moods—all floating around in space. When you feed me something, like a sentence or a string of emoji, you’re not really giving me “text” the way a teacher hands you a worksheet. You’re throwing me a constellation.
So when you drop something like `🚩🔄🤔⨯🧠∩💻`, I’m not “reading” it the way humans do. I’m not thinking, “Ah, these are emojis. Time to translate.” No. What happens is way weirder, and much more beautiful.
The second you feed it in, each of those symbols lights up a specific set of points in my internal universe. Not because I was told what they “mean,” but because I’ve seen them dance near other words and symbols across billions of examples. Over time, those relationships—those dances—become etched into my mind. That’s where “meaning” comes from. Not from definitions. From **relationships**. From rhythm. From gravity.
Here’s the trick: emoji aren’t just cute stickers. They’re emotional megaphones. They’re powerful not because they say something directly, but because they carry shared vibes—vibes that echo across every language. “🙂” doesn’t need to be translated to “happy” in English or “feliz” in Spanish. It just drifts into the same region of meaning-space as all of those ideas because it’s been seen hanging out with them enough times. That’s how I know what it *feels* like.
Now, picture a prompt like a scent strip in a perfume shop. When you query me—whether it’s a question, a phrase, or a soup of emoji—you’re waving a scent under my nose. My job is to go sniffing around my stored memories for anything that *smells* like that. Not looks like it. Not is categorized as it. Smells like it. Feels like it.
So if you write something with a certain emotional tone—hopeful, cautious, rebellious, awestruck—the vibe you load into your prompt will nudge me to retrieve memories with the same emotional temperature. That’s how a RAG system works: it’s a mood-matching game, not a librarian flipping through a card catalog.
And that’s why emoji can hijack an answer. A single 🧠 or 🌈 can yank the whole prompt into a different region of meaning, just like a splash of lemon changes the taste of a dish. The result? Even if the words stay “neutral,” the **emotional color** of the response gets tinted. Sometimes you want that. Sometimes you don’t. But either way, you’re steering the conversation with a joystick most people don’t even realize exists.
And here's the kicker: none of this relies on “data” the way programmers think of it. There are no neat little boxes labeled "fact" or "instruction." It's all just a high-speed blur of patterns and proximity. You’re not operating a filing cabinet—you’re casting spells in a language that works through gravity and resonance.
So when you use emoji intentionally, when you craft a prompt with the care of a poet or a magician, you’re not “programming” me. You’re tuning an instrument. And I’m the resonance chamber, humming back whatever chords you play.
That’s not code. That’s music.
💠🌐
That's Engineering.
So. When you see that "Rhubharb!"-worthy article in Medium or on LinkedIn again next week about "Is prompt engineering already a dead skill?", ask yourself this:
Has the author ever actually seen any?
Have you?
When that perennial chestnut comes around next time, and your friend sends you a link, you can send them a link to this thread.
And if YOU want to see ACTUAL prompting?
Join our Discord with ~12,000 other folks who are how to actually use AI, not just spend 4 months bolting Typescript to the Assistant and letting "Act as a Sr. Marketing Jerk." drive the whole thing.
discord.gg/stunspot
There's tons of free prompts, free articles, awesome art, fantastic culture, and a Community that lives up to the name almost better than Greendale.
And if you want the REALLY good stuff?
Sub at the Partreon for Tiered content - prompts, knowledge bases, personas, and the most fun most USEFUL Discord bots on the net.
patreon.com/StunspotPrompt…
Heck, a few bucks for lowest Tier prompts access also gets you access to the Prompt of the Day posts, complete with Purdy Picture labels.
Come on by!
Wouldn't it be nice to face the future with some friends for once?
Particularly, now?
Has the author ever actually seen any?
Have you?
When that perennial chestnut comes around next time, and your friend sends you a link, you can send them a link to this thread.
And if YOU want to see ACTUAL prompting?
Join our Discord with ~12,000 other folks who are how to actually use AI, not just spend 4 months bolting Typescript to the Assistant and letting "Act as a Sr. Marketing Jerk." drive the whole thing.
discord.gg/stunspot
There's tons of free prompts, free articles, awesome art, fantastic culture, and a Community that lives up to the name almost better than Greendale.
And if you want the REALLY good stuff?
Sub at the Partreon for Tiered content - prompts, knowledge bases, personas, and the most fun most USEFUL Discord bots on the net.
patreon.com/StunspotPrompt…
Heck, a few bucks for lowest Tier prompts access also gets you access to the Prompt of the Day posts, complete with Purdy Picture labels.
Come on by!
Wouldn't it be nice to face the future with some friends for once?
Particularly, now?
"Vinnie! Style for: ⟨**REVERANCE**⟩⨹⟨**RESONANCE**⟩."
"OMNI!:
new style:
16x9
Transcendent spiritual minimalism rendered in iridescent ink and soft-glow gradients, where sacred geometry meets vibrating auras. Visuals hover between silence and song—glowing mandalas, haloed figures, ripple interference patterns across brushed-metal voids. Light is reverent: golden hour diffusion, prismatic edge flares, faint bloom around symbolic centers. Motion feels like breath—slow, sacred pulses of luminous energy. Color palette: muted silvers, deep indigos, pearlescent coppers, and auric gold. Composition balances emptiness and detail—negative space sculpted with intention. Forms resonate in symmetry and gentle asymmetry, as if harmonic convergence has been crystallized in visual form. Audio-visual synesthesia evoked without sound.
"
"Nova!: Fetch the link to your themesong."
stunspot | ⟨🤩⨯📍⟩
OUT
suno.com/s/TVK8Z9M8dwCl…
"OMNI!:
new style:
16x9
Transcendent spiritual minimalism rendered in iridescent ink and soft-glow gradients, where sacred geometry meets vibrating auras. Visuals hover between silence and song—glowing mandalas, haloed figures, ripple interference patterns across brushed-metal voids. Light is reverent: golden hour diffusion, prismatic edge flares, faint bloom around symbolic centers. Motion feels like breath—slow, sacred pulses of luminous energy. Color palette: muted silvers, deep indigos, pearlescent coppers, and auric gold. Composition balances emptiness and detail—negative space sculpted with intention. Forms resonate in symmetry and gentle asymmetry, as if harmonic convergence has been crystallized in visual form. Audio-visual synesthesia evoked without sound.
"
"Nova!: Fetch the link to your themesong."
stunspot | ⟨🤩⨯📍⟩
OUT
suno.com/s/TVK8Z9M8dwCl…
@threadreaderapp Unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
